Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 1/2015

01-02-2015 | Original Article

Prostate-specific antigen density predicts extracapsular extension and increased risk of biochemical recurrence in patients with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy

Authors: Takuya Koie, Koji Mitsuzuka, Takahiro Yoneyama, Shintaro Narita, Sadafumi Kawamura, Yasuhiro Kaiho, Norihiko Tsuchiya, Tatsuo Tochigi, Tomonori Habuchi, Yoichi Arai, Chikara Ohyama, Tohru Yoneyama, Yuki Tobisawa

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients with advanced local-stage, high-grade prostate cancer (Pca) and high pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels have inferior outcomes compared to their counterparts with more favorable clinical characteristics. However, some patients exhibit favorable pathological features or experience long-term PSA-free survival after radical prostatectomy (RP). We retrospectively examined the ability of preoperative characteristics to predict pathological and oncological outcomes in high-risk Pca patients who underwent RP.

Methods

We examined data of 1,268 consecutive Pca patients treated with RP alone at 4 hospitals from the Michinoku Urological Cancer Study Group database. Preoperative predictors included age, PSA level, biopsy Gleason score, clinical T stage, and PSA density (PSAD). The outcome measures pathological T stage and PSA-free survival were evaluated by multivariate analysis.

Results

We identified 380 high-risk Pca patients, of which 44 % patients had extracapsular extension. Logistic regression analysis indicated that PSAD was an independent predictor of adverse pathologic stage. The 5-year PSA-free survival rates were 82.9 % for patients with PSAD ≤0.468 ng mL−1 cm−2 and 50.7 % for those with PSAD >0.468 ng mL−1 cm−2 (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analyses revealed that PSAD, cT, and the number of preoperative high-risk Pca criteria were independent predictors of PSA-free survival.

Conclusions

PSAD may be an independent predictor of advanced pathological features and biochemical recurrence in high-risk Pca patients treated with RP alone. PSAD may be used for further risk stratification of high-risk Pca patients.
Literature
1.
go back to reference D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB et al (1998) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 280:969–974PubMedCrossRef D’Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB et al (1998) Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA 280:969–974PubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Yuh B, Artibani W, Heidenreich et al (2013) The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.026 Yuh B, Artibani W, Heidenreich et al (2013) The role of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection in the management of high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review. Eur Urol. doi:10.​1016/​j.​eururo.​2013.​05.​026
3.
4.
go back to reference Sundi D, Wang V, Pierorazio PM et al (2014) Identification of men with the highest risk of early disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Prostate. doi:10.1002/pros.22780 Sundi D, Wang V, Pierorazio PM et al (2014) Identification of men with the highest risk of early disease recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Prostate. doi:10.​1002/​pros.​22780
5.
go back to reference Polascik TJ, Oesterling JE, Partin AW (1999) Prostate specific antigen: a decade of discovery-what have learned and where we are going. J Urol 162:293–306PubMedCrossRef Polascik TJ, Oesterling JE, Partin AW (1999) Prostate specific antigen: a decade of discovery-what have learned and where we are going. J Urol 162:293–306PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Horiguchi A, Nakashima J, Horiguchi Y et al (2003) Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer. Prostate 56:23–29PubMedCrossRef Horiguchi A, Nakashima J, Horiguchi Y et al (2003) Prediction of extraprostatic cancer by prostate specific antigen density, endorectal MRI, and biopsy Gleason score in clinically localized prostate cancer. Prostate 56:23–29PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Brassell SA, Kao T, Sun L et al (2005) Prostate-specific antigen versus prostate-specific antigen density as predictor of tumor volume, margin status, pathologic stage, and biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Urology 66:1229–1233PubMedCrossRef Brassell SA, Kao T, Sun L et al (2005) Prostate-specific antigen versus prostate-specific antigen density as predictor of tumor volume, margin status, pathologic stage, and biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Urology 66:1229–1233PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Corn BW, Hanks GE, Lee WR et al (1995) Prostate specific antigen density is not an independent predictor of response for prostate cancer treated by conformal radiotherapy. J Urol 153:1855–1859PubMedCrossRef Corn BW, Hanks GE, Lee WR et al (1995) Prostate specific antigen density is not an independent predictor of response for prostate cancer treated by conformal radiotherapy. J Urol 153:1855–1859PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJC) (2010) Prostate. In: Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC et al (eds) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York, pp 457–468CrossRef American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJC) (2010) Prostate. In: Edge SB, Byrd DR, Compton CC et al (eds) AJCC cancer staging manual, 7th edn. Springer, New York, pp 457–468CrossRef
10.
go back to reference Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB et al (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1228–1242PubMedCrossRef Epstein JI, Allsbrook WC Jr, Amin MB et al (2005) The 2005 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) consensus conference on Gleason grading of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 29:1228–1242PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Gancarczyk KJ, Wu H, McLeod DG et al (2003) Using the percentage of biopsy cores positive for cancer, pretreatment PSA, and highest biopsy Gleason sum to predict pathologic stage after radical prostatectomy: the Center for Prostate Disease Research nomograms. Urology 61:589–595PubMedCrossRef Gancarczyk KJ, Wu H, McLeod DG et al (2003) Using the percentage of biopsy cores positive for cancer, pretreatment PSA, and highest biopsy Gleason sum to predict pathologic stage after radical prostatectomy: the Center for Prostate Disease Research nomograms. Urology 61:589–595PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Perkins NJ, Schisterman EF (2006) The inconsistency of ‘optimal’ cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristics curve. Am J Epidemiol 163:670–675PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Perkins NJ, Schisterman EF (2006) The inconsistency of ‘optimal’ cutpoints obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristics curve. Am J Epidemiol 163:670–675PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Boorjian SA, Karnes RJ, Rangel LJ et al (2008) Mayo clinic validation of the D’Amico risk group classification for predicting survival following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 179:1354–1361PubMedCrossRef Boorjian SA, Karnes RJ, Rangel LJ et al (2008) Mayo clinic validation of the D’Amico risk group classification for predicting survival following radical prostatectomy. J Urol 179:1354–1361PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Ishida M, Nakashima J, Hashiguchi A et al (2009) Are predictive models for cancer volume clinically useful in localized prostate cancer? Int J Urol 16:936–940PubMedCrossRef Ishida M, Nakashima J, Hashiguchi A et al (2009) Are predictive models for cancer volume clinically useful in localized prostate cancer? Int J Urol 16:936–940PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Lee JT, Lee S, Yun CJ et al (2010) Prediction of perineural invasion and its prognostic value in patients with prostate cancer. Korean J Urol 51:745–751PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Lee JT, Lee S, Yun CJ et al (2010) Prediction of perineural invasion and its prognostic value in patients with prostate cancer. Korean J Urol 51:745–751PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Pierorazio PM, Guzzo TJ, Han M et al (2010) Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy for men with high Gleason sum in pathologic specimen. Urology 76:715–721PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Pierorazio PM, Guzzo TJ, Han M et al (2010) Long-term survival after radical prostatectomy for men with high Gleason sum in pathologic specimen. Urology 76:715–721PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Koie T, Hashimoto Y, Hatakeyama S et al (2011) Minimum incision endoscopic radical prostatectomy: clinical and oncological outcomes at a single institute. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:805–810PubMedCrossRef Koie T, Hashimoto Y, Hatakeyama S et al (2011) Minimum incision endoscopic radical prostatectomy: clinical and oncological outcomes at a single institute. Eur J Surg Oncol 37:805–810PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Tsuzuki T, Hernandez DJ, Aydin H et al (2005) Prediction of extraprostatic extension in the neurovascular bundle based on prostate needle biopsy pathology, serum prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination. J Urol 173:450–453PubMedCrossRef Tsuzuki T, Hernandez DJ, Aydin H et al (2005) Prediction of extraprostatic extension in the neurovascular bundle based on prostate needle biopsy pathology, serum prostate specific antigen and digital rectal examination. J Urol 173:450–453PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Perotti M, Pantuck A, Rabbani F et al (1999) Review of staging modalities in clinically localized prostate cancer. Urology 54:208–214CrossRef Perotti M, Pantuck A, Rabbani F et al (1999) Review of staging modalities in clinically localized prostate cancer. Urology 54:208–214CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Radwan MH, Yan Y, Luly JR et al (2007) Prostate-specific antigen density predicts adverse pathology and increased risk of biochemical failure. Urology 69:1121–1127PubMedCrossRef Radwan MH, Yan Y, Luly JR et al (2007) Prostate-specific antigen density predicts adverse pathology and increased risk of biochemical failure. Urology 69:1121–1127PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Giannarini G, Scott CA, Moro U et al (2008) Are PSA density and PSA density of the transition zone more accurate than PSA in predicting the pathological stage of clinical localized prostate cancer? Urol Oncol 26:353–360PubMedCrossRef Giannarini G, Scott CA, Moro U et al (2008) Are PSA density and PSA density of the transition zone more accurate than PSA in predicting the pathological stage of clinical localized prostate cancer? Urol Oncol 26:353–360PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Prostate-specific antigen density predicts extracapsular extension and increased risk of biochemical recurrence in patients with high-risk prostate cancer who underwent radical prostatectomy
Authors
Takuya Koie
Koji Mitsuzuka
Takahiro Yoneyama
Shintaro Narita
Sadafumi Kawamura
Yasuhiro Kaiho
Norihiko Tsuchiya
Tatsuo Tochigi
Tomonori Habuchi
Yoichi Arai
Chikara Ohyama
Tohru Yoneyama
Yuki Tobisawa
Publication date
01-02-2015
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-014-0696-0

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 1/2015 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine