Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 5/2011

01-10-2011 | Original Article

Modified FOLFOX6 with oxaliplatin stop-and-go strategy and oral S-1 maintenance therapy in advanced colorectal cancer: CCOG-0704 study

Authors: Goro Nakayama, Yasuhiro Kodera, Hiroyuki Yokoyama, Naoto Okuda, Takuya Watanabe, Chie Tanaka, Naoki Iwata, Norifumi Ohashi, Masahiko Koike, Michitaka Fujiwara, Akimasa Nakao

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 5/2011

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A combination of fluorouracil and leucovorin (5-FU/LV) with oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) is an established first-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, the cumulative neurotoxicity of oxaliplatin often requires therapy to be discontinued while the patient is still responding. A strategy to stop FOLFOX, deliver 5-FU/LV as a maintenance therapy and reintroduce FOLFOX was found to be equivalent in terms of efficacy while neurotoxicity was substantially reduced. The aim of this study was to evaluate feasibility of a stop-and-go strategy with S-1, an oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, as a maintenance therapy administered between modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) as a first-line treatment of mCRC.

Methods

Thirty patients with untreated mCRC were treated with six cycles of mFOLFOX6 followed by maintenance therapy with oral S-1. Reintroduction of mFOLFOX6 was scheduled after four cycles of S-1 or upon tumor progression. The primary endpoint was duration of disease control (DDC).

Results

Twenty-one of the 30 patients who achieved responses or stabilizations received S-1 maintenance therapy. mFOLFOX6 was reintroduced in 15 patients. Median DDC and progression-free survival were 9.3 and 7.9 months, respectively. The response rates and disease control rates were 40.0 and 86.6% for the initial mFOLFOX6, 23.8 and 57.1% for S-1 maintenance therapy and 20.0 and 73.3% for mFOLFOX6 reintroduction, respectively. Twenty-eight patients (93.3%) had peripheral neuropathy, but grade 3 neurotoxicity was observed in only 1 patient (3.3%).

Conclusion

The planned oxaliplatin stop-and-go strategy with oral S-1 maintenance therapy was feasible as a first-line treatment for Japanese mCRC patients. Further prospective randomized control study is warranted.
Literature
1.
go back to reference De Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M et al (2000) Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:2938–2947PubMed De Gramont A, Figer A, Seymour M et al (2000) Leucovorin and fluorouracil with or without oxaliplatin as first-line treatment in advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 18:2938–2947PubMed
2.
go back to reference Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Morton RF et al (2004) A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:23–30PubMedCrossRef Goldberg RM, Sargent DJ, Morton RF et al (2004) A randomized controlled trial of fluorouracil plus leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combinations in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:23–30PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Goldstein D, Mitchell P, Michael M et al (2005) Australian experience of a modified schedule of FOLFOX with high activity and tolerability and improved convenience in untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer 92:832–837PubMedCrossRef Goldstein D, Mitchell P, Michael M et al (2005) Australian experience of a modified schedule of FOLFOX with high activity and tolerability and improved convenience in untreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Br J Cancer 92:832–837PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Tournigand C, Cervantes A, Figer A et al (2006) OPTIMOX1: a randomised study of FOLFOX4 or FOLFOX7 with oxaliplatin in a stop-and-go fashion in advanced colorectal cancer—a GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol 24:394–400PubMedCrossRef Tournigand C, Cervantes A, Figer A et al (2006) OPTIMOX1: a randomised study of FOLFOX4 or FOLFOX7 with oxaliplatin in a stop-and-go fashion in advanced colorectal cancer—a GERCOR study. J Clin Oncol 24:394–400PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Chibaudel B, Maindrault-Goebel F, Lledo G et al (2009) Can chemotherapy be discontinued in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer? The GERCOR OPTIMOX2 study. J Clin Oncol 27:5727–5733PubMedCrossRef Chibaudel B, Maindrault-Goebel F, Lledo G et al (2009) Can chemotherapy be discontinued in unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer? The GERCOR OPTIMOX2 study. J Clin Oncol 27:5727–5733PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Douillard JY, Hoff PM, Skillings JR et al (2002) Multicenter phase III study of uracil/tegafur and oral leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3605–3616PubMedCrossRef Douillard JY, Hoff PM, Skillings JR et al (2002) Multicenter phase III study of uracil/tegafur and oral leucovorin versus fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3605–3616PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Carmichael J, Popiela T, Radstone D et al (2002) Randomized comparative study of tegafur/uracil and oral leucovorin versus parenteral fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3617–3627PubMedCrossRef Carmichael J, Popiela T, Radstone D et al (2002) Randomized comparative study of tegafur/uracil and oral leucovorin versus parenteral fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 20:3617–3627PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G et al (2001) Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Results of a randomized Phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:2282–2292PubMed Hoff PM, Ansari R, Batist G et al (2001) Comparison of oral capecitabine versus intravenous 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin as first-line treatment in 605 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Results of a randomized Phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:2282–2292PubMed
9.
go back to reference Van Cutsem E, Twelves C, Cassidy J et al (2001) Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:4097–4106PubMed Van Cutsem E, Twelves C, Cassidy J et al (2001) Oral capecitabine compared with intravenous fluorouracil plus leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: results of a large phase III study. J Clin Oncol 19:4097–4106PubMed
10.
go back to reference Shirasaki T (2009) Development history and concept of an oral anticancer agent S-1 (TS-1): its clinical usefulness and future vistas. Jap J Clin Oncol 39:2–15CrossRef Shirasaki T (2009) Development history and concept of an oral anticancer agent S-1 (TS-1): its clinical usefulness and future vistas. Jap J Clin Oncol 39:2–15CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Shirao K, Ohtsu A, Takada H et al (2004) Phase II study of oral S-1 for treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 100:2355–2366PubMedCrossRef Shirao K, Ohtsu A, Takada H et al (2004) Phase II study of oral S-1 for treatment of metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Cancer 100:2355–2366PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Ohtsu A, Baba H, Sakata Y et al (2000) Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Br J Cancer 83:141–145PubMedCrossRef Ohtsu A, Baba H, Sakata Y et al (2000) Phase II study of S-1, a novel oral fluoropyrimidine derivative, in patients with metastatic colorectal carcinoma. Br J Cancer 83:141–145PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Modified FOLFOX6 with oxaliplatin stop-and-go strategy and oral S-1 maintenance therapy in advanced colorectal cancer: CCOG-0704 study
Authors
Goro Nakayama
Yasuhiro Kodera
Hiroyuki Yokoyama
Naoto Okuda
Takuya Watanabe
Chie Tanaka
Naoki Iwata
Norifumi Ohashi
Masahiko Koike
Michitaka Fujiwara
Akimasa Nakao
Publication date
01-10-2011
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 5/2011
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-011-0214-6

Other articles of this Issue 5/2011

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 5/2011 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine