Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology 3/2021

Open Access 01-03-2021 | SARS-CoV-2 | COVID-19

External validity of phase III trials on vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 to a middle-aged and elderly Western European population

Authors: Natalie Terzikhan, Albert Hofman, Jaap Goudsmit, Mohammad Arfan Ikram

Published in: European Journal of Epidemiology | Issue 3/2021

Login to get access

Abstract

Initial results from various phase-III trials on vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 are promising. For proper translation of these results to clinical guidelines, it is essential to determine how well the general population is reflected in the study populations of these trials. This study was conducted among 7162 participants (age-range: 51–106 years; 58% women) from the Rotterdam Study. We quantified the proportion of participants that would be eligible for the nine ongoing phase-III trials. We further quantified the eligibility among participants at high risk to develop severe COVID-19. Since many trials were not explicit in their exclusion criterion with respect to ‘acute’ or ‘unstable preexisting’ diseases, we performed two analyses. First, we included all participants irrespective of this criterion. Second, we excluded persons with acute or ‘unstable preexisting’ diseases. 97% of 7162 participants was eligible for any trial with eligibility for separate trials ranging between 11–97%. For high-risk individuals the corresponding numbers were 96% for any trial with separate trials ranging from 5–96%. Importantly, considering persons ineligible due to ‘acute’ or ‘unstable pre-existing’ disease drastically dropped the eligibilities for all trials below 43% for the total population and below 36% for high-risk individuals. The eligibility for ongoing vaccine trials against SARS-CoV-2 can reduce by half depending on interpretation and application of a single unspecified exclusion criterion. This exclusion criterion in our study would especially affect the elderly and those with pre-existing morbidities. These findings thus indicate the difficulty as well as importance of developing clinical recommendations for vaccination and applying these to the appropriate target populations. This becomes especially paramount considering the fact that many countries worldwide have initiated their vaccination programs by first targeting the elderly and most vulnerable persons.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
2.
go back to reference Ikram MA, et al. The rotterdam study: 2018 update on objectives, design and main results. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017;32(9):807–50.CrossRef Ikram MA, et al. The rotterdam study: 2018 update on objectives, design and main results. Eur J Epidemiol. 2017;32(9):807–50.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Dekkers OM, et al. How to assess the external validity of therapeutic trials: a conceptual approach. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(1):89–94.CrossRef Dekkers OM, et al. How to assess the external validity of therapeutic trials: a conceptual approach. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39(1):89–94.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Pibouleau L, et al. Applicability and generalisability of published results of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies evaluating four orthopaedic procedures: methodological systematic review. BMJ. 2009;339:b4538.CrossRef Pibouleau L, et al. Applicability and generalisability of published results of randomised controlled trials and non-randomised studies evaluating four orthopaedic procedures: methodological systematic review. BMJ. 2009;339:b4538.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Braend AM, Straand J, Klovning A. Clinical drug trials in general practice: how well are external validity issues reported? Bmc Fam Pract. 2017;18:1–11.CrossRef Braend AM, Straand J, Klovning A. Clinical drug trials in general practice: how well are external validity issues reported? Bmc Fam Pract. 2017;18:1–11.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Licher S, et al. Lifetime risk and multimorbidity of non-communicable diseases and disease-free life expectancy in the general population: a population-based cohort study. PLoS Med. 2019;16(2):e1002741.CrossRef Licher S, et al. Lifetime risk and multimorbidity of non-communicable diseases and disease-free life expectancy in the general population: a population-based cohort study. PLoS Med. 2019;16(2):e1002741.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Vernooij MW, et al. Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1821–8.CrossRef Vernooij MW, et al. Incidental findings on brain MRI in the general population. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(18):1821–8.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Winkler V, et al. Response in individuals with and without foreign background and application to the National Cohort in Germany: which factors have an effect? Int J Public Health. 2014;59(3):555–63.CrossRef Winkler V, et al. Response in individuals with and without foreign background and application to the National Cohort in Germany: which factors have an effect? Int J Public Health. 2014;59(3):555–63.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
External validity of phase III trials on vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 to a middle-aged and elderly Western European population
Authors
Natalie Terzikhan
Albert Hofman
Jaap Goudsmit
Mohammad Arfan Ikram
Publication date
01-03-2021
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
European Journal of Epidemiology / Issue 3/2021
Print ISSN: 0393-2990
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7284
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-021-00729-5

Other articles of this Issue 3/2021

European Journal of Epidemiology 3/2021 Go to the issue