Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 3/2008

01-03-2008 | Original Contributions

Long-Term Outcome of Delayed Primary or Early Secondary Reconstruction of the Anal Sphincter after Obstetrical Injury

Authors: Mette M. Soerensen, M.D., Karl M. Bek, M.D., Ph.D., Steen Buntzen, M.D., D.M.Sci., Karen-Elise Højberg, M.D., Ph.D., Søren Laurberg, Prof., M.D., D.M.Sci.

Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Issue 3/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Traditionally sphincter repair has not been performed during the puerperium. This prospective study was designed to determine the long-term outcome of delayed primary or early secondary sphincteroplasty in the puerperium.

Methods

Between 1991 and 2005, 22 females underwent delayed primary or early secondary repair after third-degree or fourth-degree anal sphincter rupture. Delayed primary reconstruction was performed more than 72 hours after delivery. Early secondary reconstruction was performed within 14 days postpartum. The reconstruction of the anal sphincter was performed without a covering stoma, in all cases. A control group of 19 age-matched and parity-matched females, without known anal sphincter injury after vaginal delivery, were included. Current degree of continence and associated quality of life were determined by a fecal incontinence severity questionnaire and a quality of life questionnaire.

Results

None of the females had complications postoperatively. Mean follow-up was 50 (range, 2–155) months in the case group and 60 (range, 12–132) months in the control group. At time of follow-up, the Wexner score was 4.1 (range, 0–13) in females with delayed primary or early secondary reconstruction and 1.1 (range, 0–8) in the control group (P < 0.01). The inconvenience of incontinence after reconstruction was significantly higher (P < 0.01) compared with the control group, but the quality of life was not significantly affected (P = 0.75).

Conclusions

It is safe to perform a delayed primary or early secondary reconstruction without a covering stoma in females who have sustained a third-degree or fourth-degree obstetric tear. The long-term functional outcome is acceptable.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Zetterström J, López A, Anzén B, Norman M, Holmström B, Mellgren A. Anal sphincter tears at vaginal delivery: risk factors and clinical outcome of primary repair. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:21–8.PubMedCrossRef Zetterström J, López A, Anzén B, Norman M, Holmström B, Mellgren A. Anal sphincter tears at vaginal delivery: risk factors and clinical outcome of primary repair. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:21–8.PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Third-degree obstetric anal sphincter tear: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 1994;308:887–91.PubMed Sultan AH, Kamm MA, Hudson CN, Bartram CI. Third-degree obstetric anal sphincter tear: risk factors and outcome of primary repair. BMJ 1994;308:887–91.PubMed
3.
go back to reference Fornell EU, Matthiesen L, Sjodahl R, Berg G. Obstetric anal sphincter injury ten years after: subjective and objective long term effects. BJOG 2005;112:312–6.PubMedCrossRef Fornell EU, Matthiesen L, Sjodahl R, Berg G. Obstetric anal sphincter injury ten years after: subjective and objective long term effects. BJOG 2005;112:312–6.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Halverson AL, Hull TL. Long-term outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:345–8.PubMedCrossRef Halverson AL, Hull TL. Long-term outcome of overlapping anal sphincter repair. Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:345–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Bek KM, Laurberg S. Risks of anal incontinence from subsequent vaginal delivery after complete obstetric anal sphincter tear. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:724–6.PubMed Bek KM, Laurberg S. Risks of anal incontinence from subsequent vaginal delivery after complete obstetric anal sphincter tear. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1992;99:724–6.PubMed
6.
go back to reference Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A. Incontinence. France: EDITIONS, 2005:21. Abrams P, Cardozo L, Khoury S, Wein A. Incontinence. France: EDITIONS, 2005:21.
7.
go back to reference Arona AJ, al-Marayati L, Grimes DA, Ballard CA. Early secondary repair of third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations after outpatient wound preparation. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:294–6.PubMedCrossRef Arona AJ, al-Marayati L, Grimes DA, Ballard CA. Early secondary repair of third- and fourth-degree perineal lacerations after outpatient wound preparation. Obstet Gynecol 1995;86:294–6.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hankins GD, Hauth JC, Glistrap LC, Hammond TL, Yeomans ER, Snyder RR. Early repair of episiotomy dehiscence. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:48–51.PubMed Hankins GD, Hauth JC, Glistrap LC, Hammond TL, Yeomans ER, Snyder RR. Early repair of episiotomy dehiscence. Obstet Gynecol 1990;75:48–51.PubMed
9.
go back to reference Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:77–97.PubMedCrossRef Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:77–97.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of fecal incontinence grading system. Gut 1999;44:77–80.PubMedCrossRef Vaizey CJ, Carapeti E, Cahill JA, Kamm MA. Prospective comparison of fecal incontinence grading system. Gut 1999;44:77–80.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Norderval S, Öian P, Revhaug A, Vonen B. Anal incontinence after obstetric sphincter tear: outcome of anatomic primary repair. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1055–66.PubMedCrossRef Norderval S, Öian P, Revhaug A, Vonen B. Anal incontinence after obstetric sphincter tear: outcome of anatomic primary repair. Dis Colon Rectum 2005;48:1055–66.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Long-term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 2000;355:260–5.PubMedCrossRef Malouf AJ, Norton CS, Engel AF, Nicholls RJ, Kamm MA. Long-term results of overlapping anterior anal-sphincter repair for obstetric trauma. Lancet 2000;355:260–5.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Gutierrez AB, Madoff RD, Lowry AC, Parker SC, Buie WD, Baxter NN. Long-term results of anterior sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:727–31.CrossRef Gutierrez AB, Madoff RD, Lowry AC, Parker SC, Buie WD, Baxter NN. Long-term results of anterior sphincteroplasty. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:727–31.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Nichols C, Lamb E, Ramakrishnan V. Differences in outcomes after third- versus fourth-degree perineal laceration repair. A prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:530–4.PubMedCrossRef Nichols C, Lamb E, Ramakrishnan V. Differences in outcomes after third- versus fourth-degree perineal laceration repair. A prospective study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005;193:530–4.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Long-Term Outcome of Delayed Primary or Early Secondary Reconstruction of the Anal Sphincter after Obstetrical Injury
Authors
Mette M. Soerensen, M.D.
Karl M. Bek, M.D., Ph.D.
Steen Buntzen, M.D., D.M.Sci.
Karen-Elise Højberg, M.D., Ph.D.
Søren Laurberg, Prof., M.D., D.M.Sci.
Publication date
01-03-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Issue 3/2008
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Electronic ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-007-9084-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2008

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 3/2008 Go to the issue