Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Cancer Causes & Control
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 9/2008

01-11-2008 | Original Paper

Social inequalities in the incidence and case fatality of cancers of the lung, the stomach, the bowels, and the breast

Author: Siegfried Geyer

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 9/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

In order to examine health inequalities in terms of incidences and case fatalities in a German health insurance population. Lung cancer, stomach cancer, intestinal carcinoma, and breast cancer were considered. Social differentiation was depicted by income and occupational position in order to examine which one is more strongly associated with incidence and case fatality.

Methods

Analyses were performed using data from a statutory health insurance (n = 170,848). Incomes were divided into quintiles, and subjects were grouped according to occupational status.

Results

For lung cancer incidence a gradient between the highest and the lowest 20% of the income distribution emerged. The relative risk of the lowest category was RR = 7.03, for occupational position the figure was RR = 6.98. For stomach cancer the relative risks were RR = 5.33 for income and RR = 7.11 for occupational position. For intestinal carcinoma only income was significantly related with incidence (RR = 4.37 for the lowest 20% of the income distribution), and for breast cancer incidence no social inequalities were found. For case fatality increased relative risks emerged for lung cancer, but only for income.

Conclusions

Income and occupational position were associated with cancer incidence with the exception of breast cancer. Apart from lung cancer, case fatalities were unrelated to measures of social differentiation.
Literature
1.
Hart CL, Hole DJ, Gillis CR, Smith GD, Watt GCM, Hawthorne VM (2001) Social class differences in lung cancer mortality: risk factor explanations using two Scottish cohort studies. Int J Epidemiol 30:268–274PubMedCrossRef
2.
Marshall B, Chevalier A, Garillon C, Goldberg M, Coing F (1999) Socioeconomic status, social mobility and cancer occurrence during working life: a case-control study among French electricity and gas workers. Cancer Causes Control 10:495–502PubMedCrossRef
3.
Mao Y, Hu JF, Ugnat AM, Semenciw R, Fincham S (2001) Socioeconomic status and lung cancer risk in Canada. Int J Epidemiol 30:809–817PubMedCrossRef
4.
Menvielle G, Luce D, Geoffroy-Perez B, Chastang J-F, Leclerc A (2005) Social inequalities and cancer mortality in France, 1975–1990. Cancer Causes Control 16:501–513PubMedCrossRef
5.
Singh GK, Miller BA, Hankey BF (2002) Changing area socioeconomic patterns in US cancer mortality, 1950–1998: Part II—lung and colorectal cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:916–925PubMed
6.
Braaten T, Weiderpass E, Kumle M, Lund E (2005) Explaining the socioeconomic variation in cancer risk in the Norwegian Women and Cancer Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 14:2591–2597PubMedCrossRef
7.
Brewster DH, Thomson CS, Hole DJ, Black RJ, Stroner PL, Gillis CR (2001) Relation between socioeconomic status and tumour stage in patients with breast, colorectal, ovarian, and lung cancer: results from four national, population based studies. BMJ 322:830–831PubMedCrossRef
8.
Hemminki K, Zhang H, Czene K (2003) Socioeconomic factors in cancer in Sweden. Int J Cancer 105:692–700PubMedCrossRef
9.
Mackenbach JP, Huisman M, Andersen O et al (2004) Inequalities in lung cancer mortality by the educational level in 10 European populations. Eur J Cancer 40:126–135PubMedCrossRef
10.
Faggiano F, Partanen T, Kogevinas M, Boffetta P (1997) Socioeconomic differences in cancer incidence and mortality. IARC Sci Publ 138:65–176PubMed
11.
van Loon AJ, Goldbohm RA, van den Brandt PA (1998) Socioeconomic status and stomach cancer incidence in men: results from The Netherlands Cohort Study. J Epidemiol Community Health 52:166–171PubMed
12.
13.
Menvielle G, Leclerc A, Chastang J-F, Luce D (2006) Social inequalities in breast cancer mortality among French women: disappearing educational disparities from 1968 to 1996. Br J Cancer 94:152–155PubMedCrossRef
14.
Brown J, Harding S, Bethune A, Rosato M (1998) Longitudinal study of socio-economic differences in the incidence of stomach, colorectal and pancreatic cancers. Popul Trends 94:35–41PubMed
15.
Negri E, Bosetti E, LaVecchia C, Fioretti F, Conti E, Franceschi S (1999) Risk factors for adenocarcinoma of the small intestine. Int J Cancer 82:171–174PubMedCrossRef
16.
Faggiano F, Partanen T, Kogevinas M, Boffetta P (1997) Socioeconomic differences in cancer incidence and mortality. IARC Sci Publ 138:65–176PubMed
17.
Mielck A (2000) Soziale Ungleichheit und Gesundheit. Huber, Bern
18.
Aziz Z, Sana S, Akram M, Saeed A (2004) Socioeconomic status and breast cancer survival in Pakistani women. J Pak Med Assoc 54:448–543PubMed
19.
Liu L, Deapen D, Bernstein L (1998) Socioeconomic status and cancers of the female breast and reproductive organs: a comparison across racial/ethnic populations in Los Angeles County, California (United States). Cancer Causes Control 9:369–380PubMedCrossRef
20.
Yost K, Perkins C, Cohen R, Morris C, Wright W (2001) Socioeconomic status and breast cancer incidence in California for different race/ethnic groups. Cancer Causes Control 12:703–711PubMedCrossRef
21.
Pukkula E, Weiderpass E (1999) Time trends in socio-economic differences in incidence rates of cancers of the breast and female genital organs (Finland, 1971–1995). Int J Cancer 31:56–61CrossRef
22.
Macleod U, Ross S, Twelves C, George WD, Gillis C, Watt GCM (2000) Primary and secondary care management of women with early breast cancer from affluent and deprived areas: retrospective review of hospital and general practice records. Br Med J 320:1442–1445CrossRef
23.
Kaffashian F, Godward S, Davies T, Solomon L, McCann J, Duffy SW (2003) Socioeconomic effects on breast cancer survival: proportion attributable to stage and morphology. Cancer 89:1693–6CrossRef
24.
Bouchardy C, Verkooijen HM, Fioretta G (2006) Social class is an important and independent prognostic factor of breast cancer mortality. Int J Cancer 119:1145–1151PubMedCrossRef
25.
Michelozzi P, Perucci CA, Forastiere F, Fusco D, Ancona C, Dell’Orco V (1999) Inequality in health: socioeconomic differentials in mortality in Rome, 1990–1995. J Epidemiol Community Health 53:687–693PubMedCrossRef
26.
Brenner H, Mielck A, Ziegler H (1991) The role of socioeconomic factors in the survival of patients with colorectal cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 44:807–815PubMedCrossRef
27.
Neumann G, Liedermann A (1981) Mortalität und Sozialschicht. Bundesgesundheitsblatt 24:173–181PubMed
28.
Katalinic A, Hense H-W, Becker N (2006) Krebsregistrierung in Deutschland cancer registration in Germany. Der Onkologe 12:1084–1093CrossRef
29.
Katalinic A (2004) Epidemiologische Krebsregistrierung in Deutschland. Bestandsausfnahme und Perspektiven. Bundesgesundheitsblatt—Gesundheitsforschung—Gesundheitsschutz 47:422–428PubMedCrossRef
30.
Becker N, Altenburg H-P, Stegmaier C, Ziegler H (2007) Report on trends of incidence (1970–2002) of and mortality (1952–2002) from cancer in Germany. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 133:23–35PubMedCrossRef
31.
Hall S, Holman CD, Sheiner H, Hendrie D (2004) The influence of socio-economic and locational disadvantage on survival after a diagnosis of ling and breast cancer in Western Australia. J Health Serv Res Policy 9(Suppl 2):10–16PubMedCrossRef
32.
Steenland K, Henley J, Thun M (2002) All-cause and cause-specific death rates by educational status for two million people in two American Cancer Society Cohorts, 1959–1996. Am J Epidemiol 156:11–21PubMedCrossRef
33.
Lahelma E, Martikainen P, Laaksonen M, Aittomaki A (2004) Pathways between socioeconomic determinants of health. J Epidemiol Community Health 58:327–332PubMedCrossRef
34.
Geyer S, Hemström Ö, Peter R, Vågerö D (2006) Education, income and occupational class cannot be used interchangeably in social epidemiology. Empirical evidence against an unquestioned practice. J Epidemiol Community Health 60:804–810PubMedCrossRef
35.
Geyer S, Peter R (1999) Occupational status and all-cause mortality: a study with health insurance data from Nordrhein-Westfalen, Germany. Eur J Public Health 9:114–118CrossRef
36.
Arbeitsgemeinschaft Bevölkerungsbezogener Krebsregister in Deutschland (2002) Krebs in Deutschland. Häufigkeiten und Trends (Cancer in Germany. Frequencies and trends). Saarbrücken
37.
Greß S, Walendzik A, Wasem J (2005) Nichtversicherte Personen im Krankenversicherungssystem der Bundesrepublik Deutschland—Bestandaufnahme und Lösungsmöglichkeiten (Uninsured persons in the health care system of the Federal Republic of Germany- Stocktaking and possible solutions). Faculty of the Economic Sciences, University of Duisburg- Essen, Essen
38.
Geyer S, Peter R (2000) Income, social position, qualification and health inequalities-competing risks? J Epidemiol Community Health 54:299–305PubMedCrossRef
39.
Bundesanstalt für Arbeit (1992) Schlüsselverzeichnis für die Angaben zur Tätigkeit in den Versicherungsnachweisen (Code manual for occupational information in insurance certificates). Bundesanstalt für Arbeit, Nürnberg
40.
Cox DR, Oakes D (1984) Analysis of survival data. Chapman & Hall, London
41.
Collett D (1994) Modelling survival data in medical research. Chapman & Hall, London
42.
Stata Corp. (2007) Stata statistical software: release 10. College Station, TX
43.
Helmert U, Borgers D, Bammann K (2001) Soziale Determinanten des Rauchverhaltens in Deutschland: Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 1995. Sozial- und Präventivmedizin 46:172–181PubMedCrossRef
44.
Laaksonen M, Rahkonen O, Karvonen S, Lahelma E (2005) Socioeconomic status and smoking: analysing inequalities with multiple indicators. Eur J Public Health 15:262–269PubMedCrossRef
45.
Evans GW, Kantrowitz E (2002) Socioeconomic status and health: the potential role of environmental risk exposure. Annu Rev Public Health 23:303–331PubMedCrossRef
46.
47.
Stephens MR, Blackshaw GR, Wyn GL et al (2005) Influence of socio-economic deprivation on outcomes for patients diagnosed with gastric cancer. Scand J Gastroenterol 40:1351–1357PubMedCrossRef
48.
Hemminki K, Zhang H, Czene K (2003) Socioeconomic factors in cancer in Sweden. Int J Cancer 105:692–700PubMedCrossRef
49.
Becker N, Wahrendorf J, Holzmeier S (2002) Krebsatlas der Bundesrepublik Deutschland 1981–1990. Atlas of Cancer Mortality in the Federal Republic of Germany. Springer, Heidelberg
50.
Chow WH, Malker HS, Hsing AW et al (1994) Occupational risks for colon cancer in Sweden. J Occup Med 36:647–651PubMed
51.
DeRoos AJ, Ray RM, Gao DL et al (2005) Colorectal cancer incidence among female textile workers in Shanghai, China: a case-cohort analysis of occupational exposures. Cancer Causes Control 16:1177–1188CrossRef
52.
Gonzalez CA, Jakszyn P, Pera G et al (2006) Meat intake and risk of stomach and esophagal adenocarcinoma within the European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC-EURGAST). J Natl Cancer Inst 98:345–354PubMedCrossRef
53.
54.
Krieger N, Quesenberry C, Peng T, et al (1999) Social class, race/ ethnicity, and incidence of breast, cervix, colon, lung, and prostate cancer among Asian, Black, Hispanic and White residents of the San Francisco Bay area 1988–92 (United States). Cancer Causes Control 10:525–537PubMedCrossRef
55.
Kogevinas M, Porta M (1997) Socioeconomic differences in cancer survival: a review of the evidence. IARC Sci Publ 138:177–206PubMed
56.
Oksbjerg Dalton S, Ross L, Düring M, et al (2007) Influence of socioeconomic factors on survival after breast cancer—a nationwide cohort study of women diagnosed with breast cancer in Denmark 1983–1999. Int J Cancer. doi:10.​1002/​ijc.​22979
57.
Baquet CR, Commiskey P (2000) Socioeconomic factors and breast carcinoma in multicultural women. Cancer 88(Suppl 5):1256–1264PubMedCrossRef
58.
Lannin DR, Mathews HF, Mitchell J, Swanson MS, Swanson FH, Edwards MS (1998) Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on racial differences in late-stage presentation of breast cancer. J Am Med Assoc 279:1801–1807CrossRef
59.
Wilkinson RG (2005) The impact of inequality. How to make sick societies healthier. Routledge, London
60.
Subramanian SV, Belli P, Kawachi I (2002) The macroeconomic determinants of health. Annu Rev Public Health 23:287–302PubMedCrossRef
61.
Teppo L, Dickman PW, Hakulinen T, et al (1999) Cancer patient survival—patterns, comparisons, trends—a population-based cancer registry study in Finland. Acta Oncol 38:283–294PubMedCrossRef
62.
Gorey KM, Holowaty EJ, Fehringer G, Laukkanen E, Richter NL, Meyer CM (2000) An international comparison of cancer survival: relatively poor areas of Toronto, Ontario and three US metropolitan areas. J Public Health Med 22:343–348PubMedCrossRef
63.
Gorey KM, Holowaty EJ, Laukkanen E, Fehringer G, Richter NL (1998) Association between socioeconomic status and cancer incidence in Toronto, Ontario: possible confounding of cancer mortality by incidence and survival. Cancer Prevention Control 2:236–241PubMed
64.
Lee-Feldstein A, Feldstein PJ, Buchmueller T, Katterhagen G (2001) Breast cancer outcomes among older women—HMO, fee-for- service, and delivery system comparisons. J Gen Intern Med 16:189–199PubMedCrossRef
65.
Norredam M, Groenvold M, Petersen JH, Kresnik A (1998) Effect of social class on tumour size at diagnosis and surgical treatment in Danish women with breast cancer. Soc Sci Med 47:1659–1663PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Social inequalities in the incidence and case fatality of cancers of the lung, the stomach, the bowels, and the breast
Author
Siegfried Geyer
Publication date
01-11-2008
Publisher
Springer Netherlands
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 9/2008
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-008-9162-5

Other articles of this Issue 9/2008

Cancer Causes & Control 9/2008 Go to the issue

Original Paper

Plasma vitamins E and A and risk of bladder cancer: a case–control analysis

Original Paper

Influence of body mass index on prognosis in gynecological malignancies

Original Paper

Ethnic differences in prostate cancer survival in New Zealand: a national study

Original Paper

Physical activity, sedentary behavior, and the risk of colon and rectal cancer in the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study

Original Paper

Genetic variation in hormone metabolizing genes and risk of testicular germ cell tumors

Original Paper

Association of the TCF7L2 polymorphism with colorectal cancer and adenoma risk
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Watch now

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Image Credits