Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 4/2007

01-12-2007

Measurement of the Distribution of Medial Olivocochlear Acoustic Reflex Strengths Across Normal-Hearing Individuals via Otoacoustic Emissions

Authors: Bradford C. Backus, John J. Guinan Jr

Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Issue 4/2007

Login to get access

Abstract

A clinical test for the strength of the medial olivocochlear reflex (MOCR) might be valuable as a predictor of individuals at risk for acoustic trauma or for explaining why some people have trouble understanding speech in noise. A first step in developing a clinical test for MOCR strength is to determine the range and variation of MOCR strength in a research setting. A measure of MOCR strength near 1 kHz was made across a normal-hearing population (N = 25) by monitoring stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions (SFOAEs) while activating the MOCR with 60 dB SPL wideband contralateral noise. Statistically significant MOCR effects were measured in all 25 subjects; but not all SFOAE frequencies tested produced significant effects within the time allotted. To get a metric of MOCR strength, MOCR-induced changes in SFOAEs were normalized by the SFOAE amplitude obtained by two-tone suppression. We found this “normalized MOCR effect” varied across frequency and time within the same subject, sometimes with significant differences between measurements made as little as 40 Hz apart or as little as a few minutes apart. Averaging several single-frequency measures spanning 200 Hz in each subject reduced the frequency- and time-dependent variations enough to produce correlated measures indicative of the true MOCR strength near 1 kHz for each subject. The distribution of MOCR strengths, in terms of SFOAE suppression near 1 kHz, across our normal-hearing subject pool was reasonably approximated by a normal distribution with mean suppression of approximately 35% and standard deviation of approximately 12%. The range of MOCR strengths spanned a factor of 4, suggesting that whatever function the MOCR plays in hearing (e.g., enhancing signal detection in noise, reducing acoustic trauma), different people will have corresponding differences in their abilities to perform that function.
Literature
go back to reference Backus BC. Bias due to noise in otoacoustic emission measurements. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121:1588–1603, 2007.PubMedCrossRef Backus BC. Bias due to noise in otoacoustic emission measurements. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121:1588–1603, 2007.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Backus BC, Guinan JJ Jr. Time-course of the human medial olivocochlear reflex. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119:2889–2904, 2006.PubMedCrossRef Backus BC, Guinan JJ Jr. Time-course of the human medial olivocochlear reflex. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 119:2889–2904, 2006.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Bar-Haim Y, Henkin Y, Ari-Even-Roth D, Tetin-Schneider S, Hildesheimer M, Muchnik C. Reduced auditory efferent activity in childhood selective mutism. Biol. Psychiatry 55:1061–1068, 2004.PubMedCrossRef Bar-Haim Y, Henkin Y, Ari-Even-Roth D, Tetin-Schneider S, Hildesheimer M, Muchnik C. Reduced auditory efferent activity in childhood selective mutism. Biol. Psychiatry 55:1061–1068, 2004.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference De Ceulaer G, Yperman M, Daemers K, Van Driessche K, Somers T, Offeciers FE, Govaerts PJ. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: normative data for a clinical test set-up. Otol. Neurotol. 22:350–355, 2001.PubMedCrossRef De Ceulaer G, Yperman M, Daemers K, Van Driessche K, Somers T, Offeciers FE, Govaerts PJ. Contralateral suppression of transient evoked otoacoustic emissions: normative data for a clinical test set-up. Otol. Neurotol. 22:350–355, 2001.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Geisler CD. Letter: hypothesis on the function of the crossed olivocochlear bundle. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 56:1908–1909, 1974.PubMedCrossRef Geisler CD. Letter: hypothesis on the function of the crossed olivocochlear bundle. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 56:1908–1909, 1974.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Gelfand SA, Piper N. Acoustic reflex thresholds: variability and distribution effects. Ear Hear. 5:228–234, 1984.PubMedCrossRef Gelfand SA, Piper N. Acoustic reflex thresholds: variability and distribution effects. Ear Hear. 5:228–234, 1984.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Guinan JJ Jr. Inhibition of stimulus frequency emissions by medial olivocochlear efferent neurons in cats. Abstr. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 14:129, 1991. Guinan JJ Jr. Inhibition of stimulus frequency emissions by medial olivocochlear efferent neurons in cats. Abstr. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 14:129, 1991.
go back to reference Guinan JJ Jr, Backus BC, Lilaonitkul W, Aharonson V. Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 4:521–540, 2003.PubMedCrossRef Guinan JJ Jr, Backus BC, Lilaonitkul W, Aharonson V. Medial olivocochlear efferent reflex in humans: otoacoustic emission (OAE) measurement issues and the advantages of stimulus frequency OAEs. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 4:521–540, 2003.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kalluri R, Shera CA. Near equivalence of human click-evoked and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121:2097–2110, 2007.PubMedCrossRef Kalluri R, Shera CA. Near equivalence of human click-evoked and stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 121:2097–2110, 2007.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Kawase T, Delgutte B, Liberman MC. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones. J. Neurophysiol. 70:2533–2549, 1993.PubMed Kawase T, Delgutte B, Liberman MC. Antimasking effects of the olivocochlear reflex. II. Enhancement of auditory-nerve response to masked tones. J. Neurophysiol. 70:2533–2549, 1993.PubMed
go back to reference Kemp DT, Bray P, et al. Acoustic emission cochleography–practical aspects. Scand. Audiol. Suppl. 25:71–95, 1986.PubMed Kemp DT, Bray P, et al. Acoustic emission cochleography–practical aspects. Scand. Audiol. Suppl. 25:71–95, 1986.PubMed
go back to reference Kim DO, Dorn PA, Neely ST, Gorga MP. Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2:31–40, 2001.PubMed Kim DO, Dorn PA, Neely ST, Gorga MP. Adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emission in humans. J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol. 2:31–40, 2001.PubMed
go back to reference Kumar UA, Vanaja CS. Functioning of olivocochlear bundle and speech perception in noise. Ear Hear. 25:142–146, 2004.PubMedCrossRef Kumar UA, Vanaja CS. Functioning of olivocochlear bundle and speech perception in noise. Ear Hear. 25:142–146, 2004.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Liberman MC, Brown MC. Physiology and anatomy of single olivocochlear neurons in the cat. Hear. Res. 24:17–36, 1986.PubMedCrossRef Liberman MC, Brown MC. Physiology and anatomy of single olivocochlear neurons in the cat. Hear. Res. 24:17–36, 1986.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Maison SF, Liberman MC. Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with a noninvasive assay of olivocochlear reflex strength. J. Neurosci. 20:4701–4707, 2000.PubMed Maison SF, Liberman MC. Predicting vulnerability to acoustic injury with a noninvasive assay of olivocochlear reflex strength. J. Neurosci. 20:4701–4707, 2000.PubMed
go back to reference Maison S, Micheyl C, Andeol G, Gallego S, Collet L. Activation of medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans: influence of stimulus bandwidth. Hear. Res. 140:111–125, 2000.PubMedCrossRef Maison S, Micheyl C, Andeol G, Gallego S, Collet L. Activation of medial olivocochlear efferent system in humans: influence of stimulus bandwidth. Hear. Res. 140:111–125, 2000.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Micheyl C, Collet L. Involvement of the olivocochlear bundle in the detection of tones in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99:1604–1610, 1996.PubMedCrossRef Micheyl C, Collet L. Involvement of the olivocochlear bundle in the detection of tones in noise. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99:1604–1610, 1996.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Micheyl C, Morlet T, Giraud AL, Collet L, Morgon A. Contralateral suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions and detection of a multi-tone complex in noise. Acta Otolaryngol. 115:178–182, 1995.PubMed Micheyl C, Morlet T, Giraud AL, Collet L, Morgon A. Contralateral suppression of evoked otoacoustic emissions and detection of a multi-tone complex in noise. Acta Otolaryngol. 115:178–182, 1995.PubMed
go back to reference Muller J, Janssen T, Heppelmann G, Wagner W. Evidence for a bipolar change in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during contralateral acoustic stimulation in humans. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118:3747–3756, 2005.PubMedCrossRef Muller J, Janssen T, Heppelmann G, Wagner W. Evidence for a bipolar change in distortion product otoacoustic emissions during contralateral acoustic stimulation in humans. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 118:3747–3756, 2005.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Puria S, Guinan JJ Jr, Liberman MC. Olivocochlear reflex assays: effects of contralateral sound on compound action potentials versus ear-canal distortion products. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99:500–507, 1996.PubMedCrossRef Puria S, Guinan JJ Jr, Liberman MC. Olivocochlear reflex assays: effects of contralateral sound on compound action potentials versus ear-canal distortion products. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99:500–507, 1996.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Rajan R, Johnstone BM. Crossed cochlear influences on monaural temporary threshold shifts. Hear. Res. 9:279–294, 1983.PubMedCrossRef Rajan R, Johnstone BM. Crossed cochlear influences on monaural temporary threshold shifts. Hear. Res. 9:279–294, 1983.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Reiter ER, Liberman MC. Efferent-mediated protection from acoustic overexposure: relation to slow effects of olivocochlear stimulation. J. Neurophysiol. 73:506–514, 1995.PubMed Reiter ER, Liberman MC. Efferent-mediated protection from acoustic overexposure: relation to slow effects of olivocochlear stimulation. J. Neurophysiol. 73:506–514, 1995.PubMed
go back to reference Shera CA, Guinan JJ Jr. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:782–798, 1999.PubMedCrossRef Shera CA, Guinan JJ Jr. Evoked otoacoustic emissions arise by two fundamentally different mechanisms: a taxonomy for mammalian OAEs. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105:782–798, 1999.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Talmadge CL, Tubis A, Long GR, Tong C. Modeling the combined effects of basilar membrane nonlinearity and roughness on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission fine structure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108:2911–2932, 2000.PubMedCrossRef Talmadge CL, Tubis A, Long GR, Tong C. Modeling the combined effects of basilar membrane nonlinearity and roughness on stimulus frequency otoacoustic emission fine structure. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108:2911–2932, 2000.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Veuillet E, Collet L, Duclaux R. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables. J. Neurophysiol. 65:724–735, 1991.PubMed Veuillet E, Collet L, Duclaux R. Effect of contralateral acoustic stimulation on active cochlear micromechanical properties in human subjects: dependence on stimulus variables. J. Neurophysiol. 65:724–735, 1991.PubMed
go back to reference Wagner W, Heppelmann G, Kuehn M, Tisch M, Vonthein R, Zenner HP. Olivocochlear activity and temporary threshold shift-susceptibility in humans. Laryngoscope 115:2021–2028, 2005.PubMedCrossRef Wagner W, Heppelmann G, Kuehn M, Tisch M, Vonthein R, Zenner HP. Olivocochlear activity and temporary threshold shift-susceptibility in humans. Laryngoscope 115:2021–2028, 2005.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wagner W, Heppelmann G, Muller J, Janssen T, Zenner HP. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips. Hear. Res. 223:83–92, 2007.PubMedCrossRef Wagner W, Heppelmann G, Muller J, Janssen T, Zenner HP. Olivocochlear reflex effect on human distortion product otoacoustic emissions is largest at frequencies with distinct fine structure dips. Hear. Res. 223:83–92, 2007.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Walsh EJ, McGee J, McFadden SL, Liberman MC. Long-term effects of sectioning the olivocochlear bundle in neonatal cats. J. Neurosci. 18:3859–3869, 1998.PubMed Walsh EJ, McGee J, McFadden SL, Liberman MC. Long-term effects of sectioning the olivocochlear bundle in neonatal cats. J. Neurosci. 18:3859–3869, 1998.PubMed
go back to reference Winslow RL, Sachs MB. Single-tone intensity discrimination based on auditory-nerve rate responses in backgrounds of quiet, noise, and with stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle. Hear. Res. 35:165–189, 1988.PubMedCrossRef Winslow RL, Sachs MB. Single-tone intensity discrimination based on auditory-nerve rate responses in backgrounds of quiet, noise, and with stimulation of the crossed olivocochlear bundle. Hear. Res. 35:165–189, 1988.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Zweig G, Shera CA. The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98:2018–2047, 1995.PubMedCrossRef Zweig G, Shera CA. The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98:2018–2047, 1995.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Measurement of the Distribution of Medial Olivocochlear Acoustic Reflex Strengths Across Normal-Hearing Individuals via Otoacoustic Emissions
Authors
Bradford C. Backus
John J. Guinan Jr
Publication date
01-12-2007
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Issue 4/2007
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Electronic ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-007-0100-0

Other articles of this Issue 4/2007

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 4/2007 Go to the issue