Published in:
01-02-2015 | Erratum
Erratum to: Quantitative accuracy of attenuation correction in the Philips Ingenuity TF whole-body PET/MR system: a direct comparison with transmission-based attenuation correction
Published in: Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine | Issue 1/2015
Login to get accessExcerpt
Unfortunately, the online published article has errors in Table 2. In Table 2, in the row “clavicular region,” the ranges should be −13 to 22 % and −11 to 23 % instead of −13 to 2 % and −11 to 2 %.
Table 2
Relative differences (mean ± standard deviation) between SUVMRAC and SUVTRAC in the liver, the cerebellum and several hot focal structure VOIs
|
VOI
|
Number
|
ΔSUVrel,max (%)
|
ΔSUVrel,mean (%)
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Mean ± SD
|
Median
|
Range
|
Mean ± SD
|
Median
|
Range
|
||
|
Liver
|
9
|
−4 ± 9
|
−5
|
−18 to 8
|
−5 ± 10
|
−7
|
−20 to 12
|
|
Cerebellum
|
4
|
12 ± 6
|
12
|
6 to 19
|
12 ± 4
|
12
|
8 to 17
|
|
Hot focal structures
|
|||||||
|
Total
|
49
|
−2 ± 11
|
−6
|
−17 to 22
|
−1 ± 10
|
−4
|
−16 to 23
|
|
Lung and mediastinum
|
8
|
−13 ± 3
|
−14
|
−17 to −9
|
−13 ± 3
|
−14
|
−16 to −8
|
|
Thoracic spine
|
18
|
−6 ± 8
|
−8
|
−16 to 19
|
−5 ± 7
|
−6
|
−12 to 15
|
|
Clavicular region
|
18
|
7 ± 9
|
7
|
−13 to 22
|
7 ± 8
|
6
|
−11 to 23
|
|
Liver and kidney
|
5
|
−1 ± 6
|
−1
|
−8 to 9
|
−1 ± 6
|
−2
|
−6 to 9
|