Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences 6/2011

Open Access 01-06-2011 | Original Article

Apple Sauce Improves Detection of Esophageal Motor Dysfunction During High-Resolution Manometry Evaluation of Dysphagia

Authors: Benjamin Basseri, Mark Pimentel, Omid A. Shaye, Kimberly Low, Edy E. Soffer, Jeffrey L. Conklin

Published in: Digestive Diseases and Sciences | Issue 6/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Esophageal manometry utilizes water swallows to evaluate esophageal motor abnormalities in patients with dysphagia, chest pain, or reflux symptoms. Although manometry is the gold standard for evaluation of these symptoms, patients with dysphagia often have normal results in manometry studies.

Aim

The objective of this work was to test the hypothesis that challenging the esophagus with viscous apple sauce boluses uncovers motor abnormalities in patients with dysphagia not seen when using water swallows.

Methods

High-resolution esophageal manometry was performed using ten water swallows followed by ten apple sauce swallows in consecutive subjects presenting with dysphagia. Subjects with grossly abnormal water swallow evaluations were excluded. Each swallow was categorized as normal, hypotensive (distal isobaric contour plots of <30 mmHg over >5 cm), or simultaneous (distal esophageal velocity ≥8.0 cm/s). Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) was defined as ≥30% hypotensive swallows, and pressurization was defined as ≥20% simultaneous pressure waves.

Results

Data from 41 subjects was evaluated. Overall, 96.3% of water swallows were normal, 2.9% hypotensive, and 0.7% simultaneous. Only 70.3% of viscous swallows were normal; 16.7% were hypotensive and 13.0% were simultaneous (P < 0.001 all groups). Seven (17.1%) met criteria for IEM, and pressurization with viscous swallows was observed for nine (22.0%). Fourteen subjects (34.1%) had abnormal results from viscous studies. The presence of any abnormal water swallows was predictive of abnormal viscous swallows (OR = 9.00, CI = 2.15–80.0), although the presence of hypotensive or simultaneous water swallows was not associated with IEM (OR = 0.63, CI = 0.16–2.17) or pressurization (OR = 7.00, CI = 0.90–315.4) with viscous apple sauce.

Conclusions

Apple sauce challenge increased identification of classifiable motor disorders in patients with dysphagia and may be preferred to alternative bolus materials.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:209–224.PubMedCrossRef Pandolfino JE, Kahrilas PJ. AGA technical review on the clinical use of esophageal manometry. Gastroenterology. 2005;128:209–224.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Fox M, Hebbard GS, Janiak P, et al. High-resolution manometry predicts the success of oesophageal bolus transport and identifies clinically important abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004;16:533–542.PubMedCrossRef Fox M, Hebbard GS, Janiak P, et al. High-resolution manometry predicts the success of oesophageal bolus transport and identifies clinically important abnormalities not detected by conventional manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2004;16:533–542.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Freeman J, Hila A, Castell DO. Esophageal manometry. In: Castell DO, Richter JE, eds. The esophagus. 4th ed. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004:115–134. Freeman J, Hila A, Castell DO. Esophageal manometry. In: Castell DO, Richter JE, eds. The esophagus. 4th ed. New York: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2004:115–134.
4.
go back to reference Blonski W, Vela M, Hila A, Castell DO. Normal values for manometry performed with swallows of viscous test material. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43:155–160.PubMedCrossRef Blonski W, Vela M, Hila A, Castell DO. Normal values for manometry performed with swallows of viscous test material. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2008;43:155–160.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ghosh SK, Janiak P, Schwizer W, et al. Physiology of the esophageal pressure transition zone: Separate contraction waves above and below. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290:G568–G576.PubMedCrossRef Ghosh SK, Janiak P, Schwizer W, et al. Physiology of the esophageal pressure transition zone: Separate contraction waves above and below. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290:G568–G576.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Zhang Q, et al. Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high-resolution manometry: A study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290:G988–G997.PubMedCrossRef Ghosh SK, Pandolfino JE, Zhang Q, et al. Quantifying esophageal peristalsis with high-resolution manometry: A study of 75 asymptomatic volunteers. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2006;290:G988–G997.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Murray JA, Clouse RE, Conklin JL. Components of the standard oesophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2003;15:591–606.PubMedCrossRef Murray JA, Clouse RE, Conklin JL. Components of the standard oesophageal manometry. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2003;15:591–606.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ. The effect of peristaltic dysfunction on esophageal volume clearance. Gastroenterology. 1988;94:73–80.PubMed Kahrilas PJ, Dodds WJ, Hogan WJ. The effect of peristaltic dysfunction on esophageal volume clearance. Gastroenterology. 1988;94:73–80.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Tutuian R, Vela MF, Balaji NS, et al. Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedence and manometry: multicenter study in healthy volunteers. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;1:174–182.PubMedCrossRef Tutuian R, Vela MF, Balaji NS, et al. Esophageal function testing with combined multichannel intraluminal impedence and manometry: multicenter study in healthy volunteers. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2003;1:174–182.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Blonski W, Hila A, Jain V, Freeman J, Vela M, Castell DO. Impedance manometry with viscous test solution increases detection of esophageal function defects compared to liquid swallows. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:917–922.PubMedCrossRef Blonski W, Hila A, Jain V, Freeman J, Vela M, Castell DO. Impedance manometry with viscous test solution increases detection of esophageal function defects compared to liquid swallows. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2007;42:917–922.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Keren S, Argaman E, Golan M. Solid swallowing versus water swallowing: Manometric study of dysphagia. Dig Dis Sci. 1992;37:603–608.PubMedCrossRef Keren S, Argaman E, Golan M. Solid swallowing versus water swallowing: Manometric study of dysphagia. Dig Dis Sci. 1992;37:603–608.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Srinivasan R, Vela MF, Katz PO, Tutuian R, Castell JA, Castell DO. Esophageal function testing using multichannel intraluminal impedance. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;280:G457–G462.PubMed Srinivasan R, Vela MF, Katz PO, Tutuian R, Castell JA, Castell DO. Esophageal function testing using multichannel intraluminal impedance. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;280:G457–G462.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Allen ML, Orr WC, Mellow MH, Robinson MG. Water swallows versus food ingestion as manometric tests for esophageal dysfunction. Gastroenterology. 1988;95:831–833.PubMed Allen ML, Orr WC, Mellow MH, Robinson MG. Water swallows versus food ingestion as manometric tests for esophageal dysfunction. Gastroenterology. 1988;95:831–833.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Mellow MH. Esophageal motility during food ingestion: A physiologic test of esophageal motor function. Gastroenterology. 1983;85:570–577.PubMed Mellow MH. Esophageal motility during food ingestion: A physiologic test of esophageal motor function. Gastroenterology. 1983;85:570–577.PubMed
15.
go back to reference Howard PJ, Maher L, Pryde A, Heading RC. Systematic comparison of conventional oesophageal manometry with oesophageal motility while eating bread. Gut. 1991;32:1264–1269.PubMedCrossRef Howard PJ, Maher L, Pryde A, Heading RC. Systematic comparison of conventional oesophageal manometry with oesophageal motility while eating bread. Gut. 1991;32:1264–1269.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Holloway RH, Tippett MD, Horowitz M, Maddox AF, Moten J, Russo A. Relationship between esophageal motility and transit in patients with type I diabetes mellitus. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:3150–3157.PubMedCrossRef Holloway RH, Tippett MD, Horowitz M, Maddox AF, Moten J, Russo A. Relationship between esophageal motility and transit in patients with type I diabetes mellitus. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:3150–3157.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Bernhard A, Pohl D, Fried M, Castell DO, Tutuian R. Influence of bolus consistency and position on esophageal high-resolution manometry findings. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:1198–1205.PubMedCrossRef Bernhard A, Pohl D, Fried M, Castell DO, Tutuian R. Influence of bolus consistency and position on esophageal high-resolution manometry findings. Dig Dis Sci. 2008;53:1198–1205.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Pouderoux P, Shi G, Tatum RP, Kahrilas PJ. Esophageal solid bolus transit: studies using concurrent videofluoroscopy and manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:1457–1463.PubMedCrossRef Pouderoux P, Shi G, Tatum RP, Kahrilas PJ. Esophageal solid bolus transit: studies using concurrent videofluoroscopy and manometry. Am J Gastroenterol. 1999;94:1457–1463.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Johnston BT, Collins JS, McFarland RJ, Blackwell JN, Love AH. A comparison of esophageal motility in response to bread swallows and water swallows. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:351–355.PubMed Johnston BT, Collins JS, McFarland RJ, Blackwell JN, Love AH. A comparison of esophageal motility in response to bread swallows and water swallows. Am J Gastroenterol. 1993;88:351–355.PubMed
20.
go back to reference Dooley CP, Di Lorenzo C, Valenzuela JE. Esophageal function in humans. Effect of bolus consistency and temperature. Dig Dis Sci. 1990;35:167–172.PubMedCrossRef Dooley CP, Di Lorenzo C, Valenzuela JE. Esophageal function in humans. Effect of bolus consistency and temperature. Dig Dis Sci. 1990;35:167–172.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Spechler SJ, Castell DO. Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities. Gut. 2001;49:145–151.PubMedCrossRef Spechler SJ, Castell DO. Classification of oesophageal motility abnormalities. Gut. 2001;49:145–151.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Apple Sauce Improves Detection of Esophageal Motor Dysfunction During High-Resolution Manometry Evaluation of Dysphagia
Authors
Benjamin Basseri
Mark Pimentel
Omid A. Shaye
Kimberly Low
Edy E. Soffer
Jeffrey L. Conklin
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Digestive Diseases and Sciences / Issue 6/2011
Print ISSN: 0163-2116
Electronic ISSN: 1573-2568
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-010-1513-x

Other articles of this Issue 6/2011

Digestive Diseases and Sciences 6/2011 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine