Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica 3/2017

01-12-2017 | Original Research Article

VEP-based acuity assessment in low vision

Authors: Michael B. Hoffmann, Jan Brands, Wolfgang Behrens-Baumann, Michael Bach

Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Issue 3/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Objective assessment of visual acuity (VA) is possible with VEP methodology, but established with sufficient precision only for vision better than about 1.0 logMAR. We here explore whether this can be extended down to 2.0 logMAR, highly desirable for low-vision evaluations.

Methods

Based on the stepwise sweep algorithm (Bach et al. in Br J Ophthalmol 92:396–403, 2008) VEPs to monocular steady-state brief onset pattern stimulation (7.5-Hz checkerboards, 40% contrast, 40 ms on, 93 ms off) were recorded for eight different check sizes, from 0.5° to 9.0°, for two runs with three occipital electrodes in a Laplace-approximating montage. We examined 22 visually normal participants where acuity was reduced to ≈ 2.0 logMAR with frosted transparencies. With the established heuristic algorithm the “VEP acuity” was extracted and compared to psychophysical VA, both obtained at 57 cm distance.

Results

In 20 of the 22 participants with artificially reduced acuity the automatic analysis indicated a valid result (1.80 logMAR on average) in at least one of the two runs. 95% test–retest limits of agreement on average were ± 0.09 logMAR for psychophysical, and ± 0.21 logMAR for VEP-derived acuity. For 15 participants we obtained results in both runs and averaged them. In 12 of these 15 the low-acuity results stayed within the 95% confidence interval (± 0.3 logMAR) as established by Bach et al. (2008).

Conclusions

The fully automated analysis yielded good agreement of psychophysical and electrophysiological VAs in 12 of 15 cases (80%) in the low-vision range down to 2.0 logMAR. This encourages us to further pursue this methodology and assess its value in patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Holder GE (2006) Electrodiagnostic testing in malingering and hysteria. In: Heckenlively J, Arden G (eds) Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision. MIT Press, Cambridge, London, pp 637–641 Holder GE (2006) Electrodiagnostic testing in malingering and hysteria. In: Heckenlively J, Arden G (eds) Principles and practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision. MIT Press, Cambridge, London, pp 637–641
2.
go back to reference Katsumi O, Arai M, Wajima R et al (1996) Spatial frequency sweep pattern reversal VER acuity vs Snellen visual acuity: effect of optical defocus. Vis Res 36:903–909CrossRefPubMed Katsumi O, Arai M, Wajima R et al (1996) Spatial frequency sweep pattern reversal VER acuity vs Snellen visual acuity: effect of optical defocus. Vis Res 36:903–909CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Arai M, Katsumi O, Paranhos FR et al (1997) Comparison of Snellen acuity and objective assessment using the spatial frequency sweep PVER. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 235:442–447CrossRefPubMed Arai M, Katsumi O, Paranhos FR et al (1997) Comparison of Snellen acuity and objective assessment using the spatial frequency sweep PVER. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 235:442–447CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Ridder WH III (2004) Methods of visual acuity determination with the spatial frequency sweep visual evoked potential. Doc Ophthalmol 109:239–247CrossRefPubMed Ridder WH III (2004) Methods of visual acuity determination with the spatial frequency sweep visual evoked potential. Doc Ophthalmol 109:239–247CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mackay AM, Bradnam MS, Hamilton R et al (2008) Real-time rapid acuity assessment using VEPs: development and validation of the step VEP technique. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:438–441CrossRef Mackay AM, Bradnam MS, Hamilton R et al (2008) Real-time rapid acuity assessment using VEPs: development and validation of the step VEP technique. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 49:438–441CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tyler C, Apkarian P (1982) Properties of localized pattern evoked potentials. In: Bodis-Wollner I (ed) Evoked Potentials. The New York Academy of Sciences, New York Tyler C, Apkarian P (1982) Properties of localized pattern evoked potentials. In: Bodis-Wollner I (ed) Evoked Potentials. The New York Academy of Sciences, New York
10.
go back to reference Strasburger H (1987) The analysis of steady state evoked potentials revisited. Clin Vision Sci 1:245–256 Strasburger H (1987) The analysis of steady state evoked potentials revisited. Clin Vision Sci 1:245–256
11.
go back to reference Bach M, Joost W (1989) VEP vs spatial frequency at high contrast: Subjects have either a bimodal or single-peaked response function. In: Kulikowski J, Dickinson C, Murray I (eds) Seeing contour and colour. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 478–484 Bach M, Joost W (1989) VEP vs spatial frequency at high contrast: Subjects have either a bimodal or single-peaked response function. In: Kulikowski J, Dickinson C, Murray I (eds) Seeing contour and colour. Pergamon Press, Oxford, pp 478–484
12.
go back to reference Parry NR, Murray IJ, Hadjizenonos C (1999) Spatio-temporal tuning of VEPs: effect of mode of stimulation. Vis Res 39:3491–3497CrossRefPubMed Parry NR, Murray IJ, Hadjizenonos C (1999) Spatio-temporal tuning of VEPs: effect of mode of stimulation. Vis Res 39:3491–3497CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Meigen T, Bach M (1999) On the statistical significance of electrophysiological steady-state responses. Doc Ophthalmol 98:207–232CrossRefPubMed Meigen T, Bach M (1999) On the statistical significance of electrophysiological steady-state responses. Doc Ophthalmol 98:207–232CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Norcia AM, Tyler CW, Hamer RD, Wesemann W (1989) Measurement of spatial contrast sensitivity with the swept contrast VEP. Vis Res 29:627–637CrossRefPubMed Norcia AM, Tyler CW, Hamer RD, Wesemann W (1989) Measurement of spatial contrast sensitivity with the swept contrast VEP. Vis Res 29:627–637CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Norcia AM, Clarke M, Tyler CW (1985) Digital filtering and robust regression techniques for estimating sensory thresholds from the evoked potential. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 4:26–32CrossRefPubMed Norcia AM, Clarke M, Tyler CW (1985) Digital filtering and robust regression techniques for estimating sensory thresholds from the evoked potential. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 4:26–32CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Tyler CW, Apkarian P, Levi DM, Nakayama K (1979) Rapid assessment of visual function: an electronic sweep technique for the pattern visual evoked potential. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18:703–713 Tyler CW, Apkarian P, Levi DM, Nakayama K (1979) Rapid assessment of visual function: an electronic sweep technique for the pattern visual evoked potential. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18:703–713
19.
go back to reference World Medical Association (2000) Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Med Assoc 284:3043–3045CrossRef World Medical Association (2000) Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. J Am Med Assoc 284:3043–3045CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bach M (2007) The freiburg visual acuity test—variability unchanged by post hoc re-analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245:965–971CrossRefPubMed Bach M (2007) The freiburg visual acuity test—variability unchanged by post hoc re-analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 245:965–971CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Bach M (1996) The freiburg visual acuity test—automatic measurement of visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 73:49–53CrossRefPubMed Bach M (1996) The freiburg visual acuity test—automatic measurement of visual acuity. Optom Vis Sci 73:49–53CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Heinrich TS, Bach M (2001) Contrast adaptation in human retina and cortex. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:2721–2727 Heinrich TS, Bach M (2001) Contrast adaptation in human retina and cortex. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci 42:2721–2727
23.
go back to reference Bach M, Meigen T, Strasburger H (1997) Raster-scan cathode-ray tubes for vision research—limits of resolution in space, time and intensity, and some solutions. Spat Vis 10:403–414CrossRefPubMed Bach M, Meigen T, Strasburger H (1997) Raster-scan cathode-ray tubes for vision research—limits of resolution in space, time and intensity, and some solutions. Spat Vis 10:403–414CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Fahle M, Bach M (2006) Basics of the VEP. In: Heckenlively J, Arden G (eds) Principles and Practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision. MIT Press, Cambridge, London, pp 207–234 Fahle M, Bach M (2006) Basics of the VEP. In: Heckenlively J, Arden G (eds) Principles and Practice of clinical electrophysiology of vision. MIT Press, Cambridge, London, pp 207–234
26.
go back to reference Bach M, Meigen T (1999) Do’s and don’ts in Fourier analysis of steady-state potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 99:69–82CrossRefPubMed Bach M, Meigen T (1999) Do’s and don’ts in Fourier analysis of steady-state potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 99:69–82CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Mackay AM, Hamilton R, Bradnam MS (2003) Faster and more sensitive VEP recording in children. Doc Ophthalmol 107:251–259CrossRefPubMed Mackay AM, Hamilton R, Bradnam MS (2003) Faster and more sensitive VEP recording in children. Doc Ophthalmol 107:251–259CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
VEP-based acuity assessment in low vision
Authors
Michael B. Hoffmann
Jan Brands
Wolfgang Behrens-Baumann
Michael Bach
Publication date
01-12-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Issue 3/2017
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-017-9613-y

Other articles of this Issue 3/2017

Documenta Ophthalmologica 3/2017 Go to the issue