Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Familial Cancer 1/2009

01-03-2009

Genetic testing for BRCA1: effects of a randomised study of knowledge provision on interest in testing and long term test uptake; implications for the NICE guidelines

Authors: Julia Hall, Susan Gray, Roger A’Hern, Susan Shanley, Maggie Watson, Kathryn Kash, Robert Croyle, Rosalind Eeles

Published in: Familial Cancer | Issue 1/2009

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction Interest in searching for mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 is high. Knowledge regarding these genes and the advantages and limitations of genetic testing is limited. It is unknown whether increasing knowledge about breast cancer genetic testing alters interest in testing. Methods Three hundred and seventy nine women (260 with a family history of breast cancer; 119 with breast cancer) from The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust were randomised to receive or not receive written educational information on cancer genetics. A questionnaire was completed assessing interest in BRCA1 testing and knowledge on breast cancer genetics and screening. Actual uptake of BRCA1 testing is reported with a six year follow-up. Results Eighty nine percent of women at risk of breast cancer and 76% of women with breast cancer were interested in BRCA1 testing (P < 0.0001). Provision of educational information did not affect level of interest. Knowledge about breast cancer susceptibility genes was poor. According to the NICE guidelines regarding eligibility for BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing, the families of 66% of the at risk group and 13% of the women with breast cancer would be eligible for testing (probability of BRCA1 mutation ≥20%). Within six years of randomisation, genetic testing was actually undertaken on 12 women, only 10 of whom would now be eligible, on the NICE guidelines. Conclusions There is strong interest in BRCA1 testing. Despite considerable ignorance of factors affecting the inheritance of breast cancer, education neither reduced nor increased interest to undergo testing. The NICE guidelines successfully triage those with a high breast cancer risk to be managed in cancer genetics clinics.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
3.
go back to reference Bluman LG, Rimer BK, Berry DA et al (1999) Attitudes, knowledge, and risk perceptions of women with breast and/or ovarian cancer considering testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Clin Oncol 17:1040–1046PubMed Bluman LG, Rimer BK, Berry DA et al (1999) Attitudes, knowledge, and risk perceptions of women with breast and/or ovarian cancer considering testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Clin Oncol 17:1040–1046PubMed
5.
go back to reference Struewing JP, Lerman C, Kase RG et al (1995) Anticipated uptake and impact of genetic testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 4:169–173PubMed Struewing JP, Lerman C, Kase RG et al (1995) Anticipated uptake and impact of genetic testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 4:169–173PubMed
6.
go back to reference Tambor ES, Rimer BK, Strigo TS (1997) Genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: awareness and interest among women in the general population. Am J Med Genet 68:43–49. doi :10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19970110)68:1<43::AID-AJMG8>3.0.CO;2-ZPubMedCrossRef Tambor ES, Rimer BK, Strigo TS (1997) Genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: awareness and interest among women in the general population. Am J Med Genet 68:43–49. doi :10.1002/(SICI)1096-8628(19970110)68:1<43::AID-AJMG8>3.0.CO;2-ZPubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Lerman C, Daly M, Masny A et al (1994) Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 12:843–850PubMed Lerman C, Daly M, Masny A et al (1994) Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility. J Clin Oncol 12:843–850PubMed
8.
go back to reference Press NA, Yasui Y, Reynolds S et al (2001) Women’s interest in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility may be based on unrealistic expectations. Am J Med Genet 99:99–110. doi :10.1002/1096-8628(2000)9999:999<00::AID-AJMG1142>3.0.CO;2-IPubMedCrossRef Press NA, Yasui Y, Reynolds S et al (2001) Women’s interest in genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility may be based on unrealistic expectations. Am J Med Genet 99:99–110. doi :10.1002/1096-8628(2000)9999:999<00::AID-AJMG1142>3.0.CO;2-IPubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Julian-Reynier C, Sobol H, Sevilla C et al. The French Cancer Genetic Network (2000) Uptake of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genetic testing in a French national sample of BRCA1 families. Psychooncology 9:504–510. doi :10.1002/1099-1611(200011/12)9:6<504::AID-PON491>3.0.CO;2-R Julian-Reynier C, Sobol H, Sevilla C et al. The French Cancer Genetic Network (2000) Uptake of hereditary breast/ovarian cancer genetic testing in a French national sample of BRCA1 families. Psychooncology 9:504–510. doi :10.1002/1099-1611(200011/12)9:6<504::AID-PON491>3.0.CO;2-R
11.
go back to reference McInerney-Leo A, Biesecker BB, Hadley DW et al (2004) BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: effectiveness of problem-solving training as a counseling intervention. Am J Med Genet 130A:221–227. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.30265 CrossRefPubMed McInerney-Leo A, Biesecker BB, Hadley DW et al (2004) BRCA1/2 testing in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: effectiveness of problem-solving training as a counseling intervention. Am J Med Genet 130A:221–227. doi:10.​1002/​ajmg.​a.​30265 CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Meijers-Heijboer H, Brekelmans CTM, Menke-Pluymers M et al (2003) Use of genetic testing and prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy in women with breast or ovarian cancer from families with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 21:1675–1681. doi:10.1200/JCO.2003.09.052 PubMedCrossRef Meijers-Heijboer H, Brekelmans CTM, Menke-Pluymers M et al (2003) Use of genetic testing and prophylactic mastectomy and oophorectomy in women with breast or ovarian cancer from families with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. J Clin Oncol 21:1675–1681. doi:10.​1200/​JCO.​2003.​09.​052 PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Schwartz MD, Benkendorf J, Lerman C et al (2001) Impact of educational print materials on knowledge, attitudes, and interest in BRCA1/BRCA2: testing among Ashkenazi Jewish women. Cancer 92:932–940. doi :10.1002/1097-0142(20010815)92:4<932::AID-CNCR1403>3.0.CO;2-QPubMedCrossRef Schwartz MD, Benkendorf J, Lerman C et al (2001) Impact of educational print materials on knowledge, attitudes, and interest in BRCA1/BRCA2: testing among Ashkenazi Jewish women. Cancer 92:932–940. doi :10.1002/1097-0142(20010815)92:4<932::AID-CNCR1403>3.0.CO;2-QPubMedCrossRef
16.
17.
go back to reference Green MJ, Peterson SK, Wagner Baker M et al (2004) Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 292:442–452. doi:10.1001/jama.292.4.442 PubMedCrossRef Green MJ, Peterson SK, Wagner Baker M et al (2004) Effect of a computer-based decision aid on knowledge, perceptions, and intentions about genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 292:442–452. doi:10.​1001/​jama.​292.​4.​442 PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Lloyd S, Watson M, Waites B et al (1996) Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling. Br J Cancer 74:482–487PubMed Lloyd S, Watson M, Waites B et al (1996) Familial breast cancer: a controlled study of risk perception, psychological morbidity and health beliefs in women attending for genetic counselling. Br J Cancer 74:482–487PubMed
20.
go back to reference Braithwaite D, Emery J, Walter F et al (2004) Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:122–133PubMedCrossRef Braithwaite D, Emery J, Walter F et al (2004) Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 96:122–133PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Meiser B, Butow P, Schnieden V et al (2000) Psychological adjustment of women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer. Psychol Health Med 5:377–388. doi:10.1080/713690217 CrossRef Meiser B, Butow P, Schnieden V et al (2000) Psychological adjustment of women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer. Psychol Health Med 5:377–388. doi:10.​1080/​713690217 CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Sivell S, Iredale R, Gray J et al (2007) Cancer genetic risk assessment for individuals at risk of familial breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:CD003721 Sivell S, Iredale R, Gray J et al (2007) Cancer genetic risk assessment for individuals at risk of familial breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 18:CD003721
25.
go back to reference National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2006) Familial breast cancer: the classification and care of women at risk of familial breast cancer in primary, secondary and tertiary care (partial update of CG14). Clinical Guideline 41:4–33. http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/CG41. Accessed January 2008 National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2006) Familial breast cancer: the classification and care of women at risk of familial breast cancer in primary, secondary and tertiary care (partial update of CG14). Clinical Guideline 41:4–33. http://​www.​nice.​org.​uk/​guidance/​CG41. Accessed January 2008
27.
go back to reference Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M and the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium (1998) Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet 62:676–689. doi:10.1086/301749 Ford D, Easton DF, Stratton M and the Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium (1998) Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium. Am J Hum Genet 62:676–689. doi:10.​1086/​301749
31.
go back to reference Wang C, Gonzalez R, Milliron KJ et al (2005) Genetic counseling for BRCA1/2: a randomized controlled trial of two strategies to facilitate the education and counseling process. Am J Med Genet 134A:66–73. doi:10.1002/ajmg.a.30577 CrossRefPubMed Wang C, Gonzalez R, Milliron KJ et al (2005) Genetic counseling for BRCA1/2: a randomized controlled trial of two strategies to facilitate the education and counseling process. Am J Med Genet 134A:66–73. doi:10.​1002/​ajmg.​a.​30577 CrossRefPubMed
34.
Metadata
Title
Genetic testing for BRCA1: effects of a randomised study of knowledge provision on interest in testing and long term test uptake; implications for the NICE guidelines
Authors
Julia Hall
Susan Gray
Roger A’Hern
Susan Shanley
Maggie Watson
Kathryn Kash
Robert Croyle
Rosalind Eeles
Publication date
01-03-2009
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Familial Cancer / Issue 1/2009
Print ISSN: 1389-9600
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-008-9201-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2009

Familial Cancer 1/2009 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine