Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2011

01-06-2011

Typical Accuracy and Quality Control of a Process for Creating CT-Based Virtual Bone Models

Authors: Hansrudi Noser, Thomas Heldstab, Beat Schmutz, Lukas Kamer

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 3/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

A pragmatic method for assessing the accuracy and precision of a given processing pipeline required for converting computed tomography (CT) image data of bones into representative three dimensional (3D) models of bone shapes is proposed. The method is based on coprocessing a control object with known geometry which enables the assessment of the quality of resulting 3D models. At three stages of the conversion process, distance measurements were obtained and statistically evaluated. For this study, 31 CT datasets were processed. The final 3D model of the control object contained an average deviation from reference values of −1.07 ± 0.52 mm standard deviation (SD) for edge distances and −0.647 ± 0.43 mm SD for parallel side distances of the control object. Coprocessing a reference object enables the assessment of the accuracy and precision of a given processing pipeline for creating CT-based 3D bone models and is suitable for detecting most systematic or human errors when processing a CT-scan. Typical errors have about the same size as the scan resolution.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Messmer P, Matthews F, Jacob AL, Kikinis R, Regazzoni P, Noser H: A CT-database for research, development and education: concept and potential. J Digit Imaging 20(1):17–22, 2007PubMedCrossRef Messmer P, Matthews F, Jacob AL, Kikinis R, Regazzoni P, Noser H: A CT-database for research, development and education: concept and potential. J Digit Imaging 20(1):17–22, 2007PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Schmutz B, Wullschleger ME, Schuetz MA: The effect of CT slice spacing on the geometry of 3D models. In: Proceedings of 6th Australian Biomechanics Conference. New Zealand: The University of Auckland, 2007, pp 93–94 Schmutz B, Wullschleger ME, Schuetz MA: The effect of CT slice spacing on the geometry of 3D models. In: Proceedings of 6th Australian Biomechanics Conference. New Zealand: The University of Auckland, 2007, pp 93–94
3.
go back to reference Shin J, Lee HK, Choi CG, et al: The quality of reconstructed 3D images in multidetector-row helical CT: experimental study involving scan parameters. Korean J Radiol 3(1):49–56, 2002PubMedCrossRef Shin J, Lee HK, Choi CG, et al: The quality of reconstructed 3D images in multidetector-row helical CT: experimental study involving scan parameters. Korean J Radiol 3(1):49–56, 2002PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Souza A, Udupa JK, Saha PK: Volume rendering in the presence of partial volume effects. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 24(2):223–235, 2005PubMedCrossRef Souza A, Udupa JK, Saha PK: Volume rendering in the presence of partial volume effects. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 24(2):223–235, 2005PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ward KA, Adams JE, Hangartner TN: Recommendations for thresholds for cortical bone geometry and density measurement by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Calcif Tissue Int 77:275–280, 2005PubMedCrossRef Ward KA, Adams JE, Hangartner TN: Recommendations for thresholds for cortical bone geometry and density measurement by peripheral quantitative computed tomography. Calcif Tissue Int 77:275–280, 2005PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Stalling D, Zöckler M, Hege HC: Interactive segmentation of 3D medical images with subvoxel accuracy. CAR 98:137–142, 1998 Stalling D, Zöckler M, Hege HC: Interactive segmentation of 3D medical images with subvoxel accuracy. CAR 98:137–142, 1998
7.
go back to reference Drapikowski P: Surface modeling—uncertainty estimation and visualization. Comput Med Imaging Graph 32:134–139, 2008PubMedCrossRef Drapikowski P: Surface modeling—uncertainty estimation and visualization. Comput Med Imaging Graph 32:134–139, 2008PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cignoni P, Rocchini C, Scopigno R: Metro: measuring error on simplified surfaces. Comput Graph Forum 17(2):167–174, 1998CrossRef Cignoni P, Rocchini C, Scopigno R: Metro: measuring error on simplified surfaces. Comput Graph Forum 17(2):167–174, 1998CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Bade R, Haase J, Preim B: Comparison of fundamental mesh smoothing algorithms for medical surface models. In: Schulze T, Schlechtweg S, Hinz V Eds. Simulation und Visualisierung. SCS European Publishing House, Erlangen, 2006, pp 289–304 Bade R, Haase J, Preim B: Comparison of fundamental mesh smoothing algorithms for medical surface models. In: Schulze T, Schlechtweg S, Hinz V Eds. Simulation und Visualisierung. SCS European Publishing House, Erlangen, 2006, pp 289–304
10.
go back to reference Piegl L, Tiller W: The NURBS Book. Springer, Berlin, 1997 Piegl L, Tiller W: The NURBS Book. Springer, Berlin, 1997
Metadata
Title
Typical Accuracy and Quality Control of a Process for Creating CT-Based Virtual Bone Models
Authors
Hansrudi Noser
Thomas Heldstab
Beat Schmutz
Lukas Kamer
Publication date
01-06-2011
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 3/2011
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-010-9287-4

Other articles of this Issue 3/2011

Journal of Digital Imaging 3/2011 Go to the issue