Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Investigational New Drugs 4/2012

01-08-2012 | PHASE II STUDIES

Phase II study of NK105, a paclitaxel-incorporating micellar nanoparticle, for previously treated advanced or recurrent gastric cancer

Authors: Ken Kato, Keisho Chin, Takaki Yoshikawa, Kensei Yamaguchi, Yasushi Tsuji, Taito Esaki, Kenji Sakai, Masami Kimura, Tetsuya Hamaguchi, Yasuhiro Shimada, Yasuhiro Matsumura, Ryuji Ikeda

Published in: Investigational New Drugs | Issue 4/2012

Login to get access

Summary

Purpose NK105 is a new drug delivery system formulation for paclitaxel (PTX) whose recommended dose (RD) is 150 mg PTX equivalent/m2 administered every 3 weeks, as determined in a phase I trial. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NK105 in patients with advanced gastric cancer after failure of first-line chemotherapy. Experimental design Eligible patients had measurable disease and one chemotherapeutic regimen except taxane. NK105 (150 mg PTX equivalent/m2) was administered by a 30-minute intravenous infusion every 3 weeks without anti-allergic premedication until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or patient refusal. The primary efficacy endpoint was best overall response rate (ORR) post baseline. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). All adverse events were reported using CTCAE v3.0. Results Between November 2007 and July 2009, 57 patients were enrolled and 56 were evaluable for efficacy. Two complete responses and 12 partial responses were observed for an ORR of 25%. The median PFS was 3.0 months, the median TTF was 2.8 months, and the median OS was 14.4 months. Drug related toxicity was mainly mild (grades 1–2) to severe (grades 3–4); other data: neutropenia (64.9%); leukopenia (17.5%); lymphopenia (8.8%); neuropathy-sensory (1.8%); fatigue (3.5%); and stomatitis (1.8%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions This study of NK105 (150 mg PTX equivalent/m2) proves the concept for the modest activity and tolerability of a new drug delivery system formulation for PTX. A phase III trial will be evaluated to clarify survival benefit.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Vital Statistics Japan (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) Vital Statistics Japan (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare)
3.
go back to reference Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H et al (2009) Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 10:1063–1069CrossRefPubMed Boku N, Yamamoto S, Fukuda H et al (2009) Fluorouracil versus combination of irinotecan plus cisplatin versus S-1 in metastatic gastric cancer: a randomised phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol 10:1063–1069CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Al-Batran SE, Hartmann JT, Probst S et al (2008) Phase III trial in metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma with fluorouracil, leucovorin plus either oxaliplatin or cisplatin: a study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie. J Clin Oncol 26:1435–1442CrossRefPubMed Al-Batran SE, Hartmann JT, Probst S et al (2008) Phase III trial in metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma with fluorouracil, leucovorin plus either oxaliplatin or cisplatin: a study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie. J Clin Oncol 26:1435–1442CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T et al (2008) S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 9:215–221CrossRefPubMed Koizumi W, Narahara H, Hara T et al (2008) S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (SPIRITS trial): a phase III trial. Lancet Oncol 9:215–221CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S et al (2006) Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study group. J Clin Oncol 24:4991–4997CrossRefPubMed Van Cutsem E, Moiseyenko VM, Tjulandin S et al (2006) Phase III study of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer: a report of the V325 Study group. J Clin Oncol 24:4991–4997CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S et al (2008) Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med 358:36–46CrossRefPubMed Cunningham D, Starling N, Rao S et al (2008) Capecitabine and oxaliplatin for advanced esophagogastric cancer. N Engl J Med 358:36–46CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Hashimoto K, Takashima A, Nagashima K et al (2009) Progression-free survival in first-line chemotherapy is a prognostic factor in second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 136:1059–1064CrossRef Hashimoto K, Takashima A, Nagashima K et al (2009) Progression-free survival in first-line chemotherapy is a prognostic factor in second-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 136:1059–1064CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Thuss-Patience PC, Kretzschmar A, Deist T, et al (2009) Irinotecan versus best supportive care (BSC) as second-line therapy in gastric cancer: a randomized phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO). J Clin Oncol;27:15s, (suppl; abstr 4540). Thuss-Patience PC, Kretzschmar A, Deist T, et al (2009) Irinotecan versus best supportive care (BSC) as second-line therapy in gastric cancer: a randomized phase III study of the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Internistische Onkologie (AIO). J Clin Oncol;27:15s, (suppl; abstr 4540).
10.
go back to reference Wilson D, Hiller L, Geh JI (2005) Review of second-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Clin Oncol 17:81–90CrossRef Wilson D, Hiller L, Geh JI (2005) Review of second-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric adenocarcinoma. Clin Oncol 17:81–90CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Wesolowski R, Lee C, Kim R (2009) Is there a role for second-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer? Lancet Oncol 10:903–912CrossRefPubMed Wesolowski R, Lee C, Kim R (2009) Is there a role for second-line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer? Lancet Oncol 10:903–912CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Kodera Y, Ito S, Mochizuki Y et al (2007) Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (CCOG0302 study). Anticancer Res 27:2667–2671PubMed Kodera Y, Ito S, Mochizuki Y et al (2007) Phase II study of weekly paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer (CCOG0302 study). Anticancer Res 27:2667–2671PubMed
13.
go back to reference Hironaka S, Zenda S, Boku N et al (2006) Weekly paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 9:14–18CrossRefPubMed Hironaka S, Zenda S, Boku N et al (2006) Weekly paclitaxel as second-line chemotherapy for advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer 9:14–18CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Rowinsky EK, Cazenave LA, Donehower RC (1990) Taxol: a novel investigational antimicrotubule agent. J Natl Cancer Inst 82:1247–1259CrossRefPubMed Rowinsky EK, Cazenave LA, Donehower RC (1990) Taxol: a novel investigational antimicrotubule agent. J Natl Cancer Inst 82:1247–1259CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Carney DN (1996) Chemotherapy in the management of patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol 23:71–75PubMed Carney DN (1996) Chemotherapy in the management of patients with inoperable non-small cell lung cancer. Semin Oncol 23:71–75PubMed
17.
go back to reference Weiss RB, Donehower RC, Wiernik PH et al (1990) Hypersensitivity reactions from taxol. J Clin Oncol 8:1263–1268PubMed Weiss RB, Donehower RC, Wiernik PH et al (1990) Hypersensitivity reactions from taxol. J Clin Oncol 8:1263–1268PubMed
19.
go back to reference Kloover JS, den Bakker MA, Gelderblom H et al (2004) Fatal outcome of a hypersensitivity reaction to paclitaxel: a critical review of premedication regimens. Br J Cancer 90:304–305CrossRefPubMed Kloover JS, den Bakker MA, Gelderblom H et al (2004) Fatal outcome of a hypersensitivity reaction to paclitaxel: a critical review of premedication regimens. Br J Cancer 90:304–305CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Hamaguchi T, Matsumura Y, Suzuki M et al (2005) NK105, a paclitaxel-incorporating micellar nanoparticle formulation, can extend in vivo antitumour activity and reduce the neurotoxicity of paclitaxel. Br J Cancer 92:1240–1246CrossRefPubMed Hamaguchi T, Matsumura Y, Suzuki M et al (2005) NK105, a paclitaxel-incorporating micellar nanoparticle formulation, can extend in vivo antitumour activity and reduce the neurotoxicity of paclitaxel. Br J Cancer 92:1240–1246CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Matsumura Y, Maeda H (1986) A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. Cancer Res 46:6387–6392PubMed Matsumura Y, Maeda H (1986) A new concept for macromolecular therapeutics in cancer chemotherapy: mechanism of tumoritropic accumulation of proteins and the antitumor agent smancs. Cancer Res 46:6387–6392PubMed
22.
go back to reference Maeda H, Wu J, Sawa T et al (2000) Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review. J Control Release 65:271–284CrossRefPubMed Maeda H, Wu J, Sawa T et al (2000) Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review. J Control Release 65:271–284CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Hamaguchi T, Kato K, Yasui H (2007) A Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of NK105, a paclitaxel -incorporating micellar nanoparticle formulation. Br J Cancer 97:170–176CrossRefPubMed Hamaguchi T, Kato K, Yasui H (2007) A Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of NK105, a paclitaxel -incorporating micellar nanoparticle formulation. Br J Cancer 97:170–176CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Therasse P, Arbuck S, Eisenhauer E et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216CrossRefPubMed Therasse P, Arbuck S, Eisenhauer E et al (2000) New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:205–216CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTC-AE Version 3.0, March 31, 2003). Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Event (CTC-AE Version 3.0, March 31, 2003).
26.
go back to reference Green S, Dahlberg S (1992) Planned versus attained design in Phase II clinical trials. Stat Med 11:853–862CrossRefPubMed Green S, Dahlberg S (1992) Planned versus attained design in Phase II clinical trials. Stat Med 11:853–862CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Tamura T, Sasaki Y, Nishiwaki Y, Saijo N (1995) Phase I study of paclitaxel by three-hour infusion: Hypotension just after infusion is one of the major dose-limiting toxicities. Jpn J Cancer Res 86:1203–1209CrossRefPubMed Tamura T, Sasaki Y, Nishiwaki Y, Saijo N (1995) Phase I study of paclitaxel by three-hour infusion: Hypotension just after infusion is one of the major dose-limiting toxicities. Jpn J Cancer Res 86:1203–1209CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Boddy AV, Plummer ER, Todd R et al (2005) A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of paclitaxel poliglumex (XYOTAX), investigating both 3-weekly and 2-weekly schedules. Clin Cancer Res 11:7834–7840CrossRefPubMed Boddy AV, Plummer ER, Todd R et al (2005) A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of paclitaxel poliglumex (XYOTAX), investigating both 3-weekly and 2-weekly schedules. Clin Cancer Res 11:7834–7840CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Ibrahim NK, Desai N, Legha S et al (2002) Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of ABI-007, a Cremophor-free, protein-stabilized, nanoparticle formulation of paclitaxel. Clin Cancer Res 8:1038–1044PubMed Ibrahim NK, Desai N, Legha S et al (2002) Phase I and pharmacokinetic study of ABI-007, a Cremophor-free, protein-stabilized, nanoparticle formulation of paclitaxel. Clin Cancer Res 8:1038–1044PubMed
30.
go back to reference Gradishar WJ, Tjulandin S, Davidson N et al (2005) Phase III trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:7794–7803CrossRefPubMed Gradishar WJ, Tjulandin S, Davidson N et al (2005) Phase III trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:7794–7803CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Phase II study of NK105, a paclitaxel-incorporating micellar nanoparticle, for previously treated advanced or recurrent gastric cancer
Authors
Ken Kato
Keisho Chin
Takaki Yoshikawa
Kensei Yamaguchi
Yasushi Tsuji
Taito Esaki
Kenji Sakai
Masami Kimura
Tetsuya Hamaguchi
Yasuhiro Shimada
Yasuhiro Matsumura
Ryuji Ikeda
Publication date
01-08-2012
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Investigational New Drugs / Issue 4/2012
Print ISSN: 0167-6997
Electronic ISSN: 1573-0646
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-011-9709-2

Other articles of this Issue 4/2012

Investigational New Drugs 4/2012 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine