Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica 3/2006

01-11-2006 | Original paper

The influence of luminance on the multifocal ERG

Authors: Thilo Schimitzek, Michael Bach

Published in: Documenta Ophthalmologica | Issue 3/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the efficacy of high luminance in increasing the amplitude of the multifocal electroretinogram (mfERG). We examined 5 male and 5 female volunteers in the age of 22–52 years (median 28 years). Three different stimulus luminance levels were applied: the bright areas of the stimulus pattern were set to 150, 300 and 500 cd/m2. We recorded the potentials via DTL electrodes using the VERIS Science 4.4 system with 61 hexagons, pupils were dilated. Analysis was based on the 5 ring averages.

Results

Across all hexagons and subjects, the response density (∼amplitude) rose by 20% when increasing the luminance by a factor of 3.3. The peak times decreased slightly with higher luminance, by less then 1.5 ms.

Conclusions

Combining the present results with those from two previous studies, the gain (= relative amplitude increase for relative luminance increase) is close to 0.4 over a range of 56–700 cd/m2. The stimulus luminance range suggested in the mfERG guidelines seems well chosen.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bach M (1998) Preparation and Montage of DTL-Electrodes. Retrieved 28.07.2006, from <http://www.michaelbach.de/dtl.html> Bach M (1998) Preparation and Montage of DTL-Electrodes. Retrieved 28.07.2006, from <http://​www.​michaelbach.​de/​dtl.​html>
2.
go back to reference Dawson WW, Trick GL, Litzkow CA (1979) Improved electrode for electroretinography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18:988–991PubMed Dawson WW, Trick GL, Litzkow CA (1979) Improved electrode for electroretinography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 18:988–991PubMed
3.
go back to reference Gerth C, Garcia SM, Ma L, Keltner JL, Werner JS (2002) Multifocal electroretinogram: age-related changes for different luminance levels. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240:202–208PubMedCrossRef Gerth C, Garcia SM, Ma L, Keltner JL, Werner JS (2002) Multifocal electroretinogram: age-related changes for different luminance levels. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 240:202–208PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Hood DC, Frishman LJ, Saszik S, Viswanathan S (2002) Retinal origins of the primate multifocal ERG: implications for the human response. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:1673–1685PubMed Hood DC, Frishman LJ, Saszik S, Viswanathan S (2002) Retinal origins of the primate multifocal ERG: implications for the human response. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:1673–1685PubMed
5.
go back to reference Hood DC, Odel JG, Chen CS, Winn BJ (2003) The multifocal electroretinogram. J Neuroophthalmol 23:225–235PubMed Hood DC, Odel JG, Chen CS, Winn BJ (2003) The multifocal electroretinogram. J Neuroophthalmol 23:225–235PubMed
6.
go back to reference Marmor MF, Hood DC, Keating D, Kondo M, Seeliger MW, Miyake Y (2003) Guidelines for basic multifocal electroretinography (mfERG). Doc Ophthalmol 106:105–115PubMedCrossRef Marmor MF, Hood DC, Keating D, Kondo M, Seeliger MW, Miyake Y (2003) Guidelines for basic multifocal electroretinography (mfERG). Doc Ophthalmol 106:105–115PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Raz D, Seeliger MW, Geva AB, Percicot CL, Lambrou GN, Ofri R (2002) The effect of contrast and luminance on mfERG responses in a monkey model of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2027–2035PubMed Raz D, Seeliger MW, Geva AB, Percicot CL, Lambrou GN, Ofri R (2002) The effect of contrast and luminance on mfERG responses in a monkey model of glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 43:2027–2035PubMed
8.
go back to reference R Development Core Team (2006) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved 31.07.2006, from <http://www.R-project.org> R Development Core Team (2006) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved 31.07.2006, from <http://​www.​R-project.​org>
9.
go back to reference Sutter EE, Tran D (1992) The field topography of ERG components in man—I. The photopic luminance response. Vis Res 32:433–446PubMedCrossRef Sutter EE, Tran D (1992) The field topography of ERG components in man—I. The photopic luminance response. Vis Res 32:433–446PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Ueno S, Kondo M, Niwa Y, Terasaki H, Miyake Y (2004) Luminance dependence of neural components that underlies the primate photopic electroretinogram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:1033–1040PubMedCrossRef Ueno S, Kondo M, Niwa Y, Terasaki H, Miyake Y (2004) Luminance dependence of neural components that underlies the primate photopic electroretinogram. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 45:1033–1040PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Yoshii M, Yanashima K, Wakaguri T, Sakemi F, Kikuchi Y, Suzuki S, Okisaka S (2000) A basic investigation of multifocal electroretinogram: reproducibility and effect of luminance. Jpn J Ophthalmol 44:122–127PubMedCrossRef Yoshii M, Yanashima K, Wakaguri T, Sakemi F, Kikuchi Y, Suzuki S, Okisaka S (2000) A basic investigation of multifocal electroretinogram: reproducibility and effect of luminance. Jpn J Ophthalmol 44:122–127PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
The influence of luminance on the multifocal ERG
Authors
Thilo Schimitzek
Michael Bach
Publication date
01-11-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Documenta Ophthalmologica / Issue 3/2006
Print ISSN: 0012-4486
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2622
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10633-006-9028-7

Other articles of this Issue 3/2006

Documenta Ophthalmologica 3/2006 Go to the issue