Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 10/2016

01-10-2016 | Original Article

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in male patients with external rectal prolapse is associated with a high reoperation rate

Authors: T. Rautio, J. Mäkelä-Kaikkonen, M. Vaarala, M. Kairaluoma, J. Kössi, M. Carpelan-Holmström, S. Salmenkylä, P. Ohtonen, J. Mäkelä

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 10/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy has been used to treat male patients with external rectal prolapse, but evidence to support this approach is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of this new abdominal rectopexy surgical technique in men.

Methods

This was a retrospective multicenter study. Adult male patients who were operated on for external rectal prolapse using ventral rectopexy in five tertiary hospitals in Finland between 2006 and 2014 were included in the study. Patient demographics, detailed operative, postoperative and short-term follow-up data were collected from patient registers in participating hospitals. A questionnaire and informed consent form was sent to all patients. The questionnaire included scores for anal incontinence, obstructed defecation syndrome, urinary symptoms and sexual dysfunction. The main outcome measure was the incidence of recurrent rectal prolapse. Surgical morbidity, the need for surgical repair due to recurrent symptoms and functional outcomes were secondary outcome measures.

Results

A total of 52 adult male patients with symptoms caused by external rectal prolapse underwent ventral rectopexy. The questionnaire response rate was 64.4 %. Baseline clinical characteristics and perioperative results were similar in the responder and non-responder groups. A total of 9 (17.3 %) patients faced complications. There were two (3.8 %) serious surgical complications during the 30-day period after surgery that necessitated reoperation. None of the complications were mesh related. Recurrence of the prolapse was noticed in nine patients (17 %), and postoperative mucosal anal prolapse symptoms persisted in 11 patients (21 %). As a result, the reoperation rate was high. Altogether, 17 patients (33 %) underwent reoperation during the follow-up period due to postoperative complications or recurrent rectal or mucosal prolapse. According to the postoperative questionnaire data, patients under 40 had good functional results in terms of anal continence, defecation, urinary functions and sexual activity.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is a safe surgical procedure in male patients with external prolapse. However, a high overall reoperation rate was noticed due to recurrent rectal and residual mucosal prolapse. This suggests that the ventral rectopexy technique should be modified or combined with other abdominal or perineal methods when treating male rectal prolapse patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lundby L, Laurberg S (2014) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for obstructed defecation syndrome: time for a critical appraisal. Colorectal Dis 17:102–103CrossRef Lundby L, Laurberg S (2014) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for obstructed defecation syndrome: time for a critical appraisal. Colorectal Dis 17:102–103CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Kairaluoma MV, Kellokumpu IH (2005) Epidemiologic aspects of complete rectal prolapse. Scand J Surg 94:207–210PubMed Kairaluoma MV, Kellokumpu IH (2005) Epidemiologic aspects of complete rectal prolapse. Scand J Surg 94:207–210PubMed
3.
go back to reference Senapati A, Gray RG, Middleton LJ et al (2013) PROSPER: a randomized comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 15:858–870CrossRefPubMed Senapati A, Gray RG, Middleton LJ et al (2013) PROSPER: a randomized comparison of surgical treatments for rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 15:858–870CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Samaranayake CB, Luo C, Plank AW, Merrie AE, Plank LD, Bissett IP (2010) Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Dis 12:504–512CrossRefPubMed Samaranayake CB, Luo C, Plank AW, Merrie AE, Plank LD, Bissett IP (2010) Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal Dis 12:504–512CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Faucheron JL, Trilling B, Girard E, Sage PY, Barbois S, Reche F (2015) Anterior rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Technical and functional results. World J Gastroenterol 21:5049–5055CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Faucheron JL, Trilling B, Girard E, Sage PY, Barbois S, Reche F (2015) Anterior rectopexy for full-thickness rectal prolapse. Technical and functional results. World J Gastroenterol 21:5049–5055CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F (2004) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 91:1500–1505CrossRefPubMed D’Hoore A, Cadoni R, Penninckx F (2004) Long-term outcome of laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for total rectal prolapse. Br J Surg 91:1500–1505CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Randall J, Smyth E, McCarthy K, Dixon AR (2014) Outcome of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for external rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 16:914–919CrossRefPubMed Randall J, Smyth E, McCarthy K, Dixon AR (2014) Outcome of laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy for external rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 16:914–919CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Consten EC, van Iersel JJ, Verheijen PM, Broeders IA, Wolthuis AM, D’Hoore A (2015) Long-term outcome after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: an observational study of 919 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 262:742–747CrossRefPubMed Consten EC, van Iersel JJ, Verheijen PM, Broeders IA, Wolthuis AM, D’Hoore A (2015) Long-term outcome after laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy: an observational study of 919 consecutive patients. Ann Surg 262:742–747CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Gosselink MP, Joshi H, Adusumilli S et al (2015) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for faecal incontinence: equivalent benefit is seen in internal and external rectal prolapse. J Gastrointest Surg 19:558–563CrossRefPubMed Gosselink MP, Joshi H, Adusumilli S et al (2015) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy for faecal incontinence: equivalent benefit is seen in internal and external rectal prolapse. J Gastrointest Surg 19:558–563CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Slawik S, Soulsby R, Carter H, Payne H, Dixon AR (2008) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy, posterior colporrhaphy and vaginal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of recto-genital prolapse and mechanical outlet obstruction. Colorectal Dis 10:138–143PubMed Slawik S, Soulsby R, Carter H, Payne H, Dixon AR (2008) Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy, posterior colporrhaphy and vaginal sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of recto-genital prolapse and mechanical outlet obstruction. Colorectal Dis 10:138–143PubMed
11.
go back to reference Owais AE, Sumrien H, Mabey K, McCarthy K, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR (2014) Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in male patients with internal or external rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 16:995–1000CrossRefPubMed Owais AE, Sumrien H, Mabey K, McCarthy K, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR (2014) Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy in male patients with internal or external rectal prolapse. Colorectal Dis 16:995–1000CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mercer-Jones MA, D’Hoore A, Dixon AR et al (2014) Consensus on ventral rectopexy: report of a panel of experts. Colorectal Dis 16:82–88CrossRefPubMed Mercer-Jones MA, D’Hoore A, Dixon AR et al (2014) Consensus on ventral rectopexy: report of a panel of experts. Colorectal Dis 16:82–88CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Jorge JMN, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97CrossRefPubMed Jorge JMN, Wexner SD (1993) Etiology and management of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 36:77–97CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Altomare DF, Spazzafumo L, Rinaldi M, Dodi G, Ghiselli R, Piloni V (2009) Set-up and statistical validation of a new scoring system for obstructed defecation syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 52:592–597CrossRef Altomare DF, Spazzafumo L, Rinaldi M, Dodi G, Ghiselli R, Piloni V (2009) Set-up and statistical validation of a new scoring system for obstructed defecation syndrome. Dis Colon Rectum 52:592–597CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Cappelleri JC, Rosen RC, Smith MD, Mishra A, Osterloh IH (1999) Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function. Urology 54:346–351CrossRefPubMed Cappelleri JC, Rosen RC, Smith MD, Mishra A, Osterloh IH (1999) Diagnostic evaluation of the erectile function domain of the International Index of Erectile Function. Urology 54:346–351CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O’Leary MP et al (1992) The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol 148:1549–1557PubMed Barry MJ, Fowler FJ Jr, O’Leary MP et al (1992) The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol 148:1549–1557PubMed
17.
go back to reference Irwin DE, Milsom I, Kopp Z, Abrams P, Artibani W, Herschorn S (2009) Prevalence, severity, and symptom bother of lower urinary tract symptoms among men in the EPIC study: impact of overactive bladder. Eur Urol 56:14–20CrossRefPubMed Irwin DE, Milsom I, Kopp Z, Abrams P, Artibani W, Herschorn S (2009) Prevalence, severity, and symptom bother of lower urinary tract symptoms among men in the EPIC study: impact of overactive bladder. Eur Urol 56:14–20CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy in male patients with external rectal prolapse is associated with a high reoperation rate
Authors
T. Rautio
J. Mäkelä-Kaikkonen
M. Vaarala
M. Kairaluoma
J. Kössi
M. Carpelan-Holmström
S. Salmenkylä
P. Ohtonen
J. Mäkelä
Publication date
01-10-2016
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 10/2016
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-016-1528-1

Other articles of this Issue 10/2016

Techniques in Coloproctology 10/2016 Go to the issue