Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 2/2015

Open Access 01-04-2015 | Special Article

Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) Guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancer

Authors: Toshiaki Watanabe, Michio Itabashi, Yasuhiro Shimada, Shinji Tanaka, Yoshinori Ito, Yoichi Ajioka, Tetsuya Hamaguchi, Ichinosuke Hyodo, Masahiro Igarashi, Hideyuki Ishida, Soichiro Ishihara, Megumi Ishiguro, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Norihiro Kokudo, Kei Muro, Atsushi Ochiai, Masahiko Oguchi, Yasuo Ohkura, Yutaka Saito, Yoshiharu Sakai, Hideki Ueno, Takayuki Yoshino, Narikazu Boku, Takahiro Fujimori, Nobuo Koinuma, Takayuki Morita, Genichi Nishimura, Yuh Sakata, Keiichi Takahashi, Osamu Tsuruta, Toshiharu Yamaguchi, Masahiro Yoshida, Naohiko Yamaguchi, Kenjiro Kotake, Kenichi Sugihara, Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 2/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Colorectal cancer is a major cause of death in Japan, where it accounts for the largest number of deaths from malignant neoplasms among women and the third largest number among men. Many new methods of treatment have been developed during recent decades. The Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum Guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancer (JSCCR Guidelines 2014) have been prepared as standard treatment strategies for colorectal cancer, to eliminate treatment disparities among institutions, to eliminate unnecessary treatment and insufficient treatment, and to deepen mutual understanding among health-care professionals and patients by making these guidelines available to the general public. These guidelines have been prepared as a result of consensuses reached by the JSCCR Guideline Committee on the basis of careful review of evidence retrieved by literature searches and taking into consideration the medical health insurance system and actual clinical practice in Japan. They can, therefore, be used as a guide for treating colorectal cancer in clinical practice. More specifically, they can be used as a guide to obtaining informed consent from patients and choosing the method of treatment for each patient. As a result of the discussions of the Guideline Committee, controversial issues were selected as clinical questions, and recommendations were made. Each recommendation is accompanied by a classification of the evidence and a classification of recommendation categories, on the basis of consensus reached by Guideline Committee members. Here we present the English version of the JSCCR Guidelines 2014.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2014) JSCCR Guidelines 2014 for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer. Kanehara and Co. Ltd, Tokyo Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2014) JSCCR Guidelines 2014 for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer. Kanehara and Co. Ltd, Tokyo
2.
go back to reference Fukui T, Yamaguchi N, Morizane T et al (2014) Minds handbook for clinical practice guideline development 2014. Igaku Shoin, Tokyo Fukui T, Yamaguchi N, Morizane T et al (2014) Minds handbook for clinical practice guideline development 2014. Igaku Shoin, Tokyo
3.
go back to reference Aihara M, Mihara H, Murayama T et al (2010) GRADE System for clinical practice guideline—therapeutic intervention. Toppan Media, Hirosaki Aihara M, Mihara H, Murayama T et al (2010) GRADE System for clinical practice guideline—therapeutic intervention. Toppan Media, Hirosaki
4.
go back to reference Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA et al (2004) The GRADE* Working Group: Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328:1490–1494 printed, abridged versionPubMed Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA et al (2004) The GRADE* Working Group: Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328:1490–1494 printed, abridged versionPubMed
5.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G et al (2008) GRADE Working Group: Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336:924–926PubMedCentralPubMed Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G et al (2008) GRADE Working Group: Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336:924–926PubMedCentralPubMed
6.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al (2008) GRADE Working Group: Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: what is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ 336:995–998PubMedCentralPubMed Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al (2008) GRADE Working Group: Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: what is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians? BMJ 336:995–998PubMedCentralPubMed
7.
go back to reference Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J et al (2008) GRADE Working Group: Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ 336:1106–1110PubMedCentralPubMed Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD, Brozek J et al (2008) GRADE Working Group: Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ 336:1106–1110PubMedCentralPubMed
8.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al (2008) GRADE Working Group: Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ 336:1170–1173PubMedCentralPubMed Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al (2008) GRADE Working Group: Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: Incorporating considerations of resources use into grading recommendations. BMJ 336:1170–1173PubMedCentralPubMed
9.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al (2008) GRADE Working Group: Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ 336:1049–1051PubMedCentralPubMed Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al (2008) GRADE Working Group: Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: going from evidence to recommendations. BMJ 336:1049–1051PubMedCentralPubMed
10.
go back to reference Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Dellinger P et al (2008) GRADE Working Group. Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive. BMJ 337:a744PubMed Jaeschke R, Guyatt GH, Dellinger P et al (2008) GRADE Working Group. Use of GRADE grid to reach decisions on clinical practice guidelines when consensus is elusive. BMJ 337:a744PubMed
11.
go back to reference Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction–GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 64:383–394PubMed Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction–GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol 64:383–394PubMed
12.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 64:395–400PubMed Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 64:395–400PubMed
13.
go back to reference Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 64:401–406PubMed Balshem H, Helfand M, Schunemann HJ et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 64:401–406PubMed
14.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence––study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol 64:407–415PubMed Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence––study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol 64:407–415PubMed
15.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence––publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1277–1282PubMed Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence––publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1277–1282PubMed
16.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 6. Rating the quality of evidence imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1283–1293PubMed Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al (2011) GRADE guidelines: 6. Rating the quality of evidence imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1283–1293PubMed
17.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al (2011) GRADE Working Group: GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence––inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1294–1302PubMed Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al (2011) GRADE Working Group: GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence––inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1294–1302PubMed
18.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al (2011) GRADE Working Group. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence––indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1303–1310PubMed Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al (2011) GRADE Working Group. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence––indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1303–1310PubMed
19.
go back to reference Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S et al (2011) GRADE Working Group. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1311–1316PubMed Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S et al (2011) GRADE Working Group. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 64:1311–1316PubMed
20.
go back to reference Brunetti M, Shemilt I, Pregno S et al (2013) GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 66:140–150PubMed Brunetti M, Shemilt I, Pregno S et al (2013) GRADE guidelines: 10. Considering resource use and rating the quality of economic evidence. J Clin Epidemiol 66:140–150PubMed
21.
go back to reference Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Sultan S et al (2013) GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 66:151–157PubMed Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Sultan S et al (2013) GRADE guidelines: 11. Making an overall rating of confidence in effect estimates for a single outcome and for all outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 66:151–157PubMed
22.
go back to reference Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Santesso N et al (2013) GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables–binary outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 66:158–172PubMed Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Santesso N et al (2013) GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables–binary outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 66:158–172PubMed
23.
go back to reference Thorlund K, Oxman AD, Walter SD et al (2013) GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing summary of findings tables-continuous outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 66:173–183PubMed Thorlund K, Oxman AD, Walter SD et al (2013) GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing summary of findings tables-continuous outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 66:173–183PubMed
24.
go back to reference Andrews J, Guyatt G, Oxman AD et al (2013) GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations J. Clin Epidemiol 66:719–725 Andrews J, Guyatt G, Oxman AD et al (2013) GRADE guidelines: 14. Going from evidence to recommendations: the significance and presentation of recommendations J. Clin Epidemiol 66:719–725
25.
go back to reference Andrews JC, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD et al (2013) GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation’s direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol 66:726–735PubMed Andrews JC, Schunemann HJ, Oxman AD et al (2013) GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation’s direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol 66:726–735PubMed
26.
go back to reference Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2013) Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma. The 8th Edition. Kanehara & CO., LTD. Tokyo Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2013) Japanese classification of colorectal carcinoma. The 8th Edition. Kanehara & CO., LTD. Tokyo
27.
go back to reference Tanaka S, Oka S, Chayama K (2008) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD): the present status and future perspective including its differentiation from endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). J Gastroenterol 43:641–651PubMed Tanaka S, Oka S, Chayama K (2008) Colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD): the present status and future perspective including its differentiation from endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). J Gastroenterol 43:641–651PubMed
28.
go back to reference Kudo S (1993) Endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed early colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 25:455–461PubMed Kudo S (1993) Endoscopic mucosal resection of flat and depressed early colorectal cancer. Endoscopy 25:455–461PubMed
29.
go back to reference Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum: Multi-institutional registry of large bowel cancer in Japan, Cases treated in 2000–2002, vol. 29 (2011), Cases treated in 2003–2004, vol. 30 (2012) Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum: Multi-institutional registry of large bowel cancer in Japan, Cases treated in 2000–2002, vol. 29 (2011), Cases treated in 2003–2004, vol. 30 (2012)
30.
go back to reference Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69:613–616PubMed Heald RJ, Husband EM, Ryall RD (1982) The mesorectum in rectal cancer surgery—the clue to pelvic recurrence? Br J Surg 69:613–616PubMed
31.
go back to reference MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ (1993) Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 341:457–460PubMed MacFarlane JK, Ryall RD, Heald RJ (1993) Mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Lancet 341:457–460PubMed
32.
go back to reference Enker WE, Thaler HT, Cranor ML et al (1995) Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 181:335–346PubMed Enker WE, Thaler HT, Cranor ML et al (1995) Total mesorectal excision in the operative treatment of carcinoma of the rectum. J Am Coll Surg 181:335–346PubMed
33.
go back to reference Lowry AC, Simmang CL, Boulos P et al (2001) Consensus statement of definitions for anorectal physiology and rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 44:915–919PubMed Lowry AC, Simmang CL, Boulos P et al (2001) Consensus statement of definitions for anorectal physiology and rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 44:915–919PubMed
34.
go back to reference Sugihara K, Kobayashi H, Kato T et al (2006) Indication and benefit of pelvic sidewall dissection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1663–1672PubMed Sugihara K, Kobayashi H, Kato T et al (2006) Indication and benefit of pelvic sidewall dissection for rectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum 49:1663–1672PubMed
35.
go back to reference Murata S, Moriya Y, Akasu T et al (1998) Resection of both hepatic and pulmonary metastases in patients with colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 83:1086–1093PubMed Murata S, Moriya Y, Akasu T et al (1998) Resection of both hepatic and pulmonary metastases in patients with colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 83:1086–1093PubMed
36.
go back to reference Kobayashi K, Kawamura M, Ishihara T (1999) Surgical treatment for both pulmonary and hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118:1090–1096PubMed Kobayashi K, Kawamura M, Ishihara T (1999) Surgical treatment for both pulmonary and hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 118:1090–1096PubMed
37.
go back to reference Portier G, Elias D, Bouche O et al (2006) Multicentric randomized trial of adjuvant fluorouracil and folnic acid compared with surgery alone after resection of colorectal liver metastases: FFCD ACHBTH AURC 9002 trial. J Clin Oncol 24:4976–4982PubMed Portier G, Elias D, Bouche O et al (2006) Multicentric randomized trial of adjuvant fluorouracil and folnic acid compared with surgery alone after resection of colorectal liver metastases: FFCD ACHBTH AURC 9002 trial. J Clin Oncol 24:4976–4982PubMed
38.
go back to reference Mitry E, Fields AL, Bleiberg H et al (2008) Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 26:4906–4911PubMed Mitry E, Fields AL, Bleiberg H et al (2008) Adjuvant chemotherapy after potentially curative resection of metastases from colorectal cancer: a pooled analysis of two randomized trials. J Clin Oncol 26:4906–4911PubMed
39.
go back to reference Robinson BJ, Rice TW, Strong SA et al (1999) Is resection of pulmonary and hepatic metastases warranted in patients with colorectal cancer? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117:66–76PubMed Robinson BJ, Rice TW, Strong SA et al (1999) Is resection of pulmonary and hepatic metastases warranted in patients with colorectal cancer? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 117:66–76PubMed
40.
go back to reference Lambert LA, Colacchio TA, Barth RJ Jr (2000) Interval hepatic resection of colorectal metastases improves patient selection. Arch Surg 135:473–479PubMed Lambert LA, Colacchio TA, Barth RJ Jr (2000) Interval hepatic resection of colorectal metastases improves patient selection. Arch Surg 135:473–479PubMed
41.
go back to reference Adam R (2007) Developing strategies for liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Semin Oncol 34(2 Suppl 1):S7–S11PubMed Adam R (2007) Developing strategies for liver metastases from colorectal cancer. Semin Oncol 34(2 Suppl 1):S7–S11PubMed
42.
go back to reference Lam VW, Spiro C, Laurence JM et al (2012) A systematic review of clinical response and survival outcomes of downsizing systemic chemotherapy and rescue liver surgery in patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 19:1292–1301PubMed Lam VW, Spiro C, Laurence JM et al (2012) A systematic review of clinical response and survival outcomes of downsizing systemic chemotherapy and rescue liver surgery in patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases. Ann Surg Oncol 19:1292–1301PubMed
43.
go back to reference Regnard JF, Grunenwald D, Spaggiari L et al (1998) Surgical treatment for hepatic and pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancers. Ann Thorac Surg 66:214–218PubMed Regnard JF, Grunenwald D, Spaggiari L et al (1998) Surgical treatment for hepatic and pulmonary metastases from colorectal cancers. Ann Thorac Surg 66:214–218PubMed
44.
go back to reference Beppu T, Matsuda T, Maeda K et al (2000) Microwave coagulation therapy for metastatic liver tumor. Surg Therapy 83:237–242 Beppu T, Matsuda T, Maeda K et al (2000) Microwave coagulation therapy for metastatic liver tumor. Surg Therapy 83:237–242
45.
go back to reference Shibata T, Niinobu T, Ogata N et al (2000) Microwave coagulation therapy for multiple hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 89:276–284PubMed Shibata T, Niinobu T, Ogata N et al (2000) Microwave coagulation therapy for multiple hepatic metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 89:276–284PubMed
46.
go back to reference Park IJ, Kim HC, Yu CS et al (2008) Radiofrequency ablation for metachronous liver metastasis from colorectal cancer after curative surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 15:227–232PubMed Park IJ, Kim HC, Yu CS et al (2008) Radiofrequency ablation for metachronous liver metastasis from colorectal cancer after curative surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 15:227–232PubMed
47.
go back to reference Wong SL, Mangu PB, Choti MA et al (2010) American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009 clinical evidence review on radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:493–508PubMed Wong SL, Mangu PB, Choti MA et al (2010) American Society of Clinical Oncology 2009 clinical evidence review on radiofrequency ablation of hepatic metastases from colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:493–508PubMed
48.
go back to reference Tree AC, Khoo VS, Eeles RA et al (2013) Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastases. Lancet Oncol 14:e28–e37PubMed Tree AC, Khoo VS, Eeles RA et al (2013) Stereotactic body radiotherapy for oligometastases. Lancet Oncol 14:e28–e37PubMed
49.
go back to reference Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Walsh JW et al (1990) A randomized trial of surgery in the treatment of single metastases to the brain. N Engl J Med 322:494–500PubMed Patchell RA, Tibbs PA, Walsh JW et al (1990) A randomized trial of surgery in the treatment of single metastases to the brain. N Engl J Med 322:494–500PubMed
50.
go back to reference National Institute of Health Consensus Conference (1990) Adjuvant therapy for patients with colon and rectal cancer. JAMA 264:1444–1450 National Institute of Health Consensus Conference (1990) Adjuvant therapy for patients with colon and rectal cancer. JAMA 264:1444–1450
51.
go back to reference Benson AB 3rd, Schrag D, Somerfield MR et al (2004) American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:3408PubMed Benson AB 3rd, Schrag D, Somerfield MR et al (2004) American Society of Clinical Oncology recommendations on adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:3408PubMed
52.
go back to reference Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A et al (2012) ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. A personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol 23:2479–2516PubMed Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A et al (2012) ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. A personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol 23:2479–2516PubMed
53.
go back to reference Haller DG, Catalano PJ, Macdonald JS et al (2005) Phase III study of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and levamisole in high-risk stage II and III colon cancer: final report of Intergroup 0089. J Clin Oncol 23:8671–8678PubMed Haller DG, Catalano PJ, Macdonald JS et al (2005) Phase III study of fluorouracil, leucovorin, and levamisole in high-risk stage II and III colon cancer: final report of Intergroup 0089. J Clin Oncol 23:8671–8678PubMed
54.
go back to reference Scheithauer W, Rosen H, Kornek GV et al (1993) Randomised comparison of combination chemotherapy plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Br Med J 306:752–755 Scheithauer W, Rosen H, Kornek GV et al (1993) Randomised comparison of combination chemotherapy plus supportive care with supportive care alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Br Med J 306:752–755
55.
go back to reference Simmonds PC (2000) Palliative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group. Br Med J 321:531–535 Simmonds PC (2000) Palliative chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group. Br Med J 321:531–535
56.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Pyrhonen S, James RD et al (1998) Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet 352:1413–1418PubMed Cunningham D, Pyrhonen S, James RD et al (1998) Randomised trial of irinotecan plus supportive care versus supportive care alone after fluorouracil failure for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Lancet 352:1413–1418PubMed
57.
go back to reference de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M et al (2000) Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:2938–2947PubMed de Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M et al (2000) Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:2938–2947PubMed
58.
go back to reference Goldberg R, Sargent D, Morton R et al (2004) A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:23–30PubMed Goldberg R, Sargent D, Morton R et al (2004) A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:23–30PubMed
59.
go back to reference Saltz LB, Clarke S, Díaz-Rubio E et al (2008) Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 26:2013–2019PubMed Saltz LB, Clarke S, Díaz-Rubio E et al (2008) Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: A randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 26:2013–2019PubMed
60.
go back to reference Cassidy J, Clarke S, Díaz-Rubio E et al (2008) Randomized phase III study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:2006–2012PubMed Cassidy J, Clarke S, Díaz-Rubio E et al (2008) Randomized phase III study of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin compared with fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin as first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:2006–2012PubMed
61.
go back to reference Tournigand C, André T, Achille E et al (2004) FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol 22:229–237PubMed Tournigand C, André T, Achille E et al (2004) FOLFIRI followed by FOLFOX6 or the reverse sequence in advanced colorectal cancer: a randomized GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol 22:229–237PubMed
62.
go back to reference Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD et al (2000) Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 355:1041–1047PubMed Douillard JY, Cunningham D, Roth AD et al (2000) Irinotecan combined with fluorouracil compared with fluorouracil alone as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 355:1041–1047PubMed
63.
go back to reference Fuchs CS, Marshall J, Mitchell E et al (2007) Randomized, controlled trial of irinotecan plus infusional, bolus, or oral fluoropyrimidines in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the BICC–C Study. J Clin Oncol 25:4779–4786PubMed Fuchs CS, Marshall J, Mitchell E et al (2007) Randomized, controlled trial of irinotecan plus infusional, bolus, or oral fluoropyrimidines in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the BICC–C Study. J Clin Oncol 25:4779–4786PubMed
64.
go back to reference Fuchs CS, Marshall J, Barrueco J et al (2008) Randomized, controlled trial of irinotecan plus infusional, bolus or oral fluoropyrimidines in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: updated results from the BICC–C study. J Clin Oncol 26:689–690PubMed Fuchs CS, Marshall J, Barrueco J et al (2008) Randomized, controlled trial of irinotecan plus infusional, bolus or oral fluoropyrimidines in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: updated results from the BICC–C study. J Clin Oncol 26:689–690PubMed
65.
go back to reference Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A et al (2009) Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:663–671PubMed Bokemeyer C, Bondarenko I, Makhson A et al (2009) Fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin with and without cetuximab in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:663–671PubMed
66.
go back to reference Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J et al (2010) Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin(FOLFOX4)versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. J Clin Oncol 28:4697–4705PubMed Douillard JY, Siena S, Cassidy J et al (2010) Randomized, phase III trial of panitumumab with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin(FOLFOX4)versus FOLFOX4 alone as first-line treatment in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer: the PRIME study. J Clin Oncol 28:4697–4705PubMed
67.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Hitre E et al (2009) Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 360:1408–1417PubMed Van Cutsem E, Köhne CH, Hitre E et al (2009) Cetuximab and chemotherapy as initial treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 360:1408–1417PubMed
68.
go back to reference Köhne CH, Hofheinz R, Mineur L et al (2012) First-line panitumumab plus irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 138:65–72PubMed Köhne CH, Hofheinz R, Mineur L et al (2012) First-line panitumumab plus irinotecan/5-fluorouracil/leucovorin treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 138:65–72PubMed
69.
go back to reference Falcone A, Ricci S, Brunetti I et al (2007) Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest: Phase III trial of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan(FOLFOXIRI)compared with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan(FOLFIRI)as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest. J Clin Oncol 25:1670–1676PubMed Falcone A, Ricci S, Brunetti I et al (2007) Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest: Phase III trial of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan(FOLFOXIRI)compared with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan(FOLFIRI)as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest. J Clin Oncol 25:1670–1676PubMed
70.
go back to reference Petrelli N, Herrera L, Rustum Y et al (1987) A prospective randomized trial of 5-fluorouracil versus 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin versus 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 5:1559–1565PubMed Petrelli N, Herrera L, Rustum Y et al (1987) A prospective randomized trial of 5-fluorouracil versus 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin versus 5-fluorouracil and methotrexate in previously untreated patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 5:1559–1565PubMed
71.
go back to reference de Gramont A, Bosset JF, Milan C et al (1997) Randomized trial comparing monthly low-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus with bimonthly high-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus plus continuous infusion for advanced colorectal cancer: a French intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 15:808–815PubMed de Gramont A, Bosset JF, Milan C et al (1997) Randomized trial comparing monthly low-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus with bimonthly high-dose leucovorin and fluorouracil bolus plus continuous infusion for advanced colorectal cancer: a French intergroup study. J Clin Oncol 15:808–815PubMed
72.
go back to reference Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Hainsworth JD et al (2005) Bevacizumab in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin: an active regimen for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:3502–3508PubMed Hurwitz H, Fehrenbacher L, Hainsworth JD et al (2005) Bevacizumab in combination with fluorouracil and leucovorin: an active regimen for first-line metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:3502–3508PubMed
73.
go back to reference Kabbinavar F, Hurwitz HI, Fehrenbacher L et al (2003) Phase II, randomized trial comparing Bevacizumab plus fluorouracil(FU)/leucovorin(LV)with FU/LV alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:60–65PubMed Kabbinavar F, Hurwitz HI, Fehrenbacher L et al (2003) Phase II, randomized trial comparing Bevacizumab plus fluorouracil(FU)/leucovorin(LV)with FU/LV alone in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 21:60–65PubMed
74.
go back to reference Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G et al (2001) Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:2282–2292PubMed Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G et al (2001) Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a randomized phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:2282–2292PubMed
75.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Twelves C, Cassidy J et al (2001) Xeloda Colorectal Cancer Study Group: Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:4097–4106PubMed Van Cutsem E, Twelves C, Cassidy J et al (2001) Xeloda Colorectal Cancer Study Group: Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:4097–4106PubMed
76.
go back to reference Tebbutt NC, Wilson K, Gebski VJ et al (2010) Capecitabine, bevacizumab, and mitomycin in first–line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group Randomized Phase III MAX Study. J Clin Oncol 28:3191–3198PubMed Tebbutt NC, Wilson K, Gebski VJ et al (2010) Capecitabine, bevacizumab, and mitomycin in first–line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: results of the Australasian Gastrointestinal Trials Group Randomized Phase III MAX Study. J Clin Oncol 28:3191–3198PubMed
77.
go back to reference Shirao K, Hoff PM, Ohtsu A et al (2004) Comparison of the efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of a uracil/tegafur(UFT)plus oral leucovorin(LV)regimen between Japanese and American patients with advanced colorectal cancer: joint United States and Japan study of UFT/LV. J Clin Oncol 22:3466–3474PubMed Shirao K, Hoff PM, Ohtsu A et al (2004) Comparison of the efficacy, toxicity, and pharmacokinetics of a uracil/tegafur(UFT)plus oral leucovorin(LV)regimen between Japanese and American patients with advanced colorectal cancer: joint United States and Japan study of UFT/LV. J Clin Oncol 22:3466–3474PubMed
78.
go back to reference Douillard JY, Hoff PM, Skillings JR et al (2002) Multicenter phase III study of uracil/tegafur and oral leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3605–3616PubMed Douillard JY, Hoff PM, Skillings JR et al (2002) Multicenter phase III study of uracil/tegafur and oral leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3605–3616PubMed
79.
go back to reference Carmichael J, Popiela T, Radstone D et al (2002) Randomized comparative study of tegafur/uracil and oral leucovorin versus parenteral fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3617–3627PubMed Carmichael J, Popiela T, Radstone D et al (2002) Randomized comparative study of tegafur/uracil and oral leucovorin versus parenteral fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3617–3627PubMed
80.
go back to reference Bennouna J, Sastre J, Arnold D et al (2013) ML18147 Study Investigators. Continuation of bevacizumab after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (ML18147): a randomized phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:29–37PubMed Bennouna J, Sastre J, Arnold D et al (2013) ML18147 Study Investigators. Continuation of bevacizumab after first progression in metastatic colorectal cancer (ML18147): a randomized phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 14:29–37PubMed
81.
go back to reference Muro K, Boku N, Shimada Y et al (2010) Irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS)versus fluorouracil and folinic acid plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI)as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised phase 2/3 non-inferiority study (FIRIS study). Lancet Oncol 11:853–860PubMed Muro K, Boku N, Shimada Y et al (2010) Irinotecan plus S-1 (IRIS)versus fluorouracil and folinic acid plus irinotecan (FOLFIRI)as second-line chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomised phase 2/3 non-inferiority study (FIRIS study). Lancet Oncol 11:853–860PubMed
82.
go back to reference Sobrero AF, Maurel J, Fehrenbacher L et al (2008) EPIC: phase III trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan after fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:2311–2319PubMed Sobrero AF, Maurel J, Fehrenbacher L et al (2008) EPIC: phase III trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan after fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin failure in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:2311–2319PubMed
83.
go back to reference Peeters M, Price TJ, Hotko YS, et al (2010) Randomized phase III study of panitumumab (pmab) with FOLFIRI vs FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Patient-reported outcomes (PRO). 2010 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium. (Abstr 282) Peeters M, Price TJ, Hotko YS, et al (2010) Randomized phase III study of panitumumab (pmab) with FOLFIRI vs FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment (tx) in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Patient-reported outcomes (PRO). 2010 ASCO Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium. (Abstr 282)
84.
go back to reference Rothenberg ML, Oza AM, Bigelow RH et al (2003) Superiority of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil–leucovorin compared with either therapy alone in patients with progressive colorectal cancer after irinotecan and fluorouracil–leucovorin: interim results of a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 21:2059–2069PubMed Rothenberg ML, Oza AM, Bigelow RH et al (2003) Superiority of oxaliplatin and fluorouracil–leucovorin compared with either therapy alone in patients with progressive colorectal cancer after irinotecan and fluorouracil–leucovorin: interim results of a phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 21:2059–2069PubMed
85.
go back to reference Giantonio BJ, Catalano PJ, Meropol NJ et al (2007) Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3200. J Clin Oncol 25:1539–1544PubMed Giantonio BJ, Catalano PJ, Meropol NJ et al (2007) Bevacizumab in combination with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin (FOLFOX4) for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer: results from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E3200. J Clin Oncol 25:1539–1544PubMed
86.
go back to reference Rothenberg ML, Cox JV, Butts C et al (2008) Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX)versus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4)as second-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III noninferiority study. Ann Oncol 19:1720–1726PubMed Rothenberg ML, Cox JV, Butts C et al (2008) Capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX)versus 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4)as second-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized phase III noninferiority study. Ann Oncol 19:1720–1726PubMed
87.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S et al (2004) Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:337–345PubMed Cunningham D, Humblet Y, Siena S et al (2004) Cetuximab monotherapy and cetuximab plus irinotecan in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:337–345PubMed
88.
go back to reference Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS et al (2007) Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 357:2040–2048PubMed Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS et al (2007) Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 357:2040–2048PubMed
89.
go back to reference Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ et al (2008) K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 359:1757–1765PubMed Karapetis CS, Khambata-Ford S, Jonker DJ et al (2008) K-ras mutations and benefit from cetuximab in advanced colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 359:1757–1765PubMed
90.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S et al (2007) Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy–refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:1658–1664PubMed Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S et al (2007) Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy–refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:1658–1664PubMed
91.
go back to reference Amado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M et al (2008) Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:1626–1634PubMed Amado RG, Wolf M, Peeters M et al (2008) Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 26:1626–1634PubMed
92.
go back to reference Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A et al (2013) CORRECT Study Group: Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 381:303–312PubMed Grothey A, Van Cutsem E, Sobrero A et al (2013) CORRECT Study Group: Regorafenib monotherapy for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (CORRECT): an international, multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 381:303–312PubMed
93.
go back to reference Meta-Analysis Group in Cancer (1996) Reappraisal of hepatic arterial infusion in the treatment of nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 88:252–258 Meta-Analysis Group in Cancer (1996) Reappraisal of hepatic arterial infusion in the treatment of nonresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 88:252–258
94.
go back to reference Skibber JM, Hoff PM, Minsky BD et al (2001) Cancer of the rectum. In: Devita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (eds) Cancer: principles and practice of oncology, 6th edn. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1271–1318 Skibber JM, Hoff PM, Minsky BD et al (2001) Cancer of the rectum. In: Devita VT, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (eds) Cancer: principles and practice of oncology, 6th edn. Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1271–1318
95.
go back to reference Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial (1997) Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 336:980–987 Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial (1997) Improved survival with preoperative radiotherapy in resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 336:980–987
96.
go back to reference Camma C, Giunta M, Fiorica F et al (2000) Preoperative radiotherapy for resectable rectal cancer. A meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 284:1008–1015 Camma C, Giunta M, Fiorica F et al (2000) Preoperative radiotherapy for resectable rectal cancer. A meta-analysis. J Am Med Assoc 284:1008–1015
97.
go back to reference Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group (2001) Adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic overview of 22 randomised trials involving 8507 patients. Lancet 358:1291–1304 Colorectal Cancer Collaborative Group (2001) Adjuvant radiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic overview of 22 randomised trials involving 8507 patients. Lancet 358:1291–1304
98.
go back to reference Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al (2001) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 345:638–646PubMed Kapiteijn E, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al (2001) Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 345:638–646PubMed
99.
go back to reference Peeters KC, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al (2007) The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 246:693–701PubMed Peeters KC, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al (2007) The TME trial after a median follow-up of 6 years: increased local control but no survival benefit in irradiated patients with resectable rectal carcinoma. Ann Surg 246:693–701PubMed
100.
go back to reference van Gijn W, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al (2011) Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group: Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial. Lancet Oncol 12:575–582PubMed van Gijn W, Marijnen CA, Nagtegaal ID et al (2011) Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group: Preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for resectable rectal cancer: 12-year follow-up of the multicentre, randomised controlled TME trial. Lancet Oncol 12:575–582PubMed
101.
go back to reference Marijnen CA, van de Velde CJ, Putter H et al (2005) Impact of short-term preoperative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 23:1847–1858PubMed Marijnen CA, van de Velde CJ, Putter H et al (2005) Impact of short-term preoperative radiotherapy on health-related quality of life and sexual functioning in primary rectal cancer: report of a multicenter randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 23:1847–1858PubMed
102.
go back to reference Peeters KC, van de Velde CJ, Leer JW et al (2005) Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients: a Dutch colorectal cancer group study. J Clin Oncol 23:6199–6206PubMed Peeters KC, van de Velde CJ, Leer JW et al (2005) Late side effects of short-course preoperative radiotherapy combined with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: increased bowel dysfunction in irradiated patients: a Dutch colorectal cancer group study. J Clin Oncol 23:6199–6206PubMed
103.
go back to reference Francois Y, Nemoz CJ, Baulieux J et al (1999) Influence of the interval between preoperative radiation therapy and surgery on downstaging and on the rate of sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer: The Lyon R90-01 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 17:2396–2402PubMed Francois Y, Nemoz CJ, Baulieux J et al (1999) Influence of the interval between preoperative radiation therapy and surgery on downstaging and on the rate of sphincter-sparing surgery for rectal cancer: The Lyon R90-01 randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 17:2396–2402PubMed
104.
go back to reference Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G et al: EORTC Radiotherapy Group Trial 22921 (2006) Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 355:1114–1123 Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G et al: EORTC Radiotherapy Group Trial 22921 (2006) Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 355:1114–1123
105.
go back to reference Gerard JP, Conroy T, Bonnetain F et al (2006) Preoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent fluorouracil and leucovorin in T3-4 rectal cancers: results of FFCD 9203. J Clin Oncol 24:4620–4625PubMed Gerard JP, Conroy T, Bonnetain F et al (2006) Preoperative radiotherapy with or without concurrent fluorouracil and leucovorin in T3-4 rectal cancers: results of FFCD 9203. J Clin Oncol 24:4620–4625PubMed
106.
go back to reference Bujko K, Nowacki MP, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A et al (2006) Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing preoperative short-course radiotherapy with preoperative conventionally fractionated chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 93:1215–1223PubMed Bujko K, Nowacki MP, Nasierowska-Guttmejer A et al (2006) Long-term results of a randomized trial comparing preoperative short-course radiotherapy with preoperative conventionally fractionated chemoradiation for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 93:1215–1223PubMed
107.
go back to reference Ngan SY, Burmeister B, Fisher RJ et al. (2012) Randomized trial of short-course radiotherapy versus long-course chemoradiation comparing rates of local recurrence in patients with T3 rectal cancer: Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group trial 01.04. J Clin Oncol 30:3827–3833PubMed Ngan SY, Burmeister B, Fisher RJ et al. (2012) Randomized trial of short-course radiotherapy versus long-course chemoradiation comparing rates of local recurrence in patients with T3 rectal cancer: Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group trial 01.04. J Clin Oncol 30:3827–3833PubMed
108.
go back to reference Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al; German Rectal Cancer Study Group (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351: 1731–1740 Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W, et al; German Rectal Cancer Study Group (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351: 1731–1740
109.
go back to reference Hofheinz RD, Wenz F, Post S et al (2012) Chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine versus fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13:579–588PubMed Hofheinz RD, Wenz F, Post S et al (2012) Chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine versus fluorouracil for locally advanced rectal cancer: a randomised, multicentre, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13:579–588PubMed
110.
go back to reference Roh MS, Yothers GA, O’Connell MJ et al (2011) The impact of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multimodality treatment in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R–04. J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts) 29:3503 Roh MS, Yothers GA, O’Connell MJ et al (2011) The impact of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in the preoperative multimodality treatment in patients with carcinoma of the rectum: NSABP R–04. J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts) 29:3503
111.
go back to reference Aschele C, Cionini L, Lonardi S et al (2011) Primary tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: pathologic results of the STAR–01 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 29:2773–2780PubMed Aschele C, Cionini L, Lonardi S et al (2011) Primary tumor response to preoperative chemoradiation with or without oxaliplatin in locally advanced rectal cancer: pathologic results of the STAR–01 randomized phase III trial. J Clin Oncol 29:2773–2780PubMed
112.
go back to reference Gérard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S et al (2010) Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the phase III trial ACCORD 12/0405–Prodige 2. J Clin Oncol 28:1638–1644PubMed Gérard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S et al (2010) Comparison of two neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer: results of the phase III trial ACCORD 12/0405–Prodige 2. J Clin Oncol 28:1638–1644PubMed
113.
go back to reference Gérard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S et al (2012) Clinical outcome of the ACCORD 12/0405 PRODIGE 2 randomized trial in rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:4558–4565PubMed Gérard JP, Azria D, Gourgou-Bourgade S et al (2012) Clinical outcome of the ACCORD 12/0405 PRODIGE 2 randomized trial in rectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:4558–4565PubMed
114.
go back to reference Rödel C, Liersch T, Becker H et al (2012) German Rectal Cancer Study Group: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO–04 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13:679–687PubMed Rödel C, Liersch T, Becker H et al (2012) German Rectal Cancer Study Group: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy and postoperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil and oxaliplatin versus fluorouracil alone in locally advanced rectal cancer: initial results of the German CAO/ARO/AIO–04 randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 13:679–687PubMed
115.
go back to reference Cancer pain relief and palliative care (1990) Report of a WHO expert committee. WHO Technical Report Series 804. WHO, Geneva, 21–22 Cancer pain relief and palliative care (1990) Report of a WHO expert committee. WHO Technical Report Series 804. WHO, Geneva, 21–22
116.
go back to reference Renehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP et al (2002) Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trial. Br Med J 324:813–816 Renehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP et al (2002) Impact on survival of intensive follow up after curative resection for colorectal cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trial. Br Med J 324:813–816
117.
go back to reference Figueredo A, Rumble RB, Maroun J et al (2003) Follow-up of patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer: a practice guideline. BMC Cancer 6:26 Figueredo A, Rumble RB, Maroun J et al (2003) Follow-up of patients with curatively resected colorectal cancer: a practice guideline. BMC Cancer 6:26
118.
go back to reference Renehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP et al (2005) Mechanisms of improved survival from intensive followup in colorectal cancer: a hypothesis. Br J Cancer 92:430–433PubMedCentralPubMed Renehan AG, Egger M, Saunders MP et al (2005) Mechanisms of improved survival from intensive followup in colorectal cancer: a hypothesis. Br J Cancer 92:430–433PubMedCentralPubMed
119.
go back to reference Jeffery M, Hickey BE, Hider PN (2007) Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 24: CD002200 Jeffery M, Hickey BE, Hider PN (2007) Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non-metastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 24: CD002200
120.
go back to reference Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2007) Follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1783–1799PubMed Tjandra JJ, Chan MK (2007) Follow-up after curative resection of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 50:1783–1799PubMed
121.
go back to reference Bruinvels D, Stiggelbout A, Kievit J et al (1994) Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis. Ann Surg 219:174–182PubMedCentralPubMed Bruinvels D, Stiggelbout A, Kievit J et al (1994) Follow-up of patients with colorectal cancer. A meta-analysis. Ann Surg 219:174–182PubMedCentralPubMed
122.
go back to reference Fleischer D, Goldberg S, Browning T et al (1989) Detection and surveillance of colorectal cancer. JAMA 261:580–585PubMed Fleischer D, Goldberg S, Browning T et al (1989) Detection and surveillance of colorectal cancer. JAMA 261:580–585PubMed
123.
go back to reference Green RJ, Metlay JP, Propert K et al (2002) Surveillance for second primary colorectal cancer after adjuvant chemotherapy: an analysis of Intergroup 0089. Ann Int Med 136:261–269PubMed Green RJ, Metlay JP, Propert K et al (2002) Surveillance for second primary colorectal cancer after adjuvant chemotherapy: an analysis of Intergroup 0089. Ann Int Med 136:261–269PubMed
124.
go back to reference Berman J, Cheung R, Weiberg D (2000) Surveillance after colorectal cancer resection. Lancet 355:395–399PubMed Berman J, Cheung R, Weiberg D (2000) Surveillance after colorectal cancer resection. Lancet 355:395–399PubMed
125.
go back to reference Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2012) JSCCR Guidelines 2012 for the Clinical Practice of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer. Kanehara & CO., LTD. Tokyo Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2012) JSCCR Guidelines 2012 for the Clinical Practice of Hereditary Colorectal Cancer. Kanehara & CO., LTD. Tokyo
126.
go back to reference Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y et al (2004) Risk factors for an adverse outcome in early invasive colorectal carcinoma. Gastroenterology 127:385–394PubMed Ueno H, Mochizuki H, Hashiguchi Y et al (2004) Risk factors for an adverse outcome in early invasive colorectal carcinoma. Gastroenterology 127:385–394PubMed
127.
go back to reference Kitajima K, Fujimori T, Fujii S et al (2004) Correlations between lymph node metastasis and depth of submucosal invasion in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma: a Japanese collaborative study. J Gastroenterol 39:534–543PubMed Kitajima K, Fujimori T, Fujii S et al (2004) Correlations between lymph node metastasis and depth of submucosal invasion in submucosal invasive colorectal carcinoma: a Japanese collaborative study. J Gastroenterol 39:534–543PubMed
128.
go back to reference Tanaka S, Haruma K, Oh-e H et al (2000) Conditions of curability after endoscopic resection for colorectal carcinoma with submucosally massive invasion. Oncol Rep 7:783–788PubMed Tanaka S, Haruma K, Oh-e H et al (2000) Conditions of curability after endoscopic resection for colorectal carcinoma with submucosally massive invasion. Oncol Rep 7:783–788PubMed
129.
go back to reference Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (1980) General Rules for Clinical and Pathological Studies on Cancer of the Colon, Rectum and Anus. The 2nd Edition. Kanehara & CO., LTD. Tokyo Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (1980) General Rules for Clinical and Pathological Studies on Cancer of the Colon, Rectum and Anus. The 2nd Edition. Kanehara & CO., LTD. Tokyo
130.
go back to reference Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (1994) General Rules for Clinical and Pathological Studies on Cancer of the Colon, Rectum and Anus. The 5th Edition. Kanehara & CO., LTD. Tokyo Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (1994) General Rules for Clinical and Pathological Studies on Cancer of the Colon, Rectum and Anus. The 5th Edition. Kanehara & CO., LTD. Tokyo
131.
go back to reference Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2005) JSCCR Guidelines 2005 for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer. Kanehara & CO., LTD. Tokyo Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (2005) JSCCR Guidelines 2005 for the Treatment of Colorectal Cancer. Kanehara & CO., LTD. Tokyo
132.
go back to reference Oka S, Tanaka S, Kanao H et al (2011) Mid-term prognosis after endoscopic resection for submucosal colorectal carcinoma: summary of a multicenter questionnaire survey conducted by the colorectal endoscopic resection standardization implementation working group in Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Dig Endosc 23:190–194PubMed Oka S, Tanaka S, Kanao H et al (2011) Mid-term prognosis after endoscopic resection for submucosal colorectal carcinoma: summary of a multicenter questionnaire survey conducted by the colorectal endoscopic resection standardization implementation working group in Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum. Dig Endosc 23:190–194PubMed
133.
go back to reference Matsuda T, Fukuzawa M, Uraoka T et al (2011) Risk of lymph node metastasis in patients with pedunculated type early invasive colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study. Cancer Sci 102:1693–1697PubMed Matsuda T, Fukuzawa M, Uraoka T et al (2011) Risk of lymph node metastasis in patients with pedunculated type early invasive colorectal cancer: a retrospective multicenter study. Cancer Sci 102:1693–1697PubMed
134.
go back to reference Ikematsu H, Yoda Y, Matsuda T et al (2013) Long-term outcomes after resection for submucosal invasive colorectal cancers. Gastroenterology 144:551–559PubMed Ikematsu H, Yoda Y, Matsuda T et al (2013) Long-term outcomes after resection for submucosal invasive colorectal cancers. Gastroenterology 144:551–559PubMed
Metadata
Title
Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) Guidelines 2014 for treatment of colorectal cancer
Authors
Toshiaki Watanabe
Michio Itabashi
Yasuhiro Shimada
Shinji Tanaka
Yoshinori Ito
Yoichi Ajioka
Tetsuya Hamaguchi
Ichinosuke Hyodo
Masahiro Igarashi
Hideyuki Ishida
Soichiro Ishihara
Megumi Ishiguro
Yukihide Kanemitsu
Norihiro Kokudo
Kei Muro
Atsushi Ochiai
Masahiko Oguchi
Yasuo Ohkura
Yutaka Saito
Yoshiharu Sakai
Hideki Ueno
Takayuki Yoshino
Narikazu Boku
Takahiro Fujimori
Nobuo Koinuma
Takayuki Morita
Genichi Nishimura
Yuh Sakata
Keiichi Takahashi
Osamu Tsuruta
Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Masahiro Yoshida
Naohiko Yamaguchi
Kenjiro Kotake
Kenichi Sugihara
Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum
Publication date
01-04-2015
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 2/2015
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-015-0801-z

Other articles of this Issue 2/2015

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 2/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine