Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 4/2017

01-04-2017 | Original Article

A pilot study assessing the efficacy of posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of low anterior resection syndrome

Authors: V. Vigorita, S. Rausei, P. Troncoso Pereira, I. Trostchansky, A. Ruano Poblador, E. Moncada Iribarren, C. Facal Alvarez, A. de San Ildefonso Pereira, E. Casal Núñez

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 4/2017

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Low anterior resection for rectal cancer often results in severe bowel dysfunction, specifically low anterior resection syndrome (LARS), with symptoms such as incontinence, urgency, and frequent bowel movements. Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) resulted in a high rate of success in patients with fecal incontinence. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of treatment with PTNS in LARS and to identify predictors of the outcome of the technique.

Methods

The study was conducted from May 2012 to April 2015 at the Alvaro Cunqueiro Hospital, University Hospital Complex of Vigo, Spain. Ten patients with LARS were recruited consecutively. All patients underwent 2 sessions per week (30 min each one) for 6 weeks. Patients were followed for 3 weeks, and those who had a significant clinical improvement were recruited to a second phase of PTNS. Some patients presenting with relapse during follow-up underwent an additional phase of PTNS. Outcome measures included Wexner scores, quality of life scores, and urgency of defecation.

Results

Three patients did not complete the treatment due to poor response in the first phase. Incontinence was reduced in the remaining seven of ten patients. The median Wexner score at initial patient evaluation was 14 (IQR 10.75–18.5), which decreased to 10 (IQR 6.5–18) after treatment (p = 0.034). A statistically significant improvement was demonstrated in quality of life scale, lifestyle, depression, and daily defecation urgency (p < 0.05). LARS Score improvement was observed in five patients (50%) with a total resolution of LARS in 2 (20%).

Conclusions

PTNS is an ambulatory treatment that could play an important role in the context of a multimodal treatment approach in patients with LARS. It could be a first-line treatment to identify non-responders to conservative management who need different and more invasive treatments.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Andreyev J (2007) Gastrointestinal symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy: a new understanding to improve management of symptomatic patients. Lancet Oncol 8(11):1007–1017CrossRefPubMed Andreyev J (2007) Gastrointestinal symptoms after pelvic radiotherapy: a new understanding to improve management of symptomatic patients. Lancet Oncol 8(11):1007–1017CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Bregendahl S, Emmertsen KJ, Lous J, Laurberg S (2013) Bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection with and without neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study. Colorectal Dis 15:1130–1139PubMed Bregendahl S, Emmertsen KJ, Lous J, Laurberg S (2013) Bowel dysfunction after low anterior resection with and without neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer: a population-based cross-sectional study. Colorectal Dis 15:1130–1139PubMed
3.
go back to reference Contin P, Kulu Y, Bruckner T, Sturm M, Welsch T et al (2014) Comparative analysis of late functional outcome following preoperative radiation therapy or chemoradiotherapy and surgery or surgery alone in rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:165–175CrossRefPubMed Contin P, Kulu Y, Bruckner T, Sturm M, Welsch T et al (2014) Comparative analysis of late functional outcome following preoperative radiation therapy or chemoradiotherapy and surgery or surgery alone in rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 29:165–175CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Madoff RD, Parker SC, Varma MG, Lowry AC (2004) Faecal incontinence in adults. Lancet 364(9434):621–632CrossRefPubMed Madoff RD, Parker SC, Varma MG, Lowry AC (2004) Faecal incontinence in adults. Lancet 364(9434):621–632CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Maeda Y, Matzel K, Lundby L, Buntzen S, Laurberg S (2011) Postoperative issues of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence and constipation: a systematic literature review and treatment guideline. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1443–1460CrossRefPubMed Maeda Y, Matzel K, Lundby L, Buntzen S, Laurberg S (2011) Postoperative issues of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence and constipation: a systematic literature review and treatment guideline. Dis Colon Rectum 54:1443–1460CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Dudding TC, Hollingshead JR, Nicholls RJ, Vaizey CJ (2011) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: optimizing outcome and managing complications. Colorectal Dis 13:196–202CrossRef Dudding TC, Hollingshead JR, Nicholls RJ, Vaizey CJ (2011) Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: optimizing outcome and managing complications. Colorectal Dis 13:196–202CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cooperberg MR, Stoller ML (2005) Percutaneous neuromodulation. Urolo Clin North Am 33:71–78CrossRef Cooperberg MR, Stoller ML (2005) Percutaneous neuromodulation. Urolo Clin North Am 33:71–78CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Van Balken MR, Vandoninck V, Gisolf KW, Vergunst H, Kiemeney LA et al (2001) Posterior tibial nerve stimulation as neuromodulative treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction. J Urol 166(3):914–918CrossRefPubMed Van Balken MR, Vandoninck V, Gisolf KW, Vergunst H, Kiemeney LA et al (2001) Posterior tibial nerve stimulation as neuromodulative treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction. J Urol 166(3):914–918CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Van Balken MR (2007) Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation: the urgent PC device. Expert Rev Med Devices 4(5):693–698CrossRefPubMed Van Balken MR (2007) Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation: the urgent PC device. Expert Rev Med Devices 4(5):693–698CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Shafik A, Ahmed I, El-sibai O, Mostafa RM (2003) Percutaneous peripheral neuromodulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Eur Surg Res 35:103–107CrossRefPubMed Shafik A, Ahmed I, El-sibai O, Mostafa RM (2003) Percutaneous peripheral neuromodulation in the treatment of fecal incontinence. Eur Surg Res 35:103–107CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Matzel KE (2011) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: its role in the treatment algorithm. Colorectal Dis 13(Supple 2):10–14CrossRefPubMed Matzel KE (2011) Sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: its role in the treatment algorithm. Colorectal Dis 13(Supple 2):10–14CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Gourcerol G, Vitton V, Leroi AM, Michot F, Abysique A, Bouvier M (2011) How sacral nerve stimulation works in patients with faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 13:203–211CrossRef Gourcerol G, Vitton V, Leroi AM, Michot F, Abysique A, Bouvier M (2011) How sacral nerve stimulation works in patients with faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 13:203–211CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Giani I, Novelli E, Martina S et al (2011) The effect of sacral nerve modulation on cerebral evoked potential latency in fecal incontinence and constipation. Ann Surg 254:90–96CrossRefPubMed Giani I, Novelli E, Martina S et al (2011) The effect of sacral nerve modulation on cerebral evoked potential latency in fecal incontinence and constipation. Ann Surg 254:90–96CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Griffin KM, Pikering M, O’Herlihy C, O’Connel PR, Jones JF (2011) Sacral nerve stimulation increases activation of the primary somatosensory cortex by anal canal stimulation in an experimental model. Br J Surg 98:1160–1169CrossRefPubMed Griffin KM, Pikering M, O’Herlihy C, O’Connel PR, Jones JF (2011) Sacral nerve stimulation increases activation of the primary somatosensory cortex by anal canal stimulation in an experimental model. Br J Surg 98:1160–1169CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Vitton V, Abysique A, Gaige S, Leroi AM, Bouvier M (2008) Colonosphincteric electromyographic responses to sacral root stimulation: evidence for a somatosympathetic reflex. Neurogastroenterol Motil 20:407–416CrossRefPubMed Vitton V, Abysique A, Gaige S, Leroi AM, Bouvier M (2008) Colonosphincteric electromyographic responses to sacral root stimulation: evidence for a somatosympathetic reflex. Neurogastroenterol Motil 20:407–416CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Vitton V, Damon H, Roman S, Mion F (2010) Transcutaneous electrical posterior tibial nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: effects on symptoms and quality of life. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:1017–1020CrossRefPubMed Vitton V, Damon H, Roman S, Mion F (2010) Transcutaneous electrical posterior tibial nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: effects on symptoms and quality of life. Int J Colorectal Dis 25:1017–1020CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Juul T, Ahlberg M, Biondo S, Emmertsen KJ, Espin E et al (2014) International validation of the low anterior resection syndrome score. Ann Surg 259(4):728–734CrossRefPubMed Juul T, Ahlberg M, Biondo S, Emmertsen KJ, Espin E et al (2014) International validation of the low anterior resection syndrome score. Ann Surg 259(4):728–734CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97CrossRefPubMed Jorge JM, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW et al (2000) Fecal Incontinence quality of life scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43:9–16CrossRefPubMed Rockwood TH, Church JM, Fleshman JW et al (2000) Fecal Incontinence quality of life scale: quality of life instrument for patients with fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 43:9–16CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference de La Portilla F, Rada R, Vega J et al (2009) Evaluation of the use of posterior tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence: preliminary results of a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1427–1433CrossRefPubMed de La Portilla F, Rada R, Vega J et al (2009) Evaluation of the use of posterior tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence: preliminary results of a prospective study. Dis Colon Rectum 52:1427–1433CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Govaert B, Pares D, Delgado-Aros S, La Torre F et al (2010) A prospective multicentre study to investigate percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 12:1236–1241CrossRefPubMed Govaert B, Pares D, Delgado-Aros S, La Torre F et al (2010) A prospective multicentre study to investigate percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence. Colorectal Dis 12:1236–1241CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Boyle DJ, Prosser K, Allison ME, Williams NS, Chan CL (2010) Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of urge fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 53(4):432–437CrossRefPubMed Boyle DJ, Prosser K, Allison ME, Williams NS, Chan CL (2010) Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for the treatment of urge fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 53(4):432–437CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Hotouras A, Allison M, Currie A, Knowles CH, Chan CL, Thaha MA (2012) Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: a video demonstration. Dis Colon Rectum 55:711–713CrossRefPubMed Hotouras A, Allison M, Currie A, Knowles CH, Chan CL, Thaha MA (2012) Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence: a video demonstration. Dis Colon Rectum 55:711–713CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Knowles CH, Horrocks EJ, Bremner SA, On behalf of the CONFIDeNT Study Group et al (2015) Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sham electrical stimulation for treatment of fecal incontinence in adults (CONFINDeNT): a double-blind, multicentre, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 386:1640–1648CrossRefPubMed Knowles CH, Horrocks EJ, Bremner SA, On behalf of the CONFIDeNT Study Group et al (2015) Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation versus sham electrical stimulation for treatment of fecal incontinence in adults (CONFINDeNT): a double-blind, multicentre, pragmatic, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial. Lancet 386:1640–1648CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Wexner SD (2015) Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in faecal incontinence. Lancet 386:1605–1606CrossRefPubMed Wexner SD (2015) Percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation in faecal incontinence. Lancet 386:1605–1606CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Hartley P, Milosevic I, Goldacre B, COMPare Project Team (2016) The CONFIDeNT trial. Lancet 387(10019):643CrossRefPubMed Hartley P, Milosevic I, Goldacre B, COMPare Project Team (2016) The CONFIDeNT trial. Lancet 387(10019):643CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference de la Portilla F, Laporte M, Maestre MV, Diaz-Pavon M, Gollonet JL et al (2014) Percutaneous neuromodulation of the posterior tibial nerve for the treatment of fecal incontinence—mid-term results: is retreatment required?. Colorectal Dis 16(4):304–310CrossRefPubMed de la Portilla F, Laporte M, Maestre MV, Diaz-Pavon M, Gollonet JL et al (2014) Percutaneous neuromodulation of the posterior tibial nerve for the treatment of fecal incontinence—mid-term results: is retreatment required?. Colorectal Dis 16(4):304–310CrossRefPubMed
29.
Metadata
Title
A pilot study assessing the efficacy of posterior tibial nerve stimulation in the treatment of low anterior resection syndrome
Authors
V. Vigorita
S. Rausei
P. Troncoso Pereira
I. Trostchansky
A. Ruano Poblador
E. Moncada Iribarren
C. Facal Alvarez
A. de San Ildefonso Pereira
E. Casal Núñez
Publication date
01-04-2017
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 4/2017
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-017-1608-x

Other articles of this Issue 4/2017

Techniques in Coloproctology 4/2017 Go to the issue