Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Investigational New Drugs 4/2012

01-08-2012 | PHASE II STUDIES

SWOG 0514: a phase II study of sorafenib in patients with unresectable or metastatic gallbladder carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma

Authors: Anthony B. El-Khoueiry, Cathryn J. Rankin, Edgar Ben-Josef, Heinz-Josef Lenz, Philip J. Gold, R. Darryl Hamilton, Rangaswamy Govindarajan, Cathy Eng, Charles D. Blanke

Published in: Investigational New Drugs | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Summary

Objectives Gallbladder and cholangiocarcinomas represent a heterogeneous group of malignant diseases that commonly present at an advanced stage and have limited therapeutic options. Based on the role of the Ras-Raf-Mek-Erk pathway and the VEGF axis in biliary carcinomas, we conducted a phase II study of sorafenib in patients with advanced biliary cancers. Methods Eligible patients had no prior therapy for metastatic or unresectable disease. Sorafenib was administered at 400 mg po twice daily continuously. Results The study was terminated after the first stage of accrual due to failure to meet the primary objective. A confirmed response rate of 0% (0%–11%) was observed. Thirty-nine percent of patients demonstrated stable disease (including 2 with unconfirmed PR). PFS was 3 months (95% CI: 2–4 months) and OS 9 months (95% CI: 4–12 months). The most common grade 3 and 4 toxicities included hand-foot skin reaction (13%), bilirubin elevation (13%), venous thromboembolism (10%), AST/ALT elevation (10%) and elevated alkaline phosphatase (10%). Conclusion While treatment with sorafenib did not result in objective responses, patients with biliary cancers receiving this drug had some therapeutic benefit. Additional studies with sorafenib in combination with chemotherapy or other targeted agents may be warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Cardinale V et al (2010) Intra-hepatic and extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma: new insight into epidemiology and risk factors. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2(11):407–16CrossRefPubMed Cardinale V et al (2010) Intra-hepatic and extra-hepatic cholangiocarcinoma: new insight into epidemiology and risk factors. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2(11):407–16CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference McGlynn KA, Tarone RE, El-Serag HB (2006) A comparison of trends in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15(6):1198–203CrossRefPubMed McGlynn KA, Tarone RE, El-Serag HB (2006) A comparison of trends in the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 15(6):1198–203CrossRefPubMed
3.
4.
go back to reference Choi CW et al (2000) Effects of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of pancreatic-biliary tract adenocarcinomas. Am J Clin Oncol 23(4):425–8PubMed Choi CW et al (2000) Effects of 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in the treatment of pancreatic-biliary tract adenocarcinomas. Am J Clin Oncol 23(4):425–8PubMed
5.
go back to reference Ducreux M et al (2005) A randomised phase II trial of weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil with and without folinic acid and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma: results of the 40955 EORTC trial. Eur J Cancer 41(3):398–403CrossRefPubMed Ducreux M et al (2005) A randomised phase II trial of weekly high-dose 5-fluorouracil with and without folinic acid and cisplatin in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma: results of the 40955 EORTC trial. Eur J Cancer 41(3):398–403CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Eckel F, Schmid RM (2007) Chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract carcinoma: a pooled analysis of clinical trials. Br J Cancer 96(6):896–902CrossRefPubMed Eckel F, Schmid RM (2007) Chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract carcinoma: a pooled analysis of clinical trials. Br J Cancer 96(6):896–902CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Valle J et al (2010) Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med 362(14):1273–81CrossRefPubMed Valle J et al (2010) Cisplatin plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine for biliary tract cancer. N Engl J Med 362(14):1273–81CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Tannapfel A et al (2003) Mutations of the BRAF gene in cholangiocarcinoma but not in hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut 52(5):706–12CrossRefPubMed Tannapfel A et al (2003) Mutations of the BRAF gene in cholangiocarcinoma but not in hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut 52(5):706–12CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Yoon JH et al (2002) Bile acids inhibit Mcl-1 protein turnover via an epidermal growth factor receptor/Raf-1-dependent mechanism. Cancer Res 62(22):6500–5PubMed Yoon JH et al (2002) Bile acids inhibit Mcl-1 protein turnover via an epidermal growth factor receptor/Raf-1-dependent mechanism. Cancer Res 62(22):6500–5PubMed
10.
go back to reference Benckert C et al (2003) Transforming growth factor beta 1 stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor gene transcription in human cholangiocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 63(5):1083–92PubMed Benckert C et al (2003) Transforming growth factor beta 1 stimulates vascular endothelial growth factor gene transcription in human cholangiocellular carcinoma cells. Cancer Res 63(5):1083–92PubMed
11.
go back to reference Yoshikawa D et al (2008) Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of EGFR, VEGF, and HER2 expression in cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Cancer 98(2):418–25CrossRefPubMed Yoshikawa D et al (2008) Clinicopathological and prognostic significance of EGFR, VEGF, and HER2 expression in cholangiocarcinoma. Br J Cancer 98(2):418–25CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Wilhelm SM et al (2004) BAY 43–9006 exhibits broad spectrum oral antitumor activity and targets the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis. Cancer Res 64(19):7099–109CrossRefPubMed Wilhelm SM et al (2004) BAY 43–9006 exhibits broad spectrum oral antitumor activity and targets the RAF/MEK/ERK pathway and receptor tyrosine kinases involved in tumor progression and angiogenesis. Cancer Res 64(19):7099–109CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Green SJ, Dahlberg S (1992) Planned versus attained design in phase II clinical trials. Stat Med 11(7):853–62CrossRefPubMed Green SJ, Dahlberg S (1992) Planned versus attained design in phase II clinical trials. Stat Med 11(7):853–62CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Blechacz BR et al (2009) Sorafenib inhibits signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 signaling in cholangiocarcinoma cells by activating the phosphatase shatterproof 2. Hepatology 50(6):1861–70CrossRefPubMed Blechacz BR et al (2009) Sorafenib inhibits signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 signaling in cholangiocarcinoma cells by activating the phosphatase shatterproof 2. Hepatology 50(6):1861–70CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Sugiyama H et al (2011) Potent in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity of sorafenib against human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cells. J Gastroenterol Sugiyama H et al (2011) Potent in vitro and in vivo antitumor activity of sorafenib against human intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma cells. J Gastroenterol
16.
go back to reference Llovet JM et al (2008) Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 359(4):378–90CrossRefPubMed Llovet JM et al (2008) Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med 359(4):378–90CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Iqbal S, Blanke C, Lenz HJ (2006) SWOG S0202: A phase II trial of gemcitabine and capecitabine in patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic gallbladder cancer or cholangiocarcinoma. Abstract # 4131. in Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology Iqbal S, Blanke C, Lenz HJ (2006) SWOG S0202: A phase II trial of gemcitabine and capecitabine in patients (pts) with unresectable or metastatic gallbladder cancer or cholangiocarcinoma. Abstract # 4131. in Proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
18.
go back to reference Bengala C et al (2010) Sorafenib in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma: a phase II trial. Br J Cancer 102(1):68–72CrossRefPubMed Bengala C et al (2010) Sorafenib in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma: a phase II trial. Br J Cancer 102(1):68–72CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Yonemoto N et al (2007) A multi-center retrospective analysis of survival benefits of chemotherapy for unresectable biliary tract cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 37(11):843–51CrossRefPubMed Yonemoto N et al (2007) A multi-center retrospective analysis of survival benefits of chemotherapy for unresectable biliary tract cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 37(11):843–51CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Nehls O et al (2008) Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in patients with advanced biliary system adenocarcinoma: a prospective multicentre phase II trial. Br J Cancer 98(2):309–15CrossRefPubMed Nehls O et al (2008) Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in patients with advanced biliary system adenocarcinoma: a prospective multicentre phase II trial. Br J Cancer 98(2):309–15CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Harder J et al (2006) Outpatient chemotherapy with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with biliary tract cancer. Br J Cancer 95(7):848–52CrossRefPubMed Harder J et al (2006) Outpatient chemotherapy with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin in patients with biliary tract cancer. Br J Cancer 95(7):848–52CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Jarnagin WR et al (2006) Differential cell cycle-regulatory protein expression in biliary tract adenocarcinoma: correlation with anatomic site, pathologic variables, and clinical outcome. J Clin Oncol 24(7):1152–60CrossRefPubMed Jarnagin WR et al (2006) Differential cell cycle-regulatory protein expression in biliary tract adenocarcinoma: correlation with anatomic site, pathologic variables, and clinical outcome. J Clin Oncol 24(7):1152–60CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
SWOG 0514: a phase II study of sorafenib in patients with unresectable or metastatic gallbladder carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma
Authors
Anthony B. El-Khoueiry
Cathryn J. Rankin
Edgar Ben-Josef
Heinz-Josef Lenz
Philip J. Gold
R. Darryl Hamilton
Rangaswamy Govindarajan
Cathy Eng
Charles D. Blanke
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Investigational New Drugs / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-011-9719-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Investigational New Drugs 4/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine