Skip to main content
Top
Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology 2/2010

01-04-2010 | Original Article

The duration of functioning of a subcutaneous implantable port for the treatment of hematological tumors: a single institution-based study

Authors: Hitoshi Ohno, Chisaki Mizumoto, Yoshihiro Otsuki, Shigeru Oguma, Yataro Yoshida

Published in: International Journal of Clinical Oncology | Issue 2/2010

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Although subcutaneous implantable ports have been indicated as venous access for chemotherapy, these devices have not been used routinely for hematological tumors.

Methods

Between May 2006 and April 2009, 39 ports were implanted in 37 patients with hematological tumors and 16 ports were implanted in 14 patients with nonhematological tumors. The patients were treated with standard/first-line and/or salvage/second-line or greater chemotherapy, and were prospectively followed until port removal, death, or the end of the study.

Results

Thirty-five (96%) patients with hematological tumors developed grade 4 hematological toxicity, while 1 (7%) patient with nonhematological tumors showed grade 4 neutropenia. The actual duration of the port in situ ranged from 14 to 719 days (mean, 271.4 days) in the hematology group, and from 50 to 955 days (mean, 419.5 days) in the nonhematology group (P = 0.039). The Kaplan–Meier-estimated median duration of port in situ in the hematology group was 364 days, which was significantly shorter than that in the nonhematology group (P = 0.009). When patient death and port removal for the end of treatment were censored, the rate of port functioning at 1 year was estimated to be 83% in the hematology group. Bloodstream infection (BSI) occurred in 7 patients with hematological tumors and in 1 patient with metastatic colorectal cancer; however, microbiological confirmation that the implantable port was the source of the BSI was inconclusive.

Conclusion

The duration of port functioning in patients with hematological tumors was comparable to that in patients with nonhematological tumors. The higher rate of BSI in the hematology group was primarily attributable to profound neutropenia.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Gallieni M, Pittiruti M, Biffi R (2008) Vascular access in oncology patients. CA Cancer J Clin 58:323–346CrossRefPubMed Gallieni M, Pittiruti M, Biffi R (2008) Vascular access in oncology patients. CA Cancer J Clin 58:323–346CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Groeger JS, Lucas AB, Thaler HT et al (1993) Infectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices in patients with cancer. Ann Intern Med 119:1168–1174PubMed Groeger JS, Lucas AB, Thaler HT et al (1993) Infectious morbidity associated with long-term use of venous access devices in patients with cancer. Ann Intern Med 119:1168–1174PubMed
3.
go back to reference Schwarz RE, Groeger JS, Coit DG (1997) Subcutaneously implanted central venous access devices in cancer patients: a prospective analysis. Cancer 79:1635–1640CrossRefPubMed Schwarz RE, Groeger JS, Coit DG (1997) Subcutaneously implanted central venous access devices in cancer patients: a prospective analysis. Cancer 79:1635–1640CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Inaba Y, Yamaura H, Sato Y et al (2007) Central venous access port-related complications in outpatient chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 37:951–954CrossRefPubMed Inaba Y, Yamaura H, Sato Y et al (2007) Central venous access port-related complications in outpatient chemotherapy for colorectal cancer. Jpn J Clin Oncol 37:951–954CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Kawamura J, Nagayama S, Nomura A et al (2008) Long-term outcomes of peripheral arm ports implanted in patients with colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 13:349–354CrossRefPubMed Kawamura J, Nagayama S, Nomura A et al (2008) Long-term outcomes of peripheral arm ports implanted in patients with colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol 13:349–354CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference O’Neil BH, Goldberg RM (2008) Innovations in chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: an update of recent clinical trials. Oncologist 13:1074–1083CrossRefPubMed O’Neil BH, Goldberg RM (2008) Innovations in chemotherapy for metastatic colorectal cancer: an update of recent clinical trials. Oncologist 13:1074–1083CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Biffi R, Pozzi S, Agazzi A et al (2004) Use of totally implantable central venous access ports for high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: results of a monocentre series of 376 patients. Ann Oncol 15:296–300CrossRefPubMed Biffi R, Pozzi S, Agazzi A et al (2004) Use of totally implantable central venous access ports for high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood stem cell transplantation: results of a monocentre series of 376 patients. Ann Oncol 15:296–300CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Boersma RS, Jie KS, Verbon A et al (2008) Thrombotic and infectious complications of central venous catheters in patients with hematological malignancies. Ann Oncol 19:433–442CrossRefPubMed Boersma RS, Jie KS, Verbon A et al (2008) Thrombotic and infectious complications of central venous catheters in patients with hematological malignancies. Ann Oncol 19:433–442CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Johansson E, Bjorkholm M, Bjorvell H et al (2004) Totally implantable subcutaneous port system versus central venous catheter placed before induction chemotherapy in patients with acute leukaemia—a randomized study. Support Care Cancer 12:99–105CrossRefPubMed Johansson E, Bjorkholm M, Bjorvell H et al (2004) Totally implantable subcutaneous port system versus central venous catheter placed before induction chemotherapy in patients with acute leukaemia—a randomized study. Support Care Cancer 12:99–105CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kurul S, Saip P, Aydin T (2002) Totally implantable venous-access ports: local problems and extravasation injury. Lancet Oncol 3:684–692CrossRefPubMed Kurul S, Saip P, Aydin T (2002) Totally implantable venous-access ports: local problems and extravasation injury. Lancet Oncol 3:684–692CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Samaras P, Dold S, Braun J et al (2008) Infectious port complications are more frequent in younger patients with hematologic malignancies than in solid tumor patients. Oncology 74:237–244CrossRefPubMed Samaras P, Dold S, Braun J et al (2008) Infectious port complications are more frequent in younger patients with hematologic malignancies than in solid tumor patients. Oncology 74:237–244CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ (2006) The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc 81:1159–1171CrossRefPubMed Maki DG, Kluger DM, Crnich CJ (2006) The risk of bloodstream infection in adults with different intravascular devices: a systematic review of 200 published prospective studies. Mayo Clin Proc 81:1159–1171CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Karthaus M, Doellmann T, Klimasch T et al (2002) Central venous catheter infections in patients with acute leukemia. Chemotherapy 48:154–157CrossRefPubMed Karthaus M, Doellmann T, Klimasch T et al (2002) Central venous catheter infections in patients with acute leukemia. Chemotherapy 48:154–157CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Nosari AM, Nador G, De Gasperi A et al (2008) Prospective monocentric study of non-tunnelled central venous catheter-related complications in hematological patients. Leuk Lymphoma 49:2148–2155CrossRefPubMed Nosari AM, Nador G, De Gasperi A et al (2008) Prospective monocentric study of non-tunnelled central venous catheter-related complications in hematological patients. Leuk Lymphoma 49:2148–2155CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Johansson E, Engervall P, Bjorvell H et al (2009) Patients’ perceptions of having a central venous catheter or a totally implantable subcutaneous port system-results from a randomised study in acute leukaemia. Support Care Cancer 17:137–143CrossRefPubMed Johansson E, Engervall P, Bjorvell H et al (2009) Patients’ perceptions of having a central venous catheter or a totally implantable subcutaneous port system-results from a randomised study in acute leukaemia. Support Care Cancer 17:137–143CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Raad I, Hanna H, Maki D (2007) Intravascular catheter-related infections: advances in diagnosis, prevention, and management. Lancet Infect Dis 7:645–657CrossRefPubMed Raad I, Hanna H, Maki D (2007) Intravascular catheter-related infections: advances in diagnosis, prevention, and management. Lancet Infect Dis 7:645–657CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Mermel LA, Farr BM, Sherertz RJ et al (2001) Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 32:1249–1272CrossRefPubMed Mermel LA, Farr BM, Sherertz RJ et al (2001) Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. Clin Infect Dis 32:1249–1272CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Allan DS, Buckstein R, Imrie KR (2001) Outpatient supportive care following chemotherapy for acute myeloblastic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 42:339–346CrossRefPubMed Allan DS, Buckstein R, Imrie KR (2001) Outpatient supportive care following chemotherapy for acute myeloblastic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma 42:339–346CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Halim TY, Song KW, Barnett MJ et al (2007) Positive impact of selective outpatient management of high-risk acute myelogenous leukemia on the incidence of septicemia. Ann Oncol 18:1246–1252CrossRefPubMed Halim TY, Song KW, Barnett MJ et al (2007) Positive impact of selective outpatient management of high-risk acute myelogenous leukemia on the incidence of septicemia. Ann Oncol 18:1246–1252CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Imataki O, Tamai Y, Watanabe M et al (2006) Central venous catheter-related thrombosis with infection in cancer patients—2 cases. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 33:1353–1356PubMed Imataki O, Tamai Y, Watanabe M et al (2006) Central venous catheter-related thrombosis with infection in cancer patients—2 cases. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 33:1353–1356PubMed
21.
go back to reference Tobinai K, Hotta T (2004) Clinical trials for malignant lymphoma in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34:369–378CrossRefPubMed Tobinai K, Hotta T (2004) Clinical trials for malignant lymphoma in Japan. Jpn J Clin Oncol 34:369–378CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
The duration of functioning of a subcutaneous implantable port for the treatment of hematological tumors: a single institution-based study
Authors
Hitoshi Ohno
Chisaki Mizumoto
Yoshihiro Otsuki
Shigeru Oguma
Yataro Yoshida
Publication date
01-04-2010
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
International Journal of Clinical Oncology / Issue 2/2010
Print ISSN: 1341-9625
Electronic ISSN: 1437-7772
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-010-0039-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2010

International Journal of Clinical Oncology 2/2010 Go to the issue
Webinar | 19-02-2024 | 17:30 (CET)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on antibody–drug conjugates in cancer

Antibody–drug conjugates (ADCs) are novel agents that have shown promise across multiple tumor types. Explore the current landscape of ADCs in breast and lung cancer with our experts, and gain insights into the mechanism of action, key clinical trials data, existing challenges, and future directions.

Dr. Véronique Diéras
Prof. Fabrice Barlesi
Developed by: Springer Medicine