Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 3/2006

01-09-2006

Current-Level Discrimination in the Context of Interleaved, Multichannel Stimulation in Cochlear Implants: Effects of Number of Stimulated Electrodes, Pulse Rate, and Electrode Separation

Authors: Ward R. Drennan, Bryan E. Pfingst

Published in: Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology | Issue 3/2006

Login to get access

Abstract

The ability of cochlear implantees to detect an increment in current level at one of many stimulated electrodes was investigated. Such changes in the electric profile provide information for cochlear implantees to discriminate numerous sounds, especially vowels. In Experiment 1, sensitivity to increases in current level at one stimulation site in the electric profile decreased as the number of stimulated electrodes increased. This outcome was most likely a result of decreased stimulus levels at individual electrodes that were required to retain a comfortable loudness when the number of active electrodes was increased. Experiment 2 investigated the effects of pulse rate and separation between stimulation sites when the levels in percent of dynamic range and number of stimulated electrodes were held constant. The effect of pulse rate and electrode separation varied among listeners. The sensitivity of 6 of 9 listeners was best at the pulse rate that they used clinically. This might have been the result of adaptation to the clinical pulse rate, or listeners might have chosen their inherently best pulse rate during the clinical fitting.
Literature
go back to reference BoËx C, Kos M-I, Pelizzone M. Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114:2058–2065, 2003.PubMedCrossRef BoËx C, Kos M-I, Pelizzone M. Forward masking in different cochlear implant systems. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 114:2058–2065, 2003.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Chatterjee M, Shannon RV. Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103:2565–2572, 1998.PubMedCrossRef Chatterjee M, Shannon RV. Forward masked excitation patterns in multielectrode electrical stimulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103:2565–2572, 1998.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference de Balthasar C, BoËx C, Cosendai G, Valentini G, Sigrist A, Plizzone M. Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjects. Hear. Res. 182:77–87, 2003.PubMedCrossRef de Balthasar C, BoËx C, Cosendai G, Valentini G, Sigrist A, Plizzone M. Channel interactions with high-rate biphasic electrical stimulation in cochlear implant subjects. Hear. Res. 182:77–87, 2003.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Drennan WR, Pfingst BE. Current-level discrimination using bipolar and monopolar electrode configurations in cochlear implants. Hear. Res. 202:170–179, 2005.PubMedCrossRef Drennan WR, Pfingst BE. Current-level discrimination using bipolar and monopolar electrode configurations in cochlear implants. Hear. Res. 202:170–179, 2005.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Green DM. Profile Analysis. Oxford University Press, NY, 1988. Green DM. Profile Analysis. Oxford University Press, NY, 1988.
go back to reference Holden LK, Skinner MW, Holden TA. Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy. Ear. Hear. 23:463–476, 2002.PubMedCrossRef Holden LK, Skinner MW, Holden TA. Effects of stimulation rate with the Nucleus 24 ACE speech coding strategy. Ear. Hear. 23:463–476, 2002.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Levitt H. Transformed up–down methods in psychoacoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49:467–477, 1971.PubMedCrossRef Levitt H. Transformed up–down methods in psychoacoustics. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49:467–477, 1971.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Lim HH, Tong YC, Clark GM. Forward masking patterns produced by intracochlear electrical stimulation of one and two electrode pairs in the human cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86:971–980, 1989.PubMedCrossRef Lim HH, Tong YC, Clark GM. Forward masking patterns produced by intracochlear electrical stimulation of one and two electrode pairs in the human cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 86:971–980, 1989.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Loizou PC, Poroy O, Dorman M. The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108:790–802, 2000.PubMedCrossRef Loizou PC, Poroy O, Dorman M. The effect of parametric variations of cochlear implant processors on speech understanding J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 108:790–802, 2000.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference McKay CM. Psychophysics and electrical stimulation. In: Zeng FG, Popper AN, and Fay RR (eds) Cochlear Implants: Auditory Prostheses and Electric Hearing. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 286–333, 2004. McKay CM. Psychophysics and electrical stimulation. In: Zeng FG, Popper AN, and Fay RR (eds) Cochlear Implants: Auditory Prostheses and Electric Hearing. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 286–333, 2004.
go back to reference McKay CM, Henshall KR, Farrell RJ, McDermott HJ. A practical method of predicting the loudness of complex electrical stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113:2054–2063, 2003.PubMedCrossRef McKay CM, Henshall KR, Farrell RJ, McDermott HJ. A practical method of predicting the loudness of complex electrical stimuli. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 113:2054–2063, 2003.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nadol JB Jr. Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlear and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 117:220–228, 1997.PubMedCrossRef Nadol JB Jr. Patterns of neural degeneration in the human cochlear and auditory nerve: implications for cochlear implantation. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Surg. 117:220–228, 1997.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Nadol JB Jr., Young Y-S, Glynn RJ. Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound hearing loss: implication for cochlear implantation. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 98:411–416, 1989.PubMed Nadol JB Jr., Young Y-S, Glynn RJ. Survival of spiral ganglion cells in profound hearing loss: implication for cochlear implantation. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 98:411–416, 1989.PubMed
go back to reference Nelson DA, Schmitz JL, Donaldson GS, Viemeister NE, Javel E. Intensity discrimination as a function of stimulus level with electric stimulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100:2393–2414, 1996.PubMedCrossRef Nelson DA, Schmitz JL, Donaldson GS, Viemeister NE, Javel E. Intensity discrimination as a function of stimulus level with electric stimulation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100:2393–2414, 1996.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Pfingst BE, Burnett PA, Sutton D. Intensity discrimination with cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73:1283–1292, 1983.PubMedCrossRef Pfingst BE, Burnett PA, Sutton D. Intensity discrimination with cochlear implants. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 73:1283–1292, 1983.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Shannon RV. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear. Res. 11:157–189, 1983.PubMedCrossRef Shannon RV. Multichannel electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve in man. I. Basic psychophysics. Hear. Res. 11:157–189, 1983.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Shepherd RK, Roberts LA, Paolini AG. Long-term sensorineural hearing loss induces functional changes in the rat auditory nerve. Eur. J. Neurosci. 20:3131–3140, 2004.PubMedCrossRef Shepherd RK, Roberts LA, Paolini AG. Long-term sensorineural hearing loss induces functional changes in the rat auditory nerve. Eur. J. Neurosci. 20:3131–3140, 2004.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Skinner MW, Arndt PL, Staller SJ. Nucleus 24 advanced encoder conversion study: performance vs preference. Ear Hear. 23:2S–25S, 2002.PubMedCrossRef Skinner MW, Arndt PL, Staller SJ. Nucleus 24 advanced encoder conversion study: performance vs preference. Ear Hear. 23:2S–25S, 2002.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Tong YC, Clark GM. Loudness summation, masking and temporal interaction for sensations produced by electric stimulation of two sites in the human cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79:1958–1966, 1986.PubMedCrossRef Tong YC, Clark GM. Loudness summation, masking and temporal interaction for sensations produced by electric stimulation of two sites in the human cochlea. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 79:1958–1966, 1986.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Vandali AE, Whitford LA, Plant KL, Clark GM. Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Ear Hear. 21:608–624, 2000.PubMedCrossRef Vandali AE, Whitford LA, Plant KL, Clark GM. Speech perception as a function of electrical stimulation rate: using the Nucleus 24 cochlear implant system. Ear Hear. 21:608–624, 2000.PubMedCrossRef
go back to reference Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, Rabinowitz WM. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 352(6332):236–238, 1991.PubMedCrossRef Wilson BS, Finley CC, Lawson DT, Wolford RD, Eddington DK, Rabinowitz WM. Better speech recognition with cochlear implants. Nature 352(6332):236–238, 1991.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Current-Level Discrimination in the Context of Interleaved, Multichannel Stimulation in Cochlear Implants: Effects of Number of Stimulated Electrodes, Pulse Rate, and Electrode Separation
Authors
Ward R. Drennan
Bryan E. Pfingst
Publication date
01-09-2006
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology / Issue 3/2006
Print ISSN: 1525-3961
Electronic ISSN: 1438-7573
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10162-006-0045-8

Other articles of this Issue 3/2006

Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology 3/2006 Go to the issue