Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Esophagus 2/2018

Open Access 01-04-2018 | Original Article

Triple-stapled quadrilateral anastomosis: a new technique for creation of an esophagogastric anastomosis

Authors: Yuji Ishibashi, Tetsu Fukunaga, Shinya Mikami, Shinichi Oka, Satoshi Kanda, Yukinori Yube, Yoshinori Kohira, Takeharu Enomoto, Takehito Otsubo

Published in: Esophagus | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Esophagogastric anastomosis performed after esophagectomy is technically complex and often the source of postoperative complications. The best technique for this anastomosis remains a matter of debate. We describe a new all-stapled side-to-side anastomosis, which we refer to as triple-stapled quadrilateral anastomosis (TRIQ), that can be performed after minimally invasive surgery, and we report results of a retrospective evaluation of postoperative outcomes among the 60 patients in whom this anastomosis has been performed thus far.

Methods

The anastomosis is created by apposition of the posterior walls of the esophagus and stomach. A linear stapler is applied to create a V-shaped posterior anastomotic wall. The anterior wall is closed in a gentle chevron-like shape with the use of 2 separate linear staplers, resulting in a wide quadrilateral anastomosis. The anastomosis is then wrapped with a greater omentum flap.

Results

The patient group comprised 48 men and 12 women with a mean age of 67.8 years. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was performed in 43 of these patients. Neither the thoracoscopic or laparoscopic procedure was converted to open surgery in any patient. The median operation time was 474 min (range 680–320 min). The intraoperative blood loss volume was 104.4 mL (range 240–30 mL). There were no anastomosis-related complications above Clavien-Dindo grade II.

Conclusions

TRIQ can be performed easily and safely, and good short-term outcome can be expected.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–66.CrossRefPubMed Takeuchi H, Miyata H, Gotoh M, et al. A risk model for esophagectomy using data of 5354 patients included in a Japanese nationwide web-based database. Ann Surg. 2014;260:259–66.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Jafari MD, Halabi WJ, Smith BR, et al. A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of partial versus total esophagectomy in the United States. Ann Surg. 2013;258:450–8.CrossRefPubMed Jafari MD, Halabi WJ, Smith BR, et al. A decade analysis of trends and outcomes of partial versus total esophagectomy in the United States. Ann Surg. 2013;258:450–8.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Price TN, Nichols FC, Harmsen WS, et al. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:1154–61.CrossRefPubMed Price TN, Nichols FC, Harmsen WS, et al. A comprehensive review of anastomotic technique in 432 esophagectomies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013;95:1154–61.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Cooke DT, Lin GC, Lau CL, et al. Analysis of cervical esophagogastic anastomotic leaks after transhiatal esophagectomy: risk factors, presentation, and detection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:177–85.CrossRefPubMed Cooke DT, Lin GC, Lau CL, et al. Analysis of cervical esophagogastic anastomotic leaks after transhiatal esophagectomy: risk factors, presentation, and detection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009;88:177–85.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Deng XF, Liu QX, Zhou D, et al. Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:4757–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Deng XF, Liu QX, Zhou D, et al. Hand-sewn vs linearly stapled esophagogastric anastomosis for esophageal cancer: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21:4757–64.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Xu QR, Wang KN, Wang WP, et al. Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:915–21.CrossRefPubMed Xu QR, Wang KN, Wang WP, et al. Linear stapled esophagogastrostomy is more effective than hand-sewn or circular stapler in prevention of anastomotic stricture: a comparative clinical study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2011;15:915–21.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of Esophageal cancer, 11th edition: part I. Esophagus. 2017;14:1–36.CrossRef Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of Esophageal cancer, 11th edition: part I. Esophagus. 2017;14:1–36.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications. A new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240:205–13.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Kimura M, Kuwabara Y, Ishiguro H, et al. A new technique for shaping the gastric tube, using both radial and linear staplers. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219:e15–8.CrossRefPubMed Kimura M, Kuwabara Y, Ishiguro H, et al. A new technique for shaping the gastric tube, using both radial and linear staplers. J Am Coll Surg. 2014;219:e15–8.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kimura M, Mitsui A, Kuwabara Y. Creation of the ideal gastric tube: comparison of three methods: a prospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg. 2016;6:42–5.CrossRef Kimura M, Mitsui A, Kuwabara Y. Creation of the ideal gastric tube: comparison of three methods: a prospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg. 2016;6:42–5.CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Kim RH, Takabe K. Methods of esophagogastric anastomoses following esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:527–33.CrossRefPubMed Kim RH, Takabe K. Methods of esophagogastric anastomoses following esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review. J Surg Oncol. 2010;101:527–33.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentere, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–92.CrossRefPubMed Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentere, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1887–92.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Fukunaga T, Kidokoro A, Fukunaga M, et al. Kinetics of cytokines and PMN-E in thoracoscopic esophagiectomy. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:1484–7.CrossRefPubMed Fukunaga T, Kidokoro A, Fukunaga M, et al. Kinetics of cytokines and PMN-E in thoracoscopic esophagiectomy. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:1484–7.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Okushiba S, Kawarada Y, Shichinohe T, et al. Esophageal delta-shaped anastomosis: a new method of stapled anastomosis for the cervical esophagus and digestive tract. Surg Today. 2005;35:341–4.CrossRefPubMed Okushiba S, Kawarada Y, Shichinohe T, et al. Esophageal delta-shaped anastomosis: a new method of stapled anastomosis for the cervical esophagus and digestive tract. Surg Today. 2005;35:341–4.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Valverde A, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Elhadad A. Manual versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after resection for carcinoma: a controlled trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. Surgery. 1996;120:476–83.CrossRefPubMed Valverde A, Hay JM, Fingerhut A, Elhadad A. Manual versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after resection for carcinoma: a controlled trial. French Associations for Surgical Research. Surgery. 1996;120:476–83.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 1997;226:169–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Law S, Fok M, Chu KM, Wong J. Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Ann Surg. 1997;226:169–73.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Fok M, Ah-Chong AK, Cheng SW, Wong J. Comparison of a single layer continuous hand-sewn method and circular stapling in 580 oesophageal anastomoses. Br J Surg. 1991;78:342–5.CrossRefPubMed Fok M, Ah-Chong AK, Cheng SW, Wong J. Comparison of a single layer continuous hand-sewn method and circular stapling in 580 oesophageal anastomoses. Br J Surg. 1991;78:342–5.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Nakata K, Nagai E, Ohuchida K, et al. Outcomes of cervical end-to-side triangle esophagogastric anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy. World J Surg. 2015;39:1099–104.CrossRefPubMed Nakata K, Nagai E, Ohuchida K, et al. Outcomes of cervical end-to-side triangle esophagogastric anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy. World J Surg. 2015;39:1099–104.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:277–88.CrossRefPubMed Orringer MB, Marshall B, Iannettoni MD. Eliminating the cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak with a side-to-side stapled anastomosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;119:277–88.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Takemura M, Yoshida K, Fujiwara Y. Modified triangulating stapling technique for esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1249–53.CrossRefPubMed Takemura M, Yoshida K, Fujiwara Y. Modified triangulating stapling technique for esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2013;27:1249–53.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Goncette L, et al. Terminalized semimechanical side-to-side suture technique for cervical esophagogastrostomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:814–7.CrossRefPubMed Collard JM, Romagnoli R, Goncette L, et al. Terminalized semimechanical side-to-side suture technique for cervical esophagogastrostomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998;65:814–7.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Ercan S, Rice TW, Murthy SC, et al. Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:623–31.CrossRefPubMed Ercan S, Rice TW, Murthy SC, et al. Does esophagogastric anastomotic technique influence the outcome of patients with esophageal cancer? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;129:623–31.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Noshiro H, Urata M, Ikeda O, et al. Triangulating stapling technique for esophagogastrostomy after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surgery. 2013;154:604–10.CrossRefPubMed Noshiro H, Urata M, Ikeda O, et al. Triangulating stapling technique for esophagogastrostomy after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surgery. 2013;154:604–10.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Toh Y, Sakaguchi Y, Ikeda O, et al. The triangulating stapling technique for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy. Surg Today. 2009;39:201–6.CrossRefPubMed Toh Y, Sakaguchi Y, Ikeda O, et al. The triangulating stapling technique for cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy. Surg Today. 2009;39:201–6.CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Dai JG, Zhang ZY, Min JX, et al. Wrapping of the omental pedicle flap around esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgery. 2011;149:404–10.CrossRefPubMed Dai JG, Zhang ZY, Min JX, et al. Wrapping of the omental pedicle flap around esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surgery. 2011;149:404–10.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Yoshida N, Baba Y, Watanabe M, et al. Triangulating stapling technique covered with the pedicled omental flap for esophagogastric anastomosis: a safe anastomosis with fewer complications. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:e13–6.CrossRefPubMed Yoshida N, Baba Y, Watanabe M, et al. Triangulating stapling technique covered with the pedicled omental flap for esophagogastric anastomosis: a safe anastomosis with fewer complications. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:e13–6.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Triple-stapled quadrilateral anastomosis: a new technique for creation of an esophagogastric anastomosis
Authors
Yuji Ishibashi
Tetsu Fukunaga
Shinya Mikami
Shinichi Oka
Satoshi Kanda
Yukinori Yube
Yoshinori Kohira
Takeharu Enomoto
Takehito Otsubo
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Esophagus / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1612-9059
Electronic ISSN: 1612-9067
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10388-017-0599-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

Esophagus 2/2018 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine