Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Investigational New Drugs 5/2012

Open Access 01-10-2012 | PHASE II STUDIES

A randomized phase II trial of intra-arterial chemotherapy using SM-11355 (Miriplatin) for hepatocellular carcinoma

Authors: Takuji Okusaka, Hiroshi Kasugai, Hiroshi Ishii, Masatoshi Kudo, Michio Sata, Katsuaki Tanaka, Yasukazu Shioyama, Kazuaki Chayama, Hiromitsu Kumada, Masaharu Yoshikawa, Toshihito Seki, Hidetugu Saito, Naoaki Hayashi, Keiko Shiratori, Kiwamu Okita, Isao Sakaida, Masao Honda, Yukio Kusumoto, Takuya Tsutsumi, Kenji Sakata

Published in: Investigational New Drugs | Issue 5/2012

Login to get access

Abstract

Background SM-11355 is a platinum complex developed to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) via administration into the hepatic artery as a sustained-release suspension in iodized oil. We conducted a multicenter phase II trial in patients with HCC to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SM-11355, using a Zinostatin stimalamer suspension in iodized oil as a reference. Methods Patients with unresectable HCC were randomized 2:1 to receive administration of the SM-11355 or Zinostatin stimalamer suspension into the hepatic artery. A second injection was given 4–12 weeks later. Efficacy was evaluated by CT 3 months after treatment and categorized as therapeutic effect (TE) V to I, where TE V was defined as disappearance or 100% necrosis of all treated tumors. Results A total of 122 patients were evaluated for efficacy and toxicity (SM-11355, n = 83; Zinostatin stimalamer, n = 39). Baseline characteristics were similar in the two groups. The TE V rates were 26.5% (22/83) and 17.9% (7/39) in the SM-11355 and Zinostatin stimalamer groups, respectively. In the SM-11355 group,the most frequent drug-related adverse events (AEs) of ≥ grade 3 were elevated AST, elevated ALT, thrombocytopenia, and hyperbilirubinemia. The AEs with the largest difference between the two groups (SM-11355 vs. Zinostatin stimalamer) were hepatic vascular injury (0 vs. 48.4%) and eosinophilia (84.3 vs. 41.0%). The 2-year and 3-year survival rates were 75.9% vs. 70.3% and 58.4% vs. 48.7%, respectively. Conclusions The results suggest that SM-11355 in iodized oil has similar efficacy to Zinostatin stimalamer and that repeated dosing of SM-11355 is possible without hepatic vascular injury in cases of relapse.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55(2):74–108PubMedCrossRef Parkin DM, Bray F, Ferlay J, Pisani P (2005) Global cancer statistics, 2002. CA Cancer J Clin 55(2):74–108PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Lopez PM, Villanueva A, Llovet JM (2006) Systematic review: evidence-based management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated analysis of randomized controlled trials. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 23(11):1535–1547PubMedCrossRef Lopez PM, Villanueva A, Llovet JM (2006) Systematic review: evidence-based management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an updated analysis of randomized controlled trials. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 23(11):1535–1547PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Maeda M, Uchida NA, Sasaki T (1986) Liposoluble platinum(II) complexes with antitumore activity. Jpn J Cancer Res 77(6):523–525PubMed Maeda M, Uchida NA, Sasaki T (1986) Liposoluble platinum(II) complexes with antitumore activity. Jpn J Cancer Res 77(6):523–525PubMed
4.
go back to reference Fujiyama S, Shibata J, Maeda S, Tanaka M, Noumaru S, Sato K et al (2003) Phase I clinical study of a novel lipophilic platinum complex (SM-11355) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to cisplatin / lipiodol. Br J Cancer 89(9):1614–1619PubMedCrossRef Fujiyama S, Shibata J, Maeda S, Tanaka M, Noumaru S, Sato K et al (2003) Phase I clinical study of a novel lipophilic platinum complex (SM-11355) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to cisplatin / lipiodol. Br J Cancer 89(9):1614–1619PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Okusaka T, Okada S, Nakanishi T, Fujiyama S, Kubo Y (2004) Phase II trial of intra-arterial chemotherapy using a novel lipophilic platinum derivative (SM-11355) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Invest New Drugs 22(2):169–176PubMedCrossRef Okusaka T, Okada S, Nakanishi T, Fujiyama S, Kubo Y (2004) Phase II trial of intra-arterial chemotherapy using a novel lipophilic platinum derivative (SM-11355) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Invest New Drugs 22(2):169–176PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (1999) Survey and follow-up study of primary liver cancer in Japan. Report 13. Acta Hepatologica Japonica 40(5):288–300CrossRef Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (1999) Survey and follow-up study of primary liver cancer in Japan. Report 13. Acta Hepatologica Japonica 40(5):288–300CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (2000) Survey and follow-up study of primary liver cancer in Japan. Report 14. Acta Hepatologica Japonica 41(12):799–811CrossRef Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan (2000) Survey and follow-up study of primary liver cancer in Japan. Report 14. Acta Hepatologica Japonica 41(12):799–811CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Okusaka T, Okada S, Ishii H, Ikeda M, Nakasuka H, Nagahama H et al (1998) Transarterial chemotherapy with Zinostatin Stimalamer for hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology 55(4):276–283PubMedCrossRef Okusaka T, Okada S, Ishii H, Ikeda M, Nakasuka H, Nagahama H et al (1998) Transarterial chemotherapy with Zinostatin Stimalamer for hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology 55(4):276–283PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Okusaka T, Kasugai H, Shioyama Y, Tanaka K, Kudo M, Saisho H (2009) Transarterial chemotherapy alone versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized phase III trial. J Hepatol 51(6):1030–1036PubMedCrossRef Okusaka T, Kasugai H, Shioyama Y, Tanaka K, Kudo M, Saisho H (2009) Transarterial chemotherapy alone versus transarterial chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: a randomized phase III trial. J Hepatol 51(6):1030–1036PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Japanese Society of Liver Carcinoma (the Committee for Preparing Criteria for Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Treatment of Liver Carcinoma) (1994) Criteria for evaluation of direct effects of liver cancer treatment. Kanzo 35(2):193–205CrossRef Japanese Society of Liver Carcinoma (the Committee for Preparing Criteria for Evaluation of Multidisciplinary Treatment of Liver Carcinoma) (1994) Criteria for evaluation of direct effects of liver cancer treatment. Kanzo 35(2):193–205CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, Beaugrand M, Lencioni R, Burroughs AK et al (2001) Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol 35(3):421–430PubMedCrossRef Bruix J, Sherman M, Llovet JM, Beaugrand M, Lencioni R, Burroughs AK et al (2001) Clinical management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Conclusions of the Barcelona-2000 EASL conference. European Association for the Study of the Liver. J Hepatol 35(3):421–430PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Takayasu K, Arii S, Matsuo N, Yoshikawa M, Ryu M, Takasaki K et al (2000) Comparison of CT findings with resected specimens after chemoembolization with iodized oil for hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 175(3):699–704 Takayasu K, Arii S, Matsuo N, Yoshikawa M, Ryu M, Takasaki K et al (2000) Comparison of CT findings with resected specimens after chemoembolization with iodized oil for hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 175(3):699–704
13.
go back to reference Okusaka T, Okada S, Ueno H, Ikeda M, Yoshimori M, Shimada K et al (2000) Evaluation of the therapeutic effect of transcatheter arterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology 58(4):293–299PubMedCrossRef Okusaka T, Okada S, Ueno H, Ikeda M, Yoshimori M, Shimada K et al (2000) Evaluation of the therapeutic effect of transcatheter arterial embolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncology 58(4):293–299PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Japan Society for Cancer Therapy (1986) The Japan Society for Cancer Therapy Criteria. J Jpn Soc Cancer Ther 21(5):929–942 Japan Society for Cancer Therapy (1986) The Japan Society for Cancer Therapy Criteria. J Jpn Soc Cancer Ther 21(5):929–942
15.
go back to reference Japan Society for Cancer Therapy (1997) Toxicity grading criteria of the Japan Society for Cancer Therapy. J Jpn Soc Cancer Ther 1(32):61–65 Japan Society for Cancer Therapy (1997) Toxicity grading criteria of the Japan Society for Cancer Therapy. J Jpn Soc Cancer Ther 1(32):61–65
16.
go back to reference Takayasu K, Shima Y, Muramatsu Y, Moriyama N, Yamada T, Makuuchi M et al (1987) Hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with intraarterial iodized oil with and without chemotherapeutic agents. Radiology 163(2):345–351PubMed Takayasu K, Shima Y, Muramatsu Y, Moriyama N, Yamada T, Makuuchi M et al (1987) Hepatocellular carcinoma: treatment with intraarterial iodized oil with and without chemotherapeutic agents. Radiology 163(2):345–351PubMed
17.
go back to reference Hanada M, Baba A, Tsutsumishita Y, Noguchi T, Yamaoka T, Chiba N et al (2009) Intra-hepatic arterial administration with miriplatin suspended in an oily lymphographic agent inhitibs the growth of tumors implanted in rat livers by inducing platinum-DNA adducts to form and massive apoptosis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 64(3):473–483PubMedCrossRef Hanada M, Baba A, Tsutsumishita Y, Noguchi T, Yamaoka T, Chiba N et al (2009) Intra-hepatic arterial administration with miriplatin suspended in an oily lymphographic agent inhitibs the growth of tumors implanted in rat livers by inducing platinum-DNA adducts to form and massive apoptosis. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 64(3):473–483PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Shibata J, Fujiyama S, Sato T, Kishimoto S, Fukushima S, Nakano M (1989) Hepatic arterial injection chemotherapy with cisplatin suspended in an oily lymphographic agent for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 64(8):1586–1594PubMedCrossRef Shibata J, Fujiyama S, Sato T, Kishimoto S, Fukushima S, Nakano M (1989) Hepatic arterial injection chemotherapy with cisplatin suspended in an oily lymphographic agent for hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer 64(8):1586–1594PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sakaguchi T, Yoshimatsu S, Sagara K, Yamashita Y, Takahashi M (1998) Intra-arterial infusion of SMANCS for treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma–adverse reactions and complications. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 25(Suppl 1):64–69PubMed Sakaguchi T, Yoshimatsu S, Sagara K, Yamashita Y, Takahashi M (1998) Intra-arterial infusion of SMANCS for treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma–adverse reactions and complications. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 25(Suppl 1):64–69PubMed
20.
go back to reference Ikeda K, Saitoh S, Kobayashi M, Suzuki Y, Suzuki F, Tsubota A et al (2000) Hepatic vascular side effects of styrene maleic acid neocarzinostatin in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol 35(5):353–360PubMedCrossRef Ikeda K, Saitoh S, Kobayashi M, Suzuki Y, Suzuki F, Tsubota A et al (2000) Hepatic vascular side effects of styrene maleic acid neocarzinostatin in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol 35(5):353–360PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
A randomized phase II trial of intra-arterial chemotherapy using SM-11355 (Miriplatin) for hepatocellular carcinoma
Authors
Takuji Okusaka
Hiroshi Kasugai
Hiroshi Ishii
Masatoshi Kudo
Michio Sata
Katsuaki Tanaka
Yasukazu Shioyama
Kazuaki Chayama
Hiromitsu Kumada
Masaharu Yoshikawa
Toshihito Seki
Hidetugu Saito
Naoaki Hayashi
Keiko Shiratori
Kiwamu Okita
Isao Sakaida
Masao Honda
Yukio Kusumoto
Takuya Tsutsumi
Kenji Sakata
Publication date
01-10-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Investigational New Drugs / Issue 5/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-011-9776-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2012

Investigational New Drugs 5/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine