Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2005

01-03-2005

Comparison of Human Observer Performance of Contrast-Detail Detection Across Multiple Liquid Crystal Displays

Authors: Alice N. Averbukh, MS, David S. Channin, MD, Prasobsook Homhual, PhD

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 1/2005

Login to get access

Abstract

Appropriate selection of a display subsystem requires balancing the optimization of its physical parameters with clinical setting and cost. Recent advances in Liquid Crystal Display (LCD) technology warrant a rigorous evaluation of both the specialized and the mass market displays for clinical radiology. This article outlines step two in the evaluation of a novel 9.2 million pixel IBM AMLCD panel. Prior to these experiments, the panel was calibrated according to the DICOM Part 14 standard, using both a gray-scale and a pseudo-gray scale lookup table. The specific aim of this study is to compare human, contrast-detail perception on different computer display subsystems. The subsystems that we looked at included 3- and 5-million pixel “medical-grade” monochrome LCDs and a 9.2-million pixel color LCD. We found that the observer response was similar for these three display configurations.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Flynn, MJ, Kanicki, J, Badano, A, et al. 1999High-fidelity electronic display of digital radiographsRadiographics1916531669PubMed Flynn, MJ, Kanicki, J, Badano, A,  et al. 1999High-fidelity electronic display of digital radiographsRadiographics1916531669PubMed
2.
go back to reference Roehrig H, Fan J, Furukawa T, et al.: Performance evaluation of LCD of displays. Proceedings CARS, pp 461-66, 2002 Roehrig H, Fan J, Furukawa T, et al.: Performance evaluation of LCD of displays. Proceedings CARS, pp 461-66, 2002
3.
go back to reference Blume H, Steven P, Cobb M, et al.: Characterization of high-resolution liquid crystal displays for medical images. Proc SPIE 4681:271-292, 2002 Blume H, Steven P, Cobb M, et al.: Characterization of high-resolution liquid crystal displays for medical images. Proc SPIE 4681:271-292, 2002
4.
go back to reference Wright SL, Samei E: Liquid crystal displays for medical imaging: a discussion of monochrome versus color. SPIE Medical Imaging; Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures and Display, Feb. 2004, SPIE Proceedings Vol. 5367, paper 49, 2004 Wright SL, Samei E: Liquid crystal displays for medical imaging: a discussion of monochrome versus color. SPIE Medical Imaging; Visualization, Image-Guided Procedures and Display, Feb. 2004, SPIE Proceedings Vol. 5367, paper 49, 2004
5.
go back to reference Siegel E, Reiner B, Hooper F et al.: Clinical comparison of LCD and CRT. Society of Computer Applications in Radiology (SCAR) Gerber, Hogan, McAvoy, Mulligan, Qureshi, Sliker, Monitors in the Evaluation of Non-Displaced Fractures. Annual Meeting, Boston, June 2003 Siegel E, Reiner B, Hooper F et al.: Clinical comparison of LCD and CRT. Society of Computer Applications in Radiology (SCAR) Gerber, Hogan, McAvoy, Mulligan, Qureshi, Sliker, Monitors in the Evaluation of Non-Displaced Fractures. Annual Meeting, Boston, June 2003
6.
go back to reference Yip, WM, Yim, WS, Knok, CS 2001ROC curve analysis of lesion detectability on phantoms : comparision of digital spot mammography with conventional spot mammographyBr J Radiol74621628PubMed Yip, WM, Yim, WS, Knok, CS 2001ROC curve analysis of lesion detectability on phantoms : comparision of digital spot mammography with conventional spot mammographyBr J Radiol74621628PubMed
7.
go back to reference Lewin, JM, D’Orsi, CJ, Hendrick, RE, et al. 2002Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancerAJR Am J Roentgenol179671677PubMed Lewin, JM, D’Orsi, CJ, Hendrick, RE,  et al. 2002Clinical comparison of full-field digital mammography and screen-film mammography for detection of breast cancerAJR Am J Roentgenol179671677PubMed
8.
go back to reference Lewin, JM, Hendrick, RE, D’Orsi, CJ, et al. 2001Comparison of full-field digital mammography with Screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945, paired examinationsRadiology218873880PubMed Lewin, JM, Hendrick, RE, D’Orsi, CJ,  et al. 2001Comparison of full-field digital mammography with Screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945, paired examinationsRadiology218873880PubMed
9.
go back to reference Kuzmiak, CM, Millnamow, GA, Qaqish, B, et al. 2002Comparison of full-field digital mammography with respect to dignostic accuracy of lesion characteristics in breast tissue biopsy specimensAcade Radiol1213781382CrossRef Kuzmiak, CM, Millnamow, GA, Qaqish, B,  et al. 2002Comparison of full-field digital mammography with respect to dignostic accuracy of lesion characteristics in breast tissue biopsy specimensAcade Radiol1213781382CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Pisano, ED, Cole, EB, Kistner, EO, et al. 2002Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film displayRadiology2483488 Pisano, ED, Cole, EB, Kistner, EO,  et al. 2002Interpretation of digital mammograms: comparison of speed and accuracy of soft-copy versus printed-film displayRadiology2483488
12.
go back to reference Averbukh, AN, Channin, DS, Flynn, MJ 2003Assessment of novel high resolution, color AMLCD for diagnostic medical image display: luminance performance and DICOM calibrationJ of Digit Imaging16270279CrossRef Averbukh, AN, Channin, DS, Flynn, MJ 2003Assessment of novel high resolution, color AMLCD for diagnostic medical image display: luminance performance and DICOM calibrationJ of Digit Imaging16270279CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Flynn MF, Tchou P: Accurate measurement of monochrome luminance palettes for the calibration of medical LCD monitors. SPIE Medical Imaging; Visualization, Image Guided Procedures and Display, Feb. 2003, SPIE Proceedings Vol. 5029, paper 47, 2003 Flynn MF, Tchou P: Accurate measurement of monochrome luminance palettes for the calibration of medical LCD monitors. SPIE Medical Imaging; Visualization, Image Guided Procedures and Display, Feb. 2003, SPIE Proceedings Vol. 5029, paper 47, 2003
14.
go back to reference Acrum, DR 1996Viewing distance at computer workstationsWorkplace Ergonomics.1012Sept./Oct Acrum, DR 1996Viewing distance at computer workstationsWorkplace Ergonomics.1012Sept./Oct
15.
go back to reference Ellis, WD 1938A Source Book of Gestalt PsychologyHarcourt, Brace & WorldNew York Ellis, WD 1938A Source Book of Gestalt PsychologyHarcourt, Brace & WorldNew York
16.
go back to reference Wertheimer, M 1989Productive Thinking (Enlarged Ed.)Harper & RowNew York Wertheimer, M 1989Productive Thinking (Enlarged Ed.)Harper & RowNew York
17.
go back to reference Wertheimer M: Laws of organization in perceptual forms. First published as Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt II, in Psycologische Forschung, 4, 301-350, 1923. Translation published in Ellis, W. (1938). A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp 71-88). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1938 Wertheimer M: Laws of organization in perceptual forms. First published as Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt II, in Psycologische Forschung, 4, 301-350, 1923. Translation published in Ellis, W. (1938). A source book of Gestalt psychology (pp 71-88). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1938
18.
go back to reference Miller, G 1981Simultaneous statistical inference2Springer Verlag, pagesNew york68 Miller, G 1981Simultaneous statistical inference2Springer Verlag, pagesNew york68
19.
go back to reference Keppel, G 1991Design and Analysis: A Researcher’s HandbookPrentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs, NJ Keppel, G 1991Design and Analysis: A Researcher’s HandbookPrentice-HallEnglewood Cliffs, NJ
Metadata
Title
Comparison of Human Observer Performance of Contrast-Detail Detection Across Multiple Liquid Crystal Displays
Authors
Alice N. Averbukh, MS
David S. Channin, MD
Prasobsook Homhual, PhD
Publication date
01-03-2005
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 1/2005
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-004-1035-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2005

Journal of Digital Imaging 1/2005 Go to the issue

Book Review

Book Review