Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 5/2014

01-05-2014 | Review

SEDASYS®, Airway, Oxygenation, and Ventilation: Anticipating and Managing the Challenges

Authors: Basavana Gouda Goudra, Preet Mohinder Singh, Vinay Chandrasekhara

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 5/2014

Login to get access

Abstract

In May 2013, the FDA (Federal Drug Administration) approved SEDASYS®, a device that enables non-anesthesia physicians to provide mild-to-moderate sedation to patients undergoing colonoscopy and esophagogastroduodenoscopy. SEDASYS® is the first among the devices being built to provide computer-assisted personalized sedation. Although the intention of this approval is to cut the anesthesia related expenses, it is likely to create new challenges to the users—both clinical and administrative—that might even increase the cost. Deep sedation is required frequently for a successful completion of the procedure, which poses unforeseen challenges. The present review aims to provide clear information to the users regarding pre-procedure assessment, possible sedation related complications and management options.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, et al. Safety and effectiveness of propofol sedation during and after outpatient colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:3420–3425.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M, et al. Safety and effectiveness of propofol sedation during and after outpatient colonoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18:3420–3425.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Goudra BGB, Singh PM. Cardiac arrests during endoscopy with anesthesia assistance. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:1659–1660.PubMedCrossRef Goudra BGB, Singh PM. Cardiac arrests during endoscopy with anesthesia assistance. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:1659–1660.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cooper GS. Complications following colonoscopy with anesthesia assistance a population-based analysis complications after colonoscopy with anesthesia. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;11:1. Cooper GS. Complications following colonoscopy with anesthesia assistance a population-based analysis complications after colonoscopy with anesthesia. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;11:1.
4.
go back to reference Cohen LB, Benson AA. Issues in endoscopic sedation. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;5:565–570. Cohen LB, Benson AA. Issues in endoscopic sedation. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;5:565–570.
5.
go back to reference Pambianco DJ, Vargo JJ, Pruitt RE, Hardi R, Martin JF. Computer-assisted personalized sedation for upper endoscopy and colonoscopy: a comparative, multicenter randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:765–772.PubMedCrossRef Pambianco DJ, Vargo JJ, Pruitt RE, Hardi R, Martin JF. Computer-assisted personalized sedation for upper endoscopy and colonoscopy: a comparative, multicenter randomized study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011;73:765–772.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Koshy G, Nair S, Norkus EP, Hertan HI, Pitchumoni CS. Propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for conscious sedation in GI endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:1476–1479.PubMedCrossRef Koshy G, Nair S, Norkus EP, Hertan HI, Pitchumoni CS. Propofol versus midazolam and meperidine for conscious sedation in GI endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:1476–1479.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Coté GA, Hovis RM, Ansstas MA, et al. Incidence of sedation-related complications with propofol use during advanced endoscopic procedures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2010;8:137–142. Coté GA, Hovis RM, Ansstas MA, et al. Incidence of sedation-related complications with propofol use during advanced endoscopic procedures. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract J Am Gastroenterol Assoc. 2010;8:137–142.
8.
go back to reference Langley MS, Heel RC. Propofol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and use as an intravenous anaesthetic. Drugs. 1988;35:334–372.PubMedCrossRef Langley MS, Heel RC. Propofol. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties and use as an intravenous anaesthetic. Drugs. 1988;35:334–372.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Fulton B, Sorkin EM. Propofol. An overview of its pharmacology and a review of its clinical efficacy in intensive care sedation. Drugs. 1995;50:636–657.PubMedCrossRef Fulton B, Sorkin EM. Propofol. An overview of its pharmacology and a review of its clinical efficacy in intensive care sedation. Drugs. 1995;50:636–657.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Dahan A, Teppema LJ. Influence of anaesthesia and analgesia on the control of breathing. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:40–49.PubMedCrossRef Dahan A, Teppema LJ. Influence of anaesthesia and analgesia on the control of breathing. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:40–49.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Lalley PM. Mu-opioid receptor agonist effects on medullary respiratory neurons in the cat: evidence for involvement in certain types of ventilatory disturbances. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2003;285:R1287–R1304.PubMed Lalley PM. Mu-opioid receptor agonist effects on medullary respiratory neurons in the cat: evidence for involvement in certain types of ventilatory disturbances. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2003;285:R1287–R1304.PubMed
12.
go back to reference Teichtahl H, Wang D, Cunnington D, et al. Ventilatory responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia in stable methadone maintenance treatment patients. Chest. 2005;128:1339–1347.PubMedCrossRef Teichtahl H, Wang D, Cunnington D, et al. Ventilatory responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia in stable methadone maintenance treatment patients. Chest. 2005;128:1339–1347.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Shook JE, Watkins WD, Camporesi EM. Differential roles of opioid receptors in respiration, respiratory disease, and opiate-induced respiratory depression. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;142:895–909.PubMedCrossRef Shook JE, Watkins WD, Camporesi EM. Differential roles of opioid receptors in respiration, respiratory disease, and opiate-induced respiratory depression. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;142:895–909.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Rowe K, Fletcher S. Sedation in the intensive care unit. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2008;8:50–55.CrossRef Rowe K, Fletcher S. Sedation in the intensive care unit. Contin Educ Anaesth Crit Care Pain. 2008;8:50–55.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Wadhwa A, Singh PM, Sinha AC. Airway management in patients with morbid obesity. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2013;51:26–40.PubMedCrossRef Wadhwa A, Singh PM, Sinha AC. Airway management in patients with morbid obesity. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 2013;51:26–40.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Litman RS, Hayes JL, Basco MG, Schwartz AR, Bailey PL, Ward DS. Use of dynamic negative airway pressure (DNAP) to assess sedative-induced upper airway obstruction. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:342–345.PubMedCrossRef Litman RS, Hayes JL, Basco MG, Schwartz AR, Bailey PL, Ward DS. Use of dynamic negative airway pressure (DNAP) to assess sedative-induced upper airway obstruction. Anesthesiology. 2002;96:342–345.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Montravers P, Dureuil B, Desmonts JM. Effects of i.v. midazolam on upper airway resistance. Br J Anaesth. 1992;68:27–31.PubMedCrossRef Montravers P, Dureuil B, Desmonts JM. Effects of i.v. midazolam on upper airway resistance. Br J Anaesth. 1992;68:27–31.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Mahmoud M, Gunter J, Donnelly LF, Wang Y, Nick TG, Sadhasivam S. A comparison of dexmedetomidine with propofol for magnetic resonance imaging sleep studies in children. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:745–753.PubMedCrossRef Mahmoud M, Gunter J, Donnelly LF, Wang Y, Nick TG, Sadhasivam S. A comparison of dexmedetomidine with propofol for magnetic resonance imaging sleep studies in children. Anesth Analg. 2009;109:745–753.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Rimaniol JM, D’Honneur G, Duvaldestin P. Recovery of the swallowing reflex after propofol anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1994;79:856–859.PubMedCrossRef Rimaniol JM, D’Honneur G, Duvaldestin P. Recovery of the swallowing reflex after propofol anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1994;79:856–859.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference D’Honneur G, Rimaniol JM, el Sayed A, Lambert Y, Duvaldestin P. Midazolam/propofol but not propofol alone reversibly depress the swallowing reflex. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1994;38:244–247.PubMedCrossRef D’Honneur G, Rimaniol JM, el Sayed A, Lambert Y, Duvaldestin P. Midazolam/propofol but not propofol alone reversibly depress the swallowing reflex. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1994;38:244–247.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Iwakiri H, Nishihara N, Nagata O, Matsukawa T, Ozaki M, Sessler DI. Individual effect-site concentrations of propofol are similar at loss of consciousness and at awakening. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:107–110.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Iwakiri H, Nishihara N, Nagata O, Matsukawa T, Ozaki M, Sessler DI. Individual effect-site concentrations of propofol are similar at loss of consciousness and at awakening. Anesth Analg. 2005;100:107–110.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Metzner J, Posner KL, Domino KB. The risk and safety of anesthesia at remote locations: the US closed claims analysis. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:502–508.PubMedCrossRef Metzner J, Posner KL, Domino KB. The risk and safety of anesthesia at remote locations: the US closed claims analysis. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2009;22:502–508.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Langeron O, Masso E, Huraux C, et al. Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:1229–1236.PubMedCrossRef Langeron O, Masso E, Huraux C, et al. Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiology. 2000;92:1229–1236.PubMedCrossRef
24.
25.
go back to reference Salem MR, Ovassapian A. Difficult mask ventilation: what needs improvement? Anesth Analg. 2009;109:1720–1722.PubMedCrossRef Salem MR, Ovassapian A. Difficult mask ventilation: what needs improvement? Anesth Analg. 2009;109:1720–1722.PubMedCrossRef
26.
27.
go back to reference Goudra B, Singh P, Sinha A. Outpatient endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: safety and efficacy of anesthetic management with a natural airway in 653 consecutive procedures. Saudi J Anaesth. 2013;7:259.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Goudra B, Singh P, Sinha A. Outpatient endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: safety and efficacy of anesthetic management with a natural airway in 653 consecutive procedures. Saudi J Anaesth. 2013;7:259.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway. A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 1993;78:597–602.CrossRef Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway. A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology. 1993;78:597–602.CrossRef
29.
go back to reference Sinha AC, Purohit M, Singh PM, Goudra BG. Difficult mask ventilation: Tegaderm for sealing a patient’s fate! J Clin Anesth. 2013;25:679–680. Sinha AC, Purohit M, Singh PM, Goudra BG. Difficult mask ventilation: Tegaderm for sealing a patient’s fate! J Clin Anesth. 2013;25:679–680.
30.
go back to reference Goudra BG, Penugonda LC, Sinha AC. Intra-lingual succinylcholine for the treatment of adult laryngospasm in the absence of IV access. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013;29:426–427.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Goudra BG, Penugonda LC, Sinha AC. Intra-lingual succinylcholine for the treatment of adult laryngospasm in the absence of IV access. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2013;29:426–427.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Schwilk B, Bothner U, Schraag S, Georgieff M. Perioperative respiratory events in smokers and nonsmokers undergoing general anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997;41:348–355.PubMedCrossRef Schwilk B, Bothner U, Schraag S, Georgieff M. Perioperative respiratory events in smokers and nonsmokers undergoing general anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1997;41:348–355.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Dennis A, Curran J, Sherriff J, Kinnear W. Effects of passive and active smoking on induction of anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1994;73:450–452.PubMedCrossRef Dennis A, Curran J, Sherriff J, Kinnear W. Effects of passive and active smoking on induction of anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1994;73:450–452.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Tait AR, Knight PR. Intraoperative respiratory complications in patients with upper respiratory tract infections. Can J Anaesth. 1987;34:300–303.PubMedCrossRef Tait AR, Knight PR. Intraoperative respiratory complications in patients with upper respiratory tract infections. Can J Anaesth. 1987;34:300–303.PubMedCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Flisberg P, Paech MJ, Shah T, Ledowski T, Kurowski I, Parsons R. Induction dose of propofol in patients using cannabis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26:192–195.PubMedCrossRef Flisberg P, Paech MJ, Shah T, Ledowski T, Kurowski I, Parsons R. Induction dose of propofol in patients using cannabis. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009;26:192–195.PubMedCrossRef
35.
36.
go back to reference Chung K-C, Juang S-E, Lee K-C, et al. The effect of pre-procedure anxiety on sedative requirements for sedation during colonoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2013;68:253–259.PubMedCrossRef Chung K-C, Juang S-E, Lee K-C, et al. The effect of pre-procedure anxiety on sedative requirements for sedation during colonoscopy. Anaesthesia. 2013;68:253–259.PubMedCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Hong J-Y, Jee YS, Luthardt FW. Comparison of conscious sedation for oocyte retrieval between low-anxiety and high-anxiety patients. J Clin Anesth. 2005;17:549–553.PubMedCrossRef Hong J-Y, Jee YS, Luthardt FW. Comparison of conscious sedation for oocyte retrieval between low-anxiety and high-anxiety patients. J Clin Anesth. 2005;17:549–553.PubMedCrossRef
38.
go back to reference Maranets I, Kain ZN. Preoperative anxiety and intraoperative anesthetic requirements. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:1346–1351.PubMed Maranets I, Kain ZN. Preoperative anxiety and intraoperative anesthetic requirements. Anesth Analg. 1999;89:1346–1351.PubMed
39.
40.
go back to reference Ansarin K, Sahebi L, Sabur S. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: complaints and housing characteristics in a population in the United States. São Paulo Med J Rev Paul Med. 2013;131:220–227. Ansarin K, Sahebi L, Sabur S. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: complaints and housing characteristics in a population in the United States. São Paulo Med J Rev Paul Med. 2013;131:220–227.
41.
go back to reference Kapsimalis F, Kryger M. Sleep breathing disorders in the U.S. female population. J Womens Health. 2002;18:1211–1219.CrossRef Kapsimalis F, Kryger M. Sleep breathing disorders in the U.S. female population. J Womens Health. 2002;18:1211–1219.CrossRef
42.
go back to reference Gambee AM, Hertzka RE, Fisher DM. Preoxygenation techniques: comparison of three minutes and four breaths. Anesth Analg. 1987;66:468–470.PubMedCrossRef Gambee AM, Hertzka RE, Fisher DM. Preoxygenation techniques: comparison of three minutes and four breaths. Anesth Analg. 1987;66:468–470.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Fairfield JE, Goroszeniuk T, Tully AM, Adams AP. Oxygen delivery systems—a comparison of two devices. Anaesthesia. 1991;46:135–138.PubMedCrossRef Fairfield JE, Goroszeniuk T, Tully AM, Adams AP. Oxygen delivery systems—a comparison of two devices. Anaesthesia. 1991;46:135–138.PubMedCrossRef
44.
go back to reference Goudra BG, Penugonda LC, Speck RM, Sinha AC. Comparison of acoustic respiration rate, impedance pneumography and capnometry monitors for respiration rate accuracy and apnea detection during GI endoscopy anesthesia. Open J Anesthesiol. 2013;3:74–79.CrossRef Goudra BG, Penugonda LC, Speck RM, Sinha AC. Comparison of acoustic respiration rate, impedance pneumography and capnometry monitors for respiration rate accuracy and apnea detection during GI endoscopy anesthesia. Open J Anesthesiol. 2013;3:74–79.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Patanwala AE, Christich AC, Jasiak KD, Edwards CJ, Phan H, Snyder EM. Age-related differences in propofol dosing for procedural sedation in the Emergency Department. J Emerg Med. 2013;44:823–828.PubMedCrossRef Patanwala AE, Christich AC, Jasiak KD, Edwards CJ, Phan H, Snyder EM. Age-related differences in propofol dosing for procedural sedation in the Emergency Department. J Emerg Med. 2013;44:823–828.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Borrat X, Trocóniz IF, Valencia JF, et al. Modeling the influence of the A118G polymorphism in the OPRM1 gene and of noxious stimulation on the synergistic relation between propofol and remifentanil: sedation and analgesia in endoscopic procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:1395–1407.PubMedCrossRef Borrat X, Trocóniz IF, Valencia JF, et al. Modeling the influence of the A118G polymorphism in the OPRM1 gene and of noxious stimulation on the synergistic relation between propofol and remifentanil: sedation and analgesia in endoscopic procedures. Anesthesiology. 2013;118:1395–1407.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Restrepo JG, Garcia-Martín E, Martínez C, Agúndez JAG. Polymorphic drug metabolism in anaesthesia. Curr Drug Metab. 2009;10:236–246.PubMedCrossRef Restrepo JG, Garcia-Martín E, Martínez C, Agúndez JAG. Polymorphic drug metabolism in anaesthesia. Curr Drug Metab. 2009;10:236–246.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
SEDASYS®, Airway, Oxygenation, and Ventilation: Anticipating and Managing the Challenges
Authors
Basavana Gouda Goudra
Preet Mohinder Singh
Vinay Chandrasekhara
Publication date
01-05-2014
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 5/2014
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-013-2996-z

Other articles of this Issue 5/2014

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 5/2014 Go to the issue

Stanford Multidisciplinary Seminars

Two Evils: Gastrocolic Fistula and Heart Failure

Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine