Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Emergency Radiology 5/2010

Open Access 01-09-2010 | Pictorial Essay

Skull fracture vs. accessory sutures: how can we tell the difference?

Authors: Thomas Sanchez, Deborah Stewart, Matthew Walvick, Leonard Swischuk

Published in: Emergency Radiology | Issue 5/2010

Login to get access

Excerpt

Plain film radiography remains the most cost effective method in evaluating skull fractures and can easily differentiate major sutures and common vascular grooves from fractures. However, in children this can be complicated due to the presence of numerous synchondroses and unusual accessory sutures. Plain film evaluation is especially challenging not only because of various artifacts that can degrade the study but also the inability to visualize intracranial processes, such as contusions and hemorrhage, that can substantiate a calvarial finding. Minimal soft tissue swelling can be difficult to see even with oblique views. Superimposition of normal suture lines like the metopic suture can mimic a fracture if one is not careful to obtain additional views [1]. During the past decade, the increasing use of spiral and multidetector CT have lead to the ability of workstations to generate three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of the skull. Therefore if cranial CT is deemed clinically necessary in trauma patients, questionable fractures can be confidently differentiated from unusual accessory sutures using these additional workstation capabilities. …
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chasler C (1967) The newborn skull: the diagnosis of fracture. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 100(1):92–99PubMed Chasler C (1967) The newborn skull: the diagnosis of fracture. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med 100(1):92–99PubMed
2.
go back to reference Weir P, Suttner NJ, Flynn P, McAuley D (2006) Normal skull suture variant mimicking intentional injury. BMJ 332(7548):1020–1021CrossRefPubMed Weir P, Suttner NJ, Flynn P, McAuley D (2006) Normal skull suture variant mimicking intentional injury. BMJ 332(7548):1020–1021CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Franken EA Jr (1969) The midline occipital fissure: diagnosis of fracture versus anatomic variants. Radiology 93(5):1043–1046PubMed Franken EA Jr (1969) The midline occipital fissure: diagnosis of fracture versus anatomic variants. Radiology 93(5):1043–1046PubMed
4.
go back to reference Allen WE 3rd, Kier EL, Rothman SL (1973) Pitfalls in the evaluation of skull trauma. A review. Radiol Clin N Am 11(3):479–503PubMed Allen WE 3rd, Kier EL, Rothman SL (1973) Pitfalls in the evaluation of skull trauma. A review. Radiol Clin N Am 11(3):479–503PubMed
5.
go back to reference Nakahara K, Miyasaka Y, Takagi H, Kan S, Fujii K (2003) Unusual accessory cranial sutures in pediatric head trauma—case report. Neurol Med Chir 43(2):80–81CrossRef Nakahara K, Miyasaka Y, Takagi H, Kan S, Fujii K (2003) Unusual accessory cranial sutures in pediatric head trauma—case report. Neurol Med Chir 43(2):80–81CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Meservy CJ, Towbin R, McLaurin RL, Myers PA, Ball W (1987) Radiographic characteristics of skull fractures resulting from child abuse. Am J Roentgenol 149(1):173–175 Meservy CJ, Towbin R, McLaurin RL, Myers PA, Ball W (1987) Radiographic characteristics of skull fractures resulting from child abuse. Am J Roentgenol 149(1):173–175
8.
go back to reference Kleinman PK, Spevak MR (1992) Soft tissue swelling and acute skull fractures. J Pediatr 121(5):737–739CrossRefPubMed Kleinman PK, Spevak MR (1992) Soft tissue swelling and acute skull fractures. J Pediatr 121(5):737–739CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Fernando S, Obaldo RE, Walsh IR, Lowe LH (2008) Neuroimaging of nonaccidental head trauma: pitfalls and controversies. Pediatr Radiol 38(8):827–838CrossRefPubMed Fernando S, Obaldo RE, Walsh IR, Lowe LH (2008) Neuroimaging of nonaccidental head trauma: pitfalls and controversies. Pediatr Radiol 38(8):827–838CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Nakahara K, Utsuki S, Shimizu S, Iida H et al (2006) Age dependence of fusion of primary occipital sutures: a radiographic study. Childs Nerv Syst 22(11):1457–1459CrossRefPubMed Nakahara K, Utsuki S, Shimizu S, Iida H et al (2006) Age dependence of fusion of primary occipital sutures: a radiographic study. Childs Nerv Syst 22(11):1457–1459CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kemp AM, Butler A, Morris S, Mann M et al (2006) Which radiological investigations should be performed to identify fractures in suspected child abuse? Clin Radiol 61(9):723–736CrossRefPubMed Kemp AM, Butler A, Morris S, Mann M et al (2006) Which radiological investigations should be performed to identify fractures in suspected child abuse? Clin Radiol 61(9):723–736CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Sty JR, Starshak RJ (1983) The role of bone scintigraphy in the evaluation of the suspected abused child. Radiology 146(2):369–375PubMed Sty JR, Starshak RJ (1983) The role of bone scintigraphy in the evaluation of the suspected abused child. Radiology 146(2):369–375PubMed
Metadata
Title
Skull fracture vs. accessory sutures: how can we tell the difference?
Authors
Thomas Sanchez
Deborah Stewart
Matthew Walvick
Leonard Swischuk
Publication date
01-09-2010
Publisher
Springer-Verlag
Published in
Emergency Radiology / Issue 5/2010
Print ISSN: 1070-3004
Electronic ISSN: 1438-1435
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-010-0877-8

Other articles of this Issue 5/2010

Emergency Radiology 5/2010 Go to the issue