Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 1/2010

01-01-2010 | Original paper

Screening mammography intervals among postmenopausal hormone therapy users and nonusers

Authors: Tracy Onega, Todd MacKenzie, Julia Weiss, Martha Goodrich, Linda Titus-Ernstoff

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 1/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The recent decline in US breast cancer incidence rates has been attributed to the marked reduction in use of postmenopausal hormone therapy (HT). An alternative explanation is that women who are not routinely seeking medical care to renew HT prescriptions may be less adherent to recommendations for mammographic screening. To investigate the latter possibility, we compared mammographic intervals according to HT use.

Methods

Using data (1995–2007) from the New Hampshire Mammography Network (NHMN), a state-based mammography registry, we assessed mammographic intervals corresponding to HT use or nonuse among postmenopausal women. We used linear mixed effects models to assess whether the length of screening mammogram intervals differed according to HT use.

Results

A total of 310,185 mammograms, representing 76,192 postmenopausal women and 319,353 person-years of screening, were included in the analysis. The median screening interval corresponding to HT use overall was 13.0 months (interquartile range: 12.4–15.1) and for nonuse was 13.1 (interquartile range: 12.4–15.8). Virtually, all screening mammograms occurred within a 2-year interval regardless of HT use or nonuse (98.5 and 98.1%, respectively).

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that screening mammography intervals are similar whether or not women are using HT. Thus, reduced utilization of screening mammography is unlikely to account for the decrease in breast cancer incidence seen soon after the WHI report.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Beral V (2003) Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the million women study. Lancet 362(9382):419–427CrossRefPubMed Beral V (2003) Breast cancer and hormone-replacement therapy in the million women study. Lancet 362(9382):419–427CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Chen WY, Manson JE, Hankinson SE et al (2006) Unopposed estrogen therapy and the risk of invasive breast cancer. Arch Intern Med 166(9):1027–1032CrossRefPubMed Chen WY, Manson JE, Hankinson SE et al (2006) Unopposed estrogen therapy and the risk of invasive breast cancer. Arch Intern Med 166(9):1027–1032CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Colditz GA, Hankinson SE, Hunter DJ et al (1995) The use of estrogens and progestins and the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 332(24):1589–1593CrossRefPubMed Colditz GA, Hankinson SE, Hunter DJ et al (1995) The use of estrogens and progestins and the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 332(24):1589–1593CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC et al (1992) Type of postmenopausal hormone use and risk of breast cancer: 12-year follow-up from the nurses’ health study. Cancer Causes Control 3(5):433–439CrossRefPubMed Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC et al (1992) Type of postmenopausal hormone use and risk of breast cancer: 12-year follow-up from the nurses’ health study. Cancer Causes Control 3(5):433–439CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA et al (1997) Postmenopausal hormone therapy and mortality. N Engl J Med 336(25):1769–1775CrossRefPubMed Grodstein F, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA et al (1997) Postmenopausal hormone therapy and mortality. N Engl J Med 336(25):1769–1775CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL et al (2002) Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the women’s health initiative randomized controlled trial. Jama 288(3):321–333CrossRefPubMed Rossouw JE, Anderson GL, Prentice RL et al (2002) Risks and benefits of estrogen plus progestin in healthy postmenopausal women: principal results from the women’s health initiative randomized controlled trial. Jama 288(3):321–333CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Breen N, AC K, Meissner HI et al (2007) Reported drop in mammography: is this cause for concern? Cancer 109(12):2405–2409CrossRefPubMed Breen N, AC K, Meissner HI et al (2007) Reported drop in mammography: is this cause for concern? Cancer 109(12):2405–2409CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Buist DS, Newton KM, Miglioretti DL et al (2004) Hormone therapy prescribing patterns in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 104(5 Pt 1):1042–1050PubMed Buist DS, Newton KM, Miglioretti DL et al (2004) Hormone therapy prescribing patterns in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 104(5 Pt 1):1042–1050PubMed
9.
go back to reference Clarke CA, Glaser SL, Uratsu CS, Selby JV, Kushi LH, Herrinton LJ (2006) Recent declines in hormone therapy utilization and breast cancer incidence: clinical and population-based evidence. J Clin Oncol 24(33):e49–e50CrossRefPubMed Clarke CA, Glaser SL, Uratsu CS, Selby JV, Kushi LH, Herrinton LJ (2006) Recent declines in hormone therapy utilization and breast cancer incidence: clinical and population-based evidence. J Clin Oncol 24(33):e49–e50CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Hersh AL, Stefanick ML, Stafford RS (2004) National use of postmenopausal hormone therapy: annual trends and response to recent evidence. Jama 291(1):47–53CrossRefPubMed Hersh AL, Stefanick ML, Stafford RS (2004) National use of postmenopausal hormone therapy: annual trends and response to recent evidence. Jama 291(1):47–53CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Krieger N (2008) Hormone therapy and the rise and perhaps fall of US breast cancer incidence rates: critical reflections. Int J Epidemiol 37(3):627–637 Krieger N (2008) Hormone therapy and the rise and perhaps fall of US breast cancer incidence rates: critical reflections. Int J Epidemiol 37(3):627–637
12.
go back to reference Ravdin PM, Cronin KA, Howlader N et al (2007) The decrease in breast-cancer incidence in 2003 in the United States. N Engl J Med 356(16):1670–1674CrossRefPubMed Ravdin PM, Cronin KA, Howlader N et al (2007) The decrease in breast-cancer incidence in 2003 in the United States. N Engl J Med 356(16):1670–1674CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Wei F, Miglioretti DL, Connelly MT et al (2005) Changes in women’s use of hormones after the women’s health initiative estrogen and progestin trial by race, education, and income. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 35:106–112CrossRefPubMed Wei F, Miglioretti DL, Connelly MT et al (2005) Changes in women’s use of hormones after the women’s health initiative estrogen and progestin trial by race, education, and income. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 35:106–112CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Health, United States (2006) With chartbook on trends in the health of Americans. In: National Center for Health Statistics. DHHS pub. no. 2006-1232 Health, United States (2006) With chartbook on trends in the health of Americans. In: National Center for Health Statistics. DHHS pub. no. 2006-1232
15.
go back to reference Jemal A, Ward E, Thun MJ (2007) Recent trends in breast cancer incidence rates by age and tumor characteristics among US women. Breast Cancer Res 9(3):1–6CrossRef Jemal A, Ward E, Thun MJ (2007) Recent trends in breast cancer incidence rates by age and tumor characteristics among US women. Breast Cancer Res 9(3):1–6CrossRef
16.
go back to reference US Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics (1999–2004) Incidence and mortality web-based report. US Department of Health and Human Services C, Atlanta US Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics (1999–2004) Incidence and mortality web-based report. US Department of Health and Human Services C, Atlanta
17.
go back to reference Glass AG, Lacey JV Jr, Carreon JD, Hoover RN (2007) Breast cancer incidence, 1980–2006: combined roles of menopausal hormone therapy, screening mammography, and estrogen receptor status. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(15):1152–1161CrossRefPubMed Glass AG, Lacey JV Jr, Carreon JD, Hoover RN (2007) Breast cancer incidence, 1980–2006: combined roles of menopausal hormone therapy, screening mammography, and estrogen receptor status. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(15):1152–1161CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Kerlikowske K, Miglioretti DL, Buist DS, Walker R, Carney PA (2007) Declines in invasive breast cancer and use of postmenopausal hormone therapy in a screening mammography population. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(17):1335–1339CrossRefPubMed Kerlikowske K, Miglioretti DL, Buist DS, Walker R, Carney PA (2007) Declines in invasive breast cancer and use of postmenopausal hormone therapy in a screening mammography population. J Natl Cancer Inst 99(17):1335–1339CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Katalinic A, Rawal R (2008) Decline in breast cancer incidence after decrease in utilisation of hormone replacement therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 107(3):427–430CrossRefPubMed Katalinic A, Rawal R (2008) Decline in breast cancer incidence after decrease in utilisation of hormone replacement therapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 107(3):427–430CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Zahl PH, Strand BH, Maehlen J (2004) Incidence of breast cancer in Norway and Sweden during introduction of nationwide screening: prospective cohort study. BMJ 328(7445):921–924CrossRefPubMed Zahl PH, Strand BH, Maehlen J (2004) Incidence of breast cancer in Norway and Sweden during introduction of nationwide screening: prospective cohort study. BMJ 328(7445):921–924CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Kliewer EV, Demers AA, Nugent ZJ (2007) A decline in breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med 357(5):509–510 (author reply 13)CrossRefPubMed Kliewer EV, Demers AA, Nugent ZJ (2007) A decline in breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med 357(5):509–510 (author reply 13)CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Joffe MM, Byrne C, Colditz GA (2001) Postmenopausal hormone use, screening, and breast cancer: characterization and control of a bias. Epidemiology 12(4):429–438CrossRefPubMed Joffe MM, Byrne C, Colditz GA (2001) Postmenopausal hormone use, screening, and breast cancer: characterization and control of a bias. Epidemiology 12(4):429–438CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Andersson I, Aspegren K, Janzon L (1988) Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmo mammographic screening trial. BMJ 279:943–948CrossRef Andersson I, Aspegren K, Janzon L (1988) Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmo mammographic screening trial. BMJ 279:943–948CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Frisell J, Eklund G, Hellstrom L, Lidbrink E, Rutqvist LE, Somell A (1991) Randomized study of mammographic screening—preliminary report on mortality in the Stockholm trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 18:49–56CrossRefPubMed Frisell J, Eklund G, Hellstrom L, Lidbrink E, Rutqvist LE, Somell A (1991) Randomized study of mammographic screening—preliminary report on mortality in the Stockholm trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 18:49–56CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Nystrom L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S et al (1993) Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 341(8851):973–978CrossRefPubMed Nystrom L, Rutqvist LE, Wall S et al (1993) Breast cancer screening with mammography: overview of Swedish randomised trials. Lancet 341(8851):973–978CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Roberts MM, Alexander F, Anderson TJ et al (1990) Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years. Lancet 335(8684):241–246CrossRefPubMed Roberts MM, Alexander F, Anderson TJ et al (1990) Edinburgh trial of screening for breast cancer: mortality at seven years. Lancet 335(8684):241–246CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L (1988) Periodic screening for breast cancer: the health insurance plan project and its sequelae, 1963–1986. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L (1988) Periodic screening for breast cancer: the health insurance plan project and its sequelae, 1963–1986. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
31.
go back to reference Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Duffy SW, Day N, Gad A, Grontoft O (1992) Update of the Swedish two-country program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 30:187–210PubMed Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Duffy SW, Day N, Gad A, Grontoft O (1992) Update of the Swedish two-country program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 30:187–210PubMed
32.
go back to reference Carney PA, Poplack SP, Wells WA, Littenberg B (1996) The New Hampshire mammography network: the development and design of a population-based registry. AJR 167(2):367–372PubMed Carney PA, Poplack SP, Wells WA, Littenberg B (1996) The New Hampshire mammography network: the development and design of a population-based registry. AJR 167(2):367–372PubMed
33.
go back to reference Petersen L, Sørensen TIA, Nielsen GG, Andersen PK (2006) Inference methods for correlated left truncated lifetimes: parent and offspring relations in an adoption study. Lifetime Data Anal 12(1):5–20CrossRefPubMed Petersen L, Sørensen TIA, Nielsen GG, Andersen PK (2006) Inference methods for correlated left truncated lifetimes: parent and offspring relations in an adoption study. Lifetime Data Anal 12(1):5–20CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Chlebowski RT, Kuller LH, Prentice RL, Stefanick ML, Manson JE, Gass M et al (2009) Breast cancer after use of estrogen plus progestin in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 360(6):573–587CrossRefPubMed Chlebowski RT, Kuller LH, Prentice RL, Stefanick ML, Manson JE, Gass M et al (2009) Breast cancer after use of estrogen plus progestin in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 360(6):573–587CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Screening mammography intervals among postmenopausal hormone therapy users and nonusers
Authors
Tracy Onega
Todd MacKenzie
Julia Weiss
Martha Goodrich
Linda Titus-Ernstoff
Publication date
01-01-2010
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 1/2010
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-009-9444-6

Other articles of this Issue 1/2010

Cancer Causes & Control 1/2010 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine