Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Gynecological Surgery 4/2005

01-12-2005 | Original Article

Laparoscopic entry technique—a survey of practices of consultant gynaecologists

Authors: S. Lalchandani, K. Phillips

Published in: Gynecological Surgery | Issue 4/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

To assess the mode of laparoscopic entry technique among consultant gynaecologists in the United Kingdom and Ireland and to find out whether recent recommendations have influenced practice, an anonymous postal questionnaire was sent to 1,190 gynaecologists. Responses were analysed using an Excel spreadsheet. There was a 64% response rate. Of the respondents, the majority (90%) performed laparoscopy by using a Veress needle technique. Regarding the patient’s position when inserting the scope, 61% used lithotomy with Trendelenberg tilt, and 39% used the flat position. The entry point used was subumbilical by 54% and intraumbilical by 44%. Thirty-eight percent used pressure and 62% used volume to decide when to insert the primary trocar. Only 26% of responding gynaecologists were aware of the Middlesbrough consensus document, but most who had attended a course were compliant with the guidelines. In conclusion, the majority of gynaecologists practiced closed laparoscopy and used the volume technique to achieve pneumoperitoneum. Only a small number of gynaecologists were aware of the recent recommendations regarding safe laparoscopic entry technique, suggesting that methods for disseminating recommendations must be improved.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HCUPnet, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. http://www.ahrq.gov/data/hcup/hcupnet.htm. 2001. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Accessed 7–8-2001 Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. HCUPnet, Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. http://​www.​ahrq.​gov/​data/​hcup/​hcupnet.​htm.​ 2001. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. Accessed 7–8-2001
2.
go back to reference Cuschieri A (1995) Whither minimal access surgery: tribulations and expectations. Am J Surg 169:9–19CrossRefPubMed Cuschieri A (1995) Whither minimal access surgery: tribulations and expectations. Am J Surg 169:9–19CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Merlin T, Scott D, Rao M, Wall D, Francis D, Bridgewater F, Maddern G (2000) Systematic review of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy—update and re-appraisal. ASERNIP-S Report No. 15, 2nd edn. ASERNIP-S, Adelaide, South Australia Merlin T, Scott D, Rao M, Wall D, Francis D, Bridgewater F, Maddern G (2000) Systematic review of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy—update and re-appraisal. ASERNIP-S Report No. 15, 2nd edn. ASERNIP-S, Adelaide, South Australia
4.
go back to reference Kerbl K, Clayman RV, McDougall EM, Gill IS, Wilson BS, Chandhoke PS, Albala DM, Kavoussi LR (1994) Transperitoneal nephrectomy for benign disease of the kidney—a comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques. Urology 43(5):607–613 Kerbl K, Clayman RV, McDougall EM, Gill IS, Wilson BS, Chandhoke PS, Albala DM, Kavoussi LR (1994) Transperitoneal nephrectomy for benign disease of the kidney—a comparison of laparoscopic and open surgical techniques. Urology 43(5):607–613
5.
go back to reference Parra RO, Perez MG, Boullier JA, Cummings JM (1995) Comparison between standard flanks versus laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign renal disease. J Urol 153:1171–1173CrossRefPubMed Parra RO, Perez MG, Boullier JA, Cummings JM (1995) Comparison between standard flanks versus laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign renal disease. J Urol 153:1171–1173CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Lujan JA, Sanchez-Bueno F, Parilla P, Robles R, Torralba JA, Gonzalez-Costea R (1998) Laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy in patients aged 65 and older. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8(3):208–210 Lujan JA, Sanchez-Bueno F, Parilla P, Robles R, Torralba JA, Gonzalez-Costea R (1998) Laparoscopic vs. open cholecystectomy in patients aged 65 and older. Surg Laparosc Endosc 8(3):208–210
7.
go back to reference Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic appendectomy study group. Am J Surg 169(2):208–212 Ortega AE, Hunter JG, Peters JH, Swanstrom LL, Schirmer B (1995) A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic appendectomy study group. Am J Surg 169(2):208–212
8.
go back to reference Picchio M, Lombardi A, Zolovkins A, Mihelsons M, La Torre G (1999) Tension-free laparoscopic and open hernia repair: randomised controlled trial of early results. World J Surg 23(10):1004–1007CrossRefPubMed Picchio M, Lombardi A, Zolovkins A, Mihelsons M, La Torre G (1999) Tension-free laparoscopic and open hernia repair: randomised controlled trial of early results. World J Surg 23(10):1004–1007CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Leron E, Piura B, Ohana E, Mazor M (1998) Delayed recognition of major vascular injury during laparoscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 79(1):91–93CrossRef Leron E, Piura B, Ohana E, Mazor M (1998) Delayed recognition of major vascular injury during laparoscopy. Eur J Obstet Gynaecol Reprod Biol 79(1):91–93CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Tebala GD, Vellone M, Cavicchioni C (1997) Routine use of open technique in laparoscopic operations. J Am Coll Surg 184:58–62PubMed Nuzzo G, Giuliante F, Tebala GD, Vellone M, Cavicchioni C (1997) Routine use of open technique in laparoscopic operations. J Am Coll Surg 184:58–62PubMed
11.
go back to reference Riedel HH, Lehmann WE, Mecke H, Semm K (1989) The frequency distribution of various pelviscopic (laparoscopic) operations, including complication rates—statistics of the Federal Republic of Germany in the years 1983–1985. Zentralblatt Gynakologie 111(2):78–91 Riedel HH, Lehmann WE, Mecke H, Semm K (1989) The frequency distribution of various pelviscopic (laparoscopic) operations, including complication rates—statistics of the Federal Republic of Germany in the years 1983–1985. Zentralblatt Gynakologie 111(2):78–91
12.
go back to reference Airan MC (1996) Basic techniques. In: McFadyen BV, Ponsky JL (eds) Operative laparoscopy and thoracoscopy. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 93–123 Airan MC (1996) Basic techniques. In: McFadyen BV, Ponsky JL (eds) Operative laparoscopy and thoracoscopy. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia, pp 93–123
13.
go back to reference Lin P, Grow DR (1999) Complications of laparoscopy—strategies for prevention and cure. Obstet Gynaecol Clin North Am 26:23 Lin P, Grow DR (1999) Complications of laparoscopy—strategies for prevention and cure. Obstet Gynaecol Clin North Am 26:23
14.
go back to reference Rosen DM, Lam AM, Chapman M, Carlton M, Cario GM (1998) Methods of creating pneumoperitoneum: a review of techniques and complications. Obstet Gynaecol Surv 53:167–174 Rosen DM, Lam AM, Chapman M, Carlton M, Cario GM (1998) Methods of creating pneumoperitoneum: a review of techniques and complications. Obstet Gynaecol Surv 53:167–174
15.
go back to reference Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko S, Airan MC (1993) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 165:9–14 Deziel DJ, Millikan KW, Economou SG, Doolas A, Ko S, Airan MC (1993) Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4,292 hospitals and an analysis of 77,604 cases. Am J Surg 165:9–14
16.
go back to reference Baadsgaard SE, Bille S, Egeblad K (1989) Major vascular injury during gynecologic laparoscopy. Report of a case and review of published cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 68(3):283–285 Baadsgaard SE, Bille S, Egeblad K (1989) Major vascular injury during gynecologic laparoscopy. Report of a case and review of published cases. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 68(3):283–285
17.
go back to reference Saber AA, Meslemani AM, Davis R, Pimentel R (2004) Safety zones for anterior abdominal wall entry during laparoscopy: a CT scan mapping of epigastric vessels. Ann Surg 239(2):182–185 Saber AA, Meslemani AM, Davis R, Pimentel R (2004) Safety zones for anterior abdominal wall entry during laparoscopy: a CT scan mapping of epigastric vessels. Ann Surg 239(2):182–185
18.
go back to reference Golan A, Sagiv R, Debby A, Glezerman M (2003) The minilaparoscope as a tool for localization and preparation for cannula insertion in patients with multiple previous abdominal incisions or umbilical hernia. J Am Assoc Gynaecol Laparosc 10(1):14–16CrossRef Golan A, Sagiv R, Debby A, Glezerman M (2003) The minilaparoscope as a tool for localization and preparation for cannula insertion in patients with multiple previous abdominal incisions or umbilical hernia. J Am Assoc Gynaecol Laparosc 10(1):14–16CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Garry R (1999) A consensus document concerning laparoscopic entry techniques: Middlesbrough, March 19–20 1999. Gynaecol Endosc 8:403–406CrossRef Garry R (1999) A consensus document concerning laparoscopic entry techniques: Middlesbrough, March 19–20 1999. Gynaecol Endosc 8:403–406CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Ewen S (1999) Avoiding complications of the laparoscopic approach. Obstet Gynaecol 1(1):34–36 Ewen S (1999) Avoiding complications of the laparoscopic approach. Obstet Gynaecol 1(1):34–36
21.
go back to reference Kalu G, Wright J (2001) Laparoscopic surgery and the law. Obstet Gynaecol 3(3):141–146 Kalu G, Wright J (2001) Laparoscopic surgery and the law. Obstet Gynaecol 3(3):141–146
22.
go back to reference Vilos GA, Vilos AG (2003) Safe laparoscopic entry guided by Veress needle CO2 insufflation pressure. J Am Assoc Gynaecol Laparosc 10(3):415–420 Vilos GA, Vilos AG (2003) Safe laparoscopic entry guided by Veress needle CO2 insufflation pressure. J Am Assoc Gynaecol Laparosc 10(3):415–420
23.
go back to reference Jansen FW, Kapiteyn K, Trimboskemper T, Hermans J, Trimbos JB (1997) Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:595–600 Jansen FW, Kapiteyn K, Trimboskemper T, Hermans J, Trimbos JB (1997) Complications of laparoscopy: a prospective multicentre observational study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:595–600
24.
go back to reference Garry R (1999) Towards evidence-based laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical problems and dilemmas. Gynaecol Endosc 8:403–406CrossRef Garry R (1999) Towards evidence-based laparoscopic entry techniques: clinical problems and dilemmas. Gynaecol Endosc 8:403–406CrossRef
25.
go back to reference O’Callaghan D, Maher PJ, Hill DJ (1996) Complications of closed laparoscopy: is the Veress needle safe? Aust N Z J Surg 66(8):505–507 O’Callaghan D, Maher PJ, Hill DJ (1996) Complications of closed laparoscopy: is the Veress needle safe? Aust N Z J Surg 66(8):505–507
26.
go back to reference Pickersgill A, Slade RJ, Falconer GF, Attwood S (1999) Open laparoscopy: the way forward. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:1116–1119PubMed Pickersgill A, Slade RJ, Falconer GF, Attwood S (1999) Open laparoscopy: the way forward. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 106:1116–1119PubMed
27.
go back to reference Hasson H (1999) Open laparoscopy as a method of access in laparoscopic surgery. Gynaecol Endosc 8:353CrossRef Hasson H (1999) Open laparoscopy as a method of access in laparoscopic surgery. Gynaecol Endosc 8:353CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Saidi MH (1986) Direct laparoscopy without prior pneumoperitoneum. J Reprod Med 31(8):684–686PubMed Saidi MH (1986) Direct laparoscopy without prior pneumoperitoneum. J Reprod Med 31(8):684–686PubMed
29.
go back to reference Kaloo P, Cooper M, Reid G (2002) A prospective multicentre study of laparoscopic complications related to the direct-entry technique. Gynaecol Endosc 11:67–70CrossRef Kaloo P, Cooper M, Reid G (2002) A prospective multicentre study of laparoscopic complications related to the direct-entry technique. Gynaecol Endosc 11:67–70CrossRef
30.
go back to reference Jansen FW, Kolkman W, Bakkum EA, de Kroon CD, Trimbos-Kemper TC, Trimbos JB (2004) Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed- versus open-entry technique. Am J Obstet Gynaec 190(3):634–638 Jansen FW, Kolkman W, Bakkum EA, de Kroon CD, Trimbos-Kemper TC, Trimbos JB (2004) Complications of laparoscopy: an inquiry about closed- versus open-entry technique. Am J Obstet Gynaec 190(3):634–638
31.
go back to reference Jones K, Fan A, Sutton C (2002) Safe entry during laparoscopy: a prospective audit in a district general hospital. Gynaecol Endosc 11:85–89CrossRef Jones K, Fan A, Sutton C (2002) Safe entry during laparoscopy: a prospective audit in a district general hospital. Gynaecol Endosc 11:85–89CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic entry technique—a survey of practices of consultant gynaecologists
Authors
S. Lalchandani
K. Phillips
Publication date
01-12-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Gynecological Surgery / Issue 4/2005
Print ISSN: 1613-2076
Electronic ISSN: 1613-2084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10397-005-0143-3

Other articles of this Issue 4/2005

Gynecological Surgery 4/2005 Go to the issue