Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 5/2015

Open Access 01-05-2015 | Original paper

Cervical cancer screening of underserved women in the United States: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1997–2012

Authors: Florence K. L. Tangka, David H. Howard, Janet Royalty, Lucinda P. Dalzell, Jacqueline Miller, Brett J. O’Hara, Susan A. Sabatino, Kristy Joseph, Kristy Kenney, Gery P. Guy Jr., Ingrid J. Hall

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 5/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) provides breast and cervical cancer screens to low-income, uninsured, and underinsured women. We describe the number and proportion of women eligible for cervical cancer screening services and the proportion of eligible women screened over the period 1997–2012.

Methods

Low-income, uninsured, and underinsured women aged 18–64 years who have not had a hysterectomy are eligible for cervical cancer screening through the NBCCEDP. We estimated the number of low-income, uninsured women using data from the US Census Bureau. We adjusted our estimates for hysterectomy status using the National Health Interview Survey and the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. We used data from the NBCCEDP to describe the number of women receiving NBCCEDP-funded screening and calculated the proportion of eligible women who received screening through the NBCCEDP at the national level (by age group, race/ethnicity) and at the state level by age group. We used the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to estimate the proportion of NBCCEDP-eligible women who were screened outside the NBCCEDP and the proportion that are not screened.

Results

We estimate that in 2010–2012, 705,970 women aged 18–64 years, 6.5 % (705,970 of 9.8 million) of the eligible population, received NBCCEDP-funded Pap tests. We estimate that 60.2 % of eligible women aged 18–64 years were screened outside the NBCCEDP and 33.3 % were not screened. The NBCCEDP provided 623,603 screens to women aged 40–64 years, an estimated 16.5 % of the eligible population, and 83,660 screens to women aged 18–39 years, representing an estimated 1.2 % of the eligible population. The estimated proportions of eligible women screened in each state ranged from 1.5 to 32.7 % and 5 % to 73.2 % among the 18–64 and 40–64 years age groups, respectively. Changes in the proportion of eligible women screened over the study period were nonsignificant.

Conclusions

Although the program provided cervical screening to over 700,000 women between 2010 and 2012, it served a small percent of those eligible. The proportion of women screened varied substantially across age groups, racial/ethnic groups, and states. Many low-income, uninsured women are not being screened.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Pierce Campbell CM, Menezes LJ, Paskett ED, Giuliano AR (2012) Prevention of invasive cervical cancer in the United States: past, present, and future. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21(9):1402–1408PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Pierce Campbell CM, Menezes LJ, Paskett ED, Giuliano AR (2012) Prevention of invasive cervical cancer in the United States: past, present, and future. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 21(9):1402–1408PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group (2013) United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2010 incidence and mortality web-based report. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Health Promotion, and National Cancer Institute (cited 2014 June 2). www.cdc.gov/uscs U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group (2013) United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2010 incidence and mortality web-based report. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Health Promotion, and National Cancer Institute (cited 2014 June 2). www.​cdc.​gov/​uscs
5.
go back to reference CDC (2012) Cancer screening—United States, 2010. MMWR 61:41–46 CDC (2012) Cancer screening—United States, 2010. MMWR 61:41–46
7.
go back to reference Howard D, Tangka FKL, Royalty J, Danzell LP, Miller J, O’Hara B, Joseph K, Kenney K, Guy G, Hall IJ (2015) Breast cancer screening of underserved women in the United States: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1998–2012. Cancer Causes Control (forthcoming, this supplement) Howard D, Tangka FKL, Royalty J, Danzell LP, Miller J, O’Hara B, Joseph K, Kenney K, Guy G, Hall IJ (2015) Breast cancer screening of underserved women in the United States: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1998–2012. Cancer Causes Control (forthcoming, this supplement)
8.
go back to reference Lantz P, Mullen J (2015) Overview of the NBCCEDP (forthcoming, this supplement) Lantz P, Mullen J (2015) Overview of the NBCCEDP (forthcoming, this supplement)
9.
go back to reference Lee NC, Wong FL, Jamison PM et al (2014) Implementation of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: the beginning. Cancer 15(120 Suppl 16):2540–2548CrossRef Lee NC, Wong FL, Jamison PM et al (2014) Implementation of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: the beginning. Cancer 15(120 Suppl 16):2540–2548CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Tangka FKL, O’Hara B, Gardner JG, Turner J, Royalty J et al (2010) Meeting the cervical cancer screening needs of underserved women: the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2004–2006. Cancer Causes Control 21:1081–1090PubMedCrossRef Tangka FKL, O’Hara B, Gardner JG, Turner J, Royalty J et al (2010) Meeting the cervical cancer screening needs of underserved women: the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 2004–2006. Cancer Causes Control 21:1081–1090PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Smith J (2013) U.S. Census Bureau, current population reports, series P60–245, income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States 2012. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Smith J (2013) U.S. Census Bureau, current population reports, series P60–245, income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States 2012. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington
12.
go back to reference Dalzell LP, Tangka FKL, Powers DS, Holmes, O’Hara BJ, Kristy J, Janet R (2015) Data sources to identify low income, uninsured populations: application to public health—National Breast and Cervical Early Detection Program (forthcoming, this supplement) Dalzell LP, Tangka FKL, Powers DS, Holmes, O’Hara BJ, Kristy J, Janet R (2015) Data sources to identify low income, uninsured populations: application to public health—National Breast and Cervical Early Detection Program (forthcoming, this supplement)
15.
go back to reference United States Government Accountability Office (2009) Report to congressional requesters. MEDICAID. Source of screening affect women’s eligibility for coverage of breast and cervical cancer treatment in some states. GAO-09-384 (cited 2014 June 2). http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09384.pdf United States Government Accountability Office (2009) Report to congressional requesters. MEDICAID. Source of screening affect women’s eligibility for coverage of breast and cervical cancer treatment in some states. GAO-09-384 (cited 2014 June 2). http://​www.​gao.​gov/​new.​items/​d09384.​pdf
19.
go back to reference Miller JW, Plescia M, Ekwueme DU (2014) Public health national approach to reducing breast and cervical cancer disparities. Cancer 15(120 Suppl 16):2537–2539CrossRef Miller JW, Plescia M, Ekwueme DU (2014) Public health national approach to reducing breast and cervical cancer disparities. Cancer 15(120 Suppl 16):2537–2539CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Yancy B, DeGroff A, Royalty J, Marroulis S, Mattingly C, Benard VB (2014) Using data to effectively manage a national screening program. Cancer 15(120 Suppl 16):2575–2583CrossRef Yancy B, DeGroff A, Royalty J, Marroulis S, Mattingly C, Benard VB (2014) Using data to effectively manage a national screening program. Cancer 15(120 Suppl 16):2575–2583CrossRef
21.
go back to reference U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2003) Recommendations and rationale screening for cervical cancer: recommendations and rationale. Am Fam Physician 67(8):1759–1766 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2003) Recommendations and rationale screening for cervical cancer: recommendations and rationale. Am Fam Physician 67(8):1759–1766
22.
go back to reference Tangka FKL, Dalaker J, Chattopadhyay SK, Gardner JG, Royalty J, Hall IJ, DeGroff A, Blackman DK, Coates RJ (2006) Meeting the mammography screening needs of underserved women: the performance of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program in 2002–2003. Cancer Causes Control 17:1145–1154PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Tangka FKL, Dalaker J, Chattopadhyay SK, Gardner JG, Royalty J, Hall IJ, DeGroff A, Blackman DK, Coates RJ (2006) Meeting the mammography screening needs of underserved women: the performance of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program in 2002–2003. Cancer Causes Control 17:1145–1154PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Corcoran J, Crowley M (2014) Latinas’ attitudes about cervical cancer prevention: a meta-synthesis. J Cult Divers 21(1):15–21PubMed Corcoran J, Crowley M (2014) Latinas’ attitudes about cervical cancer prevention: a meta-synthesis. J Cult Divers 21(1):15–21PubMed
24.
go back to reference Fayanju OM, Kraenzle S, Drake BF, Oka M, Goodman MS (2014) Perceived barriers to mammography among underserved women in a Breast Health Center Outreach Program. Am J Surg 208(3):425–434 Fayanju OM, Kraenzle S, Drake BF, Oka M, Goodman MS (2014) Perceived barriers to mammography among underserved women in a Breast Health Center Outreach Program. Am J Surg 208(3):425–434
25.
go back to reference Henry KA, McDonald K, Sherman R, Kinney AY, Stroup AM (2014) Association between individual and geographic factors and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines. J Womens Health 23(8):664–674 Henry KA, McDonald K, Sherman R, Kinney AY, Stroup AM (2014) Association between individual and geographic factors and nonadherence to mammography screening guidelines. J Womens Health 23(8):664–674
26.
go back to reference Fang DM, Baker DL (2013) Barriers and facilitators of cervical cancer screening among women of Hmong origin. J Health Care Poor Underserved 24(2):540–555PubMedCrossRef Fang DM, Baker DL (2013) Barriers and facilitators of cervical cancer screening among women of Hmong origin. J Health Care Poor Underserved 24(2):540–555PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference CDC (2012) Breast cancer screening among adult women—behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2010. MMWR 61:46–50 CDC (2012) Breast cancer screening among adult women—behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2010. MMWR 61:46–50
28.
go back to reference Ackerson K, Gretebeck K (2007) Factors influencing cancer screening practices of underserved women. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 19(11):591–601PubMedCrossRef Ackerson K, Gretebeck K (2007) Factors influencing cancer screening practices of underserved women. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 19(11):591–601PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Song L, Fletcher R (1998) Breast cancer rescreening in low-income women. Am J Prev Med 15(2):128–133PubMedCrossRef Song L, Fletcher R (1998) Breast cancer rescreening in low-income women. Am J Prev Med 15(2):128–133PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Hall IJ, Rim SH, Johnson-Turbes CA, Vanderpool R, Kamalu NN (2012) The African American women and mass media campaign: a CDC breast cancer screening project. J Womens Health 21:1107–1113CrossRef Hall IJ, Rim SH, Johnson-Turbes CA, Vanderpool R, Kamalu NN (2012) The African American women and mass media campaign: a CDC breast cancer screening project. J Womens Health 21:1107–1113CrossRef
31.
go back to reference Subramanian S, Tangka FKL, Ekwueme DU, Trogdon J, Crouse W, Royalty J (2015) Explaining variation by state in breast and cervical cancer screening proportions in the NBCCEDP (forthcoming, this supplement) Subramanian S, Tangka FKL, Ekwueme DU, Trogdon J, Crouse W, Royalty J (2015) Explaining variation by state in breast and cervical cancer screening proportions in the NBCCEDP (forthcoming, this supplement)
32.
go back to reference Dalaker J, Proctor BD (2000) U.S. Census Bureau, current population reports, series P60–210, poverty in the United States: 1999. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington Dalaker J, Proctor BD (2000) U.S. Census Bureau, current population reports, series P60–210, poverty in the United States: 1999. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington
33.
go back to reference Pascale J, Rodean J, Leeman J, Cosenza C, Schoua-Glusberg A (2013) Preparing to measure health coverage in federal surveys post-reform: lessons from Massachusetts. Inquiry 50(2):106–123PubMed Pascale J, Rodean J, Leeman J, Cosenza C, Schoua-Glusberg A (2013) Preparing to measure health coverage in federal surveys post-reform: lessons from Massachusetts. Inquiry 50(2):106–123PubMed
34.
go back to reference Miller JW, King JB, Ryerson AB, Eheman CR, White MC (2009) Mammography use from 2000 to 2006: state-level trends with corresponding breast cancer incidence rates. Am J Roentgenol 192:352–360CrossRef Miller JW, King JB, Ryerson AB, Eheman CR, White MC (2009) Mammography use from 2000 to 2006: state-level trends with corresponding breast cancer incidence rates. Am J Roentgenol 192:352–360CrossRef
35.
go back to reference Ochner MH, Salvail FR, Ford ES, Ajani U (2008) Obesity and self-reported general health, Hawaii BRFSS: are polynesians at higher risk? Obesity 16(4):923–926PubMedCrossRef Ochner MH, Salvail FR, Ford ES, Ajani U (2008) Obesity and self-reported general health, Hawaii BRFSS: are polynesians at higher risk? Obesity 16(4):923–926PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Brown ML, Klabunde CN, Cronin KA, White MC, Richardson LC, McNeel TS (2014) Challenges in meeting healthy people 2020 objectives for cancer-related preventive services, National Health Interview Survey, 2008 and 2010. Prev Chronic Dis 11:130174CrossRef Brown ML, Klabunde CN, Cronin KA, White MC, Richardson LC, McNeel TS (2014) Challenges in meeting healthy people 2020 objectives for cancer-related preventive services, National Health Interview Survey, 2008 and 2010. Prev Chronic Dis 11:130174CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Cervical cancer screening of underserved women in the United States: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, 1997–2012
Authors
Florence K. L. Tangka
David H. Howard
Janet Royalty
Lucinda P. Dalzell
Jacqueline Miller
Brett J. O’Hara
Susan A. Sabatino
Kristy Joseph
Kristy Kenney
Gery P. Guy Jr.
Ingrid J. Hall
Publication date
01-05-2015
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 5/2015
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-015-0524-5

Other articles of this Issue 5/2015

Cancer Causes & Control 5/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine