Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 6/2022

25-08-2021 | Colonoscopy | Original Article

An Interactive Video Educational Tool Does Not Improve the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Study

Authors: Ted B. Walker, Tricia A. Hengehold, Kevin Garza, Benjamin D. Rogers, Dayna Early

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 6/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background/Aims

Inadequate bowel preparation leads to poor outcomes in colonoscopy. Prior investigations have demonstrated improved bowel preparation with pre-procedural educational videos. We aimed to determine whether an interactive, online educational video could improve bowel preparation scores in an outpatient population.

Methods

We performed a prospective, endoscopist-blinded, randomized controlled trial at our hospital-based outpatient endoscopy center. Eligible patients were randomized to two groups. Both groups received standard verbal and written instructions, while the intervention group also received access to an interactive, online video. The primary outcome was improvement in the bowel preparation scores graded using the Boston bowel prep score (BBPS). Secondary outcomes included adenoma detection rate, total number of polyps detected, patient satisfaction, pre-procedure anxiety, and complication rates.

Results

The difference in BBPS in the intervention group (8) compared to the control group (7.6) did not meet statistical significance in our primary outcome of improvement in BBPS (p = 0.076). However, on subgroup analysis, there was a statistically significant improvement in BBPS in the intervention group among African Americans (p = 0.007) and patients older than 65 (p = 0.026). Those in the intervention arm rated pre-procedural materials “very easy” to understand significantly more often than in the control arm (p = 0.018).

Conclusions

Use of an interactive, online educational video for bowel preparation did not lead to improvement in overall BBPS. However, among patients at higher risk for inadequate bowel preparation, such as African Americans and elderly patients, there may be a benefit.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Early DS et al. Appropriate use of GI endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endosc 2012;75:1127–1131.CrossRef Early DS et al. Appropriate use of GI endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endosc 2012;75:1127–1131.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Joseph DA et al. Colorectal cancer screening: estimated future colonoscopy need and current volume and capacity. Cancer 2016;122:2479–2486.CrossRef Joseph DA et al. Colorectal cancer screening: estimated future colonoscopy need and current volume and capacity. Cancer 2016;122:2479–2486.CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:76–79.CrossRef Harewood GC, Sharma VK, de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003;58:76–79.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Cohen SM, Wexner SD, Binderow SR et al. Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:689–696.CrossRef Cohen SM, Wexner SD, Binderow SR et al. Prospective, randomized, endoscopic-blinded trial comparing precolonoscopy bowel cleansing methods. Dis Colon Rectum 1994;37:689–696.CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H et al. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:1797–1802.CrossRef Ness RM, Manam R, Hoen H et al. Predictors of inadequate bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2001;96:1797–1802.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kolts BE, Lyles WE, Achem SR et al. A comparison of the effectiveness and patient tolerance of oral sodium phosphate, castor oil, and standard electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:1218–1223.PubMed Kolts BE, Lyles WE, Achem SR et al. A comparison of the effectiveness and patient tolerance of oral sodium phosphate, castor oil, and standard electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 1993;88:1218–1223.PubMed
7.
go back to reference Marshall JB, Pineda JJ, Barthel JS et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1993;39:631–634.CrossRef Marshall JB, Pineda JJ, Barthel JS et al. Prospective, randomized trial comparing sodium phosphate solution with polyethylene glycol-electrolyte lavage for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 1993;39:631–634.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:72–90.CrossRef Rex DK, Schoenfeld PS, Cohen J et al. Quality indicators for colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015;110:72–90.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Hollander T et al. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:1197–1203.CrossRef Chokshi RV, Hovis CE, Hollander T et al. Prevalence of missed adenomas in patients with inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;75:1197–1203.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European panel of appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:378–384.CrossRef Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers JJ et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European panel of appropriateness of gastrointestinal endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:378–384.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Ben-Horin S, Bar-Meir S, Avidan B. The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists’ recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:2680–2685.CrossRef Ben-Horin S, Bar-Meir S, Avidan B. The impact of colon cleanliness assessment on endoscopists’ recommendations for follow-up colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2007;102:2680–2685.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Murphy D, Jenks M, McCool R et al. A systematic review and cost analysis of repeat colonoscopies due to inadequate bowel cleansing in five European countries. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2019;19:701–709.CrossRef Murphy D, Jenks M, McCool R et al. A systematic review and cost analysis of repeat colonoscopies due to inadequate bowel cleansing in five European countries. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2019;19:701–709.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Prakash SR, Verma S, McGowan J et al. Improving the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation using an educational video. Can J Gastroenterol 2013;27:696–700.CrossRef Prakash SR, Verma S, McGowan J et al. Improving the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation using an educational video. Can J Gastroenterol 2013;27:696–700.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M et al. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:1207–1214.CrossRef Lebwohl B, Kastrinos F, Glick M et al. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2011;73:1207–1214.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wu KL, Rayner CK, Chuah SK et al. Impact of low-residue diet on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2011;54:107–112.CrossRef Wu KL, Rayner CK, Chuah SK et al. Impact of low-residue diet on bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 2011;54:107–112.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Verma S, Fogel J, Beyda DJ et al. Chronic methadone use, poor bowel visualization and failed colonoscopy: a preliminary study. World J Gastroenterol 2012;18:4350–4356.CrossRef Verma S, Fogel J, Beyda DJ et al. Chronic methadone use, poor bowel visualization and failed colonoscopy: a preliminary study. World J Gastroenterol 2012;18:4350–4356.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Appannagari A, Mangla S, Liao C, Reddy KG, Kupfer SS. Risk factors for inadequate colonoscopy bowel preparations in African Americans and whites at an urban medical center. South Med J 2014;107:220–224.CrossRef Appannagari A, Mangla S, Liao C, Reddy KG, Kupfer SS. Risk factors for inadequate colonoscopy bowel preparations in African Americans and whites at an urban medical center. South Med J 2014;107:220–224.CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tae JW, Lee JC, Hong SJ et al. Impact of patient education with cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;76:804–811.CrossRef Tae JW, Lee JC, Hong SJ et al. Impact of patient education with cartoon visual aids on the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2012;76:804–811.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Liu X, Luo H, Zhang L et al. Telephone-based re-education on the day before colonoscopy improves the quality of bowel preparation and the polyp detection rate: a prospective, colonoscopist-blinded, randomised, controlled study. Gut 2014;63:125–130.CrossRef Liu X, Luo H, Zhang L et al. Telephone-based re-education on the day before colonoscopy improves the quality of bowel preparation and the polyp detection rate: a prospective, colonoscopist-blinded, randomised, controlled study. Gut 2014;63:125–130.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Moreno de Vega V, Marín I et al. Improving the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation using a smart phone application: a randomized trial. Dig Endosc 2015;27:590–595.CrossRef Lorenzo-Zúñiga V, Moreno de Vega V, Marín I et al. Improving the quality of colonoscopy bowel preparation using a smart phone application: a randomized trial. Dig Endosc 2015;27:590–595.CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Kang X, Zhao L, Leung F et al. Delivery of instructions via mobile social media app increases quality of bowel preparation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;14:429-435.e3.CrossRef Kang X, Zhao L, Leung F et al. Delivery of instructions via mobile social media app increases quality of bowel preparation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2016;14:429-435.e3.CrossRef
22.
go back to reference Lee YJ, Kim ES, Choi JH et al. Impact of reinforced education by telephone and short message service on the quality of bowel preparation: a randomized controlled study. Endoscopy 2015;47:1018–1027.CrossRef Lee YJ, Kim ES, Choi JH et al. Impact of reinforced education by telephone and short message service on the quality of bowel preparation: a randomized controlled study. Endoscopy 2015;47:1018–1027.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Guo X, Yang Z, Zhao L et al. Enhanced instructions improve the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;85:90-97.e6.CrossRef Guo X, Yang Z, Zhao L et al. Enhanced instructions improve the quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Gastrointest Endosc 2017;85:90-97.e6.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Park JS, Kim MS, Kim H et al. A randomized controlled trial of an educational video to improve quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol 2016;16:64.CrossRef Park JS, Kim MS, Kim H et al. A randomized controlled trial of an educational video to improve quality of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol 2016;16:64.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Hayat U, Lee PJ, Lopez R, Vargo JJ, Rizk MK. Online educational video improves bowel preparation and reduces the need for repeat colonoscopy within three years. Am J Med 2016;129:1219.e1211-1219.e1219.CrossRef Hayat U, Lee PJ, Lopez R, Vargo JJ, Rizk MK. Online educational video improves bowel preparation and reduces the need for repeat colonoscopy within three years. Am J Med 2016;129:1219.e1211-1219.e1219.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Liu C, Song X, Hao H. Educational video followed by retelling bowel preparation process to improve colonoscopy bowel preparation quality: a prospective nursing intervention study. Med Sci Monit 2018;24:6029–6037.CrossRef Liu C, Song X, Hao H. Educational video followed by retelling bowel preparation process to improve colonoscopy bowel preparation quality: a prospective nursing intervention study. Med Sci Monit 2018;24:6029–6037.CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Jeon SC, Kim JH, Kim SJ et al. Effect of sending educational video clips via smartphone mobile messenger on bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Clin Endosc 2019;52:53–58.CrossRef Jeon SC, Kim JH, Kim SJ et al. Effect of sending educational video clips via smartphone mobile messenger on bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Clin Endosc 2019;52:53–58.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Pillai A, Menon R, Oustecky D, Ahmad A. Educational colonoscopy video enhances bowel preparation quality and comprehension in an inner city population. J Clin Gastroenterol 2018;52:515–518.CrossRef Pillai A, Menon R, Oustecky D, Ahmad A. Educational colonoscopy video enhances bowel preparation quality and comprehension in an inner city population. J Clin Gastroenterol 2018;52:515–518.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Rice SC, Higginbotham T, Dean MJ, Slaughter JC, Yachimski PS, Obstein KL. Video on diet before outpatient colonoscopy does not improve quality of bowel preparation: a prospective, randomized, Controlled Trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2016;111:1564–1571.CrossRef Rice SC, Higginbotham T, Dean MJ, Slaughter JC, Yachimski PS, Obstein KL. Video on diet before outpatient colonoscopy does not improve quality of bowel preparation: a prospective, randomized, Controlled Trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2016;111:1564–1571.CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Ann Int Med 2010;152. Epub 24 March Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D, for the CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Ann Int Med 2010;152. Epub 24 March
31.
go back to reference Hutchings HA, Cheung WY, Alrubaiy L et al. Development and validation of the gastrointestinal endoscopy satisfaction questionnaire (GESQ). Endoscopy 2015;47:1137–1143.CrossRef Hutchings HA, Cheung WY, Alrubaiy L et al. Development and validation of the gastrointestinal endoscopy satisfaction questionnaire (GESQ). Endoscopy 2015;47:1137–1143.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Calderwood AH, Jacobson BC. Comprehensive validation of the Boston bowel preparation scale. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:686–692.CrossRef Calderwood AH, Jacobson BC. Comprehensive validation of the Boston bowel preparation scale. Gastrointest Endosc 2010;72:686–692.CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Walter B, Klare P, Strehle K et al. Improving the quality and acceptance of colonoscopy preparation by reinforced patient education with short message service: results from a randomized, multicenter study (PERICLES-II). Gastrointestinal Endosc 2019;89:506–513.CrossRef Walter B, Klare P, Strehle K et al. Improving the quality and acceptance of colonoscopy preparation by reinforced patient education with short message service: results from a randomized, multicenter study (PERICLES-II). Gastrointestinal Endosc 2019;89:506–513.CrossRef
34.
go back to reference Lebwohl FK, Glick M et al. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Clin Endosc 2011;73:1207–1214. Lebwohl FK, Glick M et al. The impact of suboptimal bowel preparation on adenoma miss rates and the factors associated with early repeat colonoscopy. Clin Endosc 2011;73:1207–1214.
35.
go back to reference Guo R, Wang YJ, Liu M et al. The effect of quality of segmental bowel preparation on adenoma detection rate. BMC Gastroenterol 2019;19:119.CrossRef Guo R, Wang YJ, Liu M et al. The effect of quality of segmental bowel preparation on adenoma detection rate. BMC Gastroenterol 2019;19:119.CrossRef
Metadata
Title
An Interactive Video Educational Tool Does Not Improve the Quality of Bowel Preparation for Colonoscopy: A Randomized Controlled Study
Authors
Ted B. Walker
Tricia A. Hengehold
Kevin Garza
Benjamin D. Rogers
Dayna Early
Publication date
25-08-2021
Publisher
Springer US
Keyword
Colonoscopy
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 6/2022
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-021-07215-8

Other articles of this Issue 6/2022

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 6/2022 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine