Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 5/2013

01-09-2013 | Clinical Investigation

Evaluation of relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness progression and visual field progression in patients with glaucoma

Authors: Kaori Tenkumo, Kazuyuki Hirooka, Tetsuya Baba, Eri Nitta, Shino Sato, Fumio Shiraga

Published in: Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology | Issue 5/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the capability of optical coherence tomography (OCT), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, and visual field (VF) measurements in glaucoma progression detection.

Methods

The study examined 62 eyes of 37 glaucoma patients observed over a 3-year period. All eyes underwent at least four serial RNFL measurements performed by Cirrus OCT, with the first and last measurements separated by at least 3 years. VF testing was performed by using the Swedish interactive threshold algorithm (SITA) Standard 30-2 program of the Humphrey field analyzer (HFA) on the same day as the RNFL imaging. Both serial RNFL thicknesses and VF progression were assessed by the guided progression analysis (GPA) software program. RNFL thickness progression was evaluated by event analysis. Total deviation (TD) in the superior or inferior hemifield was also examined.

Results

A total of 295 OCT scans and 295 VFs were analyzed. Five eyes exhibited progression by OCT only and 8 eyes exhibited progression by VF GPA only. When the analysis was based on the combined measurement findings, progression was noted in 6 eyes. The average of the progressive hemifield TD at baseline for combined RNFL and VF progression was −3.21 ± 1.38 dB, while it was −2.17 ± 1.14 dB for RNFL progression and −9.12 ± 3.75 dB for VF progression. The average of the progressive hemifield TD indicated a significant advancement of VF progression as compared to RNFL progression (P = 0.002).

Conclusions

When a mild VF defect is present, OCT RNFL thickness measurements are important in helping discern glaucoma progression.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:135–46.CrossRefPubMed Quigley HA, Addicks EM, Green WR. Optic nerve damage in human glaucoma. III. Quantitative correlation of nerve fiber loss and visual field defect in glaucoma, ischemic neuropathy, papilledema, and toxic neuropathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1982;100:135–46.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Caprioli J. Automated perimetry in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;111:235–9.PubMed Caprioli J. Automated perimetry in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1991;111:235–9.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Flammer J, Drance SM, Zulauf M. Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102:704–6.CrossRefPubMed Flammer J, Drance SM, Zulauf M. Differential light threshold. Short- and long-term fluctuation in patients with glaucoma, normal controls, and patients with suspected glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 1984;102:704–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Boeglin RJ, Caprioli J, Zulauf M. Long-term fluctuation of the visual field in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113:396–400.PubMed Boeglin RJ, Caprioli J, Zulauf M. Long-term fluctuation of the visual field in glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 1992;113:396–400.PubMed
6.
go back to reference The AGIS Investigators. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1445–55. The AGIS Investigators. Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study 2. Visual field test scoring and reliability. Ophthalmology. 1994;101:1445–55.
7.
go back to reference Katz J. Scoring systems for measuring progression of visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:391–5.CrossRefPubMed Katz J. Scoring systems for measuring progression of visual field loss in clinical trials of glaucoma treatment. Ophthalmology. 1999;106:391–5.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Gordon MO, Kass MA. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: design and baseline description of the participants. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:573–83.CrossRefPubMed Gordon MO, Kass MA. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: design and baseline description of the participants. Arch Ophthalmol. 1999;117:573–83.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Bengtsson B, Bengtsson M, Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Measuring visual field progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003;81:286–93.CrossRefPubMed Heijl A, Leske MC, Bengtsson B, Bengtsson B, Bengtsson M, Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial Group. Measuring visual field progression in the Early Manifest Glaucoma Trial. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2003;81:286–93.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Cho JY, Sung KR, Yun SC, Na JH, Lee Y, Kook MS. Progression detection in different stage of glaucoma: mean deviation versus visual field index. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012;56:128–33.CrossRefPubMed Cho JY, Sung KR, Yun SC, Na JH, Lee Y, Kook MS. Progression detection in different stage of glaucoma: mean deviation versus visual field index. Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2012;56:128–33.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Sung KR, Kim DY, Park SB, Kook MS. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Cirrus HD and Stratus optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1264–70.CrossRefPubMed Sung KR, Kim DY, Park SB, Kook MS. Comparison of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by Cirrus HD and Stratus optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:1264–70.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Park SB, Sung KR, Kang SY, Kim KR, Kook MS. Comparison of glaucoma diagnostic capabilities of Cirrus HD and Stratus optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:1603–9.CrossRefPubMed Park SB, Sung KR, Kang SY, Kim KR, Kook MS. Comparison of glaucoma diagnostic capabilities of Cirrus HD and Stratus optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol. 2009;127:1603–9.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Mills RP, Budenz DL, Lee PP, Noecker RJ, Walt JG, Siegartel LR, et al. Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:24–30.CrossRefPubMed Mills RP, Budenz DL, Lee PP, Noecker RJ, Walt JG, Siegartel LR, et al. Categorizing the stage of glaucoma from pre-diagnosis to end-stage disease. Am J Ophthalmol. 2006;141:24–30.CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Consensus statements. In: Weinreb RN, Greve EL, editors. Glaucoma diagnosis structure and function: reports and consensus statements of the 1st Global AIGS meeting on “Structure and function in the management of glaucoma”. The Hague: Kugler; 2004. p. 155–6. Consensus statements. In: Weinreb RN, Greve EL, editors. Glaucoma diagnosis structure and function: reports and consensus statements of the 1st Global AIGS meeting on “Structure and function in the management of glaucoma”. The Hague: Kugler; 2004. p. 155–6.
16.
go back to reference Wollstein G, Schuman JS, Price LL, Aydin A, Stark PC, Hertzmark E, et al. Optical coherence tomography longitudinal evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:464–70.CrossRefPubMed Wollstein G, Schuman JS, Price LL, Aydin A, Stark PC, Hertzmark E, et al. Optical coherence tomography longitudinal evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2005;123:464–70.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, Qiu K, Liu S, Li H, et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a study on optical coherence tomography guided progression analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:217–22.CrossRefPubMed Leung CK, Cheung CY, Weinreb RN, Qiu K, Liu S, Li H, et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a study on optical coherence tomography guided progression analysis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:217–22.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Leung CK, Liu S, Weinreb RN, Lai G, Ye C, Cheung CY, et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a prospective analysis with neuroretinal rim and visual field progression. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1551–7.CrossRefPubMed Leung CK, Liu S, Weinreb RN, Lai G, Ye C, Cheung CY, et al. Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a prospective analysis with neuroretinal rim and visual field progression. Ophthalmology. 2011;118:1551–7.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Hood DC, Anderson SC, Wall M, Raza AS, Kardon RH. A test of a linear model of glaucomatous structure–function loss reveals sources of variability in retinal nerve fiber and visual field measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:4254–66.CrossRefPubMed Hood DC, Anderson SC, Wall M, Raza AS, Kardon RH. A test of a linear model of glaucomatous structure–function loss reveals sources of variability in retinal nerve fiber and visual field measurements. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50:4254–66.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Leung CK, Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Sample PA, Bowd C, Ng D, et al. American Chinese glaucoma imaging study: a comparison of the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer in detecting glaucomatous damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:2644–52.CrossRefPubMed Leung CK, Medeiros FA, Zangwill LM, Sample PA, Bowd C, Ng D, et al. American Chinese glaucoma imaging study: a comparison of the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer in detecting glaucomatous damage. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48:2644–52.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Schlottmann PG, De Cilla S, Greenfield DS, Caprioli J, Garway-Heath DF. Relationship between visual field sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness as measured by scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1823–9.CrossRefPubMed Schlottmann PG, De Cilla S, Greenfield DS, Caprioli J, Garway-Heath DF. Relationship between visual field sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness as measured by scanning laser polarimetry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:1823–9.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Leung CK, Chong KK, Chen WM, Yiu CK, Tso MY, Woo J, et al. Comparative study of retinal nerve fiber layer measurement by StratusOCT and GDx VCC, II: structure/function regression analysis in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3702–11.CrossRefPubMed Leung CK, Chong KK, Chen WM, Yiu CK, Tso MY, Woo J, et al. Comparative study of retinal nerve fiber layer measurement by StratusOCT and GDx VCC, II: structure/function regression analysis in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:3702–11.CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Garway-Heath DF, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Mapping the visual field to the optic disc in normal tension glaucoma eyes. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1809–15.CrossRefPubMed Garway-Heath DF, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Mapping the visual field to the optic disc in normal tension glaucoma eyes. Ophthalmology. 2000;107:1809–15.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Iester M, Capris E, De Feo F, Polvicino M, Brusini P, Capris P, et al. Agreement to detect glaucomatous visual field progression by using three different methods: a multicentre study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95:1276–83.CrossRefPubMed Iester M, Capris E, De Feo F, Polvicino M, Brusini P, Capris P, et al. Agreement to detect glaucomatous visual field progression by using three different methods: a multicentre study. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95:1276–83.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of relationship between retinal nerve fiber layer thickness progression and visual field progression in patients with glaucoma
Authors
Kaori Tenkumo
Kazuyuki Hirooka
Tetsuya Baba
Eri Nitta
Shino Sato
Fumio Shiraga
Publication date
01-09-2013
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology / Issue 5/2013
Print ISSN: 0021-5155
Electronic ISSN: 1613-2246
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-013-0254-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2013

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology 5/2013 Go to the issue