Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 3/2016

01-03-2016 | Original Article

Poor Inter-test Reliability Between CK18 Kits as a Biomarker of NASH

Authors: Carolina F. M. G. Pimentel, Zhenghui G. Jiang, Takeshi Otsubo, Linda Feldbrügge, Tracy L. Challies, Imad Nasser, Simon Robson, Nezam Afdhal, Michelle Lai

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 3/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Aim

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) affects 15–40 % of the general population; 10–20 % of those patients have a more severe form of the disease known as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Cytokeratin-18 (CK18), released during apoptosis and one of the most studied biomarkers in NASH, can be measured by a number of commercially available kits. We compared serum measurements of the CK18 M30 from two different kits using the same cohort to evaluate the reliability between two test kits.

Methods

We measured serum levels of CK18 M30 from 185 patients with biopsy-proven NAFLD from a single center from 2009 to 2015, using two different ELISA kits, Test 1 (T1) and Test 2 (T2). Advanced fibrosis was defined as fibrosis stages 3–4 and NASH defined by NAS score ≥5.

Results

Mean age was 50.2 years (SD 12.6), 61.1 % male and 87 % White; 49.6 % had NASH and 32.2 % advanced fibrosis. There was no significant correlation between measurements from the two kits (p = 0.86, r = 0.01). While T2 predicted NASH and advanced fibrosis, T1 did not. The area under ROC curve for the prediction of NASH was 0.631 for T2 versus 0.500 for T1.

Conclusions

Measurements from two different CK18 M30 test kits did not correlate with each other. One kit showed statistically significantly higher levels of CK18 M30 in patients with advanced fibrosis and NASH, while the other kit did not. With the increasing use of CK18 as a biomarker in NASH, it is important to standardize the different kits as it could greatly bias the results.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vernon G, Baranova A, Younossi ZM. Systematic review: the epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:274–285.CrossRefPubMed Vernon G, Baranova A, Younossi ZM. Systematic review: the epidemiology and natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in adults. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2011;34:274–285.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Browning JD, Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins R, et al. Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity. Hepatology. 2004;40:1387–1395.CrossRefPubMed Browning JD, Szczepaniak LS, Dobbins R, et al. Prevalence of hepatic steatosis in an urban population in the United States: impact of ethnicity. Hepatology. 2004;40:1387–1395.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Williams CD, Stengel J, Asike MI, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis among a largely middle-aged population utilizing ultrasound and liver biopsy: a prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:124–131.CrossRefPubMed Williams CD, Stengel J, Asike MI, et al. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis among a largely middle-aged population utilizing ultrasound and liver biopsy: a prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2011;140:124–131.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Younossi ZM, Stepanova M, Afendy M, et al. Changes in the prevalence of the most common causes of chronic liver diseases in the United States From 1988 to 2008. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:524–530.CrossRefPubMed Younossi ZM, Stepanova M, Afendy M, et al. Changes in the prevalence of the most common causes of chronic liver diseases in the United States From 1988 to 2008. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2011;9:524–530.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Adams LA, Sanderson S, Lindor KD, Angulo P. The histological course of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a longitudinal study of 103 patients with sequential liver biopsies. J Hepatol. 2005;42:132–138.CrossRefPubMed Adams LA, Sanderson S, Lindor KD, Angulo P. The histological course of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a longitudinal study of 103 patients with sequential liver biopsies. J Hepatol. 2005;42:132–138.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Teli MR, James OF, Burt AD, Bennett MK, Day CP. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver: a follow-up study. Hepatology. 1995;22:1714–1719.CrossRefPubMed Teli MR, James OF, Burt AD, Bennett MK, Day CP. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver: a follow-up study. Hepatology. 1995;22:1714–1719.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Starley BQ, Calcagno CJ, Harrison SA. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma: a weighty connection. Hepatology. 2010;51:1820–1832.CrossRefPubMed Starley BQ, Calcagno CJ, Harrison SA. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma: a weighty connection. Hepatology. 2010;51:1820–1832.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Bugianesi E, Leone N, Vanni E, et al. Expanding the natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: from cryptogenic cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:134–140.CrossRefPubMed Bugianesi E, Leone N, Vanni E, et al. Expanding the natural history of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: from cryptogenic cirrhosis to hepatocellular carcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2002;123:134–140.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guideline by the American Gastroenterological Association, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and American College of Gastroenterology. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:1592–1609.CrossRefPubMed Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice guideline by the American Gastroenterological Association, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, and American College of Gastroenterology. Gastroenterology. 2012;142:1592–1609.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Ong JP, Younossi ZM. Epidemiology and natural history of NAFLD and NASH. Clin Liver Dis. 2007;11:1–16.CrossRefPubMed Ong JP, Younossi ZM. Epidemiology and natural history of NAFLD and NASH. Clin Liver Dis. 2007;11:1–16.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Singh S, Allen AM, Wang Z, Prokop LJ, Murad MH, Loomba R. Fibrosis progression in nonalcoholic fatty liver vs nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of paired-biopsy studies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:643.e9–654.e9. Singh S, Allen AM, Wang Z, Prokop LJ, Murad MH, Loomba R. Fibrosis progression in nonalcoholic fatty liver vs nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of paired-biopsy studies. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13:643.e9–654.e9.
12.
go back to reference McPherson S, Hardy T, Henderson E, Burt AD, Day CP, Anstee QM. Evidence of NAFLD progression from steatosis to fibrosing-steatohepatitis using paired biopsies: implications for prognosis and clinical management. J Hepatol. 2014;62:1148–1155.CrossRefPubMed McPherson S, Hardy T, Henderson E, Burt AD, Day CP, Anstee QM. Evidence of NAFLD progression from steatosis to fibrosing-steatohepatitis using paired biopsies: implications for prognosis and clinical management. J Hepatol. 2014;62:1148–1155.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Pais R, Charlotte F, Fedchuk L, et al. A systematic review of follow-up biopsies reveals disease progression in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver. J Hepatol. 2013;59:550–556.CrossRefPubMed Pais R, Charlotte F, Fedchuk L, et al. A systematic review of follow-up biopsies reveals disease progression in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver. J Hepatol. 2013;59:550–556.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Ekstedt M, Hagström H, Nasr P, et al. Fibrosis stage is the strongest predictor for disease-specific mortality in NAFLD after up to 33 years of follow-up. Hepatology. 2015;61:1547–1554.CrossRefPubMed Ekstedt M, Hagström H, Nasr P, et al. Fibrosis stage is the strongest predictor for disease-specific mortality in NAFLD after up to 33 years of follow-up. Hepatology. 2015;61:1547–1554.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kramer G, Erdal H, Mertens HJMM, et al. Differentiation between cell death modes using measurements of different soluble forms of extracellular cytokeratin 18. Cancer Res. 2004;64:1751–1756.CrossRefPubMed Kramer G, Erdal H, Mertens HJMM, et al. Differentiation between cell death modes using measurements of different soluble forms of extracellular cytokeratin 18. Cancer Res. 2004;64:1751–1756.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Wieckowska A, Zein NN, Yerian LM, Lopez AR, McCullough AJ, Feldstein AE. In vivo assessment of liver cell apoptosis as a novel biomarker of disease severity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2006;44:27–33.CrossRefPubMed Wieckowska A, Zein NN, Yerian LM, Lopez AR, McCullough AJ, Feldstein AE. In vivo assessment of liver cell apoptosis as a novel biomarker of disease severity in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2006;44:27–33.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Yilmaz Y. Systematic review: caspase-cleaved fragments of cytokeratin 18—the promises and challenges of a biomarker for chronic liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:1103–1109.CrossRefPubMed Yilmaz Y. Systematic review: caspase-cleaved fragments of cytokeratin 18—the promises and challenges of a biomarker for chronic liver disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009;30:1103–1109.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Aida Y, Abe H, Tomita Y, et al. Serum cytokeratin 18 fragment level as a noninvasive biomarker for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7:4191–4198.PubMedCentralPubMed Aida Y, Abe H, Tomita Y, et al. Serum cytokeratin 18 fragment level as a noninvasive biomarker for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Int J Clin Exp Med. 2014;7:4191–4198.PubMedCentralPubMed
19.
go back to reference Younossi ZM, Jarrar M, Nugent C, et al. A novel diagnostic biomarker panel for obesity-related nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Obes Surg. 2008;18:1430–1437.CrossRefPubMed Younossi ZM, Jarrar M, Nugent C, et al. A novel diagnostic biomarker panel for obesity-related nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Obes Surg. 2008;18:1430–1437.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Cao W, Zhao C, Shen C, Wang Y. Cytokeratin 18, alanine aminotransferase, platelets and triglycerides predict the presence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. PLoS One. 2013;8:1–8. Cao W, Zhao C, Shen C, Wang Y. Cytokeratin 18, alanine aminotransferase, platelets and triglycerides predict the presence of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. PLoS One. 2013;8:1–8.
21.
go back to reference Anty R, Iannelli A, Patouraux S, Bonnafous S, Lavallard VJ, Amor IB. A new composite model including metabolic syndrome, alanine aminotransferase and cytokeratin-18 for the diagnosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in morbidly obese patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:1315–1322.CrossRefPubMed Anty R, Iannelli A, Patouraux S, Bonnafous S, Lavallard VJ, Amor IB. A new composite model including metabolic syndrome, alanine aminotransferase and cytokeratin-18 for the diagnosis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in morbidly obese patients. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010;32:1315–1322.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Feldstein AE, Wieckowska A, Lopez AR, Liu YC, Zein NN, McCullough AJ. Cytokeratin-18 fragment levels as noninvasive biomarkers for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a multicenter validation study. Hepatology. 2009;50:1072–1078.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Feldstein AE, Wieckowska A, Lopez AR, Liu YC, Zein NN, McCullough AJ. Cytokeratin-18 fragment levels as noninvasive biomarkers for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis: a multicenter validation study. Hepatology. 2009;50:1072–1078.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Chan W-K, Sthaneshwar P, Mustapha NRN, Mahadeva S. Limited utility of plasma M30 in discriminating non-alcoholic steatohepatitis from steatosis—a comparison with routine biochemical markers. PLoS One. 2014;9:e105903.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Chan W-K, Sthaneshwar P, Mustapha NRN, Mahadeva S. Limited utility of plasma M30 in discriminating non-alcoholic steatohepatitis from steatosis—a comparison with routine biochemical markers. PLoS One. 2014;9:e105903.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Cusi K, Chang Z, Harrison S, et al. Limited value of plasma cytokeratin-18 as a biomarker for NASH and fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2014;60:167–174.CrossRefPubMed Cusi K, Chang Z, Harrison S, et al. Limited value of plasma cytokeratin-18 as a biomarker for NASH and fibrosis in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2014;60:167–174.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41:1313–1321.CrossRefPubMed Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41:1313–1321.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Yilmaz Y, Dolar E, Ulukaya E, et al. Soluble forms of extracellular cytokeratin 18 may differentiate simple steatosis from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:837–844.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Yilmaz Y, Dolar E, Ulukaya E, et al. Soluble forms of extracellular cytokeratin 18 may differentiate simple steatosis from nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:837–844.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Shen J, Chan HL-Y, Wong GL-H, et al. Assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease using serum total cell death and apoptosis markers. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;36:1057–1066.CrossRefPubMed Shen J, Chan HL-Y, Wong GL-H, et al. Assessment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease using serum total cell death and apoptosis markers. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012;36:1057–1066.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Poor Inter-test Reliability Between CK18 Kits as a Biomarker of NASH
Authors
Carolina F. M. G. Pimentel
Zhenghui G. Jiang
Takeshi Otsubo
Linda Feldbrügge
Tracy L. Challies
Imad Nasser
Simon Robson
Nezam Afdhal
Michelle Lai
Publication date
01-03-2016
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 3/2016
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3916-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2016

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 3/2016 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine