Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Cancer Causes & Control 9/2006

Open Access 01-11-2006 | Original Paper

Meeting the mammography screening needs of underserved women: the performance of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program in 2002–2003 (United States)

Authors: Florence K. L. Tangka, Joseph Dalaker, Sajal K. Chattopadhyay, James G. Gardner, Janet Royalty, Ingrid J. E. Hall, Amy DeGroff, Donald K. Blackman, Ralph J. Coates

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control | Issue 9/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

To examine the extent to which the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (Program) has helped to meet the mammography screening needs of underserved women.

Methods

Low-income, uninsured women aged 40–64 are eligible for free mammography screening through the Program. We used data from the U.S. Census Bureau to estimate the number of women eligible for services. We obtained the number of women receiving Program-funded mammograms from the Program. We then calculated the percentage of eligible women who received mammograms through the Program.

Results

In 2002–2003, of all U.S. women aged 40–64, approximately 4 million (8.5%) had no health insurance and had a family income below 250% of the federal poverty level, meeting Program eligibility criteria. Of these women, 528,622 (13.2%) received a Program-funded mammogram. Rates varied substantially by race and ethnicity. The percentage of eligible women screened in each state ranged from about 2% to approximately 79%.

Conclusions

Although the Program provided screening services to over a half-million low-income, uninsured women for mammography, it served a small percentage of those eligible. Given that in 2003 more than 2.3 million uninsured, low-income, women aged 40–64 did not receive recommended mammograms from either the Program or other sources, there remains a substantial need for services for this historically underserved population.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference US Cancer Statistics Working Group (2005) United States Cancer Statistics: 2002 incidence and mortality. US Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute, Atlanta US Cancer Statistics Working Group (2005) United States Cancer Statistics: 2002 incidence and mortality. US Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention and National Cancer Institute, Atlanta
2.
go back to reference Singh GK, Miller BA, Henkey BF, Edwards BK (2003) Area socioeconomic variations in US cancer incidence, mortality, stage, treatment, and survival, 1975–1999. NCI Cancer Surveillance Monograph Series, No. 4. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. NIH Publication 03-5417 Singh GK, Miller BA, Henkey BF, Edwards BK (2003) Area socioeconomic variations in US cancer incidence, mortality, stage, treatment, and survival, 1975–1999. NCI Cancer Surveillance Monograph Series, No. 4. National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. NIH Publication 03-5417
3.
go back to reference US Preventive Services Task Force (2002) Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. In: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: Periodic Updates. 3rd ed. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality US Preventive Services Task Force (2002) Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale. In: Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: Periodic Updates. 3rd ed. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality
4.
go back to reference Eheman CR, Benard VB, Blackman D, et al. Breast cancer screening among low-income or uninsured women: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, July 1995–March 2002. Cancer Causes Control in Press Eheman CR, Benard VB, Blackman D, et al. Breast cancer screening among low-income or uninsured women: results from the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program, July 1995–March 2002. Cancer Causes Control in Press
5.
go back to reference Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC (2003) Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer 97(6):1528–1540PubMedCrossRef Swan J, Breen N, Coates RJ, Rimer BK, Lee NC (2003) Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey. Cancer 97(6):1528–1540PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference US Census Bureau. Poverty Threshold 1992. Available at: http://www.census.gov/hhes/poverty/threshld/thresh92.html US Census Bureau. Poverty Threshold 1992. Available at: http://​www.​census.​gov/​hhes/​poverty/​threshld/​thresh92.​html
7.
go back to reference United States Department of Health and Human Services. Prior HHS Poverty Guidelines and Federal Register References. Available at: http://aspe.hhs.gov/poverty/figures-fed-reg.shtml United States Department of Health and Human Services. Prior HHS Poverty Guidelines and Federal Register References. Available at: http://​aspe.​hhs.​gov/​poverty/​figures-fed-reg.​shtml
8.
go back to reference Ryerson AB, Benard VB, Major AC (2005) National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: 1991–2002 National Report. US Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/nbccedp/Reports/NationalReport/index.htm Ryerson AB, Benard VB, Major AC (2005) National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: 1991–2002 National Report. US Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta. Available at: http://​www.​cdc.​gov/​cancer/​nbccedp/​Reports/​NationalReport/​index.​htm
9.
go back to reference Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NBCCEDP Screening Program Summaries. Available at: http://www.cdc.gov/cancer/nbccedp/sps/profiles/national_aggregate.htm Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. NBCCEDP Screening Program Summaries. Available at: http://​www.​cdc.​gov/​cancer/​nbccedp/​sps/​profiles/​national_​aggregate.​htm
10.
go back to reference Chattopadhyay SK, Hall HI, Wolf RB, Custer WS (1999) Sources of health insurance in the US: analysis of state-level data and implications for public health programs. J Public Health Manag Pract 5:35–46PubMed Chattopadhyay SK, Hall HI, Wolf RB, Custer WS (1999) Sources of health insurance in the US: analysis of state-level data and implications for public health programs. J Public Health Manag Pract 5:35–46PubMed
11.
go back to reference Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Bobo JK, Caplan L (2004) Breast cancer screening practices among women in the United States, 2000. Cancer Causes Control 15(2):159–170PubMedCrossRef Coughlin SS, Uhler RJ, Bobo JK, Caplan L (2004) Breast cancer screening practices among women in the United States, 2000. Cancer Causes Control 15(2):159–170PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference US Department of Health and Human Services (2003) Healthy people 2010, 2nd edn. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC US Department of Health and Human Services (2003) Healthy people 2010, 2nd edn. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
13.
go back to reference Blackman DK, Bennett EM, Miller DS (1999) Trends in self-reported use of mammograms (1989–1997) and Papanicolaou tests (1991–1997)—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. MMWR CDC Surveillance Summaries 48(6):1–22 Blackman DK, Bennett EM, Miller DS (1999) Trends in self-reported use of mammograms (1989–1997) and Papanicolaou tests (1991–1997)—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. MMWR CDC Surveillance Summaries 48(6):1–22
14.
go back to reference US Census Bureau. Poverty Threshold 2003. Available at: http://www.census.gov/hhes/poverty/threshld/thresh03.html US Census Bureau. Poverty Threshold 2003. Available at: http://​www.​census.​gov/​hhes/​poverty/​threshld/​thresh03.​html
15.
go back to reference US Census Bureau. Current Population Survey, 2003–2004. Annual Social and Demographic Supplements. Special tabulation of 2-year average data for 2002–2003, performed on 19 October 2005, using the CPS Table Creator at http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/cpstc/cps_table_creator.html. 2005. Washington, DC US Census Bureau. Current Population Survey, 2003–2004. Annual Social and Demographic Supplements. Special tabulation of 2-year average data for 2002–2003, performed on 19 October 2005, using the CPS Table Creator at http://​www.​census.​gov/​hhes/​www/​cpstc/​cps_​table_​creator.​html.​ 2005. Washington, DC
16.
go back to reference US Census Bureau. “Source and Accuracy of Estimates for Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2003.” 2004. Available at: http://www.census.gov/hhes/www/income/p60_226sa.pdf US Census Bureau. “Source and Accuracy of Estimates for Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2003.” 2004. Available at: http://​www.​census.​gov/​hhes/​www/​income/​p60_​226sa.​pdf
17.
go back to reference US Census Bureau. Current Population Survey: Design and Methodology. Technical paper 63RV. 2004. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/2002pubs/tp63rv.pdf US Census Bureau. Current Population Survey: Design and Methodology. Technical paper 63RV. 2004. Available at: http://​www.​census.​gov/​prod/​2002pubs/​tp63rv.​pdf
18.
go back to reference DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Mills RJ (2004) US Census Bureau Current Population Reports, P60–226, Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2003. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC DeNavas-Walt C, Proctor BD, Mills RJ (2004) US Census Bureau Current Population Reports, P60–226, Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2003. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC
19.
go back to reference US Census Bureau. Poverty: how the census bureau measures poverty. Available at: http://www.census.gov/hhes/poverty/povdef.html US Census Bureau. Poverty: how the census bureau measures poverty. Available at: http://​www.​census.​gov/​hhes/​poverty/​povdef.​html
20.
go back to reference Mansley EC, Dunet DO, May DS, Chattopadhyay SK, McKenna MT (2002) Variation in average costs among federally sponsored state-organized cancer detection programs: economies of scale? Med Decis Mak 22(5 Suppl):S67–79CrossRef Mansley EC, Dunet DO, May DS, Chattopadhyay SK, McKenna MT (2002) Variation in average costs among federally sponsored state-organized cancer detection programs: economies of scale? Med Decis Mak 22(5 Suppl):S67–79CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Broeders MJ, Scharpantgen A, Ascunce N, et al (2005) Comparison of early performance indicators for screening projects within the European Breast Cancer Network: 1989–2000. Eur J Cancer Prev 14(2):107–116PubMedCrossRef Broeders MJ, Scharpantgen A, Ascunce N, et al (2005) Comparison of early performance indicators for screening projects within the European Breast Cancer Network: 1989–2000. Eur J Cancer Prev 14(2):107–116PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Meeting the mammography screening needs of underserved women: the performance of the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program in 2002–2003 (United States)
Authors
Florence K. L. Tangka
Joseph Dalaker
Sajal K. Chattopadhyay
James G. Gardner
Janet Royalty
Ingrid J. E. Hall
Amy DeGroff
Donald K. Blackman
Ralph J. Coates
Publication date
01-11-2006
Publisher
Kluwer Academic Publishers
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control / Issue 9/2006
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-006-0058-y

Other articles of this Issue 9/2006

Cancer Causes & Control 9/2006 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine