Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Familial Cancer 1/2008

01-03-2008

Genetic counseling and clinical management of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients at genetic risk for BRCA germline mutations: perspective of a surgical oncologist

Author: Edibaldo Silva

Published in: Familial Cancer | Issue 1/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Women with a family history of breast cancer who are diagnosed with breast cancer are often counseled to undergo prophylactic mastectomy as part of their treatment for breast cancer. The majority of such individuals make these decisions in haste and without appropriate genetic counseling or testing. Most of them when tested for BRCA or other established mutations find that they are not mutation carriers. In retrospect, this realization leads many to question the wisdom of their prophylactic surgery which is often associated with complications and quality of life problems which they never envisioned. We have designed an algorithm for the management of these patients which minimizes these lifelong problems.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stolier A, Fuhrman G et al (2004) Initial experience with surgical treatment planning in the newly diagnosed breast cancer patient at high risk for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Breast J 10:475–480PubMedCrossRef Stolier A, Fuhrman G et al (2004) Initial experience with surgical treatment planning in the newly diagnosed breast cancer patient at high risk for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. Breast J 10:475–480PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Ganguly A, Leahy K et al (1997) Genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Genet Test 2:85–90 Ganguly A, Leahy K et al (1997) Genetic testing for breast cancer susceptibility: frequency of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Genet Test 2:85–90
3.
go back to reference Lakhani SR, van de Vijver MJ et al (2002) The pathology of familial breast cancer: predictive value of immunohistochemical markers, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2 Neu and p53 in patients with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Clin Oncol 20:2310–2318PubMedCrossRef Lakhani SR, van de Vijver MJ et al (2002) The pathology of familial breast cancer: predictive value of immunohistochemical markers, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, HER-2 Neu and p53 in patients with mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. J Clin Oncol 20:2310–2318PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Foulkes WD, Metcalfe K et al (2003) Disruption of the expected positive correlation between breast tumor size and lymph node status in BRCA1-related breast carcinoma. Cancer 98:1569–1577PubMedCrossRef Foulkes WD, Metcalfe K et al (2003) Disruption of the expected positive correlation between breast tumor size and lymph node status in BRCA1-related breast carcinoma. Cancer 98:1569–1577PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Brekelmans CTM, Seynaeve C et al (2001) Effectiveness of breast cancer surveillance in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and women with high familial risk. J Clin Oncol 19:924–930PubMed Brekelmans CTM, Seynaeve C et al (2001) Effectiveness of breast cancer surveillance in BRCA1/2 gene mutation carriers and women with high familial risk. J Clin Oncol 19:924–930PubMed
6.
go back to reference Scheuer L, Kauf N et al (2002) Outcome of preventive surgery and screening for breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 20:1260–1268PubMedCrossRef Scheuer L, Kauf N et al (2002) Outcome of preventive surgery and screening for breast and ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. J Clin Oncol 20:1260–1268PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Schwartz G, Hortogyi GN (2004) Proceedings of the consensus conference on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in carcinoma of breast, April 26–28, 2003, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Cancer 100:2512–2532PubMedCrossRef Schwartz G, Hortogyi GN (2004) Proceedings of the consensus conference on neoadjuvant chemotherapy in carcinoma of breast, April 26–28, 2003, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Cancer 100:2512–2532PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Wolmark N, Wang J, Mamounas E et al (2001) Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from NSABP B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 30:96–102PubMed Wolmark N, Wang J, Mamounas E et al (2001) Preoperative chemotherapy in patients with operable breast cancer: nine-year results from NSABP B-18. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 30:96–102PubMed
9.
go back to reference Cady B, Chung M et al (2006) Re: genetic counseling and management of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients at genetic risk for BRCA germline mutations. Breast J 12:282–283CrossRef Cady B, Chung M et al (2006) Re: genetic counseling and management of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients at genetic risk for BRCA germline mutations. Breast J 12:282–283CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Mammounas EP, Fisher B (2001) Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Semin Oncol 28:389–399CrossRef Mammounas EP, Fisher B (2001) Preoperative (neoadjuvant) chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer. Semin Oncol 28:389–399CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Tsikitis V, Chung M et al (2004) Scientific basis of neoadjuvant therapy. Semin Breast Dis 7:51–57CrossRef Tsikitis V, Chung M et al (2004) Scientific basis of neoadjuvant therapy. Semin Breast Dis 7:51–57CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Warner E, Trudeau M et al (2003) Sensitivity of BRCA1-related breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Practical implications. Breast J 9:507–508 Warner E, Trudeau M et al (2003) Sensitivity of BRCA1-related breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Practical implications. Breast J 9:507–508
13.
go back to reference Pierce LJ, Struderman M et al (2000) Effect of radiotherapy after breast conserving treatment in women with breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutations. J Clin Oncol 18:3360–3369PubMed Pierce LJ, Struderman M et al (2000) Effect of radiotherapy after breast conserving treatment in women with breast cancer and germline BRCA1/2 mutations. J Clin Oncol 18:3360–3369PubMed
14.
go back to reference Hafty B, Harrold E et al (2002) Outcome of conservatively managed early onset breast cancer by BRCA1/2 status. Lancet 359:1471–1477CrossRef Hafty B, Harrold E et al (2002) Outcome of conservatively managed early onset breast cancer by BRCA1/2 status. Lancet 359:1471–1477CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Komenaka IK, Ditkoff BA et al (2004) The development of interval breast malignancies in patients with BRCA mutations. Cancer 100:2079–2083PubMedCrossRef Komenaka IK, Ditkoff BA et al (2004) The development of interval breast malignancies in patients with BRCA mutations. Cancer 100:2079–2083PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Ascherman JA, Hanasono MM et al (2006) Implant reconstruction in breast cancer patients treated with radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:359–365PubMedCrossRef Ascherman JA, Hanasono MM et al (2006) Implant reconstruction in breast cancer patients treated with radiation therapy. Plast Reconstr Surg 117:359–365PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Narod SA, Offit K (2005) Prevention and management of hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:1656–1663PubMedCrossRef Narod SA, Offit K (2005) Prevention and management of hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:1656–1663PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ (1999) Effect of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a familial history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 340:77–84PubMedCrossRef Hartmann LC, Schaid DJ (1999) Effect of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in women with a familial history of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 340:77–84PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Hartmann LC, Sellers TA et al (2001) Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1633–1637PubMedCrossRef Hartmann LC, Sellers TA et al (2001) Efficacy of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy in BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1633–1637PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Schwartz M (2005) Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: efficacy, satisfaction, regret. J Clin Oncol 23:7777–7779PubMedCrossRef Schwartz M (2005) Contralateral prophylactic mastectomy: efficacy, satisfaction, regret. J Clin Oncol 23:7777–7779PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Rebbeck TR, Friebel T et al (2004) Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. The PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol 221:1055–1062CrossRef Rebbeck TR, Friebel T et al (2004) Bilateral prophylactic mastectomy reduces breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. The PROSE Study Group. J Clin Oncol 221:1055–1062CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Meijers-Heijboer H, van Geel B et al (2001) Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 345:159–164PubMedCrossRef Meijers-Heijboer H, van Geel B et al (2001) Breast cancer after prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 345:159–164PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Walsh T, Casadei S et al (2006) Spectrum of mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, chek2, and TP53 in families at high risk of breast cancer. JAMA 295:1379–1387PubMedCrossRef Walsh T, Casadei S et al (2006) Spectrum of mutations in BRCA1, BRCA2, chek2, and TP53 in families at high risk of breast cancer. JAMA 295:1379–1387PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Eisen A, Rebbeck TR et al (2000) Prophylactic surgery in women with a hereditary predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:1980–1995PubMed Eisen A, Rebbeck TR et al (2000) Prophylactic surgery in women with a hereditary predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:1980–1995PubMed
25.
go back to reference Rebbeck TR, Lynch HT et al (2002) Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 346:1616–1621PubMedCrossRef Rebbeck TR, Lynch HT et al (2002) Prophylactic oophorectomy in carriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. N Engl J Med 346:1616–1621PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Watson P, Narod SA et al (2003) Carrier risk status changes resulting form mutation testing in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer and hereditary breast ovarian cancer. J Med Genet 40:591–596PubMedCrossRef Watson P, Narod SA et al (2003) Carrier risk status changes resulting form mutation testing in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer and hereditary breast ovarian cancer. J Med Genet 40:591–596PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Genetic counseling and clinical management of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients at genetic risk for BRCA germline mutations: perspective of a surgical oncologist
Author
Edibaldo Silva
Publication date
01-03-2008
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Familial Cancer / Issue 1/2008
Print ISSN: 1389-9600
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7292
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-007-9167-3

Other articles of this Issue 1/2008

Familial Cancer 1/2008 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine