Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology 4/2010

01-12-2010 | Original Article

Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer: matched comparison in elderly and younger patients

Authors: V. Fiscon, G. Portale, F. Frigo, G. Migliorini

Published in: Techniques in Coloproctology | Issue 4/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Several studies have addressed the issue of the feasibility of laparoscopic colorectal surgery in elderly patients, usually by choosing an arbitrary cut-off age limit, and retrospectively evaluating patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of age on the outcome of laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer in a single department, by comparing younger and older patients, matched by ASA score and type of operation.

Methods

The perioperative outcome of patients ≥75 years old who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer between June 2005 and January 2009 were compared with findings in younger patients, matched by ASA score and type of operation.

Results

The study included 100 patients, fifty <75 years old (Group A) and fifty ≥75 (Group B) years old. There were 18 right hemicolectomies, 16 left hemicolectomies, 4 anterior resections, 9 low anterior resections, 2 Miles’ operations and 1 segmental resection in each group. We observed a significantly higher overall morbidity rate among elderly patients than among younger patients (24 vs. 8%).

Conclusions

Short-term results after laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer in patients ≥75 years old reveal that they have higher postoperative risk compared to their younger counterparts, even when matched by ASA score and type of operation. It suggests that although advanced age, per se, is not a contraindication, it is a risk for patients who undergo laparoscopic colorectal surgery for cancer. This surgery in elderly patients should be performed by experienced surgeons in specialized centers to keep postoperative risk to a minimum.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Lacy AM, Garcìa-Valdecasas LC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed Lacy AM, Garcìa-Valdecasas LC, Delgado S et al (2002) Laparoscopy-assisted colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of non-metastatic colon cancer: a randomized trial. Lancet 359:2224–2229CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P (1998) A prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187:146–154CrossRef Milsom JW, Bohm B, Hammerhofer KA, Fazio V, Steiger E, Elson P (1998) A prospective randomized trial comparing laparoscopic versus conventional techniques in colorectal cancer surgery: a preliminary report. J Am Coll Surg 187:146–154CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Kwok SP, Lau WY, Carey PD, Kelly SB, Leung KL, Li AK (1996) Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted large bowel excision for cancer. Ann Surg 223:170–176CrossRefPubMed Kwok SP, Lau WY, Carey PD, Kelly SB, Leung KL, Li AK (1996) Prospective evaluation of laparoscopic-assisted large bowel excision for cancer. Ann Surg 223:170–176CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wexner SD, Cohen SM, Johansen OB, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG (1993) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. A prospective assessment and current perspective. Br J Surg 80:1602–1605CrossRefPubMed Wexner SD, Cohen SM, Johansen OB, Nogueras JJ, Jagelman DG (1993) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. A prospective assessment and current perspective. Br J Surg 80:1602–1605CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Seshadri PA, Mamazza J, Schlachta CM, Cadeddu MO, Poulin EC (2001) Laparoscopic colorectal resection in octogenarians. Surg Endosc 15:802–805CrossRefPubMed Seshadri PA, Mamazza J, Schlachta CM, Cadeddu MO, Poulin EC (2001) Laparoscopic colorectal resection in octogenarians. Surg Endosc 15:802–805CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM (2000) Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:326–332CrossRefPubMed Stocchi L, Nelson H, Young-Fadok TM, Larson DR, Ilstrup DM (2000) Safety and advantages of laparoscopic vs. open colectomy in the elderly: matched-control study. Dis Colon Rectum 43:326–332CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Delgado S, Lacy AM, Garcìa-Valdecasas JC et al (2000) Could age be an indication for laparoscopic colectomy in colorectal cancer? Surg Endosc 14:22–26CrossRefPubMed Delgado S, Lacy AM, Garcìa-Valdecasas JC et al (2000) Could age be an indication for laparoscopic colectomy in colorectal cancer? Surg Endosc 14:22–26CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Vignali A, Di Palo S, Tamburini A, Radaelli G, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2005) Laparoscopic vs. open colectomies in octogenarians: a case-matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2070–2075CrossRefPubMed Vignali A, Di Palo S, Tamburini A, Radaelli G, Orsenigo E, Staudacher C (2005) Laparoscopic vs. open colectomies in octogenarians: a case-matched control study. Dis Colon Rectum 48:2070–2075CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference De Santis L, Frigo F (2005) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly. Acta Biomed 76:S24–S26 De Santis L, Frigo F (2005) Laparoscopic colorectal surgery in the elderly. Acta Biomed 76:S24–S26
10.
go back to reference Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Hugel O, Yildrim C, Lippert H, Kockerling F (2005) Laparoscopic surgery in the old patient: do indications and outcome differ? Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:328–332CrossRefPubMed Scheidbach H, Schneider C, Hugel O, Yildrim C, Lippert H, Kockerling F (2005) Laparoscopic surgery in the old patient: do indications and outcome differ? Langenbecks Arch Surg 390:328–332CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H, Baba H, Kitajima M (2003) Short-term surgical outcome of laparoscopic colonic surgery in octogenarians: a matched case-control study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:95–100CrossRefPubMed Yamamoto S, Watanabe M, Hasegawa H, Baba H, Kitajima M (2003) Short-term surgical outcome of laparoscopic colonic surgery in octogenarians: a matched case-control study. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 13:95–100CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, Fry R, Fleshman J (2003) Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 17:923–929CrossRefPubMed Sklow B, Read T, Birnbaum E, Fry R, Fleshman J (2003) Age and type of procedure influence the choice of patients for laparoscopic colectomy. Surg Endosc 17:923–929CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Cheung HY, Chung CC, Fung JT, Wong JC, Yau KK, Li MK (2007) Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in octogenarians: results in a decade. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1905–1910CrossRefPubMed Cheung HY, Chung CC, Fung JT, Wong JC, Yau KK, Li MK (2007) Laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer in octogenarians: results in a decade. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1905–1910CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group (2000) Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review. Lancet 356:968–974CrossRef Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group (2000) Surgery for colorectal cancer in elderly patients: a systematic review. Lancet 356:968–974CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Nascimbeni R, Di Fabio F, Di Betta E, Salerni B (2009) The changing impact of age on colorectal cancer surgery: a trend analysis. Colorectal Dis 11:13–18CrossRefPubMed Nascimbeni R, Di Fabio F, Di Betta E, Salerni B (2009) The changing impact of age on colorectal cancer surgery: a trend analysis. Colorectal Dis 11:13–18CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Schwandner O, Schiedeck TH, Bruch HP (1999) Advanced age: indication or contraindication for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Dis Colon Rectum 42:356–362CrossRefPubMed Schwandner O, Schiedeck TH, Bruch HP (1999) Advanced age: indication or contraindication for laparoscopic colorectal surgery? Dis Colon Rectum 42:356–362CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMed Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR (1987) A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chron Dis 40:373–383CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Crea N, Di Fabio F, Pata G, Nascimbeni R (2009) APACHE II, POSSUM, and ASA scores in the risk of perioperative complications in patients with colorectal disease. Ann Ital Chir 80:177–181PubMed Crea N, Di Fabio F, Pata G, Nascimbeni R (2009) APACHE II, POSSUM, and ASA scores in the risk of perioperative complications in patients with colorectal disease. Ann Ital Chir 80:177–181PubMed
Metadata
Title
Laparoscopic resection of colorectal cancer: matched comparison in elderly and younger patients
Authors
V. Fiscon
G. Portale
F. Frigo
G. Migliorini
Publication date
01-12-2010
Publisher
Springer Milan
Published in
Techniques in Coloproctology / Issue 4/2010
Print ISSN: 1123-6337
Electronic ISSN: 1128-045X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10151-010-0635-7

Other articles of this Issue 4/2010

Techniques in Coloproctology 4/2010 Go to the issue