Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Gastric Cancer 1/2016

01-01-2016 | Original Article

Preoperative locoregional staging of gastric cancer: is there a place for magnetic resonance imaging? Prospective comparison with EUS and multidetector computed tomography

Authors: Francesco Giganti, Elena Orsenigo, Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono, Roberto Nicoletti, Luca Albarello, Alessandro Ambrosi, Annalaura Salerno, Antonio Esposito, Maria Chiara Petrone, Damiano Chiari, Carlo Staudacher, Alessandro Del Maschio, Francesco De Cobelli

Published in: Gastric Cancer | Issue 1/2016

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in the preoperative locoregional staging of gastric cancer.

Methods

This study had Institutional Review Board approval, and informed consent was obtained from all patients. Fifty-two patients with biopsy-proven gastric cancer underwent preoperative 1.5-T MRI, 64-channel MDCT and EUS. All images were analysed blind, and the results were compared with histopathological findings according to the seventh edition of the TNM classification. After the population had been divided on the basis of the local invasion (T1-3 vs T4a-b) and nodal involvement (N0 vs N+), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated and diagnostic performance measures were assessed using the McNemar test.

Results

For T staging, EUS showed higher sensitivity (94 %) than MDCT and MRI (65 and 76 %; p = 0.02 and p = 0.08). MDCT and MRI had significantly higher specificity (91 and 89 %) than EUS (60 %) (p = 0.0009 and p = 0.003). Adding MRI to MDCT or EUS did not result in significant differences for sensitivity. For N staging, EUS showed higher sensitivity (92 %) than MRI and MDCT (69 and 73 %; p = 0.01 and p = 0.02). MDCT showed better specificity (81 %) than EUS and MRI (58 and 73 %; p = 0.03 and p = 0.15).

Conclusions

Our prospective study confirmed the leading role of EUS and MDCT in the staging of gastric cancer and did not prove, at present, the value of the clinical use of MRI.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.PubMedCrossRef Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.PubMedCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.PubMedCrossRef Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.PubMedCrossRef
4.
go back to reference Ajani JA, Winter K, Okawara GS, Donohoue JH, Pisters PW, Crane CH, et al. Phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiation in patients with localized gastric adenocarcinoma (RTOG 9904): quality of combined modality therapy and pathologic response. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3953–8.PubMedCrossRef Ajani JA, Winter K, Okawara GS, Donohoue JH, Pisters PW, Crane CH, et al. Phase II trial of preoperative chemoradiation in patients with localized gastric adenocarcinoma (RTOG 9904): quality of combined modality therapy and pathologic response. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:3953–8.PubMedCrossRef
5.
go back to reference Ziegler K, Sanft C, Zimmer T, Zeitz M, Felsenberg D, Stein H, et al. Comparison of computed tomography, endosonography, and intraoperative assessment in TN staging of gastric carcinoma. Gut. 1993;34:604–10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ziegler K, Sanft C, Zimmer T, Zeitz M, Felsenberg D, Stein H, et al. Comparison of computed tomography, endosonography, and intraoperative assessment in TN staging of gastric carcinoma. Gut. 1993;34:604–10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Yoo MW. Diagnostic accuracy of T and N stages with endoscopy, stomach protocol CT, and endoscopic ultrasonography in early gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99(1):20–7.PubMedCrossRef Ahn HS, Lee HJ, Yoo MW. Diagnostic accuracy of T and N stages with endoscopy, stomach protocol CT, and endoscopic ultrasonography in early gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2009;99(1):20–7.PubMedCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Tsuzuki T, Okada H, Kawahara Y, Nasu J, Takenaka R, Inoue M, et al. Usefulness and problems of endoscopic ultrasonography in prediction of the depth of tumor invasion in early gastric cancer. Acta Med Okayama. 2011;65:105–12.PubMed Tsuzuki T, Okada H, Kawahara Y, Nasu J, Takenaka R, Inoue M, et al. Usefulness and problems of endoscopic ultrasonography in prediction of the depth of tumor invasion in early gastric cancer. Acta Med Okayama. 2011;65:105–12.PubMed
8.
go back to reference Kwee RM, Kwee TC. Imaging in local staging of gastric cancer: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2107–16.PubMedCrossRef Kwee RM, Kwee TC. Imaging in local staging of gastric cancer: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:2107–16.PubMedCrossRef
9.
go back to reference Habermann CR, Weiss F, Riecken R, Honarpisheh H, Bohnacker S, Staedtler C, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: comparison of helical CT and endoscopic US. Radiology. 2004;230:465–71.PubMedCrossRef Habermann CR, Weiss F, Riecken R, Honarpisheh H, Bohnacker S, Staedtler C, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric adenocarcinoma: comparison of helical CT and endoscopic US. Radiology. 2004;230:465–71.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Hwang SW, Lee DH, Lee SH, Park YS, Hwang JH, Kim JW, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric cancer by endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector-row computed tomography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:512–8.PubMedCrossRef Hwang SW, Lee DH, Lee SH, Park YS, Hwang JH, Kim JW, et al. Preoperative staging of gastric cancer by endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector-row computed tomography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:512–8.PubMedCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Chen CY, Wu DC, Kang WY, Hsu JS. Staging of gastric cancer with 16-channel MDCT. Abdom Imaging. 2006;31:514–20.PubMedCrossRef Chen CY, Wu DC, Kang WY, Hsu JS. Staging of gastric cancer with 16-channel MDCT. Abdom Imaging. 2006;31:514–20.PubMedCrossRef
12.
go back to reference Kim AY, Kim HJ, Ha HK. Gastric cancer by multidetector row CT: preoperative staging. Abdom Imaging. 2005;30:465–72.PubMedCrossRef Kim AY, Kim HJ, Ha HK. Gastric cancer by multidetector row CT: preoperative staging. Abdom Imaging. 2005;30:465–72.PubMedCrossRef
13.
go back to reference Kumano S, Muratami T, Kim T, Hori M, Iannacone R, Nakata S, et al. T staging of gastric cancer: role of multi-detector row CT. Radiology. 2005;237:961–6.PubMedCrossRef Kumano S, Muratami T, Kim T, Hori M, Iannacone R, Nakata S, et al. T staging of gastric cancer: role of multi-detector row CT. Radiology. 2005;237:961–6.PubMedCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Chen CY, Hsu JS, Wu DC, Kang WY, Hsieh JS, Jaw TS, et al. Gastric cancer preoperative local staging with 3D multi-detector row CT––correlation with surgical and histopathologic results. Radiology. 2007;242:472–82.PubMedCrossRef Chen CY, Hsu JS, Wu DC, Kang WY, Hsieh JS, Jaw TS, et al. Gastric cancer preoperative local staging with 3D multi-detector row CT––correlation with surgical and histopathologic results. Radiology. 2007;242:472–82.PubMedCrossRef
15.
go back to reference Yang DM, Kim HC, Jin W, Ryu CW, Kang JH, Park CH, et al. 64 multidetector-row computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer histological correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:98–103.PubMedCrossRef Yang DM, Kim HC, Jin W, Ryu CW, Kang JH, Park CH, et al. 64 multidetector-row computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of gastric cancer histological correlation. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2007;31:98–103.PubMedCrossRef
16.
go back to reference Anzidei M, Napoli A, Zaccagna F, Di Paolo P, Zini C, Cavallo Marincola B. Diagnostic performance of 64-MDCT and 1.5-T MRI with high resolution sequences in the T staging for gastric cancer: a comparative analysis with histopathology. Radiol Med. 2009;114:1065–79.PubMedCrossRef Anzidei M, Napoli A, Zaccagna F, Di Paolo P, Zini C, Cavallo Marincola B. Diagnostic performance of 64-MDCT and 1.5-T MRI with high resolution sequences in the T staging for gastric cancer: a comparative analysis with histopathology. Radiol Med. 2009;114:1065–79.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Giganti F, De Cobelli F, Canevari C, Orsenigo E, Gallivanone F, Esposito A, et al. Response to chemotherapy in gastric adenocarcinoma with diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG-PET/CT: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient and partial volume corrected standardized uptake value with histological tumor regression grade. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;40 (5):1147–57. doi:10.1002/jmri.2013.24464.PubMedCrossRef Giganti F, De Cobelli F, Canevari C, Orsenigo E, Gallivanone F, Esposito A, et al. Response to chemotherapy in gastric adenocarcinoma with diffusion-weighted MRI and 18F-FDG-PET/CT: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient and partial volume corrected standardized uptake value with histological tumor regression grade. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;40 (5):1147–57. doi:10.​1002/​jmri.​2013.​24464.PubMedCrossRef
18.
go back to reference Kang BC, Kim JH, Kim KW, Lee DY, Baek SY, Lee SW, et al. Value of the dynamic and delayed MR sequence with Gd-DTPA in the T staging of stomach cancer: correlation with histopathology. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:14–24.PubMedCrossRef Kang BC, Kim JH, Kim KW, Lee DY, Baek SY, Lee SW, et al. Value of the dynamic and delayed MR sequence with Gd-DTPA in the T staging of stomach cancer: correlation with histopathology. Abdom Imaging. 2000;25:14–24.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Sohn KM, Lee JM, Lee SY, Ahn BY, Park SM, Kim KM. Comparing MR imaging and CT in the staging of gastric carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1551–7.PubMedCrossRef Sohn KM, Lee JM, Lee SY, Ahn BY, Park SM, Kim KM. Comparing MR imaging and CT in the staging of gastric carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000;174:1551–7.PubMedCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Kim AY, Han JK, Seong CK, Kim TK, Choi B. MRI in staging advanced gastric cancer: is it useful compared with spiral CT? J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000;24(3):389–94.PubMedCrossRef Kim AY, Han JK, Seong CK, Kim TK, Choi B. MRI in staging advanced gastric cancer: is it useful compared with spiral CT? J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000;24(3):389–94.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Heye T, Kuntz C, Dux M, Encke J, Palmowski M, Autschbach F, et al. CT and endoscopic ultrasound in comparison to endoluminal MRI––preliminary results in staging gastric carcinoma. Eur J Radiol. 2009;70(2):336–41.PubMedCrossRef Heye T, Kuntz C, Dux M, Encke J, Palmowski M, Autschbach F, et al. CT and endoscopic ultrasound in comparison to endoluminal MRI––preliminary results in staging gastric carcinoma. Eur J Radiol. 2009;70(2):336–41.PubMedCrossRef
22.
go back to reference Peng CW, Wang LW, Zeng WJ, Yang XJ, Li Y. Evaluation of the staging systems for gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2013;108(2):93–105.PubMedCrossRef Peng CW, Wang LW, Zeng WJ, Yang XJ, Li Y. Evaluation of the staging systems for gastric cancer. J Surg Oncol. 2013;108(2):93–105.PubMedCrossRef
23.
go back to reference De Cobelli F, Giganti F, Orsenigo E, Cellina M, Esposito A, Agostini G, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient modifications in assessing gastro-oesophageal cancer response to neoadjuvant treatment: comparison with tumour regression grade at histology. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(8):2165–74.PubMedCrossRef De Cobelli F, Giganti F, Orsenigo E, Cellina M, Esposito A, Agostini G, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient modifications in assessing gastro-oesophageal cancer response to neoadjuvant treatment: comparison with tumour regression grade at histology. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(8):2165–74.PubMedCrossRef
24.
go back to reference Palmowski M, Grenacher L, Kuntz C, Heye T, Dux M. Magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of gastric carcinoma: results of an in vitro study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006;30:896–902.PubMedCrossRef Palmowski M, Grenacher L, Kuntz C, Heye T, Dux M. Magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of gastric carcinoma: results of an in vitro study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006;30:896–902.PubMedCrossRef
25.
go back to reference Kim IY, Kim SW, Shin HC, Lee MS, Jeong DJ, Kim CJ, et al. MRI of gastric carcinoma: results of T and N-staging in an in vitro study. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(32):3992–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Kim IY, Kim SW, Shin HC, Lee MS, Jeong DJ, Kim CJ, et al. MRI of gastric carcinoma: results of T and N-staging in an in vitro study. World J Gastroenterol. 2009;15(32):3992–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lee MH, Choi D, Park MJ, Lee MW. Gastric cancer: imaging and staging with MDCT based on the 7th AJCC guidelines. Abdom Imaging. 2012;37(4):531–40.PubMedCrossRef Lee MH, Choi D, Park MJ, Lee MW. Gastric cancer: imaging and staging with MDCT based on the 7th AJCC guidelines. Abdom Imaging. 2012;37(4):531–40.PubMedCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Chen CY, Hsu HS, Wu DC, Kang WY, Hsieh JS, Jaw TS. Gastric cancer: preoperative local staging with 3D multidetector row CT––correlation with surgical and histopatological results. Radiology. 2007;242(2):472–82.PubMedCrossRef Chen CY, Hsu HS, Wu DC, Kang WY, Hsieh JS, Jaw TS. Gastric cancer: preoperative local staging with 3D multidetector row CT––correlation with surgical and histopatological results. Radiology. 2007;242(2):472–82.PubMedCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Arocena MG, Barturen A, Bujanda L, Casado O, Ramirez MM, Oleagoitia JM, et al. MRI and endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of gastric cancer. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2006;98(8):582–90.PubMedCrossRef Arocena MG, Barturen A, Bujanda L, Casado O, Ramirez MM, Oleagoitia JM, et al. MRI and endoscopic ultrasonography in the staging of gastric cancer. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2006;98(8):582–90.PubMedCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Siewert JR, Stein HJ. Classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1457–9.PubMedCrossRef Siewert JR, Stein HJ. Classification of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1457–9.PubMedCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Hasegawa S, Yoshikawa T, Aoyama T, Hayashi T, Yamada T, Tsuchida K, et al. Esophagus or stomach? The seventh TNM classification for Siewert type II/III junctional adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(3):773–9.PubMedCrossRef Hasegawa S, Yoshikawa T, Aoyama T, Hayashi T, Yamada T, Tsuchida K, et al. Esophagus or stomach? The seventh TNM classification for Siewert type II/III junctional adenocarcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20(3):773–9.PubMedCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA, editors. World Health Organization classification of tumours. Vol. 3, Pathology & genetics. Tumours of the digestive system. 3rd ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000. Hamilton SR, Aaltonen LA, editors. World Health Organization classification of tumours. Vol. 3, Pathology & genetics. Tumours of the digestive system. 3rd ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2000.
33.
go back to reference Feng XY, Wang W, Luo GY, Wu J, Zhou ZW, Li W, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multislice spiral computed tomography for the preoperative staging of gastric cancer––results of a single institution study of 610 chinese patients. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e78846.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Feng XY, Wang W, Luo GY, Wu J, Zhou ZW, Li W, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multislice spiral computed tomography for the preoperative staging of gastric cancer––results of a single institution study of 610 chinese patients. PLoS One. 2013;8(11):e78846.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
go back to reference Maccioni F, Marcelli G, Al Ansari N, Zippi M, De Marco V, Kagarmanova A. Preoperative T and N staging of gastric cancer: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus multi detector computed tomography (MDCT). Clin Ter. 2010;161(2):57–62. Maccioni F, Marcelli G, Al Ansari N, Zippi M, De Marco V, Kagarmanova A. Preoperative T and N staging of gastric cancer: magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus multi detector computed tomography (MDCT). Clin Ter. 2010;161(2):57–62.
35.
go back to reference Choi JI, Joo I, Lee JM. State-of-the-art preoperative staging of gastric cancer by MDCT and magnetic resonance imaging. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(16):4546–57.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Choi JI, Joo I, Lee JM. State-of-the-art preoperative staging of gastric cancer by MDCT and magnetic resonance imaging. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20(16):4546–57.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Preoperative locoregional staging of gastric cancer: is there a place for magnetic resonance imaging? Prospective comparison with EUS and multidetector computed tomography
Authors
Francesco Giganti
Elena Orsenigo
Paolo Giorgio Arcidiacono
Roberto Nicoletti
Luca Albarello
Alessandro Ambrosi
Annalaura Salerno
Antonio Esposito
Maria Chiara Petrone
Damiano Chiari
Carlo Staudacher
Alessandro Del Maschio
Francesco De Cobelli
Publication date
01-01-2016
Publisher
Springer Japan
Published in
Gastric Cancer / Issue 1/2016
Print ISSN: 1436-3291
Electronic ISSN: 1436-3305
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-015-0468-1

Other articles of this Issue 1/2016

Gastric Cancer 1/2016 Go to the issue
Live Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

Live: Thursday 27th June 2024, 18:00-19:30 (CEST)

WHO estimates that half of all patients worldwide are non-adherent to their prescribed medication. The consequences of poor adherence can be catastrophic, on both the individual and population level.

Join our expert panel to discover why you need to understand the drivers of non-adherence in your patients, and how you can optimize medication adherence in your clinics to drastically improve patient outcomes.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Obesity Clinical Trial Summary

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine