Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 11/2008

01-11-2008 | Original Contribution

Long-Term Functional Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Open Rectopexy for the Treatment of Rectal Prolapse

Authors: Christopher M. Byrne, M.B.B.S.(Hons.), B.Sc.(med.), M.S., F.R.A.C.S., Steven R. Smith, M.B.B.S., B.Sc.(med.), M.S., F.R.A.C.S., Michael J. Solomon, M.B.B.Ch.(Hons.), M.Sc.(Cl. Epid.), F.R.A.C.S., Jane M. Young, Ph.D., M.P.H., M.B.B.S., F.A.F.P.H.M., Anthony A. Eyers, M.B.B.S., M.Bioethics, F.R.C.S., F.R.A.C.S., Christopher J. Young, M.B.B.S., M.S., F.R.A.C.S.

Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Issue 11/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Laparoscopic rectopexy to treat full-thickness rectal prolapse has proven short-term benefits, but there is little long-term follow-up and functional outcome data available.

Methods

Patients who had abdominal surgery for prolapse during a ten-year period were identified and interviewed to ascertain details of prolapse recurrence, constipation, incontinence, cosmesis, and satisfaction. Additional details on recurrences that required surgery and mortality were obtained from chart review and the State Death Registry.

Results

Of 321 prolapse operations, laparoscopic rectopexy was performed in 126 patients, open rectopexy in 46, and resection rectopexy in 21 patients. At a median follow-up of five years after laparoscopic rectopexy, there were five (4 percent) confirmed full-thickness recurrences that required surgery. Actuarial recurrence rates of laparoscopic rectopexy were 6.9 percent at five years (95 percent confidence interval, 0.1–13.8 percent) and 10.8 percent at ten years (95 percent confidence interval, 0.9–20.1 percent). Seven patients underwent rubber band ligation for mucosal prolapse and seven required other surgical procedures. There was one recurrence after open rectopexy (2.4 percent) and one after resection rectopexy (4.7 percent), and there was no significant difference between groups. Overall constipation scores were not increased after laparoscopic rectopexy, with no significant difference to open rectopexy or resection rectopexy.

Conclusions

This study has demonstrated that laparoscopic rectopexy has reliable long-term results for treating rectal prolapse, including low recurrence rates and no overall change in functional outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Senapti A. Rectal prolapse. In: Phillips RK. Colorectal surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2001:251–71. Senapti A. Rectal prolapse. In: Phillips RK. Colorectal surgery. Philadelphia: Saunders, 2001:251–71.
2.
go back to reference Azimuddin K, Khubchandani IT, Rosen L, Stasik JJ, Riether RD, Reed JF. Rectal prolapse: a search for the “best” operation. Am Surg 2001;67:622–7.PubMed Azimuddin K, Khubchandani IT, Rosen L, Stasik JJ, Riether RD, Reed JF. Rectal prolapse: a search for the “best” operation. Am Surg 2001;67:622–7.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Kim DS, Tsang CB, Wong WD, Lowry AC, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD. Complete rectal prolapse: evolution of management and results. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:460–6.PubMedCrossRef Kim DS, Tsang CB, Wong WD, Lowry AC, Goldberg SM, Madoff RD. Complete rectal prolapse: evolution of management and results. Dis Colon Rectum 1999;42:460–6.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Solomon MJ, Eyers AA. Laparoscopic rectopexy using mesh fixation with a spiked chromium staple. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:279–84.PubMedCrossRef Solomon MJ, Eyers AA. Laparoscopic rectopexy using mesh fixation with a spiked chromium staple. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39:279–84.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Reitano MC, et al. Laparotomic vs. laparoscopic rectopexy in complete rectal prolapse. Dig Surg 1999;16:415–9.PubMedCrossRef Boccasanta P, Venturi M, Reitano MC, et al. Laparotomic vs. laparoscopic rectopexy in complete rectal prolapse. Dig Surg 1999;16:415–9.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kairaluoma MV, Viljakka MT, Kellokumpu IH. Open vs. laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-controlled study assessing short term outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:353–60.PubMedCrossRef Kairaluoma MV, Viljakka MT, Kellokumpu IH. Open vs. laparoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse: a case-controlled study assessing short term outcome. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:353–60.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA, Roberts RA. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 2002;89:35–9.PubMedCrossRef Solomon MJ, Young CJ, Eyers AA, Roberts RA. Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 2002;89:35–9.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Luniss PJ, Kamm MA, Phillips RK. Factors affecting continence after surgery for anal fistula. Br J Surg 1994;81:1382–5.CrossRef Luniss PJ, Kamm MA, Phillips RK. Factors affecting continence after surgery for anal fistula. Br J Surg 1994;81:1382–5.CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Salkeld G, Bagia M, Solomon M. Economic impact of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy. Br J Surg 2004;91:1188–91.PubMedCrossRef Salkeld G, Bagia M, Solomon M. Economic impact of laparoscopic versus open abdominal rectopexy. Br J Surg 2004;91:1188–91.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Duthie GS, Bartolo DC. Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparison of techniques. Br J Surg 1992;79:107–13.PubMedCrossRef Duthie GS, Bartolo DC. Abdominal rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a comparison of techniques. Br J Surg 1992;79:107–13.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Madoff RD, Williams JG, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Long term functional results of colon resection and rectopexy for overt rectal prolapse. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:101–4.PubMed Madoff RD, Williams JG, Wong WD, Rothenberger DA, Goldberg SM. Long term functional results of colon resection and rectopexy for overt rectal prolapse. Am J Gastroenterol 1992;87:101–4.PubMed
13.
go back to reference McKee RF, Lauder JC, Poon FW, Altchison MA, Finlay IG. A prospective randomized study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;174:145–8.PubMed McKee RF, Lauder JC, Poon FW, Altchison MA, Finlay IG. A prospective randomized study of abdominal rectopexy with and without sigmoidectomy in rectal prolapse. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1992;174:145–8.PubMed
14.
go back to reference Ashari LH, Lumley JW, Stevenson AR, Stitz RW. Laparoscopically-assisted resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a ten-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:982–7.PubMedCrossRef Ashari LH, Lumley JW, Stevenson AR, Stitz RW. Laparoscopically-assisted resection rectopexy for rectal prolapse: a ten-year experience. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:982–7.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Raftopoulos Y, Senagore AJ, Di Diuoro G, et al. Recurrence rates after abdominal surgery for complete rectal prolapse: a multicenter pooled analysis of 643 individual patient data. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1200–6.PubMedCrossRef Raftopoulos Y, Senagore AJ, Di Diuoro G, et al. Recurrence rates after abdominal surgery for complete rectal prolapse: a multicenter pooled analysis of 643 individual patient data. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1200–6.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Novell JR, Osborne MJ, Winslet MC, Lewis AA. Prospective randomized trial of Ivalon sponge versus sutured rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994;81:904–6.PubMedCrossRef Novell JR, Osborne MJ, Winslet MC, Lewis AA. Prospective randomized trial of Ivalon sponge versus sutured rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 1994;81:904–6.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Penfold JC, Hawley PR. Experience of Ivalon sponge implant for complete rectal prolapse at St. Marks Hospital 1960–1970. Br J Surg 1972;59:846–8.PubMedCrossRef Penfold JC, Hawley PR. Experience of Ivalon sponge implant for complete rectal prolapse at St. Marks Hospital 1960–1970. Br J Surg 1972;59:846–8.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference DiGiuro G, Ignjatovic D, Brogger J, et al. How accurate are published recurrence rates after rectal prolapse surgery? A meta-analysis of individual patient data. Am J Surg 2006;191:773–8.PubMedCrossRef DiGiuro G, Ignjatovic D, Brogger J, et al. How accurate are published recurrence rates after rectal prolapse surgery? A meta-analysis of individual patient data. Am J Surg 2006;191:773–8.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Luukkonen P, Mikkonen U, Jarvinen H. Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy versus rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study. Int J Colrectal Dis 1992;7:219–22.CrossRef Luukkonen P, Mikkonen U, Jarvinen H. Abdominal rectopexy with sigmoidectomy versus rectopexy alone for rectal prolapse: a prospective, randomized study. Int J Colrectal Dis 1992;7:219–22.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kellokumpu IH, Vironen J, Scheinin T. Laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapse: a prospective study evaluating surgical outcome and changes in symptoms and bowel function. Surg Endosc 2000;14:634–40.PubMedCrossRef Kellokumpu IH, Vironen J, Scheinin T. Laparoscopic repair of rectal prolapse: a prospective study evaluating surgical outcome and changes in symptoms and bowel function. Surg Endosc 2000;14:634–40.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Australian Bureau of Statistics. Census of Population and Housing: population growth and distribution, Australia, cat no. 2035.0. Canberra, Australia: ABS, 2001:38–58. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Census of Population and Housing: population growth and distribution, Australia, cat no. 2035.0. Canberra, Australia: ABS, 2001:38–58.
Metadata
Title
Long-Term Functional Outcomes After Laparoscopic and Open Rectopexy for the Treatment of Rectal Prolapse
Authors
Christopher M. Byrne, M.B.B.S.(Hons.), B.Sc.(med.), M.S., F.R.A.C.S.
Steven R. Smith, M.B.B.S., B.Sc.(med.), M.S., F.R.A.C.S.
Michael J. Solomon, M.B.B.Ch.(Hons.), M.Sc.(Cl. Epid.), F.R.A.C.S.
Jane M. Young, Ph.D., M.P.H., M.B.B.S., F.A.F.P.H.M.
Anthony A. Eyers, M.B.B.S., M.Bioethics, F.R.C.S., F.R.A.C.S.
Christopher J. Young, M.B.B.S., M.S., F.R.A.C.S.
Publication date
01-11-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Issue 11/2008
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Electronic ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-008-9365-6

Other articles of this Issue 11/2008

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 11/2008 Go to the issue