Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 2/2018

01-04-2018 | Original Article

Acute toxicity of image-guided hypofractionated proton therapy for localized prostate cancer

Authors: Koichiro Nakajima, Hiromitsu Iwata, Hiroyuki Ogino, Yukiko Hattori, Shingo Hashimoto, Mikiko Nakanishi, Toshiyuki Toshito, Yukihiro Umemoto, Shoichiro Iwatsuki, Yuta Shibamoto, Jun-etsu Mizoe

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 2/2018

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Hypofractionated proton therapy (HFPT) is expected to become an effective treatment approach for localized prostate cancer (PCa). The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in acute toxicity among patients with localized PCa treated with either conventional fractionated proton therapy (CFPT) or HFPT.

Methods

A total of 526 eligible patients treated with proton therapy between February 2013 and May 2016 in three phase II trials were analyzed. We prescribed 74 gray relative biological effectiveness equivalents [Gy (RBE)]/37 fractions for low-risk patients and 78 Gy (RBE)/39 fractions for intermediate- and high-risk patients in the CFPT group (n = 254) and 60 Gy (RBE)/20 fractions for low-risk and 63 Gy (RBE)/21 fractions for intermediate- and high-risk patients in the HFPT group (n = 272). Patients were evaluated for acute toxicity with the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0, and urinary quality-of-life change using the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS).

Results

No grade ≥3 acute toxicity was observed in either group. Among acute genitourinary toxicities, grade 2 rates were 15% (n = 38) in CFPT and 5.9% (n = 16) in HFPT (P ≤ 0.001). The median baseline IPSSs of the CFPT and HFPT groups were 7 (0–29) and 6 (0–31), respectively (P = 0.70). One-month post-treatment scores were 9 (0–32) and 11 (0–32), respectively (P = 0.036), and 6-month post-treatment scores were 7 (0–30) and 7 (0–33), respectively (P = 0.88). There were no significant differences in acute gastrointestinal toxicity between the two groups.

Conclusion

Our results demonstrated the safety of HFPT for localized PCa patients in terms of acute toxicity.
Literature
2.
go back to reference Hoppe B, Henderson R, Mendenhall WM et al (2011) Proton therapy for prostate cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 25:644–650, 652 Hoppe B, Henderson R, Mendenhall WM et al (2011) Proton therapy for prostate cancer. Oncology (Williston Park) 25:644–650, 652
3.
go back to reference Pugh TJ, Munsell MF, Choi S et al (2013) Quality of life and toxicity from passively scattered and spot-scanning proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87:946–953CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pugh TJ, Munsell MF, Choi S et al (2013) Quality of life and toxicity from passively scattered and spot-scanning proton beam therapy for localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 87:946–953CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Mendenhall NP, Hoppe BS, Nichols RC et al (2014) Five-year outcomes from 3 prospective trials of image-guided proton therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88:596–602CrossRefPubMed Mendenhall NP, Hoppe BS, Nichols RC et al (2014) Five-year outcomes from 3 prospective trials of image-guided proton therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 88:596–602CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Brenner DJ, Martinez AA, Edmundson GK et al (2002) Direct evidence that prostate tumors show high sensitivity to fractionation (low alpha/beta ratio), similar to late-responding normal tissue. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 52:6–13CrossRefPubMed Brenner DJ, Martinez AA, Edmundson GK et al (2002) Direct evidence that prostate tumors show high sensitivity to fractionation (low alpha/beta ratio), similar to late-responding normal tissue. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 52:6–13CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Fowler J, Chappell R, Ritter M (2001) Is alpha/beta for prostate tumors really low? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50:1021–1031CrossRefPubMed Fowler J, Chappell R, Ritter M (2001) Is alpha/beta for prostate tumors really low? Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 50:1021–1031CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Koontz BF, Bossi A, Cozzarini C et al (2015) A systematic review of hypofractionation for primary management of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 68:683–691CrossRefPubMed Koontz BF, Bossi A, Cozzarini C et al (2015) A systematic review of hypofractionation for primary management of prostate cancer. Eur Urol 68:683–691CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Zietman AL (2016) Making radiation therapy for prostate cancer more economical and more convenient. J Clin Oncol 34:2323–2324CrossRefPubMed Zietman AL (2016) Making radiation therapy for prostate cancer more economical and more convenient. J Clin Oncol 34:2323–2324CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Dearnaley D, Syndikus I, Mossop HK et al (2016) Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial. Lancet Oncol 17:1047–1060CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Dearnaley D, Syndikus I, Mossop HK et al (2016) Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial. Lancet Oncol 17:1047–1060CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Incrocci L, Wortel RC, Alemayehu WG et al (2016) Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer (HYPRO): final efficacy results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 17:1061–1069CrossRefPubMed Incrocci L, Wortel RC, Alemayehu WG et al (2016) Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer (HYPRO): final efficacy results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 17:1061–1069CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Manabe Y, Shibamoto Y, Sugie C et al (2014) Toxicity and efficacy of three dose-fractionation regimens of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. J Radiat Res 55:494–501CrossRefPubMed Manabe Y, Shibamoto Y, Sugie C et al (2014) Toxicity and efficacy of three dose-fractionation regimens of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer. J Radiat Res 55:494–501CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Mendenhall NP, Li Z, Hoppe BS et al (2012) Early outcomes from three prospective trials of image-guided proton therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:213–221CrossRefPubMed Mendenhall NP, Li Z, Hoppe BS et al (2012) Early outcomes from three prospective trials of image-guided proton therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:213–221CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bryant C, Smith TL, Henderson RH et al (2016) Five-year biochemical results, toxicity, and patient-reported quality of life after delivery of dose-escalated image guided proton therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:422–434CrossRefPubMed Bryant C, Smith TL, Henderson RH et al (2016) Five-year biochemical results, toxicity, and patient-reported quality of life after delivery of dose-escalated image guided proton therapy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:422–434CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Fang P, Mick R, Deville C et al (2015) A case-matched study of toxicity outcomes after proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Cancer (Phila) 121:1118–1127CrossRef Fang P, Mick R, Deville C et al (2015) A case-matched study of toxicity outcomes after proton therapy and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Cancer (Phila) 121:1118–1127CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kim YJ, Cho KH, Pyo HR et al (2013) A phase II study of hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer. Acta Oncol 52:477–485CrossRefPubMed Kim YJ, Cho KH, Pyo HR et al (2013) A phase II study of hypofractionated proton therapy for prostate cancer. Acta Oncol 52:477–485CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Vargas CE, Hartsell WF, Dunn M, et al (2015) Hypofractionated versus standard fractionated proton-beam therapy for low-risk prostate cancer: interim results of a randomized trial PCG GU 002. Am J Clin Oncol (Epub ahead of print, Oct. 29, 2015) Vargas CE, Hartsell WF, Dunn M, et al (2015) Hypofractionated versus standard fractionated proton-beam therapy for low-risk prostate cancer: interim results of a randomized trial PCG GU 002. Am J Clin Oncol (Epub ahead of print, Oct. 29, 2015)
17.
go back to reference Toshito T, Omachi C, Kibe Y et al (2016) A proton therapy system in Nagoya Proton Therapy Center. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 39:645–654CrossRefPubMed Toshito T, Omachi C, Kibe Y et al (2016) A proton therapy system in Nagoya Proton Therapy Center. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 39:645–654CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Hashimoto S, Shibamoto Y, Iwata H et al (2016) Whole-pelvic radiotherapy with spot-scanning proton beams for uterine cervical cancer: a planning study. J Radiat Res 57:524–532CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hashimoto S, Shibamoto Y, Iwata H et al (2016) Whole-pelvic radiotherapy with spot-scanning proton beams for uterine cervical cancer: a planning study. J Radiat Res 57:524–532CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Moyers MF, Miller DW, Bush DA et al (2001) Methodologies and tools for proton beam design for lung tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 49:1429–1438CrossRefPubMed Moyers MF, Miller DW, Bush DA et al (2001) Methodologies and tools for proton beam design for lung tumors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 49:1429–1438CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Park PC, Zhu XR, Lee AK et al (2012) A beam-specific planning target volume (PTV) design for proton therapy to account for setup and range uncertainties. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:329–336CrossRef Park PC, Zhu XR, Lee AK et al (2012) A beam-specific planning target volume (PTV) design for proton therapy to account for setup and range uncertainties. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 82:329–336CrossRef
21.
go back to reference Hynds S, McGarry CK, Mitchell DM et al (2011) Assessing the daily consistency of bladder filling using an ultrasonic Bladderscan device in men receiving radical conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Br J Radiol 84:813–818CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hynds S, McGarry CK, Mitchell DM et al (2011) Assessing the daily consistency of bladder filling using an ultrasonic Bladderscan device in men receiving radical conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Br J Radiol 84:813–818CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Barry MJ, Fowler FJ, O’Leary MP et al (1992) The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol 148:1549–1557CrossRefPubMed Barry MJ, Fowler FJ, O’Leary MP et al (1992) The American Urological Association symptom index for benign prostatic hyperplasia. The Measurement Committee of the American Urological Association. J Urol 148:1549–1557CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458CrossRefPubMed Kanda Y (2013) Investigation of the freely available easy-to-use software “EZR” for medical statistics. Bone Marrow Transplant 48:452–458CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Catton CN, Lukka H, Gu CS et al (2017) Randomized trial of a hypofractionated radiation regimen for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 35:1884–1890CrossRefPubMed Catton CN, Lukka H, Gu CS et al (2017) Randomized trial of a hypofractionated radiation regimen for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 35:1884–1890CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Hopewell JW, Nyman J, Turesson I (2003) Time factor for acute tissue reactions following fractionated irradiation: a balance between repopulation and enhanced radiosensitivity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol 79:513–524CrossRef Hopewell JW, Nyman J, Turesson I (2003) Time factor for acute tissue reactions following fractionated irradiation: a balance between repopulation and enhanced radiosensitivity. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol 79:513–524CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Pollack A, Walker G, Horwitz EM et al (2013) Randomized trial of hypofractionated external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 31:3860–3868CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pollack A, Walker G, Horwitz EM et al (2013) Randomized trial of hypofractionated external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol 31:3860–3868CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Tomita N, Oze I, Shimizu H et al (2015) International prostate symptom score (IPSS) change and changing factor in intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Nagoya J Med Sci 77:637–646PubMedPubMedCentral Tomita N, Oze I, Shimizu H et al (2015) International prostate symptom score (IPSS) change and changing factor in intensity-modulated radiotherapy combined with androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. Nagoya J Med Sci 77:637–646PubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Norkus D, Karklelyte A, Engels B et al (2013) A randomized hypofractionation dose escalation trial for high risk prostate cancer patients: interim analysis of acute toxicity and quality of life in 124 patients. Radiat Oncol 8:206CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Norkus D, Karklelyte A, Engels B et al (2013) A randomized hypofractionation dose escalation trial for high risk prostate cancer patients: interim analysis of acute toxicity and quality of life in 124 patients. Radiat Oncol 8:206CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Haustermans KM, Hofland I, Van Poppel H et al (1997) Cell kinetic measurements in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 37:1067–1070CrossRefPubMed Haustermans KM, Hofland I, Van Poppel H et al (1997) Cell kinetic measurements in prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 37:1067–1070CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Paganetti H (2014) Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Variations as a function of biological endpoint, dose, and linear energy transfer. Phys Med Biol 59:R419–R472CrossRefPubMed Paganetti H (2014) Relative biological effectiveness (RBE) values for proton beam therapy. Variations as a function of biological endpoint, dose, and linear energy transfer. Phys Med Biol 59:R419–R472CrossRefPubMed
32.
go back to reference Girdhani S, Sachs R, Hlatky L (2013) Biological effects of proton radiation: what we know and don’t know. Radiat Res 79:257–272CrossRef Girdhani S, Sachs R, Hlatky L (2013) Biological effects of proton radiation: what we know and don’t know. Radiat Res 79:257–272CrossRef
33.
go back to reference Iwata H, Ogino H, Hashimoto S et al (2016) Spot scanning and passive scattering proton therapy: relative biological effectiveness and oxygen enhancement ratio in cultured cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:95–102CrossRefPubMed Iwata H, Ogino H, Hashimoto S et al (2016) Spot scanning and passive scattering proton therapy: relative biological effectiveness and oxygen enhancement ratio in cultured cells. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:95–102CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Acute toxicity of image-guided hypofractionated proton therapy for localized prostate cancer
Authors
Koichiro Nakajima
Hiromitsu Iwata
Hiroyuki Ogino
Yukiko Hattori
Shingo Hashimoto
Mikiko Nakanishi
Toshiyuki Toshito
Yukihiro Umemoto
Shoichiro Iwatsuki
Yuta Shibamoto
Jun-etsu Mizoe
Publication date
01-04-2018
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 2/2018
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-017-1209-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2018

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 2/2018 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine