Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Cardiology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology Geriatrics and Gerontology Gynecology and Obstetrics Hematology Infectious Disease Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Oncology Pediatrics Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery
Congress Coverage
2024 ACC Congress 2023 ESMO Congress 2023 EASD Congress 2023 ERS Congress 2023 ESC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

LIVE: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)
Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Odontology
Published in: Odontology 2/2013

01-07-2013 | Original Article

Effect of thermal aging on the tensile bond strength at reduced areas of seven current adhesives

Authors: Bruno Baracco, M. Victoria Fuentes, Miguel A. Garrido, Santiago González-López, Laura Ceballos

Published in: Odontology | Issue 2/2013

Login to get access

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the micro-tensile bond strength (MTBS) to dentin of seven adhesive systems (total and self-etch adhesives) after 24 h and 5,000 thermocycles. Dentin surfaces of human third molars were exposed and bonded with two total-etch adhesives (Adper Scotchbond 1 XT and XP Bond), two two-step self-etch adhesives (Adper Scotchbond SE and Filtek Silorane Adhesive System) and three one-step self-etch adhesives (G-Bond, Xeno V and Bond Force). All adhesive systems were applied following manufacturers’ instructions. Composite buildups were constructed and the bonded teeth were then stored in water (24 h, 37 °C) or thermocycled (5,000 cycles) before being sectioned and submitted to MTBS test. Two-way ANOVA and subsequent comparison tests were applied at α = 0.05. Characteristic de-bonded specimens were analyzed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). After 24 h water storage, MTBS values were highest with XP Bond, Adper Scotchbond 1 XT, Filtek Silorane Adhesive System and Adper Scotchbond SE and lowest with the one-step self-etch adhesives Bond Force, Xeno V and G-Bond. After thermocycling, MTBS values were highest with XP Bond, followed by Filtek Silorane Adhesive System, Adper Scotchbond SE and Adper Scotchbond 1 XT and lowest with the one-step self-etch adhesives Bond Force, Xeno V and G-Bond. Thermal aging induced a significant decrease in MTBS values with all adhesives tested. The resistance of resin–dentin bonds to thermal-aging degradation was material dependent. One-step self-etch adhesives obtained the lowest MTBS results after both aging treatments, and their adhesive capacity was significantly reduced after thermocycling.
Literature
1.
Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Vijay P, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Buonocore Memorial Lecture. Adhesion to enamel and dentin: current status and future challenges. Oper Dent. 2003;28:215–35.PubMed
2.
Peumans M, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Clinical effectiveness of contemporary adhesives: a systematic review of current clinical trials. Dent Mater. 2005;21:864–81.PubMedCrossRef
3.
Watanabe I, Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Bonding to ground dentin by a phenyl-P self-etching primer. J Dent Res. 1994;73:1212–20.PubMed
4.
Perdigão J, Gomes G, Gondo R, Fundingsland JW. In vitro bonding performance of all-in-one adhesives. Part I. microtensile bond strengths. J Adhes Dent. 2006;8:367–73.PubMed
5.
Yazici AR, Celik C, Ozgünaltay G, Dayangaç B. Bond strength of different adhesive systems to dental hard tissues. Oper Dent. 2007;32:166–72.PubMedCrossRef
6.
Sarr M, Kane AW, Vreven J, Mine A, Van Landuyt KL, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, De Munck J. Microtensile bond strength and interfacial characterization of 11 contemporary adhesives bonded to bur-cut dentin. Oper Dent. 2010;35:94–104.PubMedCrossRef
7.
Hashimoto M, Tay FR, Ito S, Sano H, Kaga M, Pashley DH. Permeability of adhesive resin films. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005;74:699–705.PubMed
8.
De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Peumans M, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Micro-tensile bond strength of adhesives bonded to class-I cavity-bottom dentin after thermo-cycling. Dent Mater. 2005;21:999–1007.PubMedCrossRef
9.
Breschi L, Mazzoni A, Ruggeri A, Cadenaro M, Di Lenarda R, De Stefano Dorigo E. Dental adhesion review: aging and stability of the bonded interface. Dent Mater. 2008;24:90–101.PubMedCrossRef
10.
Yiu CK, King NM, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Carrilho MR, Tay FR. Effect of resin hydrophilicity and water storage on resin strength. Biomaterials. 2004;25:5789–96.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Tay FR, Pashley DH, Suh BI, Carvalho RM, Itthagarun A. Single-step adhesives are permeable membranes. J Dent. 2002;30:371–82.PubMedCrossRef
12.
Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Origin of interfacial droplets with one-step adhesives. J Dent Res. 2007;86:739–44.PubMedCrossRef
13.
Chersoni S, Suppa P, Grandini S, Goracci C, Monticelli F, Yiu C, Huang C, Prati C, Breschi L, Ferrari M, Pashley DH, Tay FR. In vivo and in vitro permeability of one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res. 2004;83:459–64.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Cadenaro M, Antoniolli F, Sauro S, Tay FR, Di Leonarda R, Prati C, Biasotto M, Contardo L, Breschi L. Degree of conversion and permeability of dental adhesives. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113:525–30.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Ikeda T, De Munck J, Shirai K, Hikita K, Inoue S, Sano H, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Effect of air-drying and solvent evaporation on the strength of HEMA-rich versus HEMA-free one-step adhesives. Dent Mater. 2008;24:1316–23.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Carvalho RM, Chersoni S, Frankenberger R, Pashley DH, Prati C, Tay FR. A challenge to the conventional wisdom that simultaneous etching and resin infiltration always occurs in self-etch adhesives. Biomaterials. 2005;26:1035–42.PubMedCrossRef
17.
De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Vargas M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent Res. 2003;82:136–40.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Osorio R, Pisani-Proenca J, Erhardt MC, Osorio E, Aguilera FS, Tay FR, Toledano M. Resistance of ten contemporary adhesives to resin–dentine bond degradation. J Dent. 2008;36:163–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Abdalla AI, Feilzer AJ. Four-year water degradation of a total-etch and two self-etching adhesives bonded to dentin. J Dent. 2008;36:611–7.PubMedCrossRef
20.
International Organization for Standardization. ISO/TS 11405:2003 Dental materials—testing of adhesion to tooth structure. WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
21.
Ferracane JL, Berge HX, Leung BW. In vitro aging of dental composites in water—effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler/matrix coupling. J Biomed Mater Res. 1998;42:465–72.PubMedCrossRef
22.
Van Meerbeek B, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Mine A, De Munck J, Van Landuyt KL. State of the art of self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2011;27:17–28.PubMedCrossRef
23.
Oliveira SS, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW Jr. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. Dent Mater. 2003;19:758–67.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Hürmüzlü F, Ozdemir AK, Hubbezoglu I, Coskun A, Siso SH. Bond strength of adhesives to dentin involving total and self-etch adhesives. Quintessence Int. 2007;38:206–12.
25.
Lattaa MA. Shear bond strength and physicochemical interactions of XP Bond. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9(suppl 2):245–8.PubMed
26.
Perdigão J, Lopes MM, Gomes G. In vitro bonding performance of self-etch adhesives: II-ultramorphological evaluation. Oper Dent. 2008;33:534–49.PubMedCrossRef
27.
Saboia VP, Silva FC, Nato F, Mazzoni A, Cadenaro M, Mazzotti G, Giannini M, Breschi L. Analysis of differential artificial ageing of the adhesive interface produced by a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive. Eur J Oral Sci. 2009;117:618–24.PubMedCrossRef
28.
Margvelashvili M, Goracci C, Beloica M, Papacchini F, Ferrari M. In vitro evaluation of bonding effectiveness to dentin of all-in-one adhesives. J Dent. 2010;38:106–12.PubMedCrossRef
29.
Duarte S Jr, Phark JH, Varjão FM, Sadan A. Nanoleakage, ultramorphological characteristics, and microtensile bond strengths of a new low-shrinkage composite to dentin after artificial aging. Dent Mater. 2009;25:589–600.PubMedCrossRef
30.
Mine A, De Munck J, Cardoso MV, Van Landuyt KL, Poitevin A, Kuboki T, Yoshida Y, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Bonding effectiveness of two contemporary self-etch adhesives to enamel and dentin. J Dent. 2009;37:872–83.PubMedCrossRef
31.
Van Meerbeek B, Willems G, Celis JP, Roos JR, Braem M, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Assessment by nano-indentation of the hardness and elasticity of the resin–dentin bonding area. J Dent Res. 1993;72:1434–42.PubMedCrossRef
32.
Choi KK, Condon JR, Ferracane JL. The effects of adhesive thickness on polymerization contraction stress of composite. J Dent Res. 2000;79:812–7.PubMedCrossRef
33.
Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, De Munck J, Peumans M, Yoshida Y, Poitevin A, Coutinho E, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Systematic review of the chemical composition of contemporary dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2007;28:3757–85.PubMedCrossRef
34.
Mine A, De Munck J, Van Ende A, Cardoso MV, Kuboki T, Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B. TEM characterization of a silorane composite bonded to enamel/dentin. Dent Mater. 2010;26:524–32.PubMedCrossRef
35.
Bouillaguet S. Biological risks of resin-based materials to the dentin–pulp complex. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med. 2004;15:47–60.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Gale MS, Darvell BW. Thermal cycling procedures for laboratory testing of dental restorations. J Dent. 1999;27:89–99.PubMedCrossRef
37.
De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A critical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tissue: methods and results. J Dent Res. 2005;84:118–32.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Osorio R, Ceballos L, Tay F, Cabrerizo-Vilchez MA, Toledano M. Effect of sodium hypochlorite on dentin bonding with a polyalkenoic acid-containing adhesive system. J Biomed Mater Res. 2002;60:316–24.PubMedCrossRef
39.
Shirai K, De Munck J, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Lambrechts P, Suzuki K, Shintani H, Van Meerbeek B. Effect of cavity configuration and aging on the bonding effectiveness of six adhesives to dentin. Dent Mater. 2005;21:110–24.PubMedCrossRef
40.
Koshiro K, Inoue S, Sano H, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. In vivo degradation of resin–dentin bonds produced by a self-etch and an etch-and-rinse adhesive. Eur J Oral Sci. 2005;113:341–8.PubMedCrossRef
41.
Eliades G, Vougiouklakis G, Palaghias G. Heterogeneous distribution of single-bottle adhesive monomers in the resin–dentin interdiffusion zone. Dent Mater. 2001;17:277–83.PubMedCrossRef
42.
De Munck J, Arita A, Shirai K, Van Landuyt KL, Coutinho E, Poitevin A. Microrotary fatigue resistance of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to dentin. J Adhes Dent. 2007;9:373–9.PubMed
43.
Van Landuyt KL, De Munck J, Snauwaert J, Coutinho E, Poitevin A, Yoshida Y, Inoue S, Peumans M, Suzuki K, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. Monomer-solvent phase separation in one-step self-etch adhesives. J Dent Res. 2005;84:183–8.PubMedCrossRef
44.
Van Landuyt KL, Snauwaert J, Peumans M, De Munck J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B. The role of HEMA in one-step self-etch adhesives. Dent Mater. 2008;24:1412–9.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Nunes TG, Ceballos L, Osorio R, Toledano M. Spatially resolved photopolymerization kinetics and oxygen inhibition in dental adhesives. Biomaterials. 2005;26:1809–17.PubMedCrossRef
46.
Wang Y, Spencer P. Continuing etching of an all-in-one adhesive in wet dentin tubules. J Dent Res. 2005;84:350–4.PubMedCrossRef
47.
Yoshida Y, Nagakane K, Fukuda R, Nakayama Y, Okazaki M, Shintani H, Inoue S, Tagawa Y, Suzuki K, De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B. Comparative study on adhesive performance of functional monomers. J Dent Res. 2004;83:454–8.PubMedCrossRef
48.
De Munck J, Ermis RB, Koshiro K, Inoue S, Ikeda T, Sano H, Van Landuyt KL, Van Meerbeek B. NaOCl degradation of a HEMA-free all-in-one adhesive bonded to enamel and dentin following two air-blowing techniques. J Dent. 2007;35:74–83.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Monticelli F, Osorio R, Pisani-Proença J, Toledano M. Resistance to degradation of resin–dentin bonds using a one-step HEMA-free adhesive. J Dent. 2007;35:181–6.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Torkabadi S, Nakajima M, Ikeda M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Bonding durability of HEMA-free and HEMA-containing one-step adhesives to dentin surrounded by bonded enamel. J Dent. 2008;36:80–6.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Effect of thermal aging on the tensile bond strength at reduced areas of seven current adhesives
Authors
Bruno Baracco
M. Victoria Fuentes
Miguel A. Garrido
Santiago González-López
Laura Ceballos
Publication date
01-07-2013
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Odontology / Issue 2/2013
Print ISSN: 1618-1247
Electronic ISSN: 1618-1255
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10266-012-0073-2

Other articles of this Issue 2/2013

Odontology 2/2013 Go to the issue

Case Report

RANK, RANKL and OPG expressions in a permanent molar with a replacement resorption

Short Communication

Stress distribution in the peri-implant bone with splinted and non-splinted implants by in vivo loading data-based finite element analysis

Short Communication

Alpha-mangostin suppresses MMP-2 and MMP-9 expression in head and neck squamous carcinoma cells

Case Report

Expression of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in odontogenic myxoma in a child: report of a clinical case

Original Article

Influence of eugenol on the push-out bond strengths of fiber posts cemented with different types of resin luting agents

Original Article

Accuracy of three-dimensional finite element modeling using two different dental cone beam computed tomography systems