Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Investigational New Drugs 2/2013

01-04-2013 | REVIEW

Clinical trial design in biosimilar drug development

Authors: G. Dranitsaris, K. Dorward, E. Hatzimichael, E. Amir

Published in: Investigational New Drugs | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Summary

In contrast to most drugs which are chemically synthesized and have a known structure, biological drugs are derived from living organisms or their products. Biologicals are structurally more complex and unique from chemically synthesized small drug molecules because of their larger size and intricate manufacturing process. Secondary to their protein structure, they are also more prone to acute and chronic immune responses. Biosimilars are intended to offer comparable safety and efficacy relative to reference brand biologicals, yet they are not generic alternatives to the original compounds and so are currently not considered interchangeable. Given their structural complexity, multifaceted manufacturing processes and risk for immunogenicity, biosimilars require class-specific regulatory approval pathways. Here we seek to provide a general overview of clinical trial design in the era of biosimilar drug development. This will include a review of the regulatory requirements for clinical trials in Europe and the United States, followed by a review of two biosimilars that have recently reported results of randomized trials against branded biologicals.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Dranitsaris G, Amir E, Dorward K (2011) Biosimilars of protein based drug therapies: regulatory, clinical and commercial considerations. Drugs 71:1527–36PubMedCrossRef Dranitsaris G, Amir E, Dorward K (2011) Biosimilars of protein based drug therapies: regulatory, clinical and commercial considerations. Drugs 71:1527–36PubMedCrossRef
5.
6.
go back to reference Woodcock J, Griffin J, Behrman R et al (2007) The FDA’s assessment of follow on protein products: a historical perspective. Nat Rev Drug Discovery 6:437–42CrossRef Woodcock J, Griffin J, Behrman R et al (2007) The FDA’s assessment of follow on protein products: a historical perspective. Nat Rev Drug Discovery 6:437–42CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Beck A (2009) European medicines workshop on biosimilars monoclonal antibodies: Perspective from the EU. MAbs 1:406–410CrossRef Beck A (2009) European medicines workshop on biosimilars monoclonal antibodies: Perspective from the EU. MAbs 1:406–410CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kueppers E (2010) Follow on biologics: how to develop a competitive advantage. Business Development and Licensing Journal 12:17–18 Kueppers E (2010) Follow on biologics: how to develop a competitive advantage. Business Development and Licensing Journal 12:17–18
10.
go back to reference Van De Werf F, Adgey J, Ardissino D et al (1999) Single-bolus tenecteplase compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT-2 double-blind randomized trial. Lancet 354:716–22CrossRef Van De Werf F, Adgey J, Ardissino D et al (1999) Single-bolus tenecteplase compared with front-loaded alteplase in acute myocardial infarction: the ASSENT-2 double-blind randomized trial. Lancet 354:716–22CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Blackwelder WC (1982) Proving the null hypothesis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 3:345–53PubMedCrossRef Blackwelder WC (1982) Proving the null hypothesis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 3:345–53PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ware JH, Antman EM (1997) Equivalence trials. N Engl J Med 16(337):1159–61CrossRef Ware JH, Antman EM (1997) Equivalence trials. N Engl J Med 16(337):1159–61CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Anonymous (1993) An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. The GUSTO investigators. N Engl J Med 329:673–82CrossRef Anonymous (1993) An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. The GUSTO investigators. N Engl J Med 329:673–82CrossRef
14.
15.
go back to reference Rothmann M, Li N, Chen G, Chi GY, Temple R, Tsou HH (2003) Design and analysis of non-inferiority mortality trials in oncology. Stat Med 22:239–64PubMedCrossRef Rothmann M, Li N, Chen G, Chi GY, Temple R, Tsou HH (2003) Design and analysis of non-inferiority mortality trials in oncology. Stat Med 22:239–64PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fox A (2010) Biosimilar medicines-new challenges for a new class of medicine. J Biopharm Stat 20:3–9PubMedCrossRef Fox A (2010) Biosimilar medicines-new challenges for a new class of medicine. J Biopharm Stat 20:3–9PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Dunnett CW (1996) An alternative to the use of two sided tests in clinical trials. Stat Med 15:1729–38PubMedCrossRef Dunnett CW (1996) An alternative to the use of two sided tests in clinical trials. Stat Med 15:1729–38PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Christensen E (2007) Methodology of superiority vs. equivalence trials and non-inferiority trials. J Hepatol 46:947–54PubMedCrossRef Christensen E (2007) Methodology of superiority vs. equivalence trials and non-inferiority trials. J Hepatol 46:947–54PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ (2006) Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA 295:1152–60PubMedCrossRef Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ (2006) Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: an extension of the CONSORT statement. JAMA 295:1152–60PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Gladkov O, Moiseyenko V, Bondarenko N et al (2011) A randomized, noninferiority study of recombinant human G-CSF/human serum albumin fusion (CG-10639) and pegfilgrastim in breast cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive therapy. J Clin Oncol 29:2011 (suppl: abstr 9086) Gladkov O, Moiseyenko V, Bondarenko N et al (2011) A randomized, noninferiority study of recombinant human G-CSF/human serum albumin fusion (CG-10639) and pegfilgrastim in breast cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive therapy. J Clin Oncol 29:2011 (suppl: abstr 9086)
25.
go back to reference Volovat C, Gladkov OA, Bondarenko IM et al (2012) Efficacy and safety of balugrastim compared with pegfilgrastim in patients with breast cancer who are receiving chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 20 (Suppl 1):S235 (abstract 986) Volovat C, Gladkov OA, Bondarenko IM et al (2012) Efficacy and safety of balugrastim compared with pegfilgrastim in patients with breast cancer who are receiving chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 20 (Suppl 1):S235 (abstract 986)
Metadata
Title
Clinical trial design in biosimilar drug development
Authors
G. Dranitsaris
K. Dorward
E. Hatzimichael
E. Amir
Publication date
01-04-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Investigational New Drugs / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-012-9899-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Investigational New Drugs 2/2013 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine