Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2015

01-10-2015 | Original Article

Patient Non-adherence and Cancellations Are Higher for Screening Colonoscopy Compared with Surveillance Colonoscopy

Authors: Michael Greenspan, Navdeep Chehl, Krista Shawron, Lisa Barnes, Hong Li, Elizabeth Avery, Shannon Sims, John Losurdo, Sohrab Mobarhan, Joshua Melson

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 10/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A significant proportion of the eligible population is non-adherent to colonoscopy for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening.

Aims

To define the demographic and clinical variables associated with non-adherence and multiple cancellations to scheduled colonoscopy within 1 year in a CRC screening and adenomatous polyp surveillance population.

Methods

This was an observational cohort study of 617 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo colonoscopy at an outpatient academic tertiary care center for CRC screening or adenomatous polyp surveillance from January 2012 to September 2012.

Results

Overall, 551 patients (89.3 %) were adherent and 66 (10.7 %) were non-adherent to scheduled colonoscopy at 1 year. The relative risk for non-adherence was 5.42 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.74–10.75] in patients undergoing colonoscopy for screening compared to those for surveillance (16.7 vs. 3.5 % non-adherence, respectively, P < 0.001). An indication of screening in comparison with surveillance was associated with non-adherence [odds ratio (OR) 12.69, 95 % CI 4.18–38.51] and multiple cancellations (OR 2.33, 95 % CI 1.27–4.31) by multiple regression analysis.

Conclusions

Patients undergoing colonoscopy for CRC screening are significantly less likely to attend their scheduled procedure within a year and have more procedure cancellations than those undergoing surveillance colonoscopy.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: CRC screening, incidence, and mortality—United States, 2002–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:884–889. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: CRC screening, incidence, and mortality—United States, 2002–2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60:884–889.
2.
go back to reference Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–857.CrossRefPubMed Lieberman DA, Rex DK, Winawer SJ, et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after screening and polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer. Gastroenterology. 2012;143:844–857.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:1–8.CrossRefPubMed Baxter NN, Goldwasser MA, Paszat LF, et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2009;150:1–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1095–1105.CrossRefPubMed Nishihara R, Wu K, Lochhead P, et al. Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy. N Engl J Med. 2013;369:1095–1105.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Turner BJ, Weiner M, Yang C, et al. Predicting adherence to colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy on the basis of physician appointment-keeping behavior. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:528–532.CrossRefPubMed Turner BJ, Weiner M, Yang C, et al. Predicting adherence to colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy on the basis of physician appointment-keeping behavior. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:528–532.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Jackson DS, Egbuonnu N, Umunakwe C, et al. Scheduled out-patient endoscopy and lack of compliance in a minority serving tertiary institution. Am J Med Sci. 2012;344:194–198.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jackson DS, Egbuonnu N, Umunakwe C, et al. Scheduled out-patient endoscopy and lack of compliance in a minority serving tertiary institution. Am J Med Sci. 2012;344:194–198.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Badurdeen DS, Umar NA, Begum R, et al. Timing of procedure and compliance with outpatient endoscopy among an underserved population in an inner-city tertiary institution. Ann Epidemiol. 2012;22:531–535.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Badurdeen DS, Umar NA, Begum R, et al. Timing of procedure and compliance with outpatient endoscopy among an underserved population in an inner-city tertiary institution. Ann Epidemiol. 2012;22:531–535.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Kazarian ES, Carreira FS, Toribara NW, et al. Colonoscopy completion in a large safety net health care system. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:438–442.CrossRefPubMed Kazarian ES, Carreira FS, Toribara NW, et al. Colonoscopy completion in a large safety net health care system. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;6:438–442.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Adams LA, Pawlik J, Forbes GM. Nonattendance at outpatient endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2004;36:402–404.CrossRefPubMed Adams LA, Pawlik J, Forbes GM. Nonattendance at outpatient endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2004;36:402–404.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gurudu SR, Fry LC, Fleischer DE, et al. Factors contributing to patient nonattendance at open-access endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2006;51:1942–1945.CrossRefPubMed Gurudu SR, Fry LC, Fleischer DE, et al. Factors contributing to patient nonattendance at open-access endoscopy. Dig Dis Sci. 2006;51:1942–1945.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Turner BJ, Weiner M, Berry SD, et al. Overcoming poor attendance to first scheduled colonoscopy: a randomized trial of peer coach or brochure support. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:58–63.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Turner BJ, Weiner M, Berry SD, et al. Overcoming poor attendance to first scheduled colonoscopy: a randomized trial of peer coach or brochure support. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:58–63.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Naylor K, Ward J, Polite BN. Interventions to improve care related to colorectal cancer among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1033–1046.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Naylor K, Ward J, Polite BN. Interventions to improve care related to colorectal cancer among racial and ethnic minorities: a systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2012;27:1033–1046.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Jandorf L, Stossel LM, Cooperman JL, et al. Cost analysis of a patient navigation system to increase screening colonoscopy adherence among urban minorities. Cancer. 2013;119:612–620.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Jandorf L, Stossel LM, Cooperman JL, et al. Cost analysis of a patient navigation system to increase screening colonoscopy adherence among urban minorities. Cancer. 2013;119:612–620.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
14.
16.
go back to reference Lukin DJ, Jandorf LH, Dhulkifl RJ, et al. Effect of comorbid conditions on adherence to colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Educ. 2012;27:269–276.CrossRef Lukin DJ, Jandorf LH, Dhulkifl RJ, et al. Effect of comorbid conditions on adherence to colorectal cancer screening. Cancer Educ. 2012;27:269–276.CrossRef
17.
go back to reference Weiss JM, Smith MA, Pickhardt PJ, et al. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening variation among primary-care providers and clinics. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:1159–1167.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed Weiss JM, Smith MA, Pickhardt PJ, et al. Predictors of colorectal cancer screening variation among primary-care providers and clinics. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013;108:1159–1167.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Sonnenberg A. How to overbook procedures in the endoscopy unit. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:710–715.CrossRefPubMed Sonnenberg A. How to overbook procedures in the endoscopy unit. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:710–715.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Patient Non-adherence and Cancellations Are Higher for Screening Colonoscopy Compared with Surveillance Colonoscopy
Authors
Michael Greenspan
Navdeep Chehl
Krista Shawron
Lisa Barnes
Hong Li
Elizabeth Avery
Shannon Sims
John Losurdo
Sohrab Mobarhan
Joshua Melson
Publication date
01-10-2015
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 10/2015
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-015-3664-2

Other articles of this Issue 10/2015

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 10/2015 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine