Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Odontology 1/2016

01-01-2016 | Original Article

Influence of surface treatments on bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic material

Author: Shaymaa E. Elsaka

Published in: Odontology | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

This study evaluated the effect of four different surface treatments methods on the shear bond strength (SBS) of ceramic and metal brackets to Vita Enamic (VE) CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic. A total of 240 plates (10 mm × 10 mm × 3 mm) were cut from VE ceramic blocks and divided into two groups. In each group, four subgroups were prepared by hydrofluoric acid (HF); phosphoric acid (H3PO4); diamond ceramic grinding bur; and silica coating using CoJet system (CJ). Maxillary central incisor metal (Victory Series) and ceramic (Clarity) brackets were bonded with light-cure composite and then stored in artificial saliva for 1 week and thermocycled. The SBS test was performed, and the failure types were classified with adhesive remnant index scores. Surface morphology of the ceramic was characterized after treatment using a scanning electron microscope. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA, Tukey HSD test, and Weibull analysis. SBS was significantly affected by the type of bracket and by type of treatment (P < 0.001). Specimens treated with CJ presented with significantly higher SBS compared to other groups (P < 0.05). Improvements in SBS values (MPa) were found in the following order: CJ > HF > Bur > H3PO4. Ceramic bracket showed higher SBS compared to metal bracket. Adhesive failures between the ceramic and composite resin were the predominant mode of failure in all groups. Surface treatment of VE CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic with silica coating enhanced the adhesion with ceramic and metal brackets.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Schmage P, Nergiz I, Herrmann W, Özcan M. Influence of various surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces. AM J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003;123:540–6.CrossRef Schmage P, Nergiz I, Herrmann W, Özcan M. Influence of various surface-conditioning methods on the bond strength of metal brackets to ceramic surfaces. AM J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003;123:540–6.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Yadav S, Upadhyay M, Borges GA, Roberts WE. Influence of ceramic (feldspathic) surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of composite resin. Angl Orthod. 2010;80:577–82. Yadav S, Upadhyay M, Borges GA, Roberts WE. Influence of ceramic (feldspathic) surface treatments on the micro-shear bond strength of composite resin. Angl Orthod. 2010;80:577–82.
3.
go back to reference Siervo S, Pampalone A, Siervo P, Siervo R. Where is the gap? Machinable ceramic systems and conventional laboratory restorations at a glance. Quintessence Int. 1994;25:773–9.PubMed Siervo S, Pampalone A, Siervo P, Siervo R. Where is the gap? Machinable ceramic systems and conventional laboratory restorations at a glance. Quintessence Int. 1994;25:773–9.PubMed
4.
go back to reference Saraç YS, Külünk T, Elekdağ-Türk S, Saraç D, Türk T. Effects of surface-conditioning methods on shear bond strength of brackets bonded to different all-ceramic materials. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:667–72.PubMedCrossRef Saraç YS, Külünk T, Elekdağ-Türk S, Saraç D, Türk T. Effects of surface-conditioning methods on shear bond strength of brackets bonded to different all-ceramic materials. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:667–72.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Türk T, Saraç D, Saraç YS, Elekdağ-Türk S. Effects of surface conditioning on bond strength of metal brackets to all-ceramic surfaces. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28:450–6.PubMedCrossRef Türk T, Saraç D, Saraç YS, Elekdağ-Türk S. Effects of surface conditioning on bond strength of metal brackets to all-ceramic surfaces. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28:450–6.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Kukiattrakoon B, Samruajbenjakul B. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with various base designs bonded to aluminous and fluorapatite ceramics. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:87–93.PubMedCrossRef Kukiattrakoon B, Samruajbenjakul B. Shear bond strength of ceramic brackets with various base designs bonded to aluminous and fluorapatite ceramics. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:87–93.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Abu Alhaija ES, Abu AlReesh IA, AlWahadni AM. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:274–80.PubMedCrossRef Abu Alhaija ES, Abu AlReesh IA, AlWahadni AM. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets bonded to different ceramic surfaces. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32:274–80.PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Karan S, Büyükyılmaz T, Toroğlu MS. Orthodontic bonding to several ceramic surfaces: are there acceptable alternatives to conventional methods? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132(144):e7–14. Karan S, Büyükyılmaz T, Toroğlu MS. Orthodontic bonding to several ceramic surfaces: are there acceptable alternatives to conventional methods? Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2007;132(144):e7–14.
9.
go back to reference Trakyali G, Malkondu O, Kazazoğlu E, Arun T. Effects of different silanes and acid concentrations on bond strength of brackets to porcelain surfaces. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31:402–6.PubMedCrossRef Trakyali G, Malkondu O, Kazazoğlu E, Arun T. Effects of different silanes and acid concentrations on bond strength of brackets to porcelain surfaces. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31:402–6.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Piascik JR, Wolter SD, Stoner BR. Development of a novel surface modification for improved bonding to zirconia. Dent Mater. 2011;27:e99–105.PubMedCrossRef Piascik JR, Wolter SD, Stoner BR. Development of a novel surface modification for improved bonding to zirconia. Dent Mater. 2011;27:e99–105.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gillis I, Redlich M. The effect of different porcelain conditioning techniques on shear bond strength of stainless steel brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998;114:387–92.CrossRef Gillis I, Redlich M. The effect of different porcelain conditioning techniques on shear bond strength of stainless steel brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998;114:387–92.CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Zachrisson YO, Zachrisson BU, Büyükyilmaz T. Surface preparation for orthodontic bonding to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1996;109:420–30.CrossRef Zachrisson YO, Zachrisson BU, Büyükyilmaz T. Surface preparation for orthodontic bonding to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1996;109:420–30.CrossRef
13.
go back to reference Barbosa VLT, Almeida MA, Chevitarese O, Keith O. Direct bonding to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;107:159–64.CrossRef Barbosa VLT, Almeida MA, Chevitarese O, Keith O. Direct bonding to porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1995;107:159–64.CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Bourke BM, Rock WP. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to porcelain. Br J Orthod. 1999;26:285–90.PubMedCrossRef Bourke BM, Rock WP. Factors affecting the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to porcelain. Br J Orthod. 1999;26:285–90.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kocadereli I, Canay S, Akça K. Tensile bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain surfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001;119:617–20.CrossRef Kocadereli I, Canay S, Akça K. Tensile bond strength of ceramic orthodontic brackets bonded to porcelain surfaces. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2001;119:617–20.CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Peterson IM, Pajares A, Lawn BR, Thompson VP, Rekow ED. Mechanical characterization of dental ceramics by hertzian contacts. J Dent Res. 1998;77:589–602.PubMedCrossRef Peterson IM, Pajares A, Lawn BR, Thompson VP, Rekow ED. Mechanical characterization of dental ceramics by hertzian contacts. J Dent Res. 1998;77:589–602.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Pannes DD, Bailey DK, Thompson JY, Pietz DM. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a comparison of bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:66–9.PubMedCrossRef Pannes DD, Bailey DK, Thompson JY, Pietz DM. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a comparison of bonding systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89:66–9.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Harari D, Shapira-Davis S, Gillis I, Roman I, Redlich M. Tensile bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to porcelain facets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003;123:551–4.CrossRef Harari D, Shapira-Davis S, Gillis I, Roman I, Redlich M. Tensile bond strength of ceramic brackets bonded to porcelain facets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2003;123:551–4.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Özcan M, Vallittu PK, Peltomäki T, Huysmans MC, Kalk W. Bonding polycarbonate brackets to ceramic: effects of substrate treatment on bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004;126:220–7.CrossRef Özcan M, Vallittu PK, Peltomäki T, Huysmans MC, Kalk W. Bonding polycarbonate brackets to ceramic: effects of substrate treatment on bond strength. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004;126:220–7.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Silane based concepts on bonding resin composite to metals. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8:1–8.PubMed Matinlinna JP, Vallittu PK. Silane based concepts on bonding resin composite to metals. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2007;8:1–8.PubMed
21.
go back to reference Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater. 2013;29:419–26.PubMedCrossRef Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. Mechanical properties of polymer-infiltrated-ceramic-network materials. Dent Mater. 2013;29:419–26.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. In-vitro strength degradation of dental ceramics and novel PICN material by sharp indentation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013;26:34–42.PubMedCrossRef Coldea A, Swain MV, Thiel N. In-vitro strength degradation of dental ceramics and novel PICN material by sharp indentation. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2013;26:34–42.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Al Jabbari YS, Al Taweel SM, Al Rifaiy M, Alqahtani MQ, Koutsoukis T, Zinelis S. Effects of surface treatment and artificial aging on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to four different provisional restorations. Angl Orthod. 2014;84:649–55.CrossRef Al Jabbari YS, Al Taweel SM, Al Rifaiy M, Alqahtani MQ, Koutsoukis T, Zinelis S. Effects of surface treatment and artificial aging on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to four different provisional restorations. Angl Orthod. 2014;84:649–55.CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Gal JY, Fovet Y, Adib-Yadzi M. About a synthetic saliva for in vitro studies. Talanta. 2001;53:1103–15.PubMedCrossRef Gal JY, Fovet Y, Adib-Yadzi M. About a synthetic saliva for in vitro studies. Talanta. 2001;53:1103–15.PubMedCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Falkensammer F, Freudenthaler J, Pseiner B, Bantleon HP. Influence of surface conditioning on ceramic microstructure and bracket adhesion. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34:498–504.PubMedCrossRef Falkensammer F, Freudenthaler J, Pseiner B, Bantleon HP. Influence of surface conditioning on ceramic microstructure and bracket adhesion. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34:498–504.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Klocke A, Kahl-Nieke B. Influence of force location in orthodontic shear bond strength testing. Dent Mater. 2005;21:391–6.PubMedCrossRef Klocke A, Kahl-Nieke B. Influence of force location in orthodontic shear bond strength testing. Dent Mater. 2005;21:391–6.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Klocke A, Kahl-Nieke B. Influence of cross-head speed in orthodontic bond strength testing. Dent Mater. 2005;21:139–44.PubMedCrossRef Klocke A, Kahl-Nieke B. Influence of cross-head speed in orthodontic bond strength testing. Dent Mater. 2005;21:139–44.PubMedCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Ishida K, Endo T, Shinkai K, Katoh Y. Shear bond strength of rebonded brackets after removal of adhesives with Er, Cr:YSGG laser. Odontology. 2011;99:129–34.PubMedCrossRef Ishida K, Endo T, Shinkai K, Katoh Y. Shear bond strength of rebonded brackets after removal of adhesives with Er, Cr:YSGG laser. Odontology. 2011;99:129–34.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Cozza P, Martucci L, De Toffol L, Penco SI. Shear bond strength of metal brackets on enamel. Angl Orthod. 2006;76:851–6. Cozza P, Martucci L, De Toffol L, Penco SI. Shear bond strength of metal brackets on enamel. Angl Orthod. 2006;76:851–6.
31.
go back to reference Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333–40.PubMedCrossRef Årtun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod. 1984;85:333–40.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Ban S, Anusavice KJ. Influence of test method on failure stress of brittle dental materials. J Dent Res. 1990;69:1791–9.PubMedCrossRef Ban S, Anusavice KJ. Influence of test method on failure stress of brittle dental materials. J Dent Res. 1990;69:1791–9.PubMedCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Oilo G. Bond strength testing—what does it mean? Int Dent J. 1993;43:492–8.PubMed Oilo G. Bond strength testing—what does it mean? Int Dent J. 1993;43:492–8.PubMed
34.
go back to reference Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975;2:171–8. Reynolds IR. A review of direct orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1975;2:171–8.
35.
go back to reference Harris AM, Joseph VP, Rossouw E. Comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic resins to ceramic and metal brackets. J Clin Orthod. 1990;24:725–8.PubMed Harris AM, Joseph VP, Rossouw E. Comparison of shear bond strengths of orthodontic resins to ceramic and metal brackets. J Clin Orthod. 1990;24:725–8.PubMed
36.
go back to reference Joseph VP, Rossouw E. The shear bond strengths of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically and light-activated composite resins. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1990;97:121–5.CrossRef Joseph VP, Rossouw E. The shear bond strengths of stainless steel and ceramic brackets used with chemically and light-activated composite resins. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1990;97:121–5.CrossRef
37.
go back to reference Odegaard J, Segner D. Shear bond strength of metal brackets compared with a new ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;94:201–6.CrossRef Odegaard J, Segner D. Shear bond strength of metal brackets compared with a new ceramic bracket. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;94:201–6.CrossRef
38.
go back to reference Blakey R, Mah J. Effects of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to temporary polycarbonate crowns. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010;138:72–8.CrossRef Blakey R, Mah J. Effects of surface conditioning on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to temporary polycarbonate crowns. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2010;138:72–8.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Eliades T, Lekka M, Eliades G, Brantley WA. Surface characterization of ceramic brackets: a multitechnique approach. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1994;105:10–8.CrossRef Eliades T, Lekka M, Eliades G, Brantley WA. Surface characterization of ceramic brackets: a multitechnique approach. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1994;105:10–8.CrossRef
40.
go back to reference Özcan M. The use of chairside silica coating for different dental applications: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:469–72.PubMedCrossRef Özcan M. The use of chairside silica coating for different dental applications: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:469–72.PubMedCrossRef
41.
go back to reference Özcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater. 2003;19:725–31.PubMedCrossRef Özcan M, Vallittu PK. Effect of surface conditioning methods on the bond strength of luting cement to ceramics. Dent Mater. 2003;19:725–31.PubMedCrossRef
42.
go back to reference El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Mohsen MM, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. Dent Mater. 2003;19:575–83.PubMedCrossRef El Zohairy AA, De Gee AJ, Mohsen MM, Feilzer AJ. Microtensile bond strength testing of luting cements to prefabricated CAD/CAM ceramic and composite blocks. Dent Mater. 2003;19:575–83.PubMedCrossRef
43.
go back to reference Schiettecatte D, Mullie G, Depoorter M. Treatment of hydrofluoric acid burns. Acta Chir Belg. 2003;103:375–8.PubMed Schiettecatte D, Mullie G, Depoorter M. Treatment of hydrofluoric acid burns. Acta Chir Belg. 2003;103:375–8.PubMed
44.
go back to reference Cochran D, O’Keefe KL, Turner DT, Powers JM. Bond strength of orthodontic composite cement to treated porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997;111:297–300.CrossRef Cochran D, O’Keefe KL, Turner DT, Powers JM. Bond strength of orthodontic composite cement to treated porcelain. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997;111:297–300.CrossRef
45.
go back to reference Bayram M, Yesilyurt C, Kusgoz A, Ulker M, Nur M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to aged resin composite surfaces: effect of surface conditioning. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:174–9.PubMedCrossRef Bayram M, Yesilyurt C, Kusgoz A, Ulker M, Nur M. Shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets to aged resin composite surfaces: effect of surface conditioning. Eur J Orthod. 2011;33:174–9.PubMedCrossRef
46.
go back to reference Smith GA, McInnes-Ledoux P, Ledoux WR, Weinberg R. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain–bond strength and refinishing. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;94:245–52.CrossRef Smith GA, McInnes-Ledoux P, Ledoux WR, Weinberg R. Orthodontic bonding to porcelain–bond strength and refinishing. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;94:245–52.CrossRef
47.
go back to reference Ozden AN, Akaltan F, Can G. Effect of surface treatments of porcelain on the shear bond strength of applied dual-cured cement. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:85–8.PubMedCrossRef Ozden AN, Akaltan F, Can G. Effect of surface treatments of porcelain on the shear bond strength of applied dual-cured cement. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:85–8.PubMedCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Sinha PK, Nanda RS. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997;112:132–7.CrossRef Sinha PK, Nanda RS. The effect of different bonding and debonding techniques on debonding ceramic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1997;112:132–7.CrossRef
49.
go back to reference Jost-Brinkmann PG, Bohme A. Shear bond strengths attained in vitro with light-cured glass ionomers vs composite adhesives in bonding ceramic brackets to metal or porcelain. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1:243–53.PubMed Jost-Brinkmann PG, Bohme A. Shear bond strengths attained in vitro with light-cured glass ionomers vs composite adhesives in bonding ceramic brackets to metal or porcelain. J Adhes Dent. 1999;1:243–53.PubMed
50.
go back to reference Winchester L. Direct orthodontic bonding to porcelain: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod. 1991;18:299–308.PubMedCrossRef Winchester L. Direct orthodontic bonding to porcelain: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod. 1991;18:299–308.PubMedCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Sargison AE, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. An ex vivo study of self-, light-, and dual-cured composites for orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1995;22:319–23.PubMedCrossRef Sargison AE, McCabe JF, Gordon PH. An ex vivo study of self-, light-, and dual-cured composites for orthodontic bonding. Br J Orthod. 1995;22:319–23.PubMedCrossRef
52.
go back to reference Eliades T, Brantley WA. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22:13–23.PubMedCrossRef Eliades T, Brantley WA. The inappropriateness of conventional orthodontic bond strength assessment protocols. Eur J Orthod. 2000;22:13–23.PubMedCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod. 1994;21:33–43.PubMedCrossRef Fox NA, McCabe JF, Buckley JG. A critique of bond strength testing in orthodontics. Br J Orthod. 1994;21:33–43.PubMedCrossRef
54.
go back to reference Littlewood SJ, Mitchell L, Greenwood DC. A randomized controlled trial to investigate brackets bonded with a hydrophilic primer. J Orthod. 2001;28:301–5.PubMedCrossRef Littlewood SJ, Mitchell L, Greenwood DC. A randomized controlled trial to investigate brackets bonded with a hydrophilic primer. J Orthod. 2001;28:301–5.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Influence of surface treatments on bond strength of metal and ceramic brackets to a novel CAD/CAM hybrid ceramic material
Author
Shaymaa E. Elsaka
Publication date
01-01-2016
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Odontology / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1618-1247
Electronic ISSN: 1618-1255
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-014-0188-8

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Odontology 1/2016 Go to the issue