Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2006

Open Access 01-12-2006

Analog to Digital Workflow Improvement: A Quantitative Study

Authors: Catherine Wideman, Jacqueline Gallet, Ph.D.

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Special Issue 1/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

This study tracked a radiology department’s conversion from utilization of a Kodak Amber analog system to a Kodak DirectView DR 5100 digital system. Through the use of ProModel® Optimization Suite, a workflow simulation software package, significant quantitative information was derived from workflow process data measured before and after the change to a digital system. Once the digital room was fully operational and the radiology staff comfortable with the new system, average patient examination time was reduced from 9.24 to 5.28 min, indicating that a higher patient throughput could be achieved. Compared to the analog system, chest examination time for modality specific activities was reduced by 43%. The percentage of repeat examinations experienced with the digital system also decreased to 8% vs. the level of 9.5% experienced with the analog system. The study indicated that it is possible to quantitatively study clinical workflow and productivity by using commercially available software.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL, Carrino, JA 2002SCAR Radiologic Technologist Survey: analysis of the impact of digital technologies on productivityJ Digit Imaging15132140PubMedCrossRef Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL, Carrino, JA 2002SCAR Radiologic Technologist Survey: analysis of the impact of digital technologies on productivityJ Digit Imaging15132140PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL, Carrino, JA 2002SCAR Radiologic Technologist Survey: analysis of technologist workforce and staffingJ Digit Imaging15121131PubMedCrossRef Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL, Carrino, JA 2002SCAR Radiologic Technologist Survey: analysis of technologist workforce and staffingJ Digit Imaging15121131PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL 2002Changes in technologist productivity with implementation of an enterprise-wide PACSJ Digit Imaging152226PubMedCrossRef Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL 2002Changes in technologist productivity with implementation of an enterprise-wide PACSJ Digit Imaging152226PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL, Hooper, FJ, et al. 1998Effect of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologistsRadiology207481485PubMed Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL, Hooper, FJ,  et al. 1998Effect of film-based versus filmless operation on the productivity of CT technologistsRadiology207481485PubMed
5.
go back to reference Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL 2002Technologist productivity in the performance of general radiographic examinations: Comparison of film-based versus filmless operationsAJR1793337PubMed Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL 2002Technologist productivity in the performance of general radiographic examinations: Comparison of film-based versus filmless operationsAJR1793337PubMed
6.
go back to reference Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL 1999Siegel, ELKolodner, RM eds. PACS and productivitySpringer-VerlagNew York, NY103112 Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL 1999Siegel, ELKolodner, RM eds. PACS and productivitySpringer-VerlagNew York, NY103112
7.
go back to reference Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL, Siddiqui, K 2003Evolution of the digital revolution: a radiologist perspectiveJ Digit Imaging16324330PubMedCrossRef Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL, Siddiqui, K 2003Evolution of the digital revolution: a radiologist perspectiveJ Digit Imaging16324330PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference MacEwan, DW 1982Radiology workload system for diagnostic radiology: productivity environment studiesJ Can Assoc Radiol33182196 MacEwan, DW 1982Radiology workload system for diagnostic radiology: productivity environment studiesJ Can Assoc Radiol33182196
9.
go back to reference Andriole, KP 2002Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinationsJ Digit Imaging15161169PubMedCrossRef Andriole, KP 2002Productivity and cost assessment of computed radiography, digital radiography, and screen-film for outpatient chest examinationsJ Digit Imaging15161169PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Janower, ML 1988Productivity standards for technologists: how to use themRadiology166276277PubMed Janower, ML 1988Productivity standards for technologists: how to use themRadiology166276277PubMed
11.
go back to reference Hanwell, LL, Conway, JM 1996Utilization of Imaging Staff: Measuring ProductivityAmerican Healthcare Radiology AdministratorsSudbury, MA130 Hanwell, LL, Conway, JM 1996Utilization of Imaging Staff: Measuring ProductivityAmerican Healthcare Radiology AdministratorsSudbury, MA130
12.
go back to reference Wiegel, EL, Diaconis, JN, Pomerantz, S, et al. 1995Making filmless radiology workJ Digit Imaging8151155CrossRef Wiegel, EL, Diaconis, JN, Pomerantz, S,  et al. 1995Making filmless radiology workJ Digit Imaging8151155CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Tellis, WM, Andriole, KP, Jovais, CS, Avrin, DE 2002RIS minus PACS equals filmJ Digit Imaging152026PubMedCrossRef Tellis, WM, Andriole, KP, Jovais, CS, Avrin, DE 2002RIS minus PACS equals filmJ Digit Imaging152026PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Andriole, KP, Luth, DM, Gould, RG 2002Workflow assessment of digital versus computed radiography and screen-film in the outpatient environmentJ Digit Imaging5124126CrossRef Andriole, KP, Luth, DM, Gould, RG 2002Workflow assessment of digital versus computed radiography and screen-film in the outpatient environmentJ Digit Imaging5124126CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Andriole KP, Luth DM, Gould RG: Workflow comparison of DR and Screen-film dedicated chest systems. SPIE, Medical Imaging 2001: Physics of Medical Imaging, San Diego, February 17–22, 2001 Andriole KP, Luth DM, Gould RG: Workflow comparison of DR and Screen-film dedicated chest systems. SPIE, Medical Imaging 2001: Physics of Medical Imaging, San Diego, February 17–22, 2001
16.
go back to reference May, GA, Deer, DD, Dackiewicz, D 2000Impact of digital radiography on clinical workflowJ Digit Imaging137678PubMedCrossRef May, GA, Deer, DD, Dackiewicz, D 2000Impact of digital radiography on clinical workflowJ Digit Imaging137678PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL, Carrino, JA 2002Workflow optimization: current trends and future directionsJ Digit Imaging15141152PubMedCrossRef Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL, Carrino, JA 2002Workflow optimization: current trends and future directionsJ Digit Imaging15141152PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Barnes, RM 1966Motion and Time Study: Design and Measurement of WorkWileyNew York, NY Barnes, RM 1966Motion and Time Study: Design and Measurement of WorkWileyNew York, NY
19.
go back to reference Siegel, EL, Reiner, BI 2002Dreyer, K eds. Image WorkflowSpringer VerlagNew York, NY161190 Siegel, EL, Reiner, BI 2002Dreyer, K eds. Image WorkflowSpringer VerlagNew York, NY161190
20.
go back to reference Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL 2002Technologists’ productivity when using PACS: comparison of film-based versus filmless radiographyAJR1793337PubMed Reiner, BI, Siegel, EL 2002Technologists’ productivity when using PACS: comparison of film-based versus filmless radiographyAJR1793337PubMed
Metadata
Title
Analog to Digital Workflow Improvement: A Quantitative Study
Authors
Catherine Wideman
Jacqueline Gallet, Ph.D.
Publication date
01-12-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue Special Issue 1/2006
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-006-0770-x

Other articles of this Special Issue 1/2006

Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2006 Go to the issue