Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 7/2013

Open Access 01-07-2013 | Original Article

Factors Predictive of Adverse Events Associated with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Solid Lesions

Authors: Akio Katanuma, Hiroyuki Maguchi, Kei Yane, Shunpei Hashigo, Toshihumi Kin, Maki Kaneko, Shin Kato, Ryusuke Kato, Ryo Harada, Manabu Osanai, Kuniyuki Takahashi, Masanori Nojima

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 7/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) provides high diagnostic accuracy with a low incidence of procedural complications. However, it occasionally causes serious complications, and factors that increase the susceptibility to such adverse events remain unknown.

Aims

We aimed to examine post-procedural events and determine risk factors associated with EUS-FNA of pancreatic solid lesions.

Methods

This single-center retrospective study included 316 consecutive patients with pancreatic solid lesions who underwent 327 EUS-FNA procedures from April 2003 to September 2011. We registered all patients undergoing EUS-FNA in the database and retrospectively ascertained the presence/absence of post-procedural adverse events.

Results

The incidence of post-procedural adverse events, including moderate to mild pancreatitis, mild abdominal pain, and mild bleeding, was 3.4 %. Univariate analysis showed that the incidence of post-procedural events was significantly increased in patients with tumors less than or equal to 20 mm in diameter (P < 0.001), those with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNET) (P = 0.012), and patients who had intervening normal pancreas for accessing the lesion (P = 0.048). Multivariate analysis identified tumors measuring less than or equal to 20 mm in diameter (OR 18.48; 95 % CI 3.55–96.17) and case of PNETs (OR 36.50; 95 % CI 1.73–771.83) were an independent risk factors.

Conclusions

EUS-FNA of pancreatic solid lesions is a safe procedure. However, pancreatic lesions with small diameters and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are important factors associated with adverse events after EUS-FNA.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Vilmann P, Jacobson GK, Henriksen FW, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography with guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;38:172–173.PubMedCrossRef Vilmann P, Jacobson GK, Henriksen FW, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography with guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in pancreatic disease. Gastrointest Endosc. 1992;38:172–173.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Eloubeidi MA, Chen VK, Eltoum IA, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer: diagnostic accuracy and acute and 30-day complications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:2663–2668.PubMed Eloubeidi MA, Chen VK, Eltoum IA, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer: diagnostic accuracy and acute and 30-day complications. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98:2663–2668.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Gress F, Gottlieb K, Sherman S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonographyguided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of suspected pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:459–464.PubMedCrossRef Gress F, Gottlieb K, Sherman S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasonographyguided fine-needle aspiration biopsy of suspected pancreatic cancer. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:459–464.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ. Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1386–1391.PubMedCrossRef Harewood GC, Wiersema MJ. Endosonography-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy in the evaluation of pancreatic masses. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97:1386–1391.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Savides TJ, Donohue M, Hunt G, et al. EUS-guided FNA diagnostic yield of malignancy in solid pancreatic masses: a benchmark for quality performance measurement. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:277–282.PubMedCrossRef Savides TJ, Donohue M, Hunt G, et al. EUS-guided FNA diagnostic yield of malignancy in solid pancreatic masses: a benchmark for quality performance measurement. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;66:277–282.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hoda KM, Rodriguez SA, Faigel DO. EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1218–1223.PubMedCrossRef Hoda KM, Rodriguez SA, Faigel DO. EUS-guided sampling of suspected GI stromal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;69:1218–1223.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Mekky MA, Yamao K, Sawaki A, et al. Diagnostic utility of EUS-guided FNA in patients with gastric submucosal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:913–919.PubMedCrossRef Mekky MA, Yamao K, Sawaki A, et al. Diagnostic utility of EUS-guided FNA in patients with gastric submucosal tumors. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:913–919.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Philipper M, Hollerbach S, Gabbert HE, et al. Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and surgical histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Endoscopy. 2010;42:300–305.PubMedCrossRef Philipper M, Hollerbach S, Gabbert HE, et al. Prospective comparison of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and surgical histology in upper gastrointestinal submucosal tumors. Endoscopy. 2010;42:300–305.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Yasuda I, Tsurumi H, Omar S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for lymphadenopathy of unknown origin. Endoscopy. 2006;38:919–924.PubMedCrossRef Yasuda I, Tsurumi H, Omar S, et al. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy for lymphadenopathy of unknown origin. Endoscopy. 2006;38:919–924.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Krishna NB, Gardner L, Collins BT, et al. Periportal lymphadenopathy in patients without identifiable pancreatobiliary or hepatic malignancy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1373–1377.PubMedCrossRef Krishna NB, Gardner L, Collins BT, et al. Periportal lymphadenopathy in patients without identifiable pancreatobiliary or hepatic malignancy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;4:1373–1377.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference O’Toole D, Plazzo L, Arotçarena R, et al. Assessment of complications of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:470–474.PubMedCrossRef O’Toole D, Plazzo L, Arotçarena R, et al. Assessment of complications of EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;53:470–474.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mortensen MB, Fristrup C, Holem FS, et al. Prospective evaluation of patients tolerability, satisfaction with patient information, and complications in endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy. 2005;37:146–153.PubMedCrossRef Mortensen MB, Fristrup C, Holem FS, et al. Prospective evaluation of patients tolerability, satisfaction with patient information, and complications in endoscopic ultrasonography. Endoscopy. 2005;37:146–153.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Lee LS, Saltzman JR, Bounds BC, et al. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts: a retrospective analysis of complications and their predictors. Clinical Gastroenterol and Hepatol. 2005;3:231–236.CrossRef Lee LS, Saltzman JR, Bounds BC, et al. EUS-guided fine needle aspiration of pancreatic cysts: a retrospective analysis of complications and their predictors. Clinical Gastroenterol and Hepatol. 2005;3:231–236.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Al-Haddad M, Wallace MB, Woodward TA, et al. The safety of fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasound: a prospective study. Endoscopy. 2008;40:204–208.PubMedCrossRef Al-Haddad M, Wallace MB, Woodward TA, et al. The safety of fine-needle aspiration guided by endoscopic ultrasound: a prospective study. Endoscopy. 2008;40:204–208.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A. Prospective assessment of diagnostic utility and complications of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Results from a newly developed academic endoscopic ultrasound program. Dig Dis. 2008;26:356–363.PubMedCrossRef Eloubeidi MA, Tamhane A. Prospective assessment of diagnostic utility and complications of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Results from a newly developed academic endoscopic ultrasound program. Dig Dis. 2008;26:356–363.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Fabbri C, Luigiano C, Cennamo V, et al. Complications of endoscopic ultrasonography. Minerva Gastroentero Dietol. 2011;57:159–166. Fabbri C, Luigiano C, Cennamo V, et al. Complications of endoscopic ultrasonography. Minerva Gastroentero Dietol. 2011;57:159–166.
17.
go back to reference Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:446–454.PubMedCrossRef Cotton PB, Eisen GM, Aabakken L, et al. A lexicon for endoscopic adverse events: report of an ASGE workshop. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;71:446–454.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Sendino O, Garcia P, Gimeno-Garcia AZ, et al. Complications of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA): a prospective investigation in a large series of patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 65:AB199. Sendino O, Garcia P, Gimeno-Garcia AZ, et al. Complications of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and EUS-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA): a prospective investigation in a large series of patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007; 65:AB199.
19.
go back to reference Siddiqui UD, Rossi F, Rosenthal LS, et al. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, randomized trial comparing 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:1093–1097.PubMedCrossRef Siddiqui UD, Rossi F, Rosenthal LS, et al. EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses: a prospective, randomized trial comparing 22-gauge and 25-gauge needles. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:1093–1097.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Bournet B, Migueres I, Delacroix M, et al. Early morbidity of endoscopic ultrasound: 13 years’ experience at a referral center. Endoscopy. 2006;38:349–354.PubMedCrossRef Bournet B, Migueres I, Delacroix M, et al. Early morbidity of endoscopic ultrasound: 13 years’ experience at a referral center. Endoscopy. 2006;38:349–354.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Factors Predictive of Adverse Events Associated with Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration of Pancreatic Solid Lesions
Authors
Akio Katanuma
Hiroyuki Maguchi
Kei Yane
Shunpei Hashigo
Toshihumi Kin
Maki Kaneko
Shin Kato
Ryusuke Kato
Ryo Harada
Manabu Osanai
Kuniyuki Takahashi
Masanori Nojima
Publication date
01-07-2013
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 7/2013
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-013-2590-4

Other articles of this Issue 7/2013

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 7/2013 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine