Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Neurosurgical Review 1/2015

01-01-2015 | Original Article

In vivo porcine training model for cranial neurosurgery

Authors: Jan Regelsberger, Sven Eicker, Ioannis Siasios, Daniel Hänggi, Matthias Kirsch, Peter Horn, Peter Winkler, Stefano Signoretti, Kostas Fountas, Henry Dufour, Juan A. Barcia, Oliver Sakowitz, Thomas Westermaier, Michael Sabel, Oliver Heese

Published in: Neurosurgical Review | Issue 1/2015

Login to get access

Abstract

Supplemental education is desirable for neurosurgical training, and the use of human cadaver specimen and virtual reality models is routine. An in vivo porcine training model for cranial neurosurgery was introduced in 2005, and our recent experience with this unique model is outlined here. For the first time, porcine anatomy is illustrated with particular respect to neurosurgical procedures. The pros and cons of this model are described. The aim of the course was to set up a laboratory scenery imitating an almost realistic operating room in which anatomy of the brain and neurosurgical techniques in a mentored environment free from time constraints could be trained. Learning objectives of the course were to learn about the microsurgical techniques in cranial neurosurgery and the management of complications. Participants were asked to evaluate the quality and utility of the programme via standardized questionnaires by a grading scale from A (best) to E (worst). In total, 154 residents have been trained on the porcine model to date. None of the participants regarded his own residency programme as structured. The bleeding and complication management (97 %), the realistic laboratory set-up (89 %) and the working environment (94 %) were favoured by the vast majority of trainees and confirmed our previous findings. After finishing the course, the participants graded that their skills in bone drilling, dissecting the brain and preserving cerebral vessels under microscopic magnification had improved to level A and B. In vivo hands-on courses, fully equipped with microsurgical instruments, offer an outstanding training opportunity in which bleeding management on a pulsating, vital brain represents a unique training approach. Our results have shown that education programmes still lack practical training facilities in which in vivo models may act as a complementary approach in surgical training.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Alaraj A, Charbel FT, Birk D, Tobin M, Luciano C, Banerjee PP et al (2013) Role of cranial and spinal virtual and augmented reality simulation using immersive touch modules in neurosurgical training. Neurosurgery 72(Suppl 1):115–123PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Alaraj A, Charbel FT, Birk D, Tobin M, Luciano C, Banerjee PP et al (2013) Role of cranial and spinal virtual and augmented reality simulation using immersive touch modules in neurosurgical training. Neurosurgery 72(Suppl 1):115–123PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
2.
go back to reference Gurusamy KS, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR: Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD006575, 2009 Gurusamy KS, Aggarwal R, Palanivelu L, Davidson BR: Virtual reality training for surgical trainees in laparoscopic surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev:CD006575, 2009
3.
go back to reference Hwang G, Oh CW, Park SQ, Sheen SH, Bang JS, Kang HS (2010) Comparison of different microanastomosis training models: model accuracy and practicality. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 47:287–290PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef Hwang G, Oh CW, Park SQ, Sheen SH, Bang JS, Kang HS (2010) Comparison of different microanastomosis training models: model accuracy and practicality. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 47:287–290PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Lewis TM, Aggarwal R, Rajaretnam N, Grantcharov TP, Darzi A (2001) Training in surgical oncology—the role of VR simulation. Surg Oncol 20:134–139CrossRef Lewis TM, Aggarwal R, Rajaretnam N, Grantcharov TP, Darzi A (2001) Training in surgical oncology—the role of VR simulation. Surg Oncol 20:134–139CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Olabe J (2009) Microsurgical training on an in vitro chicken wing infusion model. Surg Neurol 72:695–699PubMedCrossRef Olabe J (2009) Microsurgical training on an in vitro chicken wing infusion model. Surg Neurol 72:695–699PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Olabe J, Roda J (2011) Microsurgical cerebral aneurysm training porcine model. Neurol India 59:78–81PubMedCrossRef Olabe J, Roda J (2011) Microsurgical cerebral aneurysm training porcine model. Neurol India 59:78–81PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Regelsberger J, Heese O, Horn P, Kirsch M, Eicker S, Sabel M et al (2011) Training microneurosurgery—four years experiences with an in vivo model. Cent Eur Neurosurg 72:192–195PubMedCrossRef Regelsberger J, Heese O, Horn P, Kirsch M, Eicker S, Sabel M et al (2011) Training microneurosurgery—four years experiences with an in vivo model. Cent Eur Neurosurg 72:192–195PubMedCrossRef
8.
go back to reference Spetzger U, von Schilling A, Brombach T, Winkler G (2011) Training models for vascular microneurosurgery. Acta Neurochir Suppl 112:115–119PubMedCrossRef Spetzger U, von Schilling A, Brombach T, Winkler G (2011) Training models for vascular microneurosurgery. Acta Neurochir Suppl 112:115–119PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
In vivo porcine training model for cranial neurosurgery
Authors
Jan Regelsberger
Sven Eicker
Ioannis Siasios
Daniel Hänggi
Matthias Kirsch
Peter Horn
Peter Winkler
Stefano Signoretti
Kostas Fountas
Henry Dufour
Juan A. Barcia
Oliver Sakowitz
Thomas Westermaier
Michael Sabel
Oliver Heese
Publication date
01-01-2015
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Neurosurgical Review / Issue 1/2015
Print ISSN: 0344-5607
Electronic ISSN: 1437-2320
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-014-0572-4

Other articles of this Issue 1/2015

Neurosurgical Review 1/2015 Go to the issue