Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 2/2008

01-06-2008

Power Spectral Analysis of Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment

Authors: Hui Li, Maryellen L. Giger, Olufunmilayo I. Olopade, Michael R. Chinander

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 2/2008

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to evaluate the usefulness of power law spectral analysis on mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment. Materials and Methods: Mammograms from 172 subjects (30 women with the BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutation and 142 low-risk women) were retrospectively collected and digitized. Because age is a very important risk factor, 60 low-risk women were randomly selected from the 142 low-risk subjects and were age matched to the 30 gene mutation carriers. Regions of interest were manually selected from the central breast region behind the nipple of these digitized mammograms and subsequently used in power spectral analysis. The power law spectrum of the form \(P\left( f \right) = {B \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {B {f^\beta }}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {f^\beta }}\) was evaluated for the mammographic patterns. The performance of exponent β as a decision variable for differentiating between gene mutation carriers and low-risk women was assessed using receiver operating characteristic analysis for both the entire database and the age-matched subset. Results: Power spectral analysis of mammograms demonstrated a statistically significant difference between the 30 BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutation carriers and the 142 low risk women with an average β values of 2.92 (±0.28) and 2.47(±0.20), respectively. An A z value of 0.90 was achieved in distinguishing between gene mutation carriers and low-risk women in the entire database, with an A z value of 0.89 being achieved on the age-matched subset. Conclusions: The BRCA1/BRCA2 gene mutation carriers and low-risk women have different mammographic parenchymal patterns. It is expected that women identified as high risk by computerized feature analyses might potentially be more aggressively screened for breast cancer.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Carter CL, Allen C, Henson DE: Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases. Cancer 63:181–189, 1989PubMedCrossRef Carter CL, Allen C, Henson DE: Relation of tumor size, lymph node status, and survival in 24,740 breast cancer cases. Cancer 63:181–189, 1989PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Clay MG, Hishop G, Kan L, Olivotto IA, Burhenne LJ: Screening mammography in British Columbia 1988–1993. Am J Surg 167:490–492, 1994PubMedCrossRef Clay MG, Hishop G, Kan L, Olivotto IA, Burhenne LJ: Screening mammography in British Columbia 1988–1993. Am J Surg 167:490–492, 1994PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 57:43–66, 2007PubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, Murray T, Xu J, Thun MJ: Cancer statistics, 2007. CA Cancer J Clin 57:43–66, 2007PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Heine JJ, Malhotra P: Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Acad Radiol 9:298–316, 2002PubMedCrossRef Heine JJ, Malhotra P: Mammographic tissue, breast cancer risk, serial image analysis, and digital mammography. Acad Radiol 9:298–316, 2002PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C, Jager GJ, Beex L, Bult P, Hendriks J, Laheij R, Massuger L, van Die LE, Wobbes T, Barentsz JO: Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1095–1102, 2001PubMedCrossRef Stoutjesdijk MJ, Boetes C, Jager GJ, Beex L, Bult P, Hendriks J, Laheij R, Massuger L, van Die LE, Wobbes T, Barentsz JO: Magnetic resonance imaging and mammography in women with a hereditary risk of breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:1095–1102, 2001PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS, Catzavelos GC, Di Prospero LS, Yaffe MJ, Goel V, Ramsay E, Chart PL, Cole DEC, Taylor GA, Cutrara M, Samuels TH, Murphy JP, Murphy JM, Narod SA: Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:3524–3531, 2001PubMed Warner E, Plewes DB, Shumak RS, Catzavelos GC, Di Prospero LS, Yaffe MJ, Goel V, Ramsay E, Chart PL, Cole DEC, Taylor GA, Cutrara M, Samuels TH, Murphy JP, Murphy JM, Narod SA: Comparison of breast magnetic resonance imaging, mammography, and ultrasound for surveillance of women at high risk for hereditary breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 19:3524–3531, 2001PubMed
8.
go back to reference Euhus DM, Smith KC, Robinson L, Stucky A, Olopade OI, Cummings S, Garber JE, Chittenden A, Mills GB, Rieger P, Esserman L, Crawford B, Hughes KS, Roche CA, Ganz PA, Seldon J, Fabian CJ, Klemp J, Tomlinson G: Pretest prediction of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation by risk counselors and the computer model BRCAPRO. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:844–851, 2002PubMed Euhus DM, Smith KC, Robinson L, Stucky A, Olopade OI, Cummings S, Garber JE, Chittenden A, Mills GB, Rieger P, Esserman L, Crawford B, Hughes KS, Roche CA, Ganz PA, Seldon J, Fabian CJ, Klemp J, Tomlinson G: Pretest prediction of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation by risk counselors and the computer model BRCAPRO. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:844–851, 2002PubMed
9.
go back to reference Thompson D, Easton DF: Cancer incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1358–1365, 2002PubMed Thompson D, Easton DF: Cancer incidence in BRCA1 mutation carriers. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:1358–1365, 2002PubMed
10.
go back to reference Wolfe JN: Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 126:1130–1139, 1976 Wolfe JN: Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 126:1130–1139, 1976
11.
go back to reference Boyd NF, O’Sullivan B, Fishell E, Simor I, Cooke G: Mammographic patterns and breast cancer risk: methodologic standards and contradictory results. J Natl Cancer Inst 72:1253–1259, 1984PubMed Boyd NF, O’Sullivan B, Fishell E, Simor I, Cooke G: Mammographic patterns and breast cancer risk: methodologic standards and contradictory results. J Natl Cancer Inst 72:1253–1259, 1984PubMed
12.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Stone J, Greenberg C, Minkin S, Yaffe MJ: Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention. Curr Oncol Rep 3:314–321, 2001PubMedCrossRef Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Stone J, Greenberg C, Minkin S, Yaffe MJ: Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention. Curr Oncol Rep 3:314–321, 2001PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Brisson J, Diorio C, Mâsse B: Wolfe’s parenchymal pattern and percentage of the breast with mammographic densities: redundant or complementary classifications? Caner Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:728–732, 2003 Brisson J, Diorio C, Mâsse B: Wolfe’s parenchymal pattern and percentage of the breast with mammographic densities: redundant or complementary classifications? Caner Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:728–732, 2003
14.
go back to reference Tahoces PG, Correa J, Souto M, Gomez L, Vidal JJ: Computer-assisted diagnosis: the classification of mammographic breast parenchymal patterns. Phys Med Biol 40:103–117, 1995PubMedCrossRef Tahoces PG, Correa J, Souto M, Gomez L, Vidal JJ: Computer-assisted diagnosis: the classification of mammographic breast parenchymal patterns. Phys Med Biol 40:103–117, 1995PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Magnin IE, Cluzeau F, Odet CL: Mammographic texture analysis: an evaluation of risk for developing breast cancer. Opt Eng 25:780–784, 1986 Magnin IE, Cluzeau F, Odet CL: Mammographic texture analysis: an evaluation of risk for developing breast cancer. Opt Eng 25:780–784, 1986
16.
go back to reference Taylor P, Hajnal S, Dilhuydy MH, Barreau B: Measuring image texture to separate “difficult” from “easy” mammograms. Br J Radiol 67:456–463, 1994PubMed Taylor P, Hajnal S, Dilhuydy MH, Barreau B: Measuring image texture to separate “difficult” from “easy” mammograms. Br J Radiol 67:456–463, 1994PubMed
17.
go back to reference Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Lockwood LE, Little LE, Tritchler DL, Boyd NF: Automated analysis of mammographic densities and breast carcinoma risk. Cancer 80:66–74, 1997PubMedCrossRef Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Lockwood LE, Little LE, Tritchler DL, Boyd NF: Automated analysis of mammographic densities and breast carcinoma risk. Cancer 80:66–74, 1997PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Martin LJ, Knight JA, Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Tritchler DL: Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Breast Dis 10:113–126, 1998PubMed Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Martin LJ, Knight JA, Byng JW, Yaffe MJ, Tritchler DL: Mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. Breast Dis 10:113–126, 1998PubMed
19.
go back to reference Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Stone J, Greenberg C, Minkin S, Yaffe MJ: Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention. Cancer Prev 3:314–321, 2001 Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Stone J, Greenberg C, Minkin S, Yaffe MJ: Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention. Cancer Prev 3:314–321, 2001
20.
go back to reference Atkinson C, Warren R, Bingham SA, Day NE: Mammographic patterns as a predictive biomarker of breast cancer risk: effect of tamoxifen. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:863–866, 1999PubMed Atkinson C, Warren R, Bingham SA, Day NE: Mammographic patterns as a predictive biomarker of breast cancer risk: effect of tamoxifen. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 8:863–866, 1999PubMed
21.
go back to reference Huo Z, Giger ML, Wolverton DE, Zhong W, Cumming SA, Olopade OI: Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection. Med Phys 27:4–12, 2000PubMedCrossRef Huo Z, Giger ML, Wolverton DE, Zhong W, Cumming SA, Olopade OI: Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection. Med Phys 27:4–12, 2000PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Huo Z, Giger ML, Olopade OI, Wolveton DE, Weber BL, Metz CE, Zhong W, Cummings SA: Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. Radiology 225:519–526, 2002PubMedCrossRef Huo Z, Giger ML, Olopade OI, Wolveton DE, Weber BL, Metz CE, Zhong W, Cummings SA: Computerized analysis of digitized mammograms of BRCA1 and BRCA2 gene mutation carriers. Radiology 225:519–526, 2002PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Li H, Giger ML, Huo Z, Olopade OI, Lan L, Weber BL, Bonta I: Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location. Med Phys 31:549–555, 2004PubMedCrossRef Li H, Giger ML, Huo Z, Olopade OI, Lan L, Weber BL, Bonta I: Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for assessing breast cancer risk: effect of ROI size and location. Med Phys 31:549–555, 2004PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Li H, Giger ML, Olopade OI, Margolis A, Lan L, Chinander MR: Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol 12:863–873, 2005PubMedCrossRef Li H, Giger ML, Olopade OI, Margolis A, Lan L, Chinander MR: Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol 12:863–873, 2005PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Li H, Giger ML, Olopade OI, Lan L: Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment. Acad Radiol 14:513–521, 2007PubMedCrossRef Li H, Giger ML, Olopade OI, Lan L: Fractal analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns in breast cancer risk assessment. Acad Radiol 14:513–521, 2007PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Burgess AE: Mammographic structure: data preparation and spatial statistics analysis. Medical Imaging 1998, Image Processing, San Diego, CA. In: Hanson K Ed. Proceedings of the Society of photo-optics Instrumentation Engineers, Bellingham, WA, vol. 3661, 1998, pp 642–653 Burgess AE: Mammographic structure: data preparation and spatial statistics analysis. Medical Imaging 1998, Image Processing, San Diego, CA. In: Hanson K Ed. Proceedings of the Society of photo-optics Instrumentation Engineers, Bellingham, WA, vol. 3661, 1998, pp 642–653
27.
go back to reference Heine JJ, Velthuizen RP: Spectral analysis of full field digital mammography data. Med Phys 29:647–661, 2002PubMedCrossRef Heine JJ, Velthuizen RP: Spectral analysis of full field digital mammography data. Med Phys 29:647–661, 2002PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Metz CE: Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 24:234–245, 1989PubMedCrossRef Metz CE: Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 24:234–245, 1989PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, Corle DK, Green SB, Schairer C, Mulvihill JJ: Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1879–1886, 1989PubMedCrossRef Gail MH, Brinton LA, Byar DP, Corle DK, Green SB, Schairer C, Mulvihill JJ: Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually. J Natl Cancer Inst 81:1879–1886, 1989PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Sonka M, Hlavac V, Boyle R: Image processing, analysis, and machine vision, Pacific Grove, CA: PWS, 1999 Sonka M, Hlavac V, Boyle R: Image processing, analysis, and machine vision, Pacific Grove, CA: PWS, 1999
32.
go back to reference Burgess AE, Jacobson FL, Judy PF: Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. Med Phys 28:419–437, 2001PubMedCrossRef Burgess AE, Jacobson FL, Judy PF: Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. Med Phys 28:419–437, 2001PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Bendat JS, Piersol AG: Random data: analysis and measurement procedures, New York: Wiley, 2000 Bendat JS, Piersol AG: Random data: analysis and measurement procedures, New York: Wiley, 2000
34.
go back to reference Rice JA: Mathematical statistics and data analysis, Belmont, CA: Duxbury, 1995 Rice JA: Mathematical statistics and data analysis, Belmont, CA: Duxbury, 1995
35.
go back to reference Heine JJ, Velthuizen RP: Spectral analysis of full field digital mammography data. Med Phys 29:647–661, 2002PubMedCrossRef Heine JJ, Velthuizen RP: Spectral analysis of full field digital mammography data. Med Phys 29:647–661, 2002PubMedCrossRef
36.
go back to reference Eckstein MP, Whiting JS: Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds: I. Effect of number of possible spatial locations and signal contrast. J Opt Soc Am A 13:1777–1787, 1996CrossRef Eckstein MP, Whiting JS: Visual signal detection in structured backgrounds: I. Effect of number of possible spatial locations and signal contrast. J Opt Soc Am A 13:1777–1787, 1996CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Soille P, Rivest JF: On the validity of fractal dimension measurements in image analysis. J Visual Commun Image Represent 7:217–229, 1996CrossRef Soille P, Rivest JF: On the validity of fractal dimension measurements in image analysis. J Visual Commun Image Represent 7:217–229, 1996CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Power Spectral Analysis of Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns for Breast Cancer Risk Assessment
Authors
Hui Li
Maryellen L. Giger
Olufunmilayo I. Olopade
Michael R. Chinander
Publication date
01-06-2008
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 2/2008
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-007-9093-9

Other articles of this Issue 2/2008

Journal of Digital Imaging 2/2008 Go to the issue