Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 5/2018

01-10-2018 | Research Article

Psychophysical Tuning Curves as a Correlate of Electrode Position in Cochlear Implant Listeners

Authors: Lindsay DeVries, Julie G. Arenberg

Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Issue 5/2018

Login to get access

ABSTRACT

Speech understanding abilities vary widely among cochlear implant (CI) listeners. A potential source of this variability is the electrode-neuron interface (ENI), which includes peripheral factors such as electrode position and integrity of remaining spiral ganglion neurons. Suboptimal positioning of the electrode array has been associated with poorer speech outcomes; however, postoperative computerized tomography (CT) scans are often not available to clinicians. CT-estimated electrode-to-modiolus distance (distance from the inner wall of the cochlea) has been shown to account for some variability in behavioral thresholds. However, psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) may provide additional insight into site-specific variation in channel interaction. Thirteen unilaterally implanted adults with the Advanced Bionics HiRes90K device participated. Behavioral thresholds and PTCs were collected for all available electrodes with steered quadrupolar (sQP) configuration, using a modified threshold sweep procedure, used in Bierer et al. (Trends Hear 19:1–12, 2015). PTC bandwidths were quantified to characterize channel interaction across the electrode array, and tip shifts were assessed to identify possible contributions of neural dead regions. Broader PTC bandwidths were correlated with electrodes farther from the modiolus, but not correlated with sQP threshold, though a trend was observed. Both measures were affected by scalar location, and PTC tip shifts were observed for electrodes farther from the modiolus. sQP threshold was the only variable correlated with word recognition. These results suggest PTCs may be used as a site-specific measure of channel interaction that correlates with electrode position in some CI listeners.
Literature
go back to reference Abbas PJ, Hughes ML, Brown CJ et al (2004) Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential. Audiol Neurotol 9:203–213CrossRef Abbas PJ, Hughes ML, Brown CJ et al (2004) Channel interaction in cochlear implant users evaluated using the electrically evoked compound action potential. Audiol Neurotol 9:203–213CrossRef
go back to reference Anderson ES, Nelson DA, Kreft H et al (2011) Comparing spatial tuning curves, spectral ripple resolution, and speech perception in cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 130:364–375CrossRef Anderson ES, Nelson DA, Kreft H et al (2011) Comparing spatial tuning curves, spectral ripple resolution, and speech perception in cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 130:364–375CrossRef
go back to reference Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, Laszig R (2007) Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear 28:75S–79SCrossRef Aschendorff A, Kromeier J, Klenzner T, Laszig R (2007) Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults. Ear Hear 28:75S–79SCrossRef
go back to reference Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Mem Lang 59:390–412CrossRef Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM (2008) Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Mem Lang 59:390–412CrossRef
go back to reference Bierer J (2010) Probing the electrode-neuron Interface with focused Cochlear implant stimulation. Trends in Amplif 14:84–95CrossRef Bierer J (2010) Probing the electrode-neuron Interface with focused Cochlear implant stimulation. Trends in Amplif 14:84–95CrossRef
go back to reference Bierer JA (2007) Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration. J Acoust Soc Am 121:1642–1653CrossRef Bierer JA (2007) Threshold and channel interaction in cochlear implant users: evaluation of the tripolar electrode configuration. J Acoust Soc Am 121:1642–1653CrossRef
go back to reference Bierer JA, Bierer SM, Kreft HA, Oxenham AJ (2015) A fast method for measuring psychophysical thresholds across the cochlear implant Array. Trends Hear 19:1–12 Bierer JA, Bierer SM, Kreft HA, Oxenham AJ (2015) A fast method for measuring psychophysical thresholds across the cochlear implant Array. Trends Hear 19:1–12
go back to reference Bierer JA, Bierer SM, Middlebrooks JC (2010) Partial tripolar cochlear implant stimulation: spread of excitation and forward masking in the inferior colliculus. Hear Res 270:134–142CrossRef Bierer JA, Bierer SM, Middlebrooks JC (2010) Partial tripolar cochlear implant stimulation: spread of excitation and forward masking in the inferior colliculus. Hear Res 270:134–142CrossRef
go back to reference Bierer JA, Faulkner KF (2010) Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves. Ear Hear 31:247CrossRef Bierer JA, Faulkner KF (2010) Identifying cochlear implant channels with poor electrode-neuron interface: partial tripolar, single-channel thresholds and psychophysical tuning curves. Ear Hear 31:247CrossRef
go back to reference Blamey P, Artieres F, Baskent D et al (2013) Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients. Audiol Neurotol 18:36–47CrossRef Blamey P, Artieres F, Baskent D et al (2013) Factors affecting auditory performance of postlinguistically deaf adults using cochlear implants: an update with 2251 patients. Audiol Neurotol 18:36–47CrossRef
go back to reference Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM (2006) The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach. Hear Res 214:17–27CrossRef Briaire JJ, Frijns JHM (2006) The consequences of neural degeneration regarding optimal cochlear implant position in scala tympani: a model approach. Hear Res 214:17–27CrossRef
go back to reference Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Gantz B (1990) Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 88:1385–1391CrossRef Brown CJ, Abbas PJ, Gantz B (1990) Electrically evoked whole-nerve action potentials: data from human cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 88:1385–1391CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen LT (2009) Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 2. Spread of the effective stimulation field (ESF), from ECAP and FEA. Hear Res 247:100–111CrossRef Cohen LT (2009) Practical model description of peripheral neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: 2. Spread of the effective stimulation field (ESF), from ECAP and FEA. Hear Res 247:100–111CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen LT, Richardson LM, Saunders E, Cowan RS (2003) Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking. Hear Res 179:72–87CrossRef Cohen LT, Richardson LM, Saunders E, Cowan RS (2003) Spatial spread of neural excitation in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of improved ECAP method and psychophysical forward masking. Hear Res 179:72–87CrossRef
go back to reference Cohen LT, Saunders E, Clark GM (2001) Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array. Hear Res 155:63–81CrossRef Cohen LT, Saunders E, Clark GM (2001) Psychophysics of a prototype peri-modiolar cochlear implant electrode array. Hear Res 155:63–81CrossRef
go back to reference DeVries L, Scheperle R, Bierer JA (2016) Assessing the electrode-neuron interface with the electrically evoked compound action potential, electrode position, and behavioral thresholds. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 17:237–252CrossRef DeVries L, Scheperle R, Bierer JA (2016) Assessing the electrode-neuron interface with the electrically evoked compound action potential, electrode position, and behavioral thresholds. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 17:237–252CrossRef
go back to reference Finley CC, Holden TA, Holden LK et al (2008) Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otol Neurotol 29:920–928CrossRef Finley CC, Holden TA, Holden LK et al (2008) Role of electrode placement as a contributor to variability in cochlear implant outcomes. Otol Neurotol 29:920–928CrossRef
go back to reference Frijns JH, de Snoo SL, Schoonhoven R (1995) Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear Res 87:170–186CrossRef Frijns JH, de Snoo SL, Schoonhoven R (1995) Potential distributions and neural excitation patterns in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear Res 87:170–186CrossRef
go back to reference Frijns JH, de Snoo SL, ten Kate JH (1996) Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear Res 95:33–48CrossRef Frijns JH, de Snoo SL, ten Kate JH (1996) Spatial selectivity in a rotationally symmetric model of the electrically stimulated cochlea. Hear Res 95:33–48CrossRef
go back to reference Goldwyn JH, Bierer SM, Bierer JA (2010) Modeling the electrode-neuron interface of cochlear implants: effects of neural survival, electrode placement. and the partial tripolar configuration Hear Res 268:93–104CrossRef Goldwyn JH, Bierer SM, Bierer JA (2010) Modeling the electrode-neuron interface of cochlear implants: effects of neural survival, electrode placement. and the partial tripolar configuration Hear Res 268:93–104CrossRef
go back to reference Hall RD (1990) Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Hear Res 49:155–168CrossRef Hall RD (1990) Estimation of surviving spiral ganglion cells in the deaf rat using the electrically evoked auditory brainstem response. Hear Res 49:155–168CrossRef
go back to reference Hinojosa R, Lindsay JR (1980) Profound deafness. Associated sensory and neural degeneration. Arch Otolaryngol 106:193–209CrossRef Hinojosa R, Lindsay JR (1980) Profound deafness. Associated sensory and neural degeneration. Arch Otolaryngol 106:193–209CrossRef
go back to reference Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB et al (2013) Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 34:342–360CrossRef Holden LK, Finley CC, Firszt JB et al (2013) Factors affecting open-set word recognition in adults with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 34:342–360CrossRef
go back to reference Hughes ML, Abbas PJ (2006) Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays. J Acoust Soc Am 119:1538–1547CrossRef Hughes ML, Abbas PJ (2006) Electrophysiologic channel interaction, electrode pitch ranking, and behavioral threshold in straight versus perimodiolar cochlear implant electrode arrays. J Acoust Soc Am 119:1538–1547CrossRef
go back to reference Hughes ML, Stille LJ (2008) Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants. Ear Hear 29:435–452CrossRef Hughes ML, Stille LJ (2008) Psychophysical versus physiological spatial forward masking and the relation to speech perception in cochlear implants. Ear Hear 29:435–452CrossRef
go back to reference Jones GL, Ho Won J, Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT (2013) Relationship between channel interaction and spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant users a. J Acoust Soc Am 133:425–433CrossRef Jones GL, Ho Won J, Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT (2013) Relationship between channel interaction and spectral-ripple discrimination in cochlear implant users a. J Acoust Soc Am 133:425–433CrossRef
go back to reference Kalkman RK, Briaire JJ, Dekker DMT, Frijns JHM (2014) Place pitch versus electrode location in a realistic computational model of the implanted human cochlea. Hear Res 315:10–24CrossRef Kalkman RK, Briaire JJ, Dekker DMT, Frijns JHM (2014) Place pitch versus electrode location in a realistic computational model of the implanted human cochlea. Hear Res 315:10–24CrossRef
go back to reference Kawano A, Seldon HL, Clar GM (1998) Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 118:313–326CrossRef Kawano A, Seldon HL, Clar GM (1998) Intracochlear factors contributing to psychophysical percepts following cochlear implantation. Acta Otolaryngol 118:313–326CrossRef
go back to reference Khan AM, Handzel O, Damian D et al (2005) Effect of cochlear implantation on residual spiral ganglion cell count as determined by comparison with the contralateral nonimplanted inner ear in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 114:381–385CrossRef Khan AM, Handzel O, Damian D et al (2005) Effect of cochlear implantation on residual spiral ganglion cell count as determined by comparison with the contralateral nonimplanted inner ear in humans. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 114:381–385CrossRef
go back to reference Koch DB, Osberger MJ, Segel P, Kessler D (2004) HiResolution™ and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution™ bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability. Audiol Neurotol 9:214–223CrossRef Koch DB, Osberger MJ, Segel P, Kessler D (2004) HiResolution™ and conventional sound processing in the HiResolution™ bionic ear: using appropriate outcome measures to assess speech recognition ability. Audiol Neurotol 9:214–223CrossRef
go back to reference Landsberger DM, Srinivasan AG (2009) Virtual channel discrimination is improved by current focusing in cochlear implant recipients. Hear Res 254:34–41CrossRef Landsberger DM, Srinivasan AG (2009) Virtual channel discrimination is improved by current focusing in cochlear implant recipients. Hear Res 254:34–41CrossRef
go back to reference Lazard DS, Giraud A-L, Gnansia D et al (2012) Understanding the deafened brain: implications for cochlear implant rehabilitation. Eur Ann Otorhinolary 129:98–103CrossRef Lazard DS, Giraud A-L, Gnansia D et al (2012) Understanding the deafened brain: implications for cochlear implant rehabilitation. Eur Ann Otorhinolary 129:98–103CrossRef
go back to reference Linthicum FH, Fayad J, Otto SR et al (1991) Cochlear implant histopathology. Am J Otol 12:245–311PubMed Linthicum FH, Fayad J, Otto SR et al (1991) Cochlear implant histopathology. Am J Otol 12:245–311PubMed
go back to reference Litvak LM, Spahr AJ, Emadi G (2007) Loudness growth observed under partially tripolar stimulation: model and data from cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 122:967–981CrossRef Litvak LM, Spahr AJ, Emadi G (2007) Loudness growth observed under partially tripolar stimulation: model and data from cochlear implant listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 122:967–981CrossRef
go back to reference Long CJ, Holden TA, McClelland GH et al (2014) Examining the electro-neural interface of cochlear implant users using psychophysics, CT scans, and speech understanding. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 15:293–304CrossRef Long CJ, Holden TA, McClelland GH et al (2014) Examining the electro-neural interface of cochlear implant users using psychophysics, CT scans, and speech understanding. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 15:293–304CrossRef
go back to reference McKay CM (2012) Forward masking as a method of measuring place specificity of neural excitation in cochlear implants: a review of methods and interpretation. J Acoust Soc Am 131:2209–2224CrossRef McKay CM (2012) Forward masking as a method of measuring place specificity of neural excitation in cochlear implants: a review of methods and interpretation. J Acoust Soc Am 131:2209–2224CrossRef
go back to reference Nelson DA, Donaldson GS, Kreft H (2008) Forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 123:1522–1543CrossRef Nelson DA, Donaldson GS, Kreft H (2008) Forward-masked spatial tuning curves in cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 123:1522–1543CrossRef
go back to reference Nelson DA, Kreft HA, Anderson ES, Donaldson GS (2011) Spatial tuning curves from apical, middle, and basal electrodes in cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 129:3916–3933CrossRef Nelson DA, Kreft HA, Anderson ES, Donaldson GS (2011) Spatial tuning curves from apical, middle, and basal electrodes in cochlear implant users. J Acoust Soc Am 129:3916–3933CrossRef
go back to reference Pfingst BE, Bowling SA, Colesa DJ et al (2011) Cochlear infrastructure for electrical hearing. Hear Res 281:65–73CrossRef Pfingst BE, Bowling SA, Colesa DJ et al (2011) Cochlear infrastructure for electrical hearing. Hear Res 281:65–73CrossRef
go back to reference Pfingst BE, Xu L, Thompson CS (2004) Across-site threshold variation in cochlear implants: relation to speech recognition. Audiol Neurotol 9:341–352CrossRef Pfingst BE, Xu L, Thompson CS (2004) Across-site threshold variation in cochlear implants: relation to speech recognition. Audiol Neurotol 9:341–352CrossRef
go back to reference Ramekers D, Versnel H, Strahl SB et al (2014) Auditory-nerve responses to varied inter-phase gap and phase duration of the electric pulse stimulus as predictors for neuronal degeneration. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 15:187–202CrossRef Ramekers D, Versnel H, Strahl SB et al (2014) Auditory-nerve responses to varied inter-phase gap and phase duration of the electric pulse stimulus as predictors for neuronal degeneration. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 15:187–202CrossRef
go back to reference Sęk A, Alcántara J, Moore BCJ et al (2005) Development of a fast method for determining psychophysical tuning curves. Int J Audiol 44:408–420CrossRef Sęk A, Alcántara J, Moore BCJ et al (2005) Development of a fast method for determining psychophysical tuning curves. Int J Audiol 44:408–420CrossRef
go back to reference Shepherd RK, Hatsushika S, Clark GM (1993) Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation. Hear Res 66:108–120CrossRef Shepherd RK, Hatsushika S, Clark GM (1993) Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the effect of electrode position on neural excitation. Hear Res 66:108–120CrossRef
go back to reference Shepherd RK, Javel E (1997) Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status. Hear Res 108:112–144CrossRef Shepherd RK, Javel E (1997) Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. I. Correlation of physiological responses with cochlear status. Hear Res 108:112–144CrossRef
go back to reference Skinner MW, Ketten DR, Holden LK et al (2002) CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in nucleus-22 recipients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 3:332–350CrossRef Skinner MW, Ketten DR, Holden LK et al (2002) CT-derived estimation of cochlear morphology and electrode array position in relation to word recognition in nucleus-22 recipients. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 3:332–350CrossRef
go back to reference Smith L, Simmons FB (1983) Estimating eighth nerve survival by electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 92:19–23CrossRef Smith L, Simmons FB (1983) Estimating eighth nerve survival by electrical stimulation. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 92:19–23CrossRef
go back to reference Snyder RL, Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC (2004) Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 5:305–322CrossRef Snyder RL, Bierer JA, Middlebrooks JC (2004) Topographic spread of inferior colliculus activation in response to acoustic and intracochlear electric stimulation. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 5:305–322CrossRef
go back to reference Srinivasan AG, Landsberger DM, Shannon RV (2010) Current focusing sharpens local peaks of excitation in cochlear implant stimulation. Hear Res 270:89–100CrossRef Srinivasan AG, Landsberger DM, Shannon RV (2010) Current focusing sharpens local peaks of excitation in cochlear implant stimulation. Hear Res 270:89–100CrossRef
go back to reference Teymouri J, Hullar TE, Holden TA, Chole RA (2011) Verification of computed tomographic estimates of cochlear implant array position: a micro-CT and histologic analysis. Otol Neurotol 32:980–986CrossRef Teymouri J, Hullar TE, Holden TA, Chole RA (2011) Verification of computed tomographic estimates of cochlear implant array position: a micro-CT and histologic analysis. Otol Neurotol 32:980–986CrossRef
go back to reference van der Marel KS, Briaire JJ, Verbdrist BM et al (2015) The influence of cochlear implant electrode position on performance. Audiol Neurotol 20:202–211CrossRef van der Marel KS, Briaire JJ, Verbdrist BM et al (2015) The influence of cochlear implant electrode position on performance. Audiol Neurotol 20:202–211CrossRef
go back to reference Verbist BM, Frijns JH, Geleijns J, Van Buchem MA (2005) Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients. Am J of Neuroradiol 26:424–429 Verbist BM, Frijns JH, Geleijns J, Van Buchem MA (2005) Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients. Am J of Neuroradiol 26:424–429
go back to reference Won JH, Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT (2007) Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8:384–392CrossRef Won JH, Drennan WR, Rubinstein JT (2007) Spectral-ripple resolution correlates with speech reception in noise in cochlear implant users. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 8:384–392CrossRef
go back to reference Zhou N, Dong L, Hang M (2018) Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear implant users: effects of stimulation mode. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 19:99–111CrossRef Zhou N, Dong L, Hang M (2018) Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear implant users: effects of stimulation mode. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 19:99–111CrossRef
go back to reference Zhou N, Kraft CT, Colesa DJ, Pfingst BE (2015) Integration of pulse trains in humans and guinea pigs with cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 16:523–534CrossRef Zhou N, Kraft CT, Colesa DJ, Pfingst BE (2015) Integration of pulse trains in humans and guinea pigs with cochlear implants. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 16:523–534CrossRef
go back to reference Zhou N, Pfingst BE (2016) Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear-implant users: relationship to spatial selectivity. J Acoust Soc Am 140:1537–1547CrossRef Zhou N, Pfingst BE (2016) Evaluating multipulse integration as a neural-health correlate in human cochlear-implant users: relationship to spatial selectivity. J Acoust Soc Am 140:1537–1547CrossRef
Metadata
Title
Psychophysical Tuning Curves as a Correlate of Electrode Position in Cochlear Implant Listeners
Authors
Lindsay DeVries
Julie G. Arenberg
Publication date
01-10-2018
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Issue 5/2018
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Electronic ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-018-0678-4

Other articles of this Issue 5/2018

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 5/2018 Go to the issue