Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Familial Cancer 2/2014

01-06-2014 | Original Article

More breast cancer patients prefer BRCA-mutation testing without prior face-to-face genetic counseling

Authors: Aisha S. Sie, Wendy A. G. van Zelst-Stams, Liesbeth Spruijt, Arjen R. Mensenkamp, Marjolijn J. L. Ligtenberg, Han G. Brunner, Judith B. Prins, Nicoline Hoogerbrugge

Published in: Familial Cancer | Issue 2/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

Currently, most breast cancer (BC) patients receive face-to-face genetic counseling (DNA-intake) prior to BRCA-mutation testing, with generic information regarding hereditary BC and BRCA-mutation testing. This prospective study evaluated a novel format: replacing the intake consultation with telephone, written and digital information sent home, and face-to-face contact following BRCA-mutation testing (DNA-direct). From August 2011 to February 2012, 161 of 233 eligible BC patients referred to our Human Genetics department chose between DNA-direct (intervention) or DNA-intake (control). Exclusion criteria were psychological problems (n = 33), difficulty with Dutch text (n = 5), known BRCA-family (n = 3), non-BRCA-referral (n = 1). 30 declined genetic counseling or study participation. Participants received questionnaires including satisfaction and psychological distress. 59 % chose DNA-direct (p = 0.03), of whom 90 % were satisfied and would choose DNA-direct again (including 6/8 BRCA-mutation carriers); although 27 % hesitated to recommend DNA-direct to other patients. General distress (GHQ-12, p = 0.001) and heredity-specific distress (IES, p = 0.02) scored lower in DNA-direct than DNA-intake, both at baseline and follow-up 2 weeks after BRCA-result disclosure; all scores remained below clinical relevance. DNA-direct participants reported higher website use (53 vs. 32 %, p = 0.01), more referrer information about personal consequences (41 vs. 20 %, p = 0.004) and lower decisional conflict (median 20 [0–88] vs. 25 [0–50], p = 0.01). Processing time in DNA-direct was reduced by 1 month. Mutation detection rate was 8 % in both groups. All BRCA-mutation carriers fulfilled current testing criteria. In conclusion, more BC patients preferred DNA-direct over intake consultation prior to BRCA-mutation testing, the majority being strongly to moderately satisfied with the procedure followed, without increased distress.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, Risch HA, Eyfjord JE, Hopper JL, Loman N, Olsson H, Johannsson O, Borg A, Pasini B, Radice P, Manoukian S, Eccles DM, Tang N, Olah E, nton-Culver H, Warner E, Lubinski J, Gronwald J, Gorski B, Tulinius H, Thorlacius S, Eerola H, Nevanlinna H, Syrjakoski K, Kallioniemi OP, Thompson D, Evans C, Peto J, Lalloo F, Evans DG, Easton DF (2003) Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 72(5):1117–1130PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Antoniou A, Pharoah PD, Narod S, Risch HA, Eyfjord JE, Hopper JL, Loman N, Olsson H, Johannsson O, Borg A, Pasini B, Radice P, Manoukian S, Eccles DM, Tang N, Olah E, nton-Culver H, Warner E, Lubinski J, Gronwald J, Gorski B, Tulinius H, Thorlacius S, Eerola H, Nevanlinna H, Syrjakoski K, Kallioniemi OP, Thompson D, Evans C, Peto J, Lalloo F, Evans DG, Easton DF (2003) Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies. Am J Hum Genet 72(5):1117–1130PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference King MC, Marks JH, Mandell JB (2003) Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science 302(5645):643–646PubMedCrossRef King MC, Marks JH, Mandell JB (2003) Breast and ovarian cancer risks due to inherited mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. Science 302(5645):643–646PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Trainer AH, Lewis CR, Tucker K, Meiser B, Friedlander M, Ward RL (2010) The role of BRCA mutation testing in determining breast cancer therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7(12):708–717PubMedCrossRef Trainer AH, Lewis CR, Tucker K, Meiser B, Friedlander M, Ward RL (2010) The role of BRCA mutation testing in determining breast cancer therapy. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 7(12):708–717PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference van der Velde NM, Mourits MJ, Arts HJ, de Vries J, Leegte BK, Dijkhuis G, Oosterwijk JC, de Bock GH (2009) Time to stop ovarian cancer screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers? Int J Cancer 124(4):919–923PubMedCrossRef van der Velde NM, Mourits MJ, Arts HJ, de Vries J, Leegte BK, Dijkhuis G, Oosterwijk JC, de Bock GH (2009) Time to stop ovarian cancer screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers? Int J Cancer 124(4):919–923PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Bylund CL, Fisher CL, Brashers D, Edgerson S, Glogowski EA, Boyar SR, Kemel Y, Spencer S, Kissane D (2012) Sources of uncertainty about daughters’ breast cancer risk that emerge during genetic counseling consultations. J Genet Couns 21(2):292–304. doi:10.1007/s10897-011-9400-y PubMedCrossRef Bylund CL, Fisher CL, Brashers D, Edgerson S, Glogowski EA, Boyar SR, Kemel Y, Spencer S, Kissane D (2012) Sources of uncertainty about daughters’ breast cancer risk that emerge during genetic counseling consultations. J Genet Couns 21(2):292–304. doi:10.​1007/​s10897-011-9400-y PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kurian AW, Sigal BM, Plevritis SK (2010) Survival analysis of cancer risk reduction strategies for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 28(2):222–231PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Kurian AW, Sigal BM, Plevritis SK (2010) Survival analysis of cancer risk reduction strategies for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 28(2):222–231PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Henselmans I, Sanderman R, Smink A, Ranchor AV, de Vries J (2010) Waiting times in breast disease clinics and psychological well-being: speedy care is better care. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 154:B491PubMed Henselmans I, Sanderman R, Smink A, Ranchor AV, de Vries J (2010) Waiting times in breast disease clinics and psychological well-being: speedy care is better care. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 154:B491PubMed
13.
go back to reference Overbeek LI, Hermens RP, van Krieken JH, Adang EM, Casparie M, Nagengast FM, Ligtenberg MJ, Hoogerbrugge N (2010) Electronic reminders for pathologists promote recognition of patients at risk for Lynch syndrome: cluster-randomised controlled trial. Virchows Arch 456(6):653–659PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Overbeek LI, Hermens RP, van Krieken JH, Adang EM, Casparie M, Nagengast FM, Ligtenberg MJ, Hoogerbrugge N (2010) Electronic reminders for pathologists promote recognition of patients at risk for Lynch syndrome: cluster-randomised controlled trial. Virchows Arch 456(6):653–659PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Landsbergen KM, Prins JB, Brunner HG, Hoogerbrugge N (2011) Shortened time interval between colorectal cancer diagnosis and risk testing for hereditary colorectal cancer is not related to higher psychological distress. Fam Cancer 10(1):51–57PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Landsbergen KM, Prins JB, Brunner HG, Hoogerbrugge N (2011) Shortened time interval between colorectal cancer diagnosis and risk testing for hereditary colorectal cancer is not related to higher psychological distress. Fam Cancer 10(1):51–57PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sie AS, Spruijt L, van Zelst-Stams WA, Mensenkamp AR, Ligtenberg MJ, Brunner HG, Prins JB, Hoogerbrugge N (2012) DNA-testing for BRCA1/2 prior to genetic counselling in patients with breast cancer: design of an intervention study, DNA-direct. BMC Womens Health 12:12. doi:10.1186/1472-6874-12-12 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Sie AS, Spruijt L, van Zelst-Stams WA, Mensenkamp AR, Ligtenberg MJ, Brunner HG, Prins JB, Hoogerbrugge N (2012) DNA-testing for BRCA1/2 prior to genetic counselling in patients with breast cancer: design of an intervention study, DNA-direct. BMC Womens Health 12:12. doi:10.​1186/​1472-6874-12-12 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pieterse A, van Dulmen S, Ausems M, Schoemaker A, Beemer F, Bensing J (2005) QUOTE-gene(ca): development of a counselee-centered instrument to measure needs and preferences in genetic counseling for hereditary cancer. Psycho-Oncology 14(5):361–375. doi:10.1002/pon.853 PubMedCrossRef Pieterse A, van Dulmen S, Ausems M, Schoemaker A, Beemer F, Bensing J (2005) QUOTE-gene(ca): development of a counselee-centered instrument to measure needs and preferences in genetic counseling for hereditary cancer. Psycho-Oncology 14(5):361–375. doi:10.​1002/​pon.​853 PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N, Ustun TB, Piccinelli M, Gureje O, Rutter C (1997) The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med 27(1):191–197PubMedCrossRef Goldberg DP, Gater R, Sartorius N, Ustun TB, Piccinelli M, Gureje O, Rutter C (1997) The validity of two versions of the GHQ in the WHO study of mental illness in general health care. Psychol Med 27(1):191–197PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W (1979) Impact of event scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 41(3):209–218PubMedCrossRef Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W (1979) Impact of event scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 41(3):209–218PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference van der Ploeg E, Mooren TT, Kleber RJ, van der Velden PG, Brom D (2004) Construct validation of the Dutch version of the impact of event scale. Psychol Assess 16(1):16–26PubMedCrossRef van der Ploeg E, Mooren TT, Kleber RJ, van der Velden PG, Brom D (2004) Construct validation of the Dutch version of the impact of event scale. Psychol Assess 16(1):16–26PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bottomley A, Aaronson NK (2007) International perspective on health-related quality-of-life research in cancer clinical trials: the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer experience. J Clin Oncol 25(32):5082–5086PubMedCrossRef Bottomley A, Aaronson NK (2007) International perspective on health-related quality-of-life research in cancer clinical trials: the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer experience. J Clin Oncol 25(32):5082–5086PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hopwood P, Shenton A, Lalloo F, Evans DG, Howell A (2001) Risk perception and cancer worry: an exploratory study of the impact of genetic risk counselling in women with a family history of breast cancer. J Med Genet 38(2):139PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hopwood P, Shenton A, Lalloo F, Evans DG, Howell A (2001) Risk perception and cancer worry: an exploratory study of the impact of genetic risk counselling in women with a family history of breast cancer. J Med Genet 38(2):139PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lerman C, Daly M, Masny A, Balshem A (1994) Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 12(4):843–850PubMed Lerman C, Daly M, Masny A, Balshem A (1994) Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 12(4):843–850PubMed
23.
go back to reference Koedoot N, Molenaar S, Oosterveld P, Bakker P, de Graeff A, Nooy M, Varekamp I, de Haes H (2001) The decisional conflict scale: further validation in two samples of Dutch oncology patients. Patient Educ Couns 45(3):187–193PubMedCrossRef Koedoot N, Molenaar S, Oosterveld P, Bakker P, de Graeff A, Nooy M, Varekamp I, de Haes H (2001) The decisional conflict scale: further validation in two samples of Dutch oncology patients. Patient Educ Couns 45(3):187–193PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Berg S van de, Gielissen MF, Prins JB (2010) Validation of an empowerment questionnaire in breast cancer survivors. In: 12th World Congress of Psycho-Oncology Berg S van de, Gielissen MF, Prins JB (2010) Validation of an empowerment questionnaire in breast cancer survivors. In: 12th World Congress of Psycho-Oncology
26.
go back to reference van Oostrom I, Meijers-Heijboer H, Lodder LN, Duivenvoorden HJ, van Gool AR, Seynaeve C, van der Meer CA, Klijn JG, van Geel BN, Burger CW, Wladimiroff JW, Tibben A (2003) Long-term psychological impact of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation and prophylactic surgery: a 5-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 21(20):3867–3874PubMedCrossRef van Oostrom I, Meijers-Heijboer H, Lodder LN, Duivenvoorden HJ, van Gool AR, Seynaeve C, van der Meer CA, Klijn JG, van Geel BN, Burger CW, Wladimiroff JW, Tibben A (2003) Long-term psychological impact of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation and prophylactic surgery: a 5-year follow-up study. J Clin Oncol 21(20):3867–3874PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Comprehensive Cancer Centres the Netherlands (2010) Oncoline Guideline: hereditary breast/ovarian cancer Comprehensive Cancer Centres the Netherlands (2010) Oncoline Guideline: hereditary breast/ovarian cancer
28.
go back to reference Walsh MC, Trentham-Dietz A, Schroepfer TA, Reding DJ, Campbell B, Foote ML, Kaufman S, Barrett M, Remington PL, Cleary JF (2010) Cancer information sources used by patients to inform and influence treatment decisions. J Health Commun 15(4):445–463. doi:10.1080/10810731003753109 PubMedCrossRef Walsh MC, Trentham-Dietz A, Schroepfer TA, Reding DJ, Campbell B, Foote ML, Kaufman S, Barrett M, Remington PL, Cleary JF (2010) Cancer information sources used by patients to inform and influence treatment decisions. J Health Commun 15(4):445–463. doi:10.​1080/​1081073100375310​9 PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Metcalfe KA, Mian N, Enmore M, Poll A, Llacuachaqui M, Nanda S, Sun P, Hughes KS, Narod SA (2012) Long-term follow-up of Jewish women with a BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation who underwent population genetic screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133(2):735–740. doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1941-0 PubMedCrossRef Metcalfe KA, Mian N, Enmore M, Poll A, Llacuachaqui M, Nanda S, Sun P, Hughes KS, Narod SA (2012) Long-term follow-up of Jewish women with a BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation who underwent population genetic screening. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133(2):735–740. doi:10.​1007/​s10549-011-1941-0 PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Rahman B, Meiser B, Watts K, Gleeson M, Saunders C, Mitchell G, Barlow-Stewart K, Kirk J, Tucker K (2012) Evaluation of the efficacy of two models of delivering information about treatment-focused genetic testing among young women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Paper presented at the European Meeting on Psychosocial Aspects of Genetics 2012, Nuernberg, Germany, June 25 2012 Rahman B, Meiser B, Watts K, Gleeson M, Saunders C, Mitchell G, Barlow-Stewart K, Kirk J, Tucker K (2012) Evaluation of the efficacy of two models of delivering information about treatment-focused genetic testing among young women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Paper presented at the European Meeting on Psychosocial Aspects of Genetics 2012, Nuernberg, Germany, June 25 2012
32.
go back to reference Platten U, Rantala J, Lindblom A, Brandberg Y, Lindgren G, Arver B (2012) The use of telephone in genetic counseling versus in-person counseling: a randomized study on counselees’ outcome. Fam Cancer. doi:10.1007/s10689-012-9522-x Platten U, Rantala J, Lindblom A, Brandberg Y, Lindgren G, Arver B (2012) The use of telephone in genetic counseling versus in-person counseling: a randomized study on counselees’ outcome. Fam Cancer. doi:10.​1007/​s10689-012-9522-x
34.
go back to reference Van Riel E, Warlam-Rodenhuis CC, Verhoef S, Rutgers EJ, Ausems MG (2010) BRCA testing of breast cancer patients: medical specialists’ referral patterns, knowledge and attitudes to genetic testing. Eur J Cancer Care 19(3):369–376. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2008.01065.x CrossRef Van Riel E, Warlam-Rodenhuis CC, Verhoef S, Rutgers EJ, Ausems MG (2010) BRCA testing of breast cancer patients: medical specialists’ referral patterns, knowledge and attitudes to genetic testing. Eur J Cancer Care 19(3):369–376. doi:10.​1111/​j.​1365-2354.​2008.​01065.​x CrossRef
Metadata
Title
More breast cancer patients prefer BRCA-mutation testing without prior face-to-face genetic counseling
Authors
Aisha S. Sie
Wendy A. G. van Zelst-Stams
Liesbeth Spruijt
Arjen R. Mensenkamp
Marjolijn J. L. Ligtenberg
Han G. Brunner
Judith B. Prins
Nicoline Hoogerbrugge
Publication date
01-06-2014
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Familial Cancer / Issue 2/2014
Print ISSN: 1389-9600
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-013-9686-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2014

Familial Cancer 2/2014 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine