Top

Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine

Published in:

01-03-2003

The Digital Imaging Workstation

Authors: Ronald L. Arenson, M.D., Dev P. Chakraborty, Ph.D., Sridhar B. Seshadri, M.S.E.E., Harold L. Kundel, M.D.

Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine | Issue 1/2003

Abstract

Picture archiving and communication systems (PACS) are expected to convert film-based radiology into a computer-based digital environment, with associated cost savings and improved physician communication. The digital workstation will be used by physicians to display these “soft-copy” images; however, difficult technical challenges must be met for the workstation to compete successfully with the familiar viewbox. Issues relating to image perception and the impact on physicians’ practice must be carefully considered. The spatial and contrast resolutions required vary according to imaging modality, type of procedure, and class of user. Rule-based software allows simple physician interaction and speeds image display. A consensus appears to be emerging concerning the requirements for the PACS workstation. Standards such as the American College of Radiology/National Electrical Manufacturers’ Association Digital Imaging and Communication Standard are facilitating commercial applications. Yet much careful study is needed before PACS workstations will be fully integrated into radiology departments.

Seshadri SB, Arenson RL, DeSimone D, Hiss S: Cost-savings associated with a digital radiology department: a preliminary study. Presented at the Ninth Conference on Computer Applications in Radiology, Hilton Head, SC, June 1988

Gee, JC, DeSoto, LA, Kim, Y, Haynor, DR, Loop, JW 1989User interface design for a radiological imaging workstation.SPIE Med Imaging III1093122132

Braudes, SE, Mun, SK, Sibert, J, Schnizlein, J, Horii, S 1989Workstation modelling and development: clinical definition of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) user interface.SPIE Med Imaging III1093376386

Cox, GG, McMillan, JH, Wetzel, LH, Siegel, EL, Templeton, AW, Dwyer III, SJ 1989Direct diagnosis from a 2,000 × 2,000 × 12-bit displays: comparison with hard copy (abstr).Radiology173471

MacMahon, H, Metz, C, Doi, K, Kim, T, Giger, ML, Chan, H 1988Digital chest radiography: effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy.Radiology168669673PubMed

Yamasaki, K, Sato, K, Kusumoto, M, Adachi, S, Kuno, M 1989Comparative studies of physical characteristics and clinical efficacy of digitized chest image (abstr).Radiology173226

Oestmann, JW, Greene, R, Rubens, JR, et al. 1989High-frequency edge enhancement in the detection of fine pulmonary lines.Invest Radiol24643646PubMed

Ishida, M, Frank, PH, Doi, K, Lehr, JL 1983High quality digital radiographic images: improved detection of low-contrast objects and preliminary clinical studies.RadioGraphics3325338

Sheline, ME, Brikman, I, Epstein, D, Mezrich, J, Kundel, HL, Arenson, RL 1989The diagnosis of pulmonary nodules; comparison between standard and inverse digitized images and conventional chest radiographs.AJR152261263

10.

Cornsweet, TH, Pensker, HM 1965Luminance discrimination of brief flashes under various conditions of adaption.J Physiol (Lond)176294310

11.

Hendee, WR 1983The physical principles of computed tomography.Little BrownBoston

12.

Kundel, HL, Nodine, CF, Thickman, D, Carmody, D, Toto, L 1985Nodule detection with and without a chest image.Invest Radiol209499PubMed

13.

Metz, CE 1986ROC methodology in radiologic imaging.Invest Radiol21720733PubMed

14.

Foley, WD, Wilson, CR, Keyes, GS, et al. 1981The effect of varying spatial resolution on the detectability of diffuse pulmonary nodules.Radiology1412531PubMed

15.

Huebener, K-H 1983Scanned projection radiography of the chest versus standard film radiography: a comparison of 250 cases.Radiology148363368PubMed

16.

Seeley, GW, Newell, JD 1985The use of psychophysical principles in the design of a total digital radiology department.Radiol Clin North Am23341348PubMed

17.

MacMahon, H, Vyborny, CJ, Metz, CE, Doi, K, Sabeti, V, Solomon, S 1986Digital radiography of subtle pulmonary abnormalities: an ROC study of the effect of pixel size on observer performance.Radiology1582126PubMed

18.

Lams, PM, Cocklin, ML 1986Spatial resolution requirements for digital chest radiographs: an ROC study of observer performance in selected cases.Radiology1581119PubMed

19.

Goodman, LR, Foley, WD, Wilson, DR, Rimm, AA, Lawson, TL 1986Digital and conventional chest images: observer performance with film digital radiography system.Radiology1582733PubMed

20.

Chakraborty, DP, Breatnach, ES, Yester, MV, Soto, B, Barnes, GT, Fraser, R 1986Digital and conventional chest imaging: a modified ROC study of observer performance using simulated nodules.Radiology1583539PubMed

21.

Niklason, LT, Hickey, NM, Chakraborty, DP, et al. 1986Simulated pulmonary nodules: detection with dual energy digital versus conventional radiography.Radiology160589593PubMed

22.

Kushner, DC, Cleveland, RH, Herman, TE, et al. 1987Low-dose flying spot digital radiography of the chest: sensitivity studies.Radiology163685688PubMed

23.

Barnes, GT, Sabbagh, EA, Chakraborty, DP, et al. 1989A comparison of dual-energy digital radiography and screen-film imaging in the detection of subtle interstitial pulmonary disease.Invest Radiol24585591PubMed

24.

Chan, H, Vyborny, CJ, MacMahon, H, Metz, CE, Doi, K, Sickles, EA 1987Digital mammography ROC studies of the effects of pixel size and unsharp-mask filtering on the detection of subtle microcalcifications.Invest Radiol22581589PubMed

25.

Oestmann, JW, Kopans, D, Hall, DA, McCarthy, KA, Rubens, JR, Greene, R 1988A comparison of digitized storage phosphors and conventional mammography in the detection of malignant microcalcifications.Invest Radiol23726723

26.

Seeley, GW, Stempski, M, Roehrig, H, Nudelman, S, Capp, MP October 1982Psychophysical comparison of a video display system to film by using bone fracture images. Presented at the First International Symposium on Medical Imaging and Image Interpretation.Federal Republic of GermanyBerlin

27.

Murphey, MD 1989Digital skeletal radiography: spatial resolution requirements for detection of subperiosteal resorption.AJR152541546

28.

Kastan, DJ, Ackerman, LV, Feczko, PJ 1987Digital gastrointestinal imaging: the effect of pixel size on detection of subtle mucosal abnormalities.Radiology167853856

29.

Fajardo, LL, Hillman, BJ, Hunter, TB, Claypool, HR, Westerman, BR, Mockbee, B 1987Excretory urography using computed radiography.Radiology162345351PubMed

30.

Rose, A 1973Vision, human and electronic.PlenumNew York

31.

Kruger, RA, Mistretta, CA, Riederer, SJ 1981Physical and technical considerations of computerized fluoroscopy difference imaging.IEEE Trans Nucl SciNS28205212

32.

Rimkus, D, Baily, NA 1984Patient exposure requirements for high contrast resolution in digital radiographic systems.AJR142603608

33.

Tannas, LE 1985Flat-panel displays and CRTs.Van Nostrand ReinholdNew York

34.

Suddarth, SA, Johnson, GA, Sherrier, RH, Ravin, CE 1987Performance of high-resolution monitors for digital chest imaging.Med Phys14253257CrossRefPubMed

35.

Johnston RE: Display monitors. Presented at the American Association of Physicists in Medicine Summer School in Image Communication and Image Analysis, Ann Arbor, Mien, July 12-17, 1987

36.

O’Malley, KG, Giunta, JA 1988The alternator: determination of its fundamental features, as a basis for design of a PACS.SPIE Med Imaging II914988994

37.

Kasaday, LR 1986Human factor considerations in PACS design.SPIE Med XIV PACS IV626581592

38.

Rogers, DC, Johnston, RE, Brenton, B, Staab, EV, Thomson, B, Perry, JR 1985Predicting PACS console requirements from radiologists’ reading habits.SPIE PACS III5368896

39.

Beard, D, Pizer, S, Rogers, D, Cromartie, R 1987A prototype single-screen PACS console development using human computer interaction techniques.SPIE Med Imaging767646653

40.

Johnston RE, Beard DV, Creasy JL, Perry JR: UNC PACS II: consoles. Presented at the Ninth Conference on Computer Applications in Radiology, Hilton Head, SC, June 1-4, 1988

41.

Lo, SB, Mun, SK, Braudes, RE, Levine, BA 1989A workstation for rapid image presentation.SPIE Med ImagingIII10931098

42.

Human Factors Society1988American national standards for human factors engineering of visual display terminal workstations.Human Factors SocietySanta Monica, Calif

43.

van der Voorde, F, Arenson, RL, Kundel, HL, et al. 1986Development of a physician friendly digital image display console.PACS IV626541548

44.

Alter, AJ, Kargas, GA, Kargas, SA, et al. 1982The influence of ambient and viewbox light upon visual detection of low-contrast targets in a radiograph.Invest Radiol17402406PubMed

45.

Rogers, DC, Johnston, RE 1987Effect of ambient light on electronically displayed medical images as measured by luminance-discrimination thresholds.J Opt Soc Am [A]4976983

46.

Seshadri, SB, Arenson, RL, Khalsa, SS, Brikman, IS, van der Voorde, F 1987Prototype image management system (MIMS) at the University of Pennsylvania: software design considerations.SPIE Med Imaging767793800

47.

Haynor, DR, Saarinen, AO 1989“Old study” and the correlative study: implications for PACS.SPIE Med Imaging III10931012

48.

Cox, GG, Templeton, AW, Anderson, WH, Cook, LT, Hensley, KS, Dwyer, SJ 1986Estimating digital information throughput rates for radiology networks.Invest Radiol21162169PubMed

49.

Arenson, RL, Seshadri, SB, Stevens, F, van der Voorde, F 1987The overlapping domains and interface between radiology information management systems and medical image management systems (PACS).Proceedings of computer assisted radiology.Springer-VerlagBerlin855865

50.

Arenson, RL, Seshadri, SB, Kundel, HL, et al. 1988Clinical evaluation of a medical image management system for chest images.AJR1505559

51.

Gershon-Cohen, J, Fisher, JF 1959Television contrast expansion of single roentgenograms.AJR81325327

52.

Meyers, PH, Becker, HC, Sweeney, JW, Nice, C, Nettleton, WJ 1963Evaluation of a computer retrieved radiographic image.Radiology2018385

53.

Nathan, R 1968Picture enhancement for the moon, Mars, and man.Cheng, GCLedley, RSPollock, DKRosenfeld, A eds. Pictorial pattern recognition.ThomsonWashington, DC239266

54.

Kundel, HL, Revesz, G, Stauffer, HM 1969The electro-optical processing of radiographic images.Radiol Clin North Am8447460

55.

Mistretta, CA, Crummy, AB 1981Diagnosis of cardiovascular disease by digital subtraction angiography.Science214761765PubMed

56.

Ishida, M, Frank, PH, Doi, K, Lehr, JL 1982High quality digital radiographic images: improved detection of low-contrast objects and preliminary clinical studies.RadioGraphics3325338

57.

Kundel, HL 1986Visual perception and image display terminals.Radiol Clin North Am246978PubMed

58.

Schreiber, WF 1986Fundamentals of electronic imaging systems.Springer-VerlagBerlin

59.

Pizer, SM, Chan, FH 1980Evaluation of the number of discernible levels produced by a display.Dipaola, RKahn, E eds. Information processing in medical imaging. Proceedings of the VIth International Conference on Information Processing in Medical Imaging. Vol 88.INSERMParis

60.

Cromartie, RC, Johnston, RE, Pizer, SM, Rogers, D 1987Standardization of electronic display devices based on human perception. University of North Carolina Department of Computer Science technical report 88-002.University of North CarolinaChapel Hill, NC

61.

Pizer, SM, Zimmerman, JB, Staab, EV 1984Adaptive grey level assignment in CT scan display.J Comput Assist Tomogr8300305PubMed

62.

McShan, DL, Glickman, AS 1987Color displays for medical imaging in color and the computer.Durrett, HJ eds. Color and the computer.Academic PressSan Diego189204

63.

Chan, FH, Pizer, SM 1976An ultrasonogram display system using natural color.JCU4335338PubMed

64.

Vannier, MW, Rickman, D 1989Multispectral and color-aided displays.Invest Radiol248891PubMed

65.

DeSimone, DN, Kundel, HL, Arenson, RL, et al. 1988Effect of a digital imaging network on physician behavior in an intensive care unit.Radiology1694144PubMed

66.

Swett, HA, Miller, PL 1987ICON: computer-based approach to differential diagnosis in radiology.Radiology163555558PubMed

67.

Fischer, HW 1988Danger ahead (editorial).Radiology169267

68.

Arenson, RL 1988Opportunity ahead (editorial response).Radiology169267268

Title: The Digital Imaging Workstation
Authors: Ronald L. Arenson, M.D.
Dev P. Chakraborty, Ph.D.
Sridhar B. Seshadri, M.S.E.E.
Harold L. Kundel, M.D.
Publication date: 01-03-2003
Publisher: Springer-Verlag
Published in: Journal of Imaging Informatics in Medicine / Issue 1/2003
Print ISSN: 2948-2925
Electronic ISSN: 2948-2933
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-002-6004-y

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

The Digital Imaging Workstation

Abstract

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Springer Medicine

Abstract

Please log in to get access to this content

Other articles of this Issue 1/2003

Applications of Picture Processing, Image Analysis and Computer Graphics Techniques to Cranial CT Scans

Introduction to Paper by H. K. Huang, D.Sc., et al, “Digital Radiology at the University of California, Los Angeles: A Feasibility Study”

Introduction to Paper by Sridhar B. Seshadri, MSEE, MBA, et al, “Prototype Medical Image Management System (MIMS) at the University of Pennsylvania: Software Design Considerations”

Introduction to the PACS ‘82 Panel Discussions

Environmental Designs for Reading from Imaging Workstations: Ergonomic and Architectural Features

Introduction to Paper by Steven C. Horii, M.D., et al, “Environmental Designs for Reading from Imaging Workstations: Ergonomic and Architectural Features”