Skip to main content
Top
Published in: European Journal of Ageing 3/2005

01-09-2005 | Original Investigation

Intergenerational solidarity and the family–welfare state balance

Authors: Svein Olav Daatland, Ariela Lowenstein

Published in: European Journal of Ageing | Issue 3/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

The article addresses the strength and character of intergenerational family solidarity under different family cultures and welfare state regimes in order to answer the following two questions: (1) Is intergenerational solidarity stronger under the more collectivist southern family tradition than under the more individualist northern tradition? (2) Is more generous access to social care services a risk or a resource for family care? These questions are explored with data from the OASIS project, a comparative study among the urban populations aged 25+ (n=6,106) in Norway, England, Germany, Spain, and Israel. The findings indicate that the welfare state has not crowded out the family in elder care, but has rather helped the generations establish more independent relationships. Intergenerational solidarity is substantial in both the northern and southern welfare state regimes, and seems to vary in character more than in strength.
Footnotes
1
The OASIS project was funded under the Fifth Framework Programme of the European Union, Contract no. QLK6-TC-1999–02182, project coordinator Ariela Lowenstein, University of Haifa. For more details see Daatland and Herlofson (2001) and Lowenstein and Ogg (2003).
 
Literature
go back to reference Bengtson VL, Roberts REL (1991) Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: an example of formal theory construction. J Marriage Fam 53:856–870CrossRef Bengtson VL, Roberts REL (1991) Intergenerational solidarity in aging families: an example of formal theory construction. J Marriage Fam 53:856–870CrossRef
go back to reference Daatland SO (1990) What are families for? On family solidarity and preferences for help. Ageing Soc 10:1–15CrossRef Daatland SO (1990) What are families for? On family solidarity and preferences for help. Ageing Soc 10:1–15CrossRef
go back to reference Daatland SO (1997) Family solidarity, popular opinion, and the elderly: perspectives from Norway. Ageing Int 1:51–62CrossRef Daatland SO (1997) Family solidarity, popular opinion, and the elderly: perspectives from Norway. Ageing Int 1:51–62CrossRef
go back to reference Daatland SO, Herlofson K (2001) Ageing, intergenerational relations, care systems and quality of life. An introduction to the OASIS project. Oslo: NOVA, report 14–2001 Daatland SO, Herlofson K (2001) Ageing, intergenerational relations, care systems and quality of life. An introduction to the OASIS project. Oslo: NOVA, report 14–2001
go back to reference Daatland SO, Herlofson K (2003) ‘Lost solidarity’ or ’changed solidarity’: a comparative European view of normative family solidarity. Ageing Soc 23:537–560CrossRef Daatland SO, Herlofson K (2003) ‘Lost solidarity’ or ’changed solidarity’: a comparative European view of normative family solidarity. Ageing Soc 23:537–560CrossRef
go back to reference Daatland SO, Herlofson K (2004) Familie, velferdsstat og aldring. Familiesolidaritet i et europeisk perspektiv. Oslo: NOVA rapport 7–2004 Daatland SO, Herlofson K (2004) Familie, velferdsstat og aldring. Familiesolidaritet i et europeisk perspektiv. Oslo: NOVA rapport 7–2004
go back to reference Esping-Andersen G (1990) The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton Esping-Andersen G (1990) The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton
go back to reference Esping-Andersen G (1999) Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford Esping-Andersen G (1999) Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford
go back to reference Evers A (1988) The new long-term care insurance program in Germany. J Aging Soc Policy 10(1):77–98 Evers A (1988) The new long-term care insurance program in Germany. J Aging Soc Policy 10(1):77–98
go back to reference Ferrera M (1996) The ‘southern model’ of welfare in social Europe. J Eur Soc Policy 6(1):17–37CrossRef Ferrera M (1996) The ‘southern model’ of welfare in social Europe. J Eur Soc Policy 6(1):17–37CrossRef
go back to reference Finch J, Mason J (1993) Negotiating family responsibilities. Tavistock/Routledge, London Finch J, Mason J (1993) Negotiating family responsibilities. Tavistock/Routledge, London
go back to reference Katan J, Lowenstein A (2001) Basing welfare services in a legal infra structure—implications of the Long-term Care Insurance Law. Gerontology 27(1):55–68 Katan J, Lowenstein A (2001) Basing welfare services in a legal infra structure—implications of the Long-term Care Insurance Law. Gerontology 27(1):55–68
go back to reference Kohli M (1999) Private and public transfers between generations: linking the family and the state. European Societies 1 Kohli M (1999) Private and public transfers between generations: linking the family and the state. European Societies 1
go back to reference Künemund H, Rein M (1999) There is more to receiving than needing: theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out. Ageing Soc 19:93–121CrossRef Künemund H, Rein M (1999) There is more to receiving than needing: theoretical arguments and empirical explorations of crowding in and crowding out. Ageing Soc 19:93–121CrossRef
go back to reference Lee GR, Peek CW, Coward RT (1998) Race differences in filial responsibility expectations among older parents. J Marriage Fam 60:404–412CrossRef Lee GR, Peek CW, Coward RT (1998) Race differences in filial responsibility expectations among older parents. J Marriage Fam 60:404–412CrossRef
go back to reference Lingsom S (1997) The substitution issue. Care policies and their consequences for family care. Oslo: NOVA, report 6–1997 Lingsom S (1997) The substitution issue. Care policies and their consequences for family care. Oslo: NOVA, report 6–1997
go back to reference Litwak E (1985) Helping the elderly: the complementary roles of informal networks and formal systems. Guilford Press, New York Litwak E (1985) Helping the elderly: the complementary roles of informal networks and formal systems. Guilford Press, New York
go back to reference Lowenstein A, Ogg J (eds) (2003) OASIS. Old age and autonomy: the role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity. Final report. University of Haifa, Haifa Lowenstein A, Ogg J (eds) (2003) OASIS. Old age and autonomy: the role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity. Final report. University of Haifa, Haifa
go back to reference Lowenstein A, Katz R (2005) Living arrangements, family solidarity and life satisfaction of two generations of immigrants. Ageing Soc 25:1–19CrossRef Lowenstein A, Katz R (2005) Living arrangements, family solidarity and life satisfaction of two generations of immigrants. Ageing Soc 25:1–19CrossRef
go back to reference Lüscher K, Pillemer K (1998) Intergenerational ambivalence: a new approach to the study of parent–child relations in later life. J Marriage Fam 60:413–425CrossRef Lüscher K, Pillemer K (1998) Intergenerational ambivalence: a new approach to the study of parent–child relations in later life. J Marriage Fam 60:413–425CrossRef
go back to reference Marshall VW, Matthews SH, Rosenthal CJ (1993) Elusiveness of family life: a challenge for the sociology of aging. In: Maddox GL, Lawton MP (eds) Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics: focus on kinship, aging and social change. Springer, New York Marshall VW, Matthews SH, Rosenthal CJ (1993) Elusiveness of family life: a challenge for the sociology of aging. In: Maddox GL, Lawton MP (eds) Annual review of gerontology and geriatrics: focus on kinship, aging and social change. Springer, New York
go back to reference Millar J, Warman A (1996) Family obligations in Europe. Family Policy Studies Centre, London Millar J, Warman A (1996) Family obligations in Europe. Family Policy Studies Centre, London
go back to reference Motel-Klingebiel A, Tesch-Römer C, von Kondratowitz H-J (2003) ‘The quantitative survey’. In: Lowenstein A, Ogg J (eds) OASIS old age and autonomy: the role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity. Final report. University of Haifa, Haifa, pp 63–101 Motel-Klingebiel A, Tesch-Römer C, von Kondratowitz H-J (2003) ‘The quantitative survey’. In: Lowenstein A, Ogg J (eds) OASIS old age and autonomy: the role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity. Final report. University of Haifa, Haifa, pp 63–101
go back to reference Reher DS (1998) Family ties in western Europe: persistent contrasts. Popul Dev Rev 24(2):203–234CrossRef Reher DS (1998) Family ties in western Europe: persistent contrasts. Popul Dev Rev 24(2):203–234CrossRef
go back to reference Silverstein M, Bengtson VL (1997) Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult–child relationships in American families. Am J Soc 103(2):429–460CrossRef Silverstein M, Bengtson VL (1997) Intergenerational solidarity and the structure of adult–child relationships in American families. Am J Soc 103(2):429–460CrossRef
go back to reference Sundström G (1994) Care by families: an overview of trends. In: Hennesy P (ed) Caring for frail elderly people in Europe. New directions in care. Paris: OECD, Social Policy Studies no 14, pp 15–55 Sundström G (1994) Care by families: an overview of trends. In: Hennesy P (ed) Caring for frail elderly people in Europe. New directions in care. Paris: OECD, Social Policy Studies no 14, pp 15–55
go back to reference UN (2002) World population ageing 1950–2050 UN (2002) World population ageing 1950–2050
go back to reference von Kondratowitz HJ, Tesch-Römer C, Motel-Klingebiel A (2002) Establishing systems of care in Germany: a lpng and winding road. Aging Clin Exp Res 14(4):239–246PubMed von Kondratowitz HJ, Tesch-Römer C, Motel-Klingebiel A (2002) Establishing systems of care in Germany: a lpng and winding road. Aging Clin Exp Res 14(4):239–246PubMed
go back to reference von Kondratowitz HJ (2003) Comparing welfare states. In: Lowenstein A, Ogg J (eds) OASIS old age and autonomy: the role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity. Final report. University of Haifa, Haifa von Kondratowitz HJ (2003) Comparing welfare states. In: Lowenstein A, Ogg J (eds) OASIS old age and autonomy: the role of service systems and intergenerational family solidarity. Final report. University of Haifa, Haifa
go back to reference Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Med Care 30(6):473–483PubMedCrossRef Ware JE, Sherbourne CD (1992) The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Med Care 30(6):473–483PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wolfe A (1989) Whose keeper? Social science and moral obligations. University of California Press, Berkely Wolfe A (1989) Whose keeper? Social science and moral obligations. University of California Press, Berkely
Metadata
Title
Intergenerational solidarity and the family–welfare state balance
Authors
Svein Olav Daatland
Ariela Lowenstein
Publication date
01-09-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
European Journal of Ageing / Issue 3/2005
Print ISSN: 1613-9372
Electronic ISSN: 1613-9380
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-005-0001-1

Other articles of this Issue 3/2005

European Journal of Ageing 3/2005 Go to the issue