Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 4/2005

01-04-2005 | Original Contribution

Colonic J-Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Rectal Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Handsewn vs. Stapled Anastomosis

Authors: Alexis Laurent, M.D., Yann Parc, M.D., Deborah McNamara, M.D., Rolland Parc, M.D., Emmanuel Tiret, M.D.

Published in: Diseases of the Colon & Rectum | Issue 4/2005

Login to get access

PURPOSE

Colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosis performed after complete proctectomy and total mesorectal excision for adenocarcinoma of the rectum can be handsewn or stapled. Stapling the coloanal anastomosis is believed to shorten operating time and reduce morbidity, but there are no randomized trials comparing the techniques.

METHODS

Between January 1999 and May 2001, all patients with rectal adenocarcinoma requiring total mesorectal excision were randomized intraoperatively to handsewn or stapled anastomosis. Mortality, intraoperative, and postoperative findings and functional results at 3, 6, and 12 months were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (12 females; mean age, 60 ± 10 years) were randomized (stapled group: n = 20; handsewn group: n = 17). The two groups were comparable for age, gender, distance between the tumor and the levator ani, tumor volume, and use of preoperative radiotherapy (3 in each group). Morbidity did not differ between stapled group (3/20) and handsewn group (4/17; P > 0.05). Mean ± standard deviation operative time was shorter in stapled group (261 ± 40 minutes) than in handsewn group (314 ± 46 minutes; P = 0.0008), and median distance between the anastomosis and the anal verge was shorter in handsewn group (19 ± 9 mm) than in stapled group (27 ± 8 mm; P = 0.01). Three patients of handsewn group and none of stapled group developed an anastomotic stricture requiring a single digital dilation (not significant). Number of stools per 24 hours, urgency, incidence of fragmented stools, degree of continence, requirement for protective pad, and/or need to take medication at 3, 6, and 12 months were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Stapled coloanal anastomosis is significantly faster than handsewn CAA and has similar functional results. It should be the preferred technique when it is feasible.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Parks, AG, Percy, JP 1982Resection and sutured colo-anal anastomosis for rectal carcinomaBr J Surg693014PubMed Parks, AG, Percy, JP 1982Resection and sutured colo-anal anastomosis for rectal carcinomaBr J Surg693014PubMed
2.
go back to reference Lazorthes, F, Fages, P, Chiotasso, P, Lemozy, J, Bloom, E 1986Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectumBr J Surg731368PubMed Lazorthes, F, Fages, P, Chiotasso, P, Lemozy, J, Bloom, E 1986Resection of the rectum with construction of a colonic reservoir and coloanal anastomosis for carcinoma of the rectumBr J Surg731368PubMed
3.
go back to reference Parc, R, Tiret, E, Frileux, P, Moszkowski, E, Loygue, J 1986Resection and coloanal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinomaBr J Surg7313941PubMed Parc, R, Tiret, E, Frileux, P, Moszkowski, E, Loygue, J 1986Resection and coloanal anastomosis with colonic reservoir for rectal carcinomaBr J Surg7313941PubMed
4.
go back to reference Ortiz, H, Miguel, De M, Armendariz, P, Rodriguez, J, Chocarro, C 1995Coloanal anastomosis: are functional results better with a pouch?Dis Colon Rectum383757PubMed Ortiz, H, Miguel, De M, Armendariz, P, Rodriguez, J, Chocarro, C 1995Coloanal anastomosis: are functional results better with a pouch?Dis Colon Rectum383757PubMed
5.
go back to reference Seow-Choen, F, Goh, HS 1995Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstructionBr J Surg8260810PubMed Seow-Choen, F, Goh, HS 1995Prospective randomized trial comparing J colonic pouch-anal anastomosis and straight coloanal reconstructionBr J Surg8260810PubMed
6.
go back to reference Hallbook, O, Pahlman, L, Krog, M, Wexner, SD, Sjodahl, R 1996Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resectionAnn Surg2245865CrossRefPubMed Hallbook, O, Pahlman, L, Krog, M, Wexner, SD, Sjodahl, R 1996Randomized comparison of straight and colonic J pouch anastomosis after low anterior resectionAnn Surg2245865CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Lazorthes, F, Chiotasso, P, Gamagami, RA, Istvan, G, Muhammed, S 1997Late clinical outcome in a randomised prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosisBr J Surg84144951CrossRefPubMed Lazorthes, F, Chiotasso, P, Gamagami, RA, Istvan, G, Muhammed, S 1997Late clinical outcome in a randomised prospective comparison of colonic J pouch and straight coloanal anastomosisBr J Surg84144951CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Heald, RJ, Husband, EM, Ryall, RD 1982The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery – the clue to pelvic recurrence?Br J Surg696136PubMed Heald, RJ, Husband, EM, Ryall, RD 1982The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery – the clue to pelvic recurrence?Br J Surg696136PubMed
9.
go back to reference Dehni, N, McNamara, DA, Schlegel, RD, Guiguet, M, Tiret, E, Parc, R 2002Clinical effects of preoperative radiation therapy on anorectal function after proctectomy and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosisDis Colon Rectum45163540PubMed Dehni, N, McNamara, DA, Schlegel, RD, Guiguet, M, Tiret, E, Parc, R 2002Clinical effects of preoperative radiation therapy on anorectal function after proctectomy and colonic J-pouch-anal anastomosisDis Colon Rectum45163540PubMed
10.
go back to reference Jorge, JM, Wexner, SD 1993Etiology and management of fecal incontinenceDis Colon Rectum367797PubMed Jorge, JM, Wexner, SD 1993Etiology and management of fecal incontinenceDis Colon Rectum367797PubMed
11.
go back to reference Ogan, K, Lotan, Y, Koeneman, K, Pearle, MS, Cadeddu, JA, Rassweiler, J 2002Laparoscopic versus open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a cost analysisJ Urol16819459CrossRefPubMed Ogan, K, Lotan, Y, Koeneman, K, Pearle, MS, Cadeddu, JA, Rassweiler, J 2002Laparoscopic versus open retroperitoneal lymph node dissection: a cost analysisJ Urol16819459CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Dakkuri, RA, Ludwig, DJ, Traverso, LW 2002Should bilateral inguinal hernias be repaired during one operation?Am J Surg1835547CrossRefPubMed Dakkuri, RA, Ludwig, DJ, Traverso, LW 2002Should bilateral inguinal hernias be repaired during one operation?Am J Surg1835547CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Williams, NS 1984The rationale for preservation of the anal sphincter in patients with low rectal cancerBr J Surg7157581PubMed Williams, NS 1984The rationale for preservation of the anal sphincter in patients with low rectal cancerBr J Surg7157581PubMed
14.
go back to reference Mortensen, NJ, Ramirez, JM, Takeuchi, N, Humphreys, MM 1995Colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis after rectal excision for carcinoma: functional outcomeBr J Surg826113PubMed Mortensen, NJ, Ramirez, JM, Takeuchi, N, Humphreys, MM 1995Colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis after rectal excision for carcinoma: functional outcomeBr J Surg826113PubMed
15.
go back to reference Reilly, WT, Pemberton, JH, Wolff, BG, et al. 1997Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosaAnn Surg22566677CrossRefPubMed Reilly, WT, Pemberton, JH, Wolff, BG,  et al. 1997Randomized prospective trial comparing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by excising the anal mucosa to ileal pouch-anal anastomosis performed by preserving the anal mucosaAnn Surg22566677CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Colonic J-Pouch-Anal Anastomosis for Rectal Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized Study Comparing Handsewn vs. Stapled Anastomosis
Authors
Alexis Laurent, M.D.
Yann Parc, M.D.
Deborah McNamara, M.D.
Rolland Parc, M.D.
Emmanuel Tiret, M.D.
Publication date
01-04-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Diseases of the Colon & Rectum / Issue 4/2005
Print ISSN: 0012-3706
Electronic ISSN: 1530-0358
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10350-004-0829-z

Other articles of this Issue 4/2005

Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 4/2005 Go to the issue

Letters to the Editor

The Authors Reply