Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica 2/2017

01-04-2017 | Original Research Article

The importance of electrode position in visual electrophysiology

Authors: A. Kurtenbach, S. Kramer, T. Strasser, E. Zrenner, H. Langrová

Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Issue 2/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The DTL fibre electrode is commonly used to record the electric potentials elicited by stimulation of the retina. Two positions are commonly used: it is placed either on the cornea along the lower lid or in the conjunctival fornix. The PERG and OPs have previously been examined and compared under both conditions. The aim of this study was to examine the ERG, flicker response and on–off responses with differing electrode positions.

Methods

Before recruitment, all subjects underwent an ophthalmological examination. We enrolled 13 normal control subjects into the study aged 13–64 years, all with a visual acuity of ≥1.0. We recorded scotopic and photopic ERGs, flicker and on–off responses, for both electrode positions. On the first day, one eye had the electrode placed on the cornea along the lower lid and the other eye had it positioned in the conjunctival sac. On a second day, the recordings were repeated with the alternative electrode placements.

Results

ERG, on–off and flicker responses were all smaller by between 20 and 25% when the DTL electrode was positioned in the conjunctival sac, compared to when it was positioned on the cornea, as did the scatter in the data points. This indicates that there is no advantage clinically for one or the other placement.

Conclusions

Our results confirm other reports examining the effect of electrode position on electrophysiological potentials. When recording with the DTL electrode, it is important to ensure that it is placed at the same position in repeat recordings or in multicentre trials and that it is stable and does not move during recording.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Mentzer AE, Eifler DM, Montiani-Ferreira F, Tuntivanich N, Forcier JQ, Petersen-Jones SM (2005) Influence of recording electrode type and reference electrode position on the canine electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 111(2):95–106. doi:10.1007/s10633-005-4517-7 CrossRefPubMed Mentzer AE, Eifler DM, Montiani-Ferreira F, Tuntivanich N, Forcier JQ, Petersen-Jones SM (2005) Influence of recording electrode type and reference electrode position on the canine electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 111(2):95–106. doi:10.​1007/​s10633-005-4517-7 CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Dawson WW, Trick GL, Litzkow CA (1979) Improved electrode for electroretinography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18(9):988–991PubMed Dawson WW, Trick GL, Litzkow CA (1979) Improved electrode for electroretinography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18(9):988–991PubMed
4.
go back to reference Thompson DA, Drasdo N (1987) Computation of the luminance and pattern components of the bar pattern electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 66(3):233–244CrossRefPubMed Thompson DA, Drasdo N (1987) Computation of the luminance and pattern components of the bar pattern electroretinogram. Doc Ophthalmol 66(3):233–244CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Mierdel P (1995) An improved holder for the DTL fiber electrode in electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol 89(3):249–250CrossRefPubMed Mierdel P (1995) An improved holder for the DTL fiber electrode in electroretinography. Doc Ophthalmol 89(3):249–250CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Honda Y (1977) Some characteristics of the c-wave of ERGs recorded by a pair of electrodes on the cornea and sclera. Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie 202(1):19–26. doi:10.1007/BF00496765 CrossRefPubMed Honda Y (1977) Some characteristics of the c-wave of ERGs recorded by a pair of electrodes on the cornea and sclera. Albrecht von Graefes Archiv für klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie 202(1):19–26. doi:10.​1007/​BF00496765 CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Cringle SJ, Alder VA, Brown MJ, Yu DY (1986) Effect of scleral recording location on ERG amplitude. Curr Eye Res 5(12):959–965CrossRefPubMed Cringle SJ, Alder VA, Brown MJ, Yu DY (1986) Effect of scleral recording location on ERG amplitude. Curr Eye Res 5(12):959–965CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Otto T, Bach M (1997) Reproducibility of the pattern electroretinogram. Ophthalmologe 94(3):217–221CrossRefPubMed Otto T, Bach M (1997) Reproducibility of the pattern electroretinogram. Ophthalmologe 94(3):217–221CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lachapelle P, Benoit J, Little JM, Lachapelle B (1993) Recording the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram with the DTL electrode. Doc Ophthalmol 83(2):119–130CrossRefPubMed Lachapelle P, Benoit J, Little JM, Lachapelle B (1993) Recording the oscillatory potentials of the electroretinogram with the DTL electrode. Doc Ophthalmol 83(2):119–130CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Rotenstreich Y, Fishman GA, Anderson RJ, Birch DG (2003) Interocular amplitude differences of the full field electroretinogram in normal subjects. Br J Ophthalmol 87(10):1268–1271CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rotenstreich Y, Fishman GA, Anderson RJ, Birch DG (2003) Interocular amplitude differences of the full field electroretinogram in normal subjects. Br J Ophthalmol 87(10):1268–1271CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310CrossRefPubMed Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1(8476):307–310CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Holm S (1979) A simple sequential rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70 Holm S (1979) A simple sequential rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70
15.
go back to reference Fishman G, Birch D, Holder G (2001) Electrophysiologic testing in disorders of the retina, optic nerve, and visual pathway, 2nd edn. The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco Fishman G, Birch D, Holder G (2001) Electrophysiologic testing in disorders of the retina, optic nerve, and visual pathway, 2nd edn. The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, San Francisco
16.
go back to reference Hebert M, Lachapelle P, Dumont M (1996) Reproducibility of electroretinograms recorded with DTL electrodes. Doc Ophthalmol 91(4):333–342CrossRef Hebert M, Lachapelle P, Dumont M (1996) Reproducibility of electroretinograms recorded with DTL electrodes. Doc Ophthalmol 91(4):333–342CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Hebert M, Vaegan Lachapelle P (1999) Reproducibility of ERG responses obtained with the DTL electrode. Vis Res 39(6):1069–1070CrossRefPubMed Hebert M, Vaegan Lachapelle P (1999) Reproducibility of ERG responses obtained with the DTL electrode. Vis Res 39(6):1069–1070CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kothe AC, Lovasik JV, Coupland SG (1989) Variability in clinically measured photopic oscillatory potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 71(4):381–395CrossRefPubMed Kothe AC, Lovasik JV, Coupland SG (1989) Variability in clinically measured photopic oscillatory potentials. Doc Ophthalmol 71(4):381–395CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The importance of electrode position in visual electrophysiology
Authors
A. Kurtenbach
S. Kramer
T. Strasser
E. Zrenner
H. Langrová
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Issue 2/2017
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-017-9579-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2017

Documenta Ophthalmologica 2/2017 Go to the issue